logo
John Torode 'faced multiple allegations' but MasterChef host 'only had one complaint for using racist language upheld' in Gregg Wallace report - as his awkward on-screen moments are back in the spotlight

John Torode 'faced multiple allegations' but MasterChef host 'only had one complaint for using racist language upheld' in Gregg Wallace report - as his awkward on-screen moments are back in the spotlight

Daily Mail​15-07-2025
John Torode 'faced multiple allegations' of inappropriate behaviour but only one was upheld, it was claimed today.
The MasterChef star announced last night that a report into his former co-host, Gregg Wallace, had confirmed a claim that he once used 'racist language'.
In a post on Instagram, Torode said he had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation.
A source close to the 59-year-old claimed he was sharing drinks after filming when he is alleged to have used an inappropriate racial term.
It is claimed the witness said Torode apologised instantly and 'was mortified' and he 'didn't use the term as a slur'.
No one complained at the time, but the incident had been brought up during Wallace's inquiry, the source said.
Sources say the BBC and production company Banijay asked Torode to resign last week over the alleged incident but he refused.
Torode is said to have been the subject of multiple allegations before only one - relating to 'racist language' - was upheld, reports the Telegraph.
One insider told the paper there had been a 'massive cultural problem' at the show going back decades.
'For a long time, certain kinds of language and jokes were found acceptable,' they said.
'There is a massive cultural problem there, and it goes back 20 years, when attitudes and ways of working were different.'
It follows a separate report in The Sun claiming that Torode was asked by the BBC and production company Banijay to step down from MasterChef and then pretend he had mental health issues.
The source went on to explain that, 'shockingly', Torode was only made aware of the claim relating to his 'racist language' two weeks ago before being informed on Friday that it would be upheld.
Torode was reportedly called by The BBC on Thursday night, followed by an email on Friday asking him to quit.
The source reportedly said: 'They ambushed him, and it was suggested he quit due to the stress and scrutiny of the furore around the show.
'Obviously he was absolutely shocked and appalled and told them quite firmly he didn't have any mental health issues. To try to use mental health as a get-out clause seems incredibly low — and is also deeply unfair to those with genuine mental health trauma.
'John absolutely loves MasterChef, and doesn't want to lose his job because of an investigation into his co-star.'
In his social media post last night, Torode said: ' Following publication of the Executive Summary of the Investigation into Gregg Wallace while working on MasterChef, I am aware of speculation that I am one of the two other individuals against whom an allegation has been upheld.
'For the sake of transparency I confirm that I am the individual who is alleged to have used racial language on one occasion.
'The allegation is that I did so sometime in 2018 or 2019, in a social situation, and that the person I was speaking with did not believe that it was intended in a malicious way and that I apologised immediately afterwards.'
Torode went on to say he had 'absolutely no recollection' of the incident and did 'not believe it happened'.
He added: 'I want to be clear that I've always had the view that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment.
'I'm shocked and saddened by the allegation as I would never wish to cause anyone any offence.'
Torode has been accused of inappropriate behaviour before over a series of mildly controversial comments made during filming.
This includes a joke he made last year on This Morning during an appearance alongside Cat Deeley.
The presenter was plating up a dish of toad in the hole during the show's cooking segment when he turned to Deeley and joked: 'I never thought I'd say to Cat Deeley, ' Here's a little sausage for you darling'.''
Deeley, 47, tapped him on the back and replied: 'Oh I like it, thank you,' before she turned to make a face at the camera.
Some viewers took to social media to point out the unfortunate timing of his comment in the light of the scandal affecting his co-presenter.
A number of viewers also complained in 2022 that he had used the swearword 's***' before the 9pm watershed, calling it 'uncalled for'.
Following yesterday's report, Wallace hit out at the BBC by warning 'won't be the last' to be cancelled.
The investigation into Wallace's behaviour on the cooking show upheld 45 out of 83 complaints made, including one count of 'unwanted physical contact', leaving the BBC to admit it 'could and should have' acted sooner to stop him.
The damning investigation also found that two complaints about the behaviour of 'other people' were upheld.
While apologising for any 'distress' he caused, Wallace took at the MasterChef broadcaster, which he claims has valued 'protecting its legacy' over 'protecting people'.
