
No one can live like this, say Ramaphosa informal settlement residents amid growing sanitation crisis
For months, residents of the Ramaphosa informal settlement in Vereeniging, located about 50 kilometres from Johannesburg, have been battling a serious sanitation crisis. Their portable toilets have not been cleaned, and some have become so badly infested with maggots that many have been left with no choice but to rely on the bucket system.
Approximately 3,000 households live in the Ramaphosa informal settlement, where there is no formal housing, electricity, or proper roads. Although there are taps, residents say that water supply is inconsistent.
With no access to electricity, most people use candles, paraffin lamps, and stoves for lighting and cooking.
'Some of us are women and it is very easy to get infections, so we had no choice but to use the buckets to relieve ourselves,' said Ayanda Mpuluseng.
Mpuluseng has been a resident in the area since 2019.
The settlement itself was the result of an illegal land occupation in 2018 and is named after the country's first citizen, Cyril Ramaphosa. It falls under the ailing Emfuleni Local Municipality.
The municipality, encompassing Evaton, Sebokeng, Sharpeville, Boipatong, Bophelong and Tshepiso townships, remains one of the poorest performing municipalities in Gauteng province, as can be seen in Good Governance Africa's (GGA) Governance Performance Index from March 2025.
Disgruntled residents
On Monday, 26 May 2025, the Democratic Alliance conducted an oversight visit to the area.
'Please do the right thing,' shouted one resident to a DA delegation.
As the delegation reached out to the man, Nicholas Ziyane, he shared the plight of his living conditions, pleading with them to bring about change.
Ziyane initially scolded the delegation: 'Why do you come when you only want votes?'
The delegation was quick to defend itself, saying this was not the case as elections were still far away.
'No one can live this, please help us sir,' Ziyane said.
Another resident, Priscilla Sello, told the delegation that her toilet had been cleaned last week, after about four months of not being serviced.
Although Sello was relieved that her toilet had finally been cleaned, she feared she might find herself in the same situation again.
'I am happy they came to clean, but they might come back again only after three months,' she said.
Although most yards appear to have their own toilets Sello said this was not the case for everyone, saying she shared a toilet with about nine other households.
The DA's Mervyn Cirota, an MPL and Gauteng Shadow MEC for Human Settlements, said: 'This is unacceptable and indicates the Gauteng government's lack of involvement in municipal affairs.
'The government's reactive approach only responds to crises when they hit the headlines — such as the recent attempts to empty the toilets in Ramaphosa informal settlement after public outrage. This is disappointing as these quick fixes do not address the real challenge,' Cirota said.
ANC councillor Taliyana Zinyana said the sanitation problems in the area were longstanding because the provincial government failed to appoint service providers on time to clean and maintain the toilets.
She said one company was hired to do the job from March to June 2025. After that, the province delayed appointing a new provider, leaving residents without any services for about two months, although some residents say it was as long as four months.
Zinyana said the MMC for human settlements had since met with two previous service providers and asked them to help the community. Both had agreed to assist for now.
It's still unclear when a new service provider will be officially appointed, as the provincial treasury has not yet approved the budget.
'At the moment I have no idea when it will be resolved, unless it has been communicated to the MMC or the MEC,' Zinyana said.
'It's a disaster'
Water is another major challenge for the community. Some taps have been dry for months, forcing residents to depend on their neighbours for water. But even that isn't guaranteed, as some neighbours also face inconsistent water supply and sometimes refuse to share.
Sizwe Basa, a resident wearing an ANC T-shirt featuring an image of Ramaphosa, said that despite the many challenges facing the community, he would continue to vote for the ANC.
'As you can see, my sister, nothing works here. We don't have electricity, we have the water sometimes, but I don't trust other politicians (from the DA). I think they just want the votes and nothing else,' Basa said.
Just metres from the informal settlement is Rustervaal, a predominantly coloured community facing similar challenges — one of the biggest being illegal dumping, which residents say is taking a toll on their health.
Marta Hermans, who was born and raised in the area, lives next to a dumping site used by both local residents and people from nearby informal settlements.
'Trash was last collected in January,' she said. 'It's bad because even our health is now compromised. My child is even now suffering from asthma because of this.'
