logo
Four Years Of Taliban Rule In Afghanistan: A Timeline

Four Years Of Taliban Rule In Afghanistan: A Timeline

NDTVa day ago
Here is a look at key dates since the Taliban returned to power four years ago, as United States and NATO forces withdrew from the country:
2021
August 15: The Taliban march into Kabul, returning to power after two decades as internationally backed President Ashraf Ghani flees the country.
August 26: Islamic State group suicide bombers and gunmen kill over 170 Afghans and 13 US troops in an attack on the crowds trying to be evacuated at Kabul's airport.
2022
March 23: On the day high schools are opening, the Taliban abruptly reverse a promise to allow girls above the sixth grade to attend school.
May 7: The Taliban Virtue and Vice Ministry says women in public must wear all-encompassing robes and cover their faces except for their eyes. It advises them to stay home unless they have important work outside the house.
November 10: A nationwide ban on women using gyms and parks comes into force. The Taliban say they imposed the ban because women allegedly disobeyed gender segregation rules or didn't cover themselves properly.
November 20: The Taliban lash 19 people, including alleged adulterers, in the first public flogging since their return to rule.
December 8: The Taliban execute a convicted killer before hundreds of spectators, the first public execution since the takeover.
December 21: The Taliban bar female students from attending university.
December 24: The Taliban bar Afghan women from working with national and international nongovernmental groups.
2023
July 4: The Taliban order beauty salons to shut down for offering allegedly un-Islamic services like eyebrow shaping. The decision affects as many as 60,000 female entrepreneurs.
September 13: The Taliban hail China's new ambassador with fanfare. Months later, the Taliban officially send their new ambassador to Beijing.
October 4: Pakistan announces a major crackdown on foreigners living in the country illegally, including millions of Afghans.
October 7: A 6.3 magnitude earthquake in western Herat province kills thousands. More quakes follow, bringing further devastation to the area.
2024
January 4: The Taliban arrest women in Kabul for wearing 'bad hijab,' the first official dress code crackdown since they returned to power.
May 17: Shooters open fire in Bamiyan, killing six people, including three Spanish vacationers. It's a blow to the Taliban's plans to woo tourists. IS claims the attack.
June 4: The leader of the United Arab Emirates meets a Taliban official facing a US bounty over his involvement in deadly assaults. It highlights the growing divide on how to deal with the Taliban.
July 30: The Taliban say they no longer recognize Afghan diplomatic missions staffed by diplomats from the former Western-backed government.
August 13: The Taliban celebrate the third anniversary of their return to power at a former US air base that was once the center of Washington's war to unseat the Taliban and hunt down the al-Qaida perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks.
August 21: The UAE accepts the credentials of the Taliban's ambassador to the Gulf Arab state.
August 22: Authorities ban women's voices and bare faces in public under new laws approved by the supreme leader in efforts to combat vice and promote virtue.
September 13: IS militants kill 14 people in a Shiite-majority area of central Afghanistan, gunning them down as they returned from visiting shrines in Iraq.
September 16: The Taliban suspend polio vaccination campaigns in Afghanistan, one of two countries in which the spread of the potentially fatal, paralyzing disease has never been stopped.
October 15: Taliban run-media stop showing images of living beings in some Afghan provinces to comply with morality laws. That same month, the southern province of Helmand bans all media from showing images of living beings.
November 10: The Taliban confirm they will attend a U.N. climate conference. The head of the country's national environment agency says Afghanistan needs international support to deal with extreme weather.
December 4: There is widespread condemnation after reports that the Taliban's leader has ordered private and public institutions to suspend medical courses for women.
December 11: A suicide bombing in the Afghan capital kills the refugee minister. The funeral for Khalil Haqqani, the paternal uncle of acting interior minister Sirajuddin Haqqani, is held the following day.
December 24: Airstrikes by Pakistan target suspected Pakistani Taliban hideouts in Afghanistan. Afghan officials say the airstrikes killed 46 people, mostly women and children.
2025
January 22: A prisoner swap with the US frees two Americans in exchange for a Taliban figure imprisoned for life in California on drug trafficking and terrorism charges. The Taliban free more Americans months later.
January 24: The International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor requests arrest warrants for two top Taliban officials for the repression of women.
February 24: The Taliban confirm the arrest of two elderly British nationals, Peter and Barbie Reynolds.
March 5: A suspect in the 2021 suicide bombing at Kabul airport appears in a US court following his capture in Pakistan.
March 23: The US lifts bounties on three senior Taliban figures, including the interior minister.
June 5: US President Donald Trump bans entry for citizens from 12 countries, including Afghanistan.
July 4: Russia becomes the first country to officially recognize the Taliban government.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hell hath no fury like Donald Trump scorned
Hell hath no fury like Donald Trump scorned