Warning that it was 'dangerous' to be a 'working-class man with a direct manner' in the world of broadcasting, he said he 'won't be the last' to face cancellation.
The presenter said: 'In the end, the BBC left me exposed to trial by media and the damage it leaves in its wake.
'To those who've shown kindness, thank you. It mattered. This has been brutal. For a working-class man with a direct manner, modern broadcasting has become a dangerous place. I was the headline this time. But I won't be the last.
'There will be more casualties if the BBC continues down this path, where protecting its legacy matters more than protecting people. For my part, with full legal support, I will consider my next move.'
Patrick Holland, CEO of MasterChef production company Banijay, said he was 'extremely sorry' to those who had been impacted by Wallace's behaviour and added that the report makes the star's 'return to MasterChef untenable'.
Wallace's statement claimed that he 'never set out to harm or humiliate' anyone and that he was 'deeply sorry for any distress caused'.
He said his 'late autism diagnosis' - which he received while he stepped back from MasterChef at the end of last year - has helped him to understand how he communicates and how he is perceived.
He said: 'For eight months, my family and I have lived under a cloud. Trial by media, fuelled by rumour and clickbait. None of the serious allegations against me were upheld.
'I challenged the remaining issue of unwanted touching but have had to accept a difference in perception, and I am deeply sorry for any distress caused. It was never intended.
'I'm relieved that the Banijay report fully recognises that my behaviour changed profoundly in 2018.
'Some of my humour and language missed the mark. I never set out to harm or humiliate. I always tried to bring warmth and support to MasterChef, on screen and off.
'After nearly 20 years on the show, I now see that certain patterns, shaped by traits I've only recently begun to understand, may have been misread. I also accept that more could have been done, by others and by myself, to address concerns earlier.
'A late autism diagnosis has helped me understand how I communicate and how I'm perceived. I'm still learning. Banijay have given me great support, and I thank them.'
Wallace's fiery statement comes just days after he said he would 'not go quietly' in a post which has since been deleted from his Instagram page.
The BBC said the investigation into a 'substantial number of allegations of inappropriate conduct' over 19 years highlighted behaviour that falls below the corporation's values.
'Although the full extent of these issues were not known at the relevant time, opportunities were missed to address this behaviour - both by the production companies running MasterChef and the BBC,' a spokesman added.
'We accept more could and should have been done sooner.'
The corporation would not confirm whether they will broadcast the series of MasterChef they filmed with him last Autumn.
Four previous winners have reportedly insisted that the BBC owes it to those who took part in the series to air it, given Wallace's bad behaviour is the only reason it has been delayed.
A spokesman for Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Downing Street welcomed the fact the BBC had 'severed ties' with Wallace, adding: 'We're clear that appropriate steps must be taken to ensure abuses of power are prevented from happening in the future.'
The seven-month investigation, conducted by law firm Lewis Silkin, heard 83 allegations from 41 complainants against Wallace, all relating to his time on the cookery programme.
It also found that 10 standalone allegations were made against 'other people', from 2012 to 2019, with two claims upheld, relating to swearing and racist language.
The majority of the allegations against Mr Wallace (94 per cent) related to behaviour which is said to have occurred between 2005 and 2018. Only one allegation was substantiated post 2018.
The majority of substantiated allegations related to inappropriate sexual language and humour. A smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated. One allegation of unwanted physical contact was substantiated.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the allegations against Wallace were 'horrendous and appalling', and she welcomed the BBC's decision to end its association with the MasterChef presenter.
The investigation team found evidence that during the period from 2005 to 2024, six complaints were raised with the production company and 6 with the BBC (four of which had also been raised with the production company).
However, the investigator found that 'there was a tendency to address the concern informally on a case-by-case basis and not therefore consider each issue as additive to any prior allegations or to matters which had been observed by senior members of staff'.
More formal action was taken by the production company in 2015 and the BBC in 2017.
Wallace was diagnosed with autism during the time of the investigation and the report found that this was 'highly relevant' in the context of the findings.
