UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
The Metropolitan Police said officers arrested 532 people on Saturday, 522 of them for displaying items in support of the proscribed group. A breakdown of the arrest figures released on Sunday revealed that 348 of those apprehended were age 50 or over, The Independent newspaper reported.
The protest, organized by Defend Our Juries, an organization that 'supports collective action to expose this corruption of democracy and the rule of law,' took place after ministers warned they would take action against anyone who showed public support for Palestine Action, which was designated a terrorist organization last month.
Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones defended the crackdown, saying: 'The right to peacefully protest in this country is a cornerstone of our democracy, and of course we respect that. But with regards to Palestine Action, they are a proscribed terrorist organization and their actions have not been peaceful.
'They have violently carried out criminal damage to RAF aircraft. We have credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons which we can't disclose because of national security.
'But they are a proscribed terrorist organization and anyone showing support for that terrorist organization will feel the full force of the law.'
The prime minister's office also defended the proscription, saying it followed 'strong security advice' and citing attacks said to be linked to the group involving violence, injury and criminal damage.
Officials said the UK's Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had linked the group to three separate acts of terrorism.
However, the move drew sharp criticism from across the political spectrum.
Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, a member of Starmer's ruling Labour Party and of the House of Lords, warned that the ban risked deepening social divisions.
'The proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions,' she told The Independent, referring to a highly unpopular taxation policy of former prime minister Margaret Thatcher's government that led to violent protests in the early 1990s across the UK.
'The courts have already found an arguable case that it breaches fundamental rights and more, not less, people are coming out to protest against both atrocities in Gaza and inappropriate use of terror laws at home.
'The notable presence of so many older people highlights the strength of genuine feeling. Criminal damage at air force bases can be prosecuted, but sweeping guilt by association only exacerbates community tensions and creates a bigger headache for the police.'
Former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the arrests as 'madness,' and said Palestine Action was 'not equivalent' to terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda or Daesh, adding that this was why he had voted against its ban.
Independent MP Diane Abbott said: 'The government is in danger of making itself look both draconian and foolish.'
Left-wing Labour MP Nadia Whittome, who also opposed the ban, accused ministers of 'conflating protest with terrorism.' In a message posted on social media platform X, she said: 'Last month, I warned that proscribing Palestine Action would result in the mass criminalization of people who are not even members of the group. Now, more than 500 people have been arrested. I voted against the proscription; we shouldn't be conflating protest with terrorism.'
Former chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal warned that the mass arrests would clog the justice system: 'These would probably be jury trials as each of them would be advised to plead not guilty and expect a trial in 2027 at the earliest. I also suspect that no jury would convict anyhow.'
Amnesty International described the level of policing as 'disproportionate to the point of absurdity.'
Its chief executive, Sacha Deshmukh, said: 'Peaceful protest is a fundamental right. People are understandably outraged by the ongoing genocide being committed in Gaza and are entitled under international human rights law to express their horror.
'The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists. We have long criticized UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded, and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.'
Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said the protest would 'go down in our country's history as a momentous act of collective defiance of an unprecedented attack on our fundamental freedoms.'
She argued that the large number of people granted street bail showed the law was 'unenforceable.' Street bail is a process under which arrested individuals can be granted bail before they are taken to a police station.
Under the UK's Terrorism Act 2000, membership of or support for a proscribed organization carries a maximum prison term of 14 years. In some cases, prosecutions require approval from both the Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney General.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
UK rights watchdog warns police to avoid ‘heavy-handed' policing of Gaza protests
LONDON: Britain's human rights watchdog has urged ministers and police chiefs to avoid 'heavy-handed' tactics when policing demonstrations over the war in Gaza, saying that such actions risk creating a 'chilling effect' on the right to protest, it was reported on Friday. In a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, the Equality and Human Rights Commission chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner said the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy' and any interference 'must be lawful and assessed case by case.' Her intervention follows reports of individuals facing police action at recent demonstrations despite not expressing support for any banned organizations. The EHRC cited the case of Laura Murton, who in July was threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act by Kent Police in July for holding a Palestinian flag and signs reading 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide' during a demonstration in Canterbury. Murton told officers she did not support any proscribed groups but was reportedly warned that her actions were linked to Palestine Action — which in July was banned by the government. Membership of or support for the group is a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act, carrying a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison. 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences,' Falkner said. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections,' she added. She called on the UK government and police to ensure 'all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' so that 'the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights.' In a separate statement, she said that the right to peaceful protest was fundamental to British democracy and must be protected even when dealing with complex and sensitive issues. 