No respite as confusion prevails over Delhi fuel ban, orders awaited
In a letter addressed to the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), Sirsa urged a pause to the enforcement of the order until the Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system is fully functional across the entire National Capital Region (NCR).The minister highlighted multiple operational roadblocks:Technological glitches and improperly placed ANPR cameras within DelhiLack of integration with NCR states' databasesUninstalled ANPR systems in adjoining regions like Gurugram and NoidaPotential rise in illegal fuel procurement due to cross-border loopholesWater Minister Parvesh Verma echoed these concerns, stating that ANPR implementation is flawed and age-based bans are irrational. 'Vehicles should be banned by looking at their pollution levels, not just their age,' he asserted, adding that uniform enforcement is absent across NCR cities.Verma also confirmed that Delhi officials are planning to meet with CAQM to iron out these issues.Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notices to the Delhi government and CAQM, following a plea by the Delhi Petrol Dealers Association, which challenged the legality of enforcing the at fuel stations.Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, in a statement on X, acknowledged the public distress, "This decision is adversely affecting the daily lives and livelihoods of millions of families We are fully committed to fighting air pollution, but the transition must be balanced with citizens' social and economic needs."Senior AAP leaders Saurabh Bharadwaj and Atishi, launched a scathing attack on the BJP-led Delhi Government over the controversial vehicle fuel ban, accusing it of acting in haste and lacking administrative clarity. Saurabh Bharadwaj mocked the government's handling of the policy, likening it to the fictional 'Phulera ki Panchayat,' and questioned why the government was so eager to enforce a ban allegedly based on a Supreme Court directive, only to now seek to bypass it. He criticised the overzealous push to implement the order by March 31 and questioned the role of the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), calling it a bureaucratic body rather than a judicial authority. "If they could revoke it now, why didn't they do so earlier?" he asked, raising doubts about the motivations behind the policy.advertisementDelhi Leader of Opposition Atishi echoed similar sentiments, branding the BJP as a 'government of U-turns' that acts under public pressure without any consistency or accountability. She pointed out that despite the public statements, no official order has yet been issued to withdraw the ELV fuel ban, further deepening the confusion. Atishi also alleged collusion between the BJP and automobile manufacturers, claiming the sudden push to scrap over 62 lakh vehicles in Delhi was driven by vested commercial interests rather than environmental concern. Demanding transparency, she challenged the BJP to reveal how much funding it had received from car manufacturers and scrap dealers, calling for answers to what she termed a betrayal of public trust.Despite the Delhi government's plea for postponement, CAQM is yet to issue a formal response, leaving fuel station operators in limbo. A worker at a Connaught Place petrol pump said, 'We haven't received any written order yet. Only when the company sends us a letter can we act accordingly.'advertisementUntil CAQM officially places the directive on hold, the ban technically remains in effect, adding to the ongoing confusion among citizens and enforcement bodies.Subscribe to Auto Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Yellow Line delay: BJP slams Bengaluru Metro, Congress attacks Centre
Bengaluru: The long-delayed Yellow Line of Namma Metro, meant to link RV Road with Electronics City, has become the latest flashpoint between BJP and the ruling Congress over why the Rs 7,000-crore corridor remains idle despite being physically complete for over two years. With just three out of the required train sets delivered, and a fourth expected by late July, the line's opening has been repeatedly pushed — from 2021 to 2022, and now tentatively to Aug 2025. That too hinges on two pending clearances: the independent safety assessment (ISA) for the line's signalling system, and a statutory inspection by the commissioner of metro rail safety (CMRS), likely only after July 15. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru BJP has called for a "Citizen March" Saturday, accusing the Congress govt and BMRCL of misleading Bengalureans with missed deadlines. Bangalore South MP Tejasvi Surya, along with other senior party functionaries, including R Ashoka, are slated to meet BMRCL MD Maheshwar Rao at 9.30am demanding accountability. Surya said: "This line was supposed to open in 2021. Then in 2022. Then before the 2024 elections. Now they say July. No one knows when it will actually open. People are stuck in traffic while a fully built Metro line sits unused. BMRCL is taking Bengalureans for granted." But Congress has pushed back sharply — turning the spotlight on the BJP-led Centre, which jointly funds BMRCL and oversees key safety and administrative clearances. State transport minister Ramalinga Reddy said: "BJP ruled Karnataka for four years and at the Centre for 11. Why haven't they ensured coach supply or fast-tracked CMRS inspections? They should hold their own govt accountable." A Congress delegation is also scheduled to meet the BMRCL MD at 9am Saturday, demanding that the Centre expedite the remaining approvals and train supply to prevent further delays. The 19-km elevated Yellow Line, which passes through one of Bengaluru's most congested corridors, is expected to ease traffic for lakhs of commuters. 1-hour disruption on Purple Line Metro services on the Purple Line will be partially disrupted Sunday, due to scheduled maintenance work between Indiranagar and Baiyappanahalli stations. As per BMRCL, operations between Swami Vivekananda Metro Station and Baiyappanahalli will be halted for one hour from 7am to 8am. All other stretches of the Purple Line, including Challaghatta to Indiranagar and Baiyappanahalli to Whitefield (Kadugodi), will function as usual.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Nitin Gadkari's app-cab reform: Drivers to get care, customer is the king