Hindustan Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Hell hath no fury like Donald Trump scorned

Trump has not threatened China and Turkey, the largest and third largest importers of Russian oil. Nor Hungary and Slovakia, two European and Nato countries that import Russian oil. And he's ignored the fact that Japan has started to do so from June this year Has Donald Trump got it in for India? He's slapped 50% tariffs, he's suspended trade talks till the tariff dispute is resolved, he says he doesn't care if India's 'dead economy' sinks and Peter Navarro, his trade advisor, has said India is threatening America's national security by buying Russian oil. Worst of all, Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, has revealed that secondary tariffs on India could increase if Trump's talks with Putin fail. He also wants Europe to impose its own secondary tariffs. Does all of this suggest India has fallen out of America's favour? There is a view that Trump is using India to send a message to China and Russia. It's not a comforting one. It means we're collateral damage and he doesn't really care what happens to us. On the other hand — and this is equally galling — Trump seems to have fallen in love with Pakistan. He's only imposed 19% tariffs, his government considers Islamabad a 'phenomenal partner' in the fight against counter-terrorism — last week it lauded Pakistan's 'continued successes in containing terrorist entities' — he invited Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch and wants to help Pakistan prospect for oil. In fact, Trump has taunted India with the tease that Pakistan could one day sell oil to Delhi. So, is Pakistan the new belle of the ball? Let's focus on the issue of Russian oil, both because it rankles with Delhi but also because Trump has made it clear that until it's resolved there'll be no trade negotiations. In fact, Bessent has threatened further penalties. The truth is the Biden Administration encouraged India to buy Russian oil. In May 2024, this is what Eric Garcetti, the American ambassador in Delhi, said: 'Actually, they (India) bought Russian oil because we (the US) wanted somebody to buy Russian oil at a price cap … because as a commodity we didn't want oil prices going up and they fulfilled that.' Today Trump is deliberately ignoring his predecessor's policy and blaming India instead. Secondly, Trump is also being hypocritical. America continues to import palladium, uranium hexafluoride, fertilisers and chemicals from Russia and reports indicate that in the last six months the amount imported has increased substantially compared to last year. So, if America can import from Russia, why can't India? Thirdly — and this hints at Trump's real intentions — there's another double standard. He has not threatened China and Turkey, the largest and third largest importers of Russian oil. Nor Hungary and Slovakia, two European and Nato countries that import Russian oil. And he's ignored the fact that Japan has started to do so from June this year. In fact, he's just extended the trade truce with China for another 90 days. Clearly his wrath is single-mindedly directed at Delhi. There is, however, another equally worrying aspect of the problem. Does Trump's attitude and behaviour suggest Quad has lost its utility in his eyes? If it has, where does America's Indo-Pacific strategy stand? It brought great comfort to India vis-à-vis our problems with China. If Trump is no longer committed to it, that will create worrying concerns for us. Whether Trump reaches an economic deal with China is hard to predict but probably likely because he's already talking of a summit with Xi Jinping. The question is, will the deal also presage a better political understanding of China? More space for Beijing's regional ambitions? In that event, will India continue to have US support over our border dispute with China? The biggest problem is what can we do about this? The truthful answer is very little. There's nothing we export to America that America can't do without. China has rare earth minerals and metals. We don't. Our leverage is very limited. Our only hope is a Putin-Trump deal on Ukraine which could lead to the secondary sanctions being lifted. Scott Bessent's comments suggest the White House has India in its sights if they aren't. Hell, it seems, hath no fury like a Trump scorned! Karan Thapar is the author of Devil's Advocate: The Untold Story. The views expressed are personal.

Vladimir Putin willing to end the Ukraine war, but has one condition: Report
Vladimir Putin willing to end the Ukraine war, but has one condition: Report

Hindustan Times

time30 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Vladimir Putin willing to end the Ukraine war, but has one condition: Report

