logo
Trump is betraying the West's allies in Syria

Trump is betraying the West's allies in Syria

Telegraph14-05-2025

If we have learnt anything from President Donald Trump's approach to world affairs, it is that the lure of lucrative trade deals will always take precedence over national security.
His overtures to Russia are based on the premise that ending the war in Ukraine could open up a new era of economic co-operation between Washington and Moscow. One of the driving factors in his drive for a nuclear deal with Tehran is the prospect of the US benefiting from peace in the Gulf region.
Trump's mercantilist approach has been in evidence during his visit to the Middle East this week, where he has signed an arms deal worth nearly $142 billion with Saudi Arabia. Having been treated as pariahs by the previous Biden administration, the Saudis are keen to restore ties with Washington.
The deals they have agreed with more than a dozen US defence companies have been characterised by Trump, with characteristic understatement, as 'the largest defence co-operation agreement' in history. But while the deal may well provide a boost to Trump's efforts to enrich Americans, it has come at a cost to the region's security. It appears that, in order to seal the deal, Trump has bowed to pressure from the Saudis and Turkey to lift all sanctions against the Islamist regime currently in power in Syria.
Wide-ranging Western sanctions have been imposed against Syria since the earliest days of the country's brutal civil war in 2011. The Assad regime oversaw the barbaric repression of the Syrian people, resulting in the deaths of around 500,000 Syrians and half the country's 23 million population forced to flee their homes.
The overthrow of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad at the end of last year by Islamist militants was supposed to herald a new era of peace and stability in the war-torn country under the leadership of the country's self-appointed leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa.
Instead, Sharaa, who himself was placed under US sanctions for his close al-Qaeda associations during the civil war, has allowed the country to descend into another death spiral of factional violence. Minority groups such as the Alawites, Druze and Christians are all being subjected to acts of extreme violence.
In such circumstances, the issue of lifting sanctions should only be addressed once sufficient guarantees are in place to demonstrate that the new regime is committed to governing on behalf of all Syrians, and not just its Islamist supporters. Yet, just as Trump has been prepared to ditch Ukraine in his quest for a trade deal with the Kremlin, so he has shown an alarming willingness to let the new Syrian regime off the hook in pursuit of his multi-billion dollar Saudi deal.
After meeting Sharaa in Riyadh yesterday, Trump said his administration was looking to normalise ties with Damascus and that, by agreeing to lift sanctions, he had given the Islamist regime 'a chance for greatness'. The new Syrian regime has certainly done its best to reassure Trump of its good intentions. He has offered Washington access to Syria's modest oil reserves, provided reassurances about Israel's security and put forward a somewhat far-fetched proposition to build a Trump tower in central Damascus.
Sharaa, who previously spent five years in a US prison after leading al-Qaeda's murderous campaign against US forces in Iraq, has clearly mounted an impressive public relations campaign to persuade Trump of his good intentions. It is another matter entirely whether he and his fellow Islamist fanatics are capable of bringing a semblance of stability to Syria after 14 years of brutal conflict, especially as the new regime seems as committed to settling scores with rival factions as the previous Assad regime.
It was only in March that Washington was obliged to release a sharply-worded statement urging Damascus to protect minorities after attacks by pro-Assad forces sparked revenge killings of nearly 900 mostly Alawite civilians in north-west Syria. The new regime's decidedly Islamist agenda has caused alarm and consternation in Israel. This has led the Israelis to resist attempts by Damascus to deploy its forces further south, with Israeli war planes carrying out dozens of air strikes across the country in recent months to safeguard its own borders.
If Trump's decision to commence normalising ties with Syria is premature, it could be the harbinger of a far greater betrayal. Washington may abandon other long-established policy goals in the region, such as maintaining support for pro-Western Kurdish groups which played a vital role in defeating Islamic State terrorists during Syria's civil war.
The Kurds, who have established an autonomous zone in northern Syria, rely on the 3,000 US forces based in the region for their protection. But if Trump – as he attempted to do during his first presidential term – decides to withdraw US support, the Kurds will be left to the mercy of the Islamist regimes in Turkey and Syria, constituting yet another great betrayal by the Trump administration.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FTSE 100 hits record high on back of US-Iran tensions
FTSE 100 hits record high on back of US-Iran tensions

Sky News

time13 minutes ago

  • Sky News

FTSE 100 hits record high on back of US-Iran tensions

Why you can trust Sky News The FTSE 100 has secured a new record closing high after riding out a US trade war-linked slump. The index of London's leading shares gained 20 points to hit 8,884, surpassing the 3 March peak of 8,771 and leaving its value more than 8.6% up in the year to date. It was achieved despite gloomy official figures covering April - when the impact of the US trade war started to be felt, household bills spiked and budget tax and wage rises hit employers for the first time. The Office for National Statistics reported that the . The FTSE 100 tumbled early in the spring when Donald Trump 's protectionist agenda gathered steam through a series of on-off tariffs against global trading partners, later exacerbated by his "liberation day" escalation. Stock market values were hit worldwide as the consequences for domestic economies - and global activity - were digested amid a slew of output downgrades by respected international bodies such as the International Monetary Fund. But the suspension or reductions of many trade tariffs, coupled with select deals to end hostilities with nations such as the UK, has helped values climb back since last month. 2:42 A new high for the UK's top flight shares was almost achieved on Wednesday, as a limited trade truce between the US and China was on the table following talks in London. But market analysts said on Thursday that the optimism was overtaken by nerves on whether the progress could be maintained and a surge, of up to 4%, in global oil prices due to growing tensions between the US and Iran. Mr Trump has repeatedly warned the country it is at risk of airstrikes by the US and Israel if it is found not to be complying with its nuclear obligations. A United Nations report has made such a finding - and some US personnel have been evacuated from the Middle East region as a result. The spike in oil costs late on Wednesday, which took the Brent crude international benchmark to a two-month high, lifted the values of energy-linked shares including those of BP and Shell early on Thursday. Precious metal miners were also doing well. Tesco was among the winners too, gaining almost 2%, thanks to a solid set of first quarter results. Weaker than expected US inflation figures yesterday, which kept the prospect for a summer interest rate hike by the Federal Reserve intact despite the continuing trade war, also helped prop up sentiment internationally. The outlook for UK and global stock market values, however, is very uncertain. FTSE 100 firms make the bulk of their earnings overseas so a deep-seated trade spat between the world's two largest economies is particularly damaging.