In India's booming app-based cab economy, often the only thing that matters for the consumer is not the technology or the car but the most-ignored cog in the wheel: the driver. Whether you step out grinning or groaning from an Ola/Uber ride depends on that crucial factor—how was the driver?Now, the Union ministry of road transport and highways, under Nitin Gadkari, seems to have finally accepted this elementary truth more than ever before. The newly revised Motor Vehicles Aggregator Guidelines 2025, published recently, take into account mental health reviews for drivers as well as how much their work schedules can be stretched, among other things. For an industry defined by long hours, fickle pay and frequent confrontational customers, it can be a game new guidelines, revised from an earlier set in 2020, say drivers will also get better insurance cover: Rs 15 lakh as term insurance and Rs 7.5 lakh for health, a big jump from the earlier Rs 10 lakh and Rs 5 lakh, respectively. It's a long overdue correction for a workforce that hasn't had access to the safety nets available to employees in the more formal bottomline: when drivers are safer, healthier and more secure, they are better able to serve customers; the roads get safer too. This has been underpinned by a growing acceptance within government that it is the people, as opposed to the infrastructure, that shape passengers' experience. That said, the refreshed and forward-looking 2025 regulations are not exactly mandatory. Transport may be on the Concurrent List of the Indian Constitution, but there's precious little the Centre can do to compel a state into legislating on transport matters. So it would be for each state government to either accept or adjust the recommendations. BJP-ruled states will probably fall in line, but others may hesitate, stall or even ignore the changes. It is, therefore, a wishlist with all the good there are several good upgrades in the guidelines as well, such as the way data is to be treated by the aggregators, as per the new Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Aggregators are now required to keep for a finite time—mininum three months, maximum two years—data generated by the Indian app on Indian servers and in compliance with the Indian data laws. It is part of a shift away from casual data-governance practices that used to be the norm, especially in the gig also a green nudge. Previously, states had the option to offer incentives for electric vehicles purchased within aggregator fleets. The rules now require action: at least 5 per cent of an aggregator's fleet must be electric within the first year of the notice, and that number must double in the second year. It's an aggressive play in a sector that has been slow to see EV adoption, largely because of the erratic charging infrastructure and higher out-of-pocket costs. Also, the demise of BluSmart has been a may finally have some bite. For instance, customers can now know the break-up of fares before booking their rides, ending opaque pricing that often left riders in the dark. If it takes the driver more than five minutes past promised time, riders will have a clear right to cancel the ride without penalty. Also, passengers are meant to be compensated if a driver cancels for no good training and safety protocols are improved as well. The old guidelines addressed gender sensitisation only. But the new ones say drivers have to learn about sexual harassment and how to protect the vulnerable—children and seniors and women. The guidelines stress there should be a clear way to escalate complaints in the the gulf between policy and practice remains wide. Aggregator platforms, known for finding ways to sidestep worker protections in the gig economy in the name of technological neutrality, are likely to slow down on implementing the more stringent rules. And unless state governments have the political will for enforcement, these may well remain on all in all, by making the driver the centerpiece of the ride-hailing equation, the government is signalling a new norm. While it could still be a bumpy ride, a lot of the potholes look set to be filled should the states play to India Today Magazine- EndsTune InMust Watch
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
CJI Gavai assures ‘complete transparency' in the collegium system for appointments
Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai on Friday (July 4, 2025) said that the collegium system for appointment of judges would uphold the principles of merit, transparency, and inclusive representation, and asserted that the process would not be compromised by external pressures. Speaking at a felicitation event hosted by the Bombay Bar Association in his honour, CJI Gavai remarked, 'We will adopt a procedure of complete transparency. Merit will never be compromised. We will have representatives from all sections of society.' CJI Gavai, who took charge as the 52nd Chief Justice of India in May, noted that efforts to increase transparency within the collegium had already been under way during the tenure of his predecessor, Justice Sanjiv Khanna. He also addressed recent concerns raised publicly by Justice Dipankar Datta about alleged interference in the collegium's functioning, stating that all names recommended would be duly followed up and considered fairly. Reflecting on his own elevation to the Supreme Court in 2019, CJI Gavai revealed that not all members of the collegium were initially in support. 'One of the collegium judges had some reservations, thinking my elevation might lead to unrest among senior members of the Mumbai Bar,' he said. 'But several senior lawyers met the judge in Delhi and clarified the matter.' He expressed gratitude to the Bombay Bar Association, saying, 'I will always remain indebted. My elevation to the Supreme Court, and now as Chief Justice of India, would not have been possible without the Bar's support.' The Chief Justice also clarified that the Supreme Court should not be viewed as being centred around one individual. 'The Supreme Court is not a CJI-centric court. The Chief Justice is only the first among equals,' he said. Deliberately avoiding public statements or interviews at the time of assuming office, CJI Gavai said he preferred to let his actions speak. 'Rather than laying out a roadmap, I chose not to make promises. Let my work speak for itself when I retire six months from now,' he added. On the reasons for the high pendency in Bombay High Court, CJI Gavai said, 'Insofar as my own High Court is concerned, I can assure that the names, whatever are recommended, we will try to follow it up and as soon as possible, the Bombay HC starts functioning at a full strength so that at least the issue of pendency is resolved at least to some extent.'