They said: 'Mr Wallace's neurodiversity diagnosis is considered highly relevant in the context of the findings made, particularly regarding his use of humour as a 'masking' technique and his difficulty in reading social cues.
'Mr Wallace accepts that his diagnosis may help to explain some of his actions, but he does not wish to hide behind it.'
The categories of allegations were separated in seven categories which included inappropriate comments (jokes and innuendo), sexually explicit comments, being in a state of undress, sexualised comments made to or about someone, culturally insensitive / racist comments, bullying, unwanted physical contact.
The majority of the substantiated allegations against Mr Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour, however, a smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language, being in a state of undress and unwelcome physical contact were also substantiated.
Out of the 45 upheld complaints, 27 occurred between 2005 to 2011, 17 from 2012 to 2018 and just one from 2019 to 2024.
Overall, the report concluded that 16 sexually explicit comments, 12 inappropriate comments, two sexualised comments to or about someone and four culturally insensitive/racist comments were made.
One incident of unwelcome physical contact and three incidents of being in a state of undress were also substantiated.
While, seven cases of bullying were upheld.
Prior to 2016, the investigation found that there was little or no formal training or clear escalation procedures in place, leading to underreporting of inappropriate behaviour.
It also added that concerns were not always flagged to Wallace meaning he was 'not necessarily aware that his behaviour had caused offence'.
The report found that many contestants felt unable to speak out on MasterChef because 'their desire to do well in the competition meant that they were unlikely to complain or allow their reactions to show.'
Karen Baxter, the head of investigations at Lewis Silkin, who conducted the report did find that after the BBC warned Wallace about his behaviour in 2017 that he did change his behaviour.
She said: 'There is evidence which shows that Mr Wallace took some proactive steps to modify his behaviour, seek guidance from colleagues on his choice of language, and to remove himself from work-related social situations.'
Patrick Holland, CEO Banijay UK said: 'In earlier years, specifically prior to 2016 where the vast majority of these issues arose, it is clear that escalation procedures were not as robust as they should have been, and awareness of policies and procedures were lacking particularly amongst freelance staff.'
A spokesman for the BBC said: 'We welcome the publication of the findings by Lewis Silkin, following the investigation into the conduct of Gregg Wallace.
'In light of these findings, Banijay UK and the BBC have agreed Mr Wallace's return to MasterChef is untenable. The BBC has informed Mr Wallace we have no plans to work with him in future.
'The investigation details a substantial number of allegations of inappropriate conduct spanning 19 years. This behaviour falls below the values of the BBC and the expectations we have for anyone who works with or for us.
'Although the full extent of these issues were not known at the relevant time, opportunities were missed to address this behaviour - both by the production companies running MasterChef and the BBC. We accept more could and should have been done sooner.
'We want to thank all those who took part in the investigation, including those who first raised concerns directly with the BBC in November last year. We apologise to everyone who has been impacted by Mr Wallace's behaviour.
'Lewis Silkin's findings include two further allegations which were upheld, relating to other individuals. The BBC takes these findings very seriously and we have asked Banijay UK to take action to address these issues, which is underway. This will be completed as a priority.
'The BBC will not be commenting further at this stage, but we are clear we expect the highest standards of respect at work to be upheld on the production.
'At this stage we are not going to make a final decision on the broadcast of the series that was filmed last year. We know this is disappointing for fans of the show and those who took part and at the appropriate time Banijay UK will consult further with the amateur contestants.
'In April the BBC published a detailed response to an independent review of workplace culture, which reinforces expectations around behaviour and that we will act more decisively when standards are not met. This also requires all TV production partners to align with the Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) standards.
'We want to reaffirm, there is no place for the abuse of power, unacceptable behaviour or language at the BBC, or shows made for the BBC.'
Torode, The BBC and Banijay UK have been contacted for further comment on the 'mental health' allegation and whether Torode had been asked - and refused - to step down.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TV's best (and worst) historical epics: from Wolf Hall to I, Claudius:
TV's best (and worst) historical epics: from Wolf Hall to I, Claudius:

The Guardian

time14 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

TV's best (and worst) historical epics: from Wolf Hall to I, Claudius:

Inflate thy balloons and unsheathe thy Party Rings, for here is Chief of War (Apple TV+) to remind us of the joy of the scowling historical epic. Here too, almost, is Battle of Hastings belter King & Conqueror (BBC, August). And Spartacus: House of Ashur (Starz, this winter). Also in the period-specific pipeline are second series for Disney+'s brilliant Shogun and Amazon Prime's terrible House of David. Historical epics, it would not be unreasonable to say, are everywhere. But which are the best and which should be catapulted, screaming, across a poorly rendered CGI battlefield? Given their abundance, some arbitrary judging criteria is clearly in order. Hence: no 'fantasy' nonsense (ie Game of Thrones) and nothing set after the early 1800s, the latter on the grounds that a) there are too many of the sods and b) Julian 'Downton Bloody Abbey' Fellowes has effectively tucked the era under his top hat and run off with it while honking like an overprivileged goose. Let battle commenceth… A barrel-chested wodge of Big History in which mountainous creator and co-writer Jason Momoa thunders through the based-on-true-events that led to the late 18th century unification and, ultimately, colonisation of his native Hawaii. And it's brilliant; from its predominantly Polynesian cast to the sense of doom that swirls perpetually around the scenic foothills of Mount Momoa. It may lean a touch too heavily on extended, subtitled brawls in which there is much [grunting], but this is heartfelt storytelling; as muscular and sincere as its loinclothed protagonist. Startlingly brutal middle ages od(in)yssey in which mud-caked peasants duck from the flailing mace of progress/death and Norsemen with calves like bowling balls stagger across fjords, their complexions suggesting they may not be getting their five a day. There are the obligatory fireside frottageings, but this is clever stuff, with complex characters, an atmosphere of thunderously oppressive gloom and dialogue that does not make one long to inter oneself, sobbing, in a flaming longship. The second adaptation of James Clavell's 1,100-page clomp through the late Sengoku period of feudal Japan, this US-produced saga leaves its beloved 1980 predecessor spluttering in its backwash, the latter's once sacrosanct USP (Richard Chamberlain blinking expressionlessly in a kimono) unable to compete with the former's rich, knotty script, riveting characterisation and steadfast attention to historical detail. Cue stoic samurai, scurvy-ridden sailors and preoccupied warlords in a succession of exquisitely indifferent terrains and everyone else sprinting for cover as the whole shebang is (justly) pelted with Emmys. Yes, the pace is slow, the sets perfunctory and the wigs apparently assembled from the contents of a vacuum cleaner. But still, 50 years on, the BBC's adaptation of Robert Graves' novels on the bastardry of the early Roman empire remains one of TV's finest achievements, with an unapologetically adult script and magnificent, pillar-rattling performances from John Hurt, Siân Phillips and Derek Jacobi, the last assisted by prosthetic makeup and a false nose that could dislodge the cobwebs from a triumphal arch. An object lesson, here, in how to deliver prestige historical drama without recourse to bums or bombast. Instead, there are exquisitely layered performances (Damian Lewis, Jonathan Pryce), quiet, adult explorations of difficult, adult things (grief, ageing) and many, many candlelit silences into which Mark Rylance's Thomas Cromwell glides, his expression, as always, that of a ferret saddened by developments in France. A monumental achievement, obviously, and in director Peter Kosminksy and scriptwriter Peter Straughan's hands, a near-perfect adaptation of Hilary Mantel's three-piece masterpiece. Rome, 1492, and the Vatican is besieged by filth as director/co-creator Neil Jordan takes a stiff quill to non-secular skulduggery. Cue: tumescent priests, pouting strumpets and a never-wearier Jeremy Irons as Pope Shagger VI. Here, historical integrity is something to be bent over and humped, unconvincingly, behind a net curtain. The script? Pfft. The acting? Tsk. The plot? Possibly, although it's tricky to concentrate on the dynastic machinations of 15th century Italy when Irons in a mitre keeps shouting 'WHORE'. A catastrophic attempt by the BBC to replicate the success of I, Claudius by squeezing Grade II-listed hams into togas and forcing them to SHOUT at punishing length about the PTOLEMAIC DYNASTY in what appears to be an abandoned REGIONAL LEISURE CENTRE. The upshot? Tedium. Plus? Bald caps, flagrant boobery, Richard Griffiths 'working' a 'smoky eye', the line 'Let's get out of Egypt!' and trembling extras gulping in horror as the plot catapults yet another flaming ball of exposition at the studio floor. Manacled jocks go loincloth to loincloth in a US production comprised almost entirely of buttocks. There is, occasionally, other stuff: blood, knockers, airborne viscera, Americans in sandals decapitating other Americans while shouting 'ass', some 'plot' or other involving revenge, John Hannah (as dastardly slave trader Batiatus) bellowing 'BY JUPITER'S COCK!' at 30-second intervals etc. But it is mainly buttocks. Watch it on fast-forward and it's like being shot in the face by a pump-action bum-gun. One, two, swashbuckle my shoe: abject 'international co-production' tosh here from the Beeb as Alexandre Dumas's novels are reimagined for whichever generation it is that is supposed to be interested in this sort of thing. And lo, much adolescent tomfoolery doth ensue, with PG-rated punch-ups, tiresome hunks smirking in pleather and dialogue of the 'Things just got complicated!' genus. The result? Hollycloaks. Peter Capaldi does his best as Cardinal Richelieu but it would take more than thigh boots and nostril-flaring to lighten this particular load. Verily, my liege, this idiot Canadian-Irish co-production does dance a merry jig upon the very concept of historical accuracy, with its Irish Henry VIII (Jonathan Rhys Meyers), its ripped courtiers and Joss Stone as Anne of Cleves. There is the occasional grudging nod to Actual Historical Stuff (the Reformation, wives etc). But it's mostly just Henry banging his way around Tudor England, his bum cheeks jack-hammering with such ferocity that they are little more than a meaty blur, like a deli counter viewed from the top deck of a speeding bus in the rain. Chief of War is on Apple TV+ from 1 August.