Hermans said residents had tried to clean the area themselves, but their efforts hadn't made much of a difference.
'Community members tried to clean up the dump, but that did not yield positive results as residents were forced to come back to the dump as trash is not collected,' she said.
Facing the dumping site is a community church, part of which is used by the Lerato Dropping Centre, a non-profit organisation that provides breakfast and lunch to more than 350 children. The centre also helps disadvantaged children with homework and offers other support.
Pitso Thomas and Yvonne McColen, who work at the centre, said the ongoing dumping problem made their work more difficult.
'The illegal dumping really affects the work we do because we are dealing with children here, and the sad part is that we clean daily but there is no difference. When health inspectors come, it looks like we are not clean,' said McColen.
'In summer, it is worse. It's a disaster, actually,' added Thomas.
With local government elections set for 2026, most residents in the area feel despondent.
Esther Bowers de Kork said she had lost faith in politicians. She was seen at an illegal dumping site where she had been forced to dispose of her waste due to the lack of refuse collection.
Asked about waste collection, Zinyana said it was a serious challenge that the municipality had committed to resolving soon, but without giving any timeframes.
Bowers de Kork also criticised the high levels of crime and the presence of illegal immigrants in the area.
'I do not vote any more because the government has failed me, not me alone but all of us.'
EWN reported that Premier Panyaza Lesufi said it was unacceptable for the government to neglect basic services such as cleaning toilets. He has directed the provincial human settlements department to urgently address and resolve the sanitation crisis.
'I had a very not-so-nice meeting with the HOD and MEC of human settlements because this matter has been brought to my attention. We just need to attend to it and resolve it,' he said. DM

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Mkhwanazi ad hoc committee adopts draft terms of reference in ‘marathon', ‘poorly managed' meeting
The final draft of the terms of reference is expected to be circulated to MPs within two days. Parliament's Ad Hoc Committee investigating KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's explosive allegations has adopted draft terms of reference after over 10 hours of deliberation. The committee, which met virtually on Monday, was tasked with considering and adopting the framework that will guide how MPs conduct their inquiry. The document, initially presented last week, outlines the purpose of the process, procedures for witness testimony, and other operational details. The committee, which has until 31 October to conclude its work, will operate independently of the judicial commission of inquiry, which is also set to investigate Mkhwanazi's claims. The commission will be chaired by former acting deputy chief justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga. Mkhwanazi ad hoc committee debates terms of reference The meeting, scheduled to run from 11am to 2pm, stretched late into the night as MPs debated which clauses should remain, be amended, or be removed. Parliament's legal services division presented the initial draft terms of reference, while political parties also made their submissions. The document's table of contents covered areas such as the legal framework, the objectives and scope of the inquiry, provisions for public participation, allocation of resources, the timeframe, and the venues for meetings. After adopting the first section, MPs debated proposals by the MK party relating to the legal framework, including how to handle classified and sensitive information. ALSO READ: Parties question ANC MP's election in Mkhwanazi ad hoc committee, logistics concerns raised Most members agreed that the committee should adhere to existing National Assembly protocols. 'There is a process for documents that are classified to be declassified legally, and I would like this committee to unravel whatever criminality. 'We do know that documents pretty much get classified to cover up criminality. So there is legislation available to us,' said EFF MP Leigh‐Ann Mathys. The MK party also suggested that the committee refer matters to relevant authorities rather than determining criminal liability, to preserve the separation of powers. Watch part one of the meeting: Objectives of the inquiry The Democratic Alliance (DA) proposed that monthly progress reports be submitted to the National Assembly. However, parliamentary legal adviser Andile Tetyana reminded members that the committee is only mandated to submit a final report by the end of October. He also noted that the DA's suggestion to probe possible human rights abuses and the role of unions in shielding compromised police officers would require expanding the committee's scope. READ MORE: 'Same as Phala Phala' – Police committee member not optimistic about Mchunu investigations 'This falls outside of the scope of the House resolution,' Tetyana said. DA MP Ian Cameron defended the idea of regular updates. 