Alarm as Donald Trump 'throws a grenade' at crucial defence deal with UK
Alarm as Donald Trump 'throws a grenade' at crucial defence deal with UK

Daily Mirror

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Alarm as Donald Trump 'throws a grenade' at crucial defence deal with UK

The future of the crucial AUKUS deal - which sees the UK work with the US and Australia on nuclear submarines - has been thrown into doubt by the White House Donald Trump has sparked fears he could pull out of a crucial defence deal with the UK and Australia. The unpredictable US President is understood to have ordered a review into an agreement to build a new generation of nuclear-powered attack submarines. It will be headed by defence official Elbridge Colby, who has previously described himself as "sceptical" of the AUKUS partnership. ‌ The trio of nations reached the agreement in 2021, saying they would work together on advanced defence technology. ‌ Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds branded it a "first class" partnership. He told a press gallery lunch in Westminster: "The US is reviewing a lot of its international relationships, whether those are with multilateral bodies or agreements like that. "AUKUS is, on both the defence and industrial level, a genuinely first class agreement of how we treat each other's suppliers and the supply chain, and what outcome we're seeking to do and the level of collaboration. "So I would have a lot of confidence in anyone looking at the various bits of that agreement and saying that it is an incredibly strong and important agreement for the future. "So US colleagues want to look at it? Okay, that's their right to do so. "I think it is an incredibly compelling and strong agreement. When they look at it, I'm pretty certain they'll be in agreement." ‌ A No10 spokesman played down the likelihood of US withdrawal, branding AUKUS "one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades". He added: "It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year. "The UK will continue to work closely with the US and Australia at all levels to maximise the benefits and opportunities which AUKUS presents for our three nations." The Liberal Democrats said the US' decision to launch a review had "thrown another grenade into our security partnership" and urged the PM to "develop contingency plans". Helen Maguire, the party's defence spokeswoman, said: "Even in the face of an imperial Putin and the rising threat posed by China, this White House simply can't be relied upon to support our collective defence. Our national security demands that we ramp up talks with our Commonwealth friends and work to plug the gap that the US is threatening to leave in European and global security."

ICE raids and riots leave young white Americans mocked for their dramatic take on protests
ICE raids and riots leave young white Americans mocked for their dramatic take on protests

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

ICE raids and riots leave young white Americans mocked for their dramatic take on protests

Social media influencers have been roasted for their eerily similar responses to the LA riots and immigration raids. Anti-ICE protests have swept the nation since agents first conducted raids in Los Angeles on Friday, sparking viral clashes between officers in riot gear and protesters who set vehicles on fire. Critics blasted the dozens of young Americans who posted messages shamming those who have not spoken out against the issue and called others who support Donald Trump or ICE 'bad people.' 'If you're white and see an ICE raid happening and you don't get involved, I think you're a p***y, and I don't respect you at all,' one influencer said. 'If you support ICE, if you support this current administration, if you think anything that's going on in the U.S. is good for the country, I don't think you're very pretty, and I don't think you're very smart,' said Miami influencer Sydney Michelle. One woman even said she was ashamed to have purchased a shirt with an American flag on it. 'I accidentally bought an American flag shirt today, and I'm gonna go return it because I wasn't even thinking,' she said. 'With what's going on in our country right now... trash... I'm not wearing that. People are literally getting seized and deported without the freaking due process.' Others have compared being an illegal immigrant in the United States to a minor traffic offense. 'Being undocumented is not a criminal offense; it's a civil one, and if you've ever jaywalked, congratulations, you've also committed a civil offense,' mommy influencer Allison Kuch said. Another influencer almost parroted that message, saying, 'Being in a country that you're in illegally is a civil offense, not a criminal one. You know what else is a civil offense, jaywalking.' Critics were quick to blast the influencers for posting their dramatic takes and pointed out their messages are all suspiciously similar. 'Morons on TikTok,' one person said. 'They're like all manure,' said another. 'I miss the days when not everyone had an internet connection,' a third person said. 'I always love their false equivalencies,' said a fourth. 'Thank you for repeating the same falsehood-laden NGO statements we've seen from dozens and dozens of other social media accounts. Yawn,' a fifth person said. 'The best immigration policy is articulated from the front seat of your car into your camera phone for online attention,' a sixth person said. 'Struggle session. It reminds me of the "Imagine" celebrities during COVID,' said another. 'This is when you think you're a trailblazer and on the cutting edge when you're really just another follower,' a seventh person said. While physical presence in the United States without proper authorization is a civil violation, entering the country illegally is a federal criminal offense, according to the American Immigration Council. Illegal entry includes crossing the border at a time or place not designated by immigration officers, eluding inspection by officers, or entering with false information such as fake documents. Title 8 of the U.S. Code states that the first offense of illegally entering the country is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in prison. Illegally re-entering the country after previously being deported is a felony with a maximum sentence of up to two years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store