BBC Death in Paradise spin-off gets major update and fans are delighted
BBC Death in Paradise spin-off gets major update and fans are delighted

Daily Mirror

time44 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

BBC Death in Paradise spin-off gets major update and fans are delighted

Death in Paradise fans have shared their delight after bosses shared an update on Beyond Paradise Beyond Paradise has delivered thrilling news about the upcoming series, sending fans into raptures. ‌ The British crime drama, which spun off from Death in Paradise, features Kris Marshall and Sally Bretton in leading roles. ‌ The show debuted in 2023, and viewers are eagerly anticipating information about the fourth series, which is expected to broadcast early next year. ‌ Production has now kicked off, with the BBC programme posting a photograph of a clapperboard on Instagram. The message stated, "We're back in Shipton Abbott! Filming has begun this week on the brand-new series of #BeyondParadise," reports the Express. "Expect plenty of puzzling twists and turns as the team gears up for another series full of mystery, humour, and heart on the sunny shores of Devon and Cornwall." ‌ Supporters have been celebrating the announcement, with one commenting, "So exciting! " while another declared, " Excellent news!" A third chimed in, " Can't wait!" This follows after devotees discovered that Kris would be returning to his character as Detective Humphrey Goodman, as production for the BBC Series seemed to have started. One individual posted to a Facebook fan group devoted to the programme and uploaded a notice reading "BP Unit" alongside the message "Back filming in Cornwall. ‌ "The sign is at St Mellion Golf Club; it's where they store their filming trailers and lorries," one person responded. Another enthusiast posted a separate photograph from the production firm that notified locals when shooting would occur. ‌ It had been stated that filming for the fourth season of Beyond Paradise will commence in July and conclude in November, taking place "in and around East and West Looe". Details regarding the plot for the upcoming season remain under wraps; however, the third season concluded on a poignant note. The finale saw Humphrey and Martha Lloyd (Sally) bid farewell to their foster daughter Rosie, after grappling with their own fertility issues. ‌ Kris recently opened up about his evolving role, having first graced the screen in the third season of Death in Paradise, stating: "I'm still finding stuff with Humphrey." He continued: "And I think as long as that goes on and as long as Humphrey evolves [that's good] because when I started playing Humphrey it was 11 years ago so the character has to grow with me as I get older. "As I get more mature -I'm not getting mature- he has to grow with me as I get older. He has to evolve because now I'm in my fifties so I can't play the same character that Humphrey was when he was 40, which is when I started. "As long as the character keeps evolving to fit the [person] that plays him, as long as there's not too much discrepancy between the two, then that's fine. I think if ever I thought that I was becoming too old to play that then I would say 'that's enough'." Beyond Paradise can be streamed on BBC iPlayer.