'It is a good principle to have consistent feedback, especially when there might be a frustration due to previous inquiries, whether in or outside Parliament, that people, particularly the public, feel that they are not taken into confidence.' Scope and logistics MPs then debated the scope of the inquiry. The ANC proposed that Mkhwanazi's allegations form the basis for identifying witnesses. The committee's chairperson, Soviet Lekganyane, confirmed that the KZN police commissioner would ideally be the first witness, with others called depending on his testimony. DA MP Lisa‐Maré Schickerling supported the approach but urged careful wording. 'We don't have an issue with it; however, we cannot only say that we are going to base everything on one person because other information is going to come out.' External legal counsel will be limited to collecting, organising, and presenting evidence. READ MORE: Ramaphosa says Madlanga commission mustn't take more than one year They will also determine the questioning format for witnesses, in consultation with the chairperson and committee. The MK party's proposal to appoint an external forensic investigator was rejected. According to Tetyana, public participation will be key to the process. Hearings are expected to begin in Johannesburg before resuming in Cape Town after the parliamentary recess. Watch part two of the meeting: On venues, the terms of reference recommend physical sittings in the parliamentary precinct or another suitable location. Virtual and hybrid sessions were ruled out. MPs also agreed that extensions could be sought from the Speaker or through a parliamentary resolution if needed. Detailed timelines will be set out in a draft programme by parliamentary staff, rather than being included in the terms of reference itself. 'Marathon meeting' Some MPs expressed frustration with how the meeting was managed. 'In my view, the proceedings have been wholly inadequate and have done less to support the virtual work of this committee and more to frustrate what should have been a clear and coherent process in adopting the terms of reference. 'We moved haphazardly from page to page between vastly different and unrelated submissions in a manner that was neither coherent nor streamlined, leaving the process unnecessarily confusing,' ActionSA MP Dereleen James said. James also accused some MPs of undermining the decorum of the meeting with constant interjections. 'This meeting was poorly managed,' she added. MK party MP David Skosana described it as a 'marathon meeting'. The final draft of the terms of reference is expected to be circulated to members within two days. NOW READ: Here are some of the rules outlining Parliament's Mkhwanazi allegations probe


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Cartoon of the day: 19 August 2025
The government has been accused of trying to control the process around the National Dialogue. The National Dialogue has been criticised after the ANC was accused of hijacking what was supposed to be a process led by civil society. Six legacy foundations, as well as the DA and Freedom Front Plus, pulled out of the National Dialogue after complaining that the government was trying to control the process. Before the National Dialogue properly got underway, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Oliver & Adelaide Tambo Foundation and Desmond & Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation all pulled out. President Cyril Ramaphosa, however, brushed off their absence, saying that he has to be 'allowed to be the president'. READ NEXT: National Dialogue has big gaps in it


Daily Maverick
12 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Corrupt public and private sector collaborators are taking us all down
Whenever I think of the rampant plundering of South Africa's public resources, a childhood story comes to mind. When I grew up in Port Alfred, there was a Reverend Maguma who had a shop. On evenings and weekends, his sons manned the shop because he was running his church. As young boys who were the sons' friends, we would flock there every day because they sold us items at half price or sometimes just gave them to us for nothing. Some of us would even resell those to others and earn money. In no time, Rev Maguma had to shut down his shop because it couldn't sustain the losses. Just like the public leaders and servants who plunder the public purse today, the sons were eating the very capital that could have made a material difference in their own and (later) their children's lives. Similarly, the short-sightedness of the merchants of corruption blinds them from seeing how the resources they steal could help end poverty in South Africa. If things continue to deteriorate, South Africa Inc will soon close shop, thus exacerbating its already fragile state. Every year, the Fund for Peace produces the Fragile States Index. In the 2024 Fragile States Index, South Africa ranks 80th globally out of 179 countries assessed, with an overall score of 69.6 (on a scale where higher scores denote greater fragility). This marks a modest improvement from its 2023 score of 72, but remains well above the global average of about 64.6. According to the Fund for Peace's methodology, the Fragile States Index assesses countries using 12 indicators grouped under social, economic, political and cross-cutting dimensions. For South Africa in 2024, several specific vulnerabilities stand out: Economic decline: Economic instability is evident from recessionary pressures, high unemployment (especially among the young), and rising inequality; Uneven economic development: Deep structural inequalities along racial and geographic lines persist, exacerbating social tensions; Demographic pressures: Rapid urbanisation and population growth strain infrastructure and public services; Public services: Service delivery