Russian President Vladimir Putin put forward a demand that Ukraine needs to withdraw from the eastern Donetsk region as a condition for ending Moscow's war with Kyiv during the Alaska Summit with US President Donald Trump on Friday. Russian President Vladimir Putin meets US President Donald Trump, in Alaska on Saturday. (X/@WhiteHouse ) However, Putin also told Trump that if his core demands were met, he would be open to freezing the rest of the frontline, the Financial Times reported. According to the report, Trump called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders on Saturday to communicate Putin's demand. He also urged Ukraine and Europe to drop efforts to secure a ceasefire from Moscow. Russia has been in partial control of the Donetsk region for more than a decade. If Putin's demand is met, he will get control of the territory where his forces have made the most gains in the war since November last year. What is Vladimir Putin willing to let go in exchange for full control over Donetsk? According to the FT report, Vladimir Putin has said that in exchange for the Donetsk region, he would freeze the frontline in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where his forces occupy large swaths of land, and not launch new attacks to take more territory. Putin made it clear to Donald Trump that his core demand of addressing 'the root causes' of the conflict still stands. He wants NATO's eastward expansion to end, meaning Ukraine would not be allowed to join the alliance. But he is reportedly prepared to compromise on other issues, including territory, if he is satisfied that the 'root causes' are addressed. The Russian control over Donetsk Russian forces control about 70 percent of the Donetsk region. Ukraine still has control over the region's westernmost chain of cities, which are said to be critical to Kyiv's military operation and defences along the eastern front. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that he would not swap territory with Russia and would not allow a second partition of the country. He is meeting Trump on Monday in Washington, where this topic will certainly come up.

A non-NATO pact for Ukraine? US floats Western alliance-style security guarantees for Kyiv
A non-NATO pact for Ukraine? US floats Western alliance-style security guarantees for Kyiv

First Post

time30 minutes ago

  • First Post

A non-NATO pact for Ukraine? US floats Western alliance-style security guarantees for Kyiv

The US has proposed security guarantees for Ukraine similar to – but separate from – the collective defence agreement between NATO member countries. US President Donald Trump gives a thumbs up after landing at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on August 15, 2025. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin made no breakthrough on Ukraine at their high-stakes summit on August 15, 2025, pointing to areas of agreement and rekindling a friendship but offering no news on a ceasefire. Photo- AFP The United States has proposed offering Ukraine a set of NATO-style security guarantees that stop short of full alliance membership, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and diplomatic sources confirmed AFP on Saturday. The proposal, raised by President Donald Trump during calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders following his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, would create a 'non-NATO Article 5' clause to assure Kyiv of collective support without extending NATO membership, a key Russian red line. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'As one of the security guarantees for Ukraine, the American side proposed a non-NATO Article 5 type guarantee, supposedly agreed with Putin,' the diplomatic source told AFP on condition they not be identified in any way. NATO's collective security is based on its Article 5 principle: if one member is attacked, the entire alliance comes to its defence. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who was on the call with Trump, confirmed the US president had raised the idea of security guarantee 'inspired' by Article 5, which she has been pushing for several months. The starting point for the proposal was defining a collective security clause 'that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the US, (which would be) ready to act in case it is attacked again', Meloni said in a statement. In March, Meloni told Italian senators that any such response would not necessarily involve going to war. She noted that, while NATO's Article 5 has the use of force as an option, 'it is not the only possible option'. Kyiv has long aspired to join NATO – but Russia has given that as one of its reasons for its war in Ukraine, and some Western circles have expressed resistance to the idea. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has repeatedly ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance. Before his joint call with Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump spoke just with the Ukrainian president about Friday's Alaska summit. 'The American side voiced this (joint security proposal) during a conversation with the president (Zelensky) and then repeated it during a joint conversation with the Europeans,' the diplomatic source said. Another source with knowledge of the matter confirmed the NATO-like guarantees had been discussed. But that source added: 'No-one knows how this could work and why Putin would agree to it if he is categorically against NATO and obviously against really effective guarantees of Ukraine's sovereignty." European Leaders Reaffirm Support for Ukraine Several European leaders jointly pledged to continue support for Ukraine and maintain pressure on Russia until the war in Ukraine ends, after a summit in Alaska between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The joint statement from leaders including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was issued after Trump briefed them on his talks with Putin. It said the next step must be talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and that they were ready to work with Trump and Zelenskiy towards a three-way summit with European support. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump said after his talks with Putin that Ukraine should agree a deal to end the war with Russia. He said he had agreed with the Russian leader that the best way to do this was to go straight to a peace settlement rather than via a ceasefire, something hitherto opposed by Kyiv and its European allies. The European statement - also signed by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and European Council President Antonio Costa - said Ukraine must have 'ironclad' security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force. 'Our support to Ukraine will continue. We are determined to do more to keep Ukraine strong in order to achieve an end to the fighting and a just and lasting peace,' the statement said. 'As long as the killing in Ukraine continues, we stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia. We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace." STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store