University Challenge's 'easy' music question stumps every single BBC contestant - but can YOU beat the odds and solve it?
University Challenge's 'easy' music question stumps every single BBC contestant - but can YOU beat the odds and solve it?

Daily Mail​

time44 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

University Challenge's 'easy' music question stumps every single BBC contestant - but can YOU beat the odds and solve it?

One seemingly 'easy' music question left every single University Challenge contestant stumped in a recent episode of the game show. The BBC programme sees the best young minds in the UK compete in a knockout tournament, answering questions on a wide range of cultural and academic topics. This time, four students from the University of Bath battled against opponents from the University of Southampton. After having navigated rigorous questions on science, literature and maths, it was the music section that left both teams baffled. The round saw music clips played through studio speakers, and the contestants were tasked with naming the artists behind the songs. Host Amol Rajan gave the Southampton team a hint, saying the first artist based the song on her friendship with Nellee Hooper. The clip played, and the team answered correctly that it was Icelandic singer-songwriter Bjork. The next clue was: 'This singer sang this song in honour of her collaboration with Marvin Gaye.' But as the clip played, the team looked clueless. They turned to one another for answers, but each was more unsure than the last. One team member shook his head, and admitted: 'I don't know,' before his teammate passed on behalf of the group. Amol revealed: 'It's Diana Ross,' at which the team were obviously dejected. Meanwhile, agitated fans were shouting at the TV screen at home, with many online shocked at the 'easy' question. 'P**s easy music round,' wrote one, while another chimed in: 'This is a boring match.' Fans were quick to point out the seeming disparity between the simpler music section and the show's other categories. One shared an image of a sketch by comedy duo Armstrong and Miller, with the caption: 'And then the music round is all sort of Pop Music, and b***er me, I got three right! Boom! I is on fire, isn't it?' A fourth wrote: 'Geeks, you might know all sorts of elements but if you don't know The Boss Miss Ross, I can't help you.' It follows a similar loss on a recent episode of the quiz programme, where UCL and SOAS were the two universities fighting to progress to the next round. One question Amol, 42, put to the students left them dumfounded as they tried to give the presenter an answer. Amol asked them: 'In what present-day country was a territory that was given the name 'Island of the True Cross' by Pedro Álvares Cabral during a trading expedition to India in 1500? 'Perhaps attempting to avoid becalm waters in the Gulf of Guinea, Cabral sailed south-west under the terms of the Treaty of Tordesillas, claimed the place for the Crown of Portugal.' UCL tried their best to answer, with Doherty blurring out 'Goa,' but Amol told him it was incorrect. Mozayen then had a go, simply saying: 'Sri Lanka?' but was promptly told that also wasn't correct. Have you managed to correctly guess the answer? The answer was in fact Brazil. Meanwhile, BBC viewers were recently reduced to tears as University Challenge host Amol Rajan sobbed over a bereavement 'too painful to think about' in an emotional new documentary. Amol Rajan Goes To The Ganges, released on BBC One last month, followed the journalist and broadcaster on a life-changing trip to his birth country of India. The hour-long documentary came after the British-Indian presenter lost his father three years ago and struggled to come to terms with it. Amol did not take his emotional journey alone - his mother accompanied him and provided a steadying presence throughout its ups and downs. He noticed on the trip his mother, a practising Hindu, 'seemed to have an emotional toolkit that I lacked'. Amol was touched by fans' admiration of his mother, posting on X during the broadcast: 'If you're one of the thousands of people watching this on BBC One and thinking my mum is a legend, I confirm you are absolutely correct.' To a suggestion she do the famous Thought For The Day segment on Radio 4's Today programme, which he hosts, he replied: 'My mum is the most extraordinary person. She'd be fantastic.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store