challenges – especially in health, education, and municipal governance – contribute to governance fragility. This is attested by Good Governance Africa's own Governance Performance Index, which measures local government service delivery efficacy; State legitimacy: Corruption, institutional mistrust and poor political accountability erode public confidence in the state; Factionalised elites: Political factionalism and elite competition affect policymaking and cohesion; and Additionally, human rights and rule of law issues, human capital flight and brain drain further elevate South Africa's fragility risk profile. South Africa's relatively high Fragile States Index score — 69.6 — puts it in the moderate-to-warning zone. As the Fund for Peace characterises fragile states, these factors reflect 'an erosion of legitimate authority', inability to provide adequate public services and rising economic decline, demographic pressure and uneven development. In the story of the reverend's shop, it was not just his sons who were involved in making the shop's financial position fragile. I, my friends and many others participated in the collapse of that business because we were simply greedy and selfish. All we cared about was our stomachs. The same greed and selfishness are what drive private sector players to continue to collaborate with – and even wilfully enable – greedy government officials. Private sector role The private sector in South Africa has played a significant role in perpetuating corruption, often acting as a conduit for illicit activities that undermine good governance. The Zondo Commission Report highlights this troubling dynamic, noting that 'corruption in the private sector often facilitates public sector corruption, creating a corrupt symbiosis that hampers economic development'. This is also a problem identified at the global level in Transparency International's Annual Corruption Perception Index. The Zondo report also underscores how 'businesses have sometimes engaged in practices such as bribery, nepotism and fraud to secure contracts and influence government decisions'. Influential reports, including the High-Level Panel on the Assessment of Key Legislation and the Public Protector's reports, further emphasise the depth of private sector involvement. These insights reveal a pattern where the private sector's complicity in corrupt activities sustains a cycle that debilitates South Africa's democracy and economic stability. Just like we never stopped until the shop closed, indications are that the corrupt private sector players will never stop until this country's public finances, economy and the state collapse completely. The shareholders of these companies often do not live in South Africa and so feel that they can simply offload the costs of corruption on to our society while laughing all the way to the (foreign) bank. Reverend Maguma's hands-off approach, his blind trust in his sons, his distraction and lack of consequent management didn't help the situation. He let his sons continue working the till when they didn't have the moral clarity, commitment to the family business and maturity to handle the business. It is the same with President Cyril Ramaphosa and his government. Many of the people in senior and influential positions have neither the ethical underpinnings nor the love for the people and commitment to the country's growth that is needed to lift us up from the morass we are currently in. There appear to be no immediate and visible negative consequences for corruption for the most part. Priorities The distraction of so many priorities is another detrimental factor facing our country. Our country should have only six, namely: Grow the economy; Reduce unemployment; End corruption; Prevent and deal with crime; Sort out the immigration crisis; and Improve the quality of our education. We don't need another dialogue. We need a focus on implementing strategies that deal effectively with these six priorities. When I was growing up, we used to look after cows, and we also used to play with dogs. Cows and dogs used to have ticks. Now and then, there was a certain type of tick that would go to some of the most hidden parts of your body and get stuck in, sucking your blood. They were very difficult to remove. Sometimes, even if you took a pair of scissors to cut it, the head would remain stuck. That was until you found someone with the patience to take it out completely. The stubborn ticks that are sucking South Africa dry are corrupt public and private sector collaborators. They are embedded deep into the fibre of the state machinery. Until we have a leadership that will decisively remove them (and is not itself complicit), our country is doomed. Both public and private sector corruption are serious problems in South Africa, and they are often intertwined. While public sector corruption may have a broader impact on society and governance, private sector corruption can be just as damaging in terms of economic distortions and unfair practices. Addressing both types of corruption requires a multi-faceted approach involving stronger regulation, increased transparency and greater accountability in both the public and private sectors. As citizens, our responsibility is to expose both, first by not participating in it and second, by reporting it. This is what Daily Maverick investigative journalist Pieter-Louis Myburgh did when the suspended Independent Development Trust, Tebogo Malaka and her spokesperson Phasha Makgolane allegedly tried to bribe him.