J.D. Vance and Musk Tag Team to Restore Racist DOGE Bro to Government
Elez, a 25-year-old programmer and alum of Musk's rocket company SpaceX, has been at the center of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency's intrusion into sensitive payments systems at Treasury. While DOGE's mission at Treasury is opaque, Democratic senators are concerned Musk and his deputies seek the ability to shut off federal payments, down to the level of an individual Social Security check. (Elez was recently named in a federal court order limiting DOGE's access, establishing that only Elez and a DOGE colleague can access Treasury records, on a 'read only' basis.)
As The Wall Street Journal was about to go to press with its scoop, Elez resigned his post in government. On Friday, Musk — whose X handle now reads 'White House Tech Support' — began what appears to be a campaign for Elez' return.
Musk began running a poll on his social network (formerly known as Twitter) asking: 'Bring back @DOGE staffer who made inappropriate statements via a now deleted pseudonym?'
The poll received the attention of Vice President J.D. Vance, who sought to influence the results by personally lobbying for Elez:
'Here's my view,' Vance wrote. 'I obviously disagree with some of Elez's posts, but I don't think stupid social media activity should ruin a kid's life. We shouldn't reward journalists who try to destroy people. Ever. So I say bring him back.' He added of the 25-year-old man, whose offensive posts reportedly date to last year: 'If he's a bad dude or a terrible member of the team, fire him for that.'
Vance, it should be noted, is married to a woman of Indian heritage. And one of Elez' odious posts reportedly said: 'Normalize Indian hate,' and, 'You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity.'
Elez also reportedly posted against the H1-B visa, used by tech companies to employ skilled foreign programmers — a program defended by Musk even in the face of the MAGA anti-immigrant crusade. Elez reportedly wrote in December. '99% of Indian H1Bs will be replaced by slightly smarter LLMs,' adding: 'They're going back don't worry guys.'
Musk has also targeted the Wall Street Journal reporter on the Elez report over her past connection to USAID, the agency Musk has successfully sent to the 'wood chipper,' suggesting that her previous involvement in projects relating to the agency years ago makes her reporting on Elez 'Certainly improper, possibly criminal.'
Rolling Stone reached out to Elez earlier in the week asking about his role at Treasury and did not hear back. He did not immediately respond to a followup about Vance's call for his reinstatement.
More from Rolling Stone
Dem Overseeing 'Digital Assets' to Hold Luxury Retreat With Crypto Kingpin
Patrick Mahomes Debunks Trump's Weird Lie About His College Career
Kanye West on X: 'Elon Stole My Nazi Swag'
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Cook Political Report shifts Ohio Senate race after Sherrod Brown entrance
The nonpartisan Cook Political Report moved its rating of Ohio's Senate race from likely Republican to lean Republican following former Sen. Sherrod Brown's (R-Ohio) entrance into next year's Senate race. The former senator launched his comeback Senate bid on Monday, pitting himself against Sen. John Husted (R-Ohio). Husted was appointed by Gov. Mike DeWine (R) earlier this year after Vice President Vance vacated the seat to join the Trump administration. Brown, who served three terms in the Senate, lost reelection in November against Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) by roughly 3.5 points. He was the last statewide elected Democrat in Ohio. 'Brown's entrance certainly puts the Ohio Senate special election on the competitive map, and it's doubtful that any other Democrat would have made this a real race,' wrote Jessica Taylor, Senate and governors editor at the Cook Political Report. 'But Husted still starts as a slight favorite in a state that's been moving toward the right. We are shifting our rating from Likely to Lean Republican.' Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chair Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) struck an optimistic tone in her statement following Brown's campaign launch, citing his record on Social Security, the opioid epidemic, and other issues impacting the working class. 2024 Election Coverage 'In the Senate, Sherrod will stand up to the chaos, recklessness and rising prices hurting working families and make sure Ohioans have the champion they deserve,' Gillibrand said. The National Republican Senatorial Committee ripped Brown as a 'sellout' and 'radical' in their own statement responding to news of his run. 'Rather than standing up for Ohio, he spent his time in office fighting for the left,' the statement read. 'He backed higher taxes, sold out union workers, supported open borders, & even pushed sex-change surgeries for kids. Ohio deserves better.'