'We recognize the genuine challenges the police face in maintaining public safety, but we are concerned that some recent responses may not strike the right balance between security and fundamental rights,' she said. 'Our role as the national human rights institution is to uphold the laws that safeguard everyone's right to fairness, dignity and respect. When we see reports of people being questioned or prevented from peaceful protests that don't support proscribed organisations, we have a duty to speak out,' she added. Last weekend, more than 500 people were arrested in London, most on suspicion of displaying items deemed supportive of Palestine Action. Police figures indicate that half of those detained were aged 60 or older. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury, extensive criminal damage,' citing evidence and security assessments presented in closed court. The group has rejected the claims as 'false and defamatory,' saying they were contradicted by the government's own intelligence. Meanwhile, campaigners including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Quakers in Britain have urged Attorney General Richard Hermer to delay prosecution decisions for those arrested until after a High Court challenge to Palestine Action's proscription, set for November. They argued that moving ahead before the court's ruling 'raises significant legal and moral questions' and that delaying action 'would demonstrate restraint, fairness and respect for the ongoing legal process.' Murton's lawyers have also issued a letter of claim to Kent Police over her case, which they said was intended to remind forces across the country of their obligations to protect peaceful protest.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
UK police seize Andrew Tate's $240,000 Aston Martin deposit
UK police said Friday they had seized a £180,000 ($240,000) deposit misogynist influencer Andrew Tate put down on an Aston Martin supercar amid allegations of unpaid taxes and money laundering. The amount paid towards the Aston Martin Valhalla car will be added to a pot of £2.7 million already seized from Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan in December 2024. Devon and Cornwall police in southwest England last year won a legal bid to seize the deposit, paid by Andrew Tate in July 2021 from a cryptocurrency account. The Tate brothers did not oppose the police's decision to pursue the funds, half of which can now be distributed to 'good causes' while the other half will be spent on public services. A London court was told the funds used to pay the deposit 'were the proceeds of tax and VAT evasion and money laundering,' according to a statement by the police. Passing judgement in the civil fraud case last year, Judge Paul Goldspring, who also presided over the latest order, said the influencer brothers, who have millions of followers on social media, had 'engaged in long-standing conduct to evade their tax.' Andrew Tate often boasts online about his multi-million-dollar supercar collection, which forms a key part of his persona promoting toxic masculinity and hustle culture. In an X post earlier this month, he claimed to own 93 cars. He moved to Romania years ago after first starting a webcam business and then became a reality TV star in the UK. Tate later turned to social media platforms to promote his divisive views, including misogynistic and sometimes violent maxims. The Tate brothers face allegations of trafficking minors, sexual intercourse with a minor and money laundering in Romania. They also face rape and assault allegations in separate cases in Britain, with a civil trial due in June 2026. The brothers, who have British-US nationality, have denied all accusations.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
UK government must suspend Palestine Action prosecutions until ban review: Rights groups
LONDON: Protesters arrested under the UK's Terrorism Act for supporting the banned group Palestine Action should not be prosecuted while there is a legal challenge against the ban, rights groups have told the government. Organizations including Greenpeace and Human Rights Watch sent a letter to Lord Hermer, the attorney general for England and Wales, urging the delay in prosecutions, The Guardian reported on Friday. More than 500 people, half of whom are aged 60 or older, were arrested at a London demonstration last weekend under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, which prohibits public displays of support for proscribed groups. Proceeding with prosecutions amid a judicial review into the ban on Palestine Action would raise significant legal and moral questions, said the letter, which was also signed by Friends of the Earth, Global Witness and the Quakers. The review is expected to be heard in November. Lord Hermer must act 'in the public interest' and take decisive action over the question of prosecution, the letter said. Rather than the Crown Prosecution Service having decision-making powers over the prosecutions, the attorney general can decide the appropriate course of action on cases falling under the Terrorism Act, it added. Most of those arrested at the London rally were bailed, but at least 10 protesters have been charged. In their letter, the rights group said no one else should be charged, and those who have should not be prosecuted before the findings of the judicial reviews, which could overturn the ban on Palestine Action. Co-executive director of Greenpeace UK, Areeba Hamid, said: 'Hundreds of people are facing potential prison sentences for sitting quietly holding placards. It isn't difficult to see why this could be a disproportionate restriction on people's freedom of expression, and why so many legal experts have expressed their concern at the government's decision to extend their definition of terrorism in this way. 'We urge the attorney general to approach the matter with care and some caution, and not prejudge the outcome of a judicial review which could fundamentally change the legal position of these protesters.' The British judge who granted permission for the judicial review feared that those charged with criminal offenses under the Terrorism Act might individually challenge the Palestine Action ban's legality when tried. This could lead to a variation in findings and inconsistencies among different criminal courts, creating 'a recipe for chaos,' the judge said. The letter to Lord Hermer added: 'Prosecuting individuals for offences connected to that proscription before the court has determined its legality raises significant legal and moral questions. 'In particular, one of the grounds which the judge held had merit was that the proscription of Palestine Action was a disproportionate interference with human rights. 'We therefore respectfully request that you exercise your constitutional role in the public interest by delaying any decisions to prosecute individuals arrested under terrorism legislation in connection with Palestine Action until the conclusion of the judicial review process.'