Entrepreneur
29 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Google, McKinsey, Reintroduce In-Person Interviews Due to AI
Recruiters say potential hires are reading out answers from AI instead of thinking of their own during interviews. In-person job interviews are on the rise as recruiters adapt to candidates using AI during the process — even on video. Recruiters told The Wall Street Journal last week that, though virtual interviews are still popular, the format has a downside: candidates turning to AI for answers during the interview, and reading them out verbatim. This is particularly an issue for technical interviews, experts told CNBC, when potential hires are faced with the pressure of thinking of technical solutions on the spot. Instead of relying on their own mental aptitude, candidates are overwhelmingly using AI responses to cheat. Now, major companies, including Google and McKinsey, are cracking down on AI use by bringing back in-person interviews. Related: McKinsey Is Using AI to Create PowerPoints and Take Over Junior Employee Tasks: 'Technology Could Do That' McKinsey, for example, started asking hiring managers to schedule at least one in-person meeting with potential recruits before extending an offer. The consulting firm began this practice about a year and a half ago, per WSJ. Meanwhile, Google is also reintroducing "at least one round of in-person interviews for people," CEO Sundar Pichai told "The Lex Fridman Podcast" in June. Pichai said on the podcast that Google wanted to "make sure" candidates mastered "the fundamentals" through in-person interviews. Google CEO Sundar Pichai. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images The push for AI-proof hiring arrives as data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that employment has slowed to a near-decade low. The economic climate has sparked a new workplace trend called "job hugging," where employees cling to their jobs and stay at the same company. It has also led to "quiet firing," when employers try to encourage staff to leave without outright firing them. Hiring as a whole is also turning back to old practices to work around AI. For example, Business Insider reported on Monday that candidates are submitting paper resumes in person to different companies to stand out in a crowded market. At the same time, the outlet noted that some employers are flying out potential hires to in-person sites as part of the interview process, to see how candidates handle questions without AI help. Related: Is Gen Z Really Taking Their Parents to Job Interviews? A New Report Suggests 3 in 4 Have Already Done It. In-person interviews could be what potential hires are looking for to stand out — data suggests that candidates would rather give an in-person interview than a virtual one. A May 2023 report from the American Staffing Association showed that 70% of the over 2,000 U.S. adults surveyed would prefer to give an in-person interview over a phone or video call.
UPI
30 minutes ago
- UPI
Newsmax settles defamation suit by Dominion Voting Systems for $67M
A Newsmax banner hangs at the entrance of the New York Stock Exchange before the closing bell on Wall Street on March 31. The conservative media company's stock price jumped more than 700% in its first day of trading on the NYSE. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 18 (UPI) -- Newsmax on Monday agreed to pay $67 million to Dominion Voting Systems in a defamation suit against the conservative media company over its 2020 presidential election coverage. The announcement came as President Donald Trump on Monday reiterated his criticism of certain voting machines and mail-in ballots. Newmax announced the agreement in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in which the two sides mutually agreed to resolve the litigation. Dominion, a private company based in Denver, provides voting equipment to jurisdictions in 28 states. The systems include touchscreen screens and paper ballot scanning devices. The settlement will be paid in installments over three years, which the company said it "expects to fund through revenues." Newsmax, which went public in March with an initial public offering of $10 per share for $75 million, has a market capitalization of $1.56 billion. Last September, Newsmax agreed to a settlement with another voting machine company, Smartmatic, before a trial. The settlement of $40 million wasn't disclosed until March. In 2021, Dominion filed suit against Newsmax, seeking $1.6 billion and alleging certain statements made in Newsmax's coverage about the election were defamatory. "We are pleased to have settled this matter," a Dominion spokesperson told CNN, declining to comment further. "The judiciary's willingness to punish news organizations for reporting on matters of urgent national debate undermines the role of the press in a free society," Newsmax said in a news release. After Joe Biden was declared the winner against Donald Trump in November 2020, Newsmax hosts and guests falsely claimed the election results were fraudulent and specifically took aim at voting machines. Newmax didn't disclose whether there would be an on-air apology or acknowledgement about false claims that voting results were incorrect. "Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020," the company said in a statement. "We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism." Newsmax said it determined that Delaware Court Judge Eric Davis, who was presiding over the case, would not provide a fair trial in which the company could present standard libel defenses to a jury. He presided over the voting machine company's defamation suit against Fox News, in which $787 million was awarded in April 2023 in a suit settlement. Davis, who was appointed by a Democratic governor, Jack Markell, in 2010, earlier this year ruled that Newsmax aired defamatory statements about the company. He said a jury would decide if the lies were intentional and if so how much would be awarded. "From the very beginning, Judge Davis ruled in ways that strongly favored the plaintiffs and limited Newsmax's ability to defend itself," Newsmax said. The judge indicated that he likely would refuse to allow the jury to hear that Fox News had already paid Dominion $787 million. Newsmax also noted Dominion was permitted to comb through extensive communications, including personal emails, cellphone text messages and other documents of reporters and company executives unrelated to the case. "The Delaware Court under Judge Davis effectively enforced a confiscation of our property because our reporting was not always sympathetic to Joe Biden," Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy said. Newmax, which is the fourth-highest-rated network of all major pay TV providers, became a public company in March and is listed on the Nasdaq. Its main offices are in New York City and Boca Raton, Fla. The company reaches more than 40 million Americans regularly through Newsmax TV, the Newsmax App, website and publications. Trump, who continues to claim he won the 2020 election despite being told otherwise in court cases and audits, blasted the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines on Monday morning in a post on Truth Social. "I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly "Inaccurate," Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election," Trump posted. Trump, who became a resident of Palm Beach in Florida in September 2019, has sometimes voted via absentee ballot, which is essentially the same thing as mail-in ballots. His legal residence previously was New York City. Trump also spoke against the U.S. voting system during his appearance with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House. "Mail-in ballots are corrupt," he said. "You can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots."
