DWP benefit cuts hit people with Parkinson's and MS
If MPs back his amendment, patients with 'evolving' needs who cannot work could also qualify for a higher rate of benefits.
The Government's Bill has already cleared its first Commons hurdle at second reading, after work and pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms vowed not to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes coming in only after a review of the benefit.
To meet his promise, ministers have had to table amendments to their own draft new law, to remove one of its seven clauses, which MPs will debate next Wednesday.
Universal credit claimants with Parkinson's 'are already possibly struggling financially', Mr Downie said, ahead of the debate.
He added: 'The cost of living with a condition like Parkinson's can be very high. You may well require or need additional support.'
Today the UK government published its Bill that will cut eligibility criteria for, and access to, Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Here is our response 👇
🧵1/3 pic.twitter.com/5eRXQW4ezh — Parkinson's UK (@ParkinsonsUK) June 18, 2025
The Dunfermline and Dollar MP said patients who struggle with their motor control might buy pre-chopped vegetables or chicken.
'Those things are expensive, so if you're already on universal credit and you're struggling, being able to do that significantly impacts your health, it significantly impacts your ability to live properly,' he continued.
To qualify, claimants must have limited capability for work or work-related activity (LCWRA) and symptoms which 'constantly' apply.
🚨 Reminder: cuts to disability benefits affect everyone.
You might not need disability benefits today. Or tomorrow.
But you can become disabled at any time and find yourself in need of a financial safety net. pic.twitter.com/YQgvyGaRvh — Scope (@scope) July 3, 2025
Mr Downie's amendment would expand these criteria to claimants with 'a fluctuating condition'.
It would cover 'conditions like Parkinson's but also multiple sclerosis, ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis), long Covid and a whole range of other conditions where, you know, in the morning things could be really good and in the afternoon things could be really bad, and even hour by hour things could change', he said.
'I felt it was necessary to table an amendment to really probe what the Government's position is on this, and ensuring that people with Parkinson's and conditions like that are not excluded from even applying and being considered.'
Mr Downie's proposal has backing from 23 cross-party MPs so far.
Recommended reading:
Juliet Tizzard, external relations director at Parkinson's UK, said: 'Criteria in the Bill say that a new claimant for the universal credit health payment will have to be 'constantly' unable to perform certain activities to qualify.
'This doesn't work for people with Parkinson's, whose symptoms change throughout the day.
'People with Parkinson's and other fluctuating conditions like multiple sclerosis will be effectively excluded from getting all the financial support they need.
'The Government has responded to our call and withdrawn the damaging restrictions to Pip.
'Now, they must do the same with the universal credit health element. The health of many people with Parkinson's is in their hands.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Labour giants Corbyn will aim to oust
Jeremy Corbyn's new hard-Left party is expected to target Labour giants including Wes Streeting and Jess Phillips at the next general election. The former Labour leader, who now sits as an independent MP, broke his silence on Friday to confirm he is in talks about a 'real alternative' to Sir Keir Starmer's party. It comes after Zarah Sultana, an ally of Mr Corbyn who was also stripped of the whip by Sir Keir, announced that the pair would co-lead the new movement. Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana are staunchly pro-Palestine. They have both accused the Israeli government of 'genocide' over its military response to the Oct 7 massacre by Hamas. Labour shed a significant amount of support among Muslim voters at the general election last year after Sir Keir initially refused to call for an immediate ceasefire in the Middle East. The election saw five MPs, including Mr Corbyn, returned to the Commons on a pro-Gaza ticket at the expense of their defeated Labour rivals. Now Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana will hope their own electoral vehicle will be able to make similar gains at the next national poll. Both Mr Streeting, the Health Secretary, and Ms Phillips, the safeguarding minister, won their seats on Jul 4 2024 with majorities of less than 1,000 votes. An analysis by The Telegraph shows they have a significantly higher number of Muslim constituents than the last known England and Wales average of 6.5 per cent. Mr Streeting's Ilford North constituency has a Muslim majority of 30.6 per cent. He only just held on to the seat by 528 votes in the general election. Ms Phillips, meanwhile, has a constituency where 42.6 per cent of voters are Muslim. She won with a majority of 693 votes to beat Jody McIntyre, an independent hard-Left candidate. Her victory speech in Birmingham Yardley was interrupted by pro-Palestinian activists who booed and jeered her as well as chanting 'free Palestine' and 'shame on you'. Ms Phillips said the general election was 'the worst election I have ever stood in' and said she had been targeted by activists because she was a 'strong woman'. Other seats that could be targeted by the new party include Bradford West, where Naz Shah has a majority of 707 and almost three in five constituents (58.7 per cent) are Muslim. In Peterborough, Andrew Pakes has a majority of 155 in a constituency where almost 18 per cent of people are Muslim. The slimmest Labour majority in the country is just 15 votes in Hendon, which is represented by David Pinto-Duschinsky. One in six constituents (16.5 per cent) are Muslim according to the most recent census in 2021. Last year, an analysis by Survation and Royal Holloway identified the most culturally Left-wing seats in the UK. These were Nottingham East, Clapham and Brixton Hill and Hackney North and Stoke Newington. All three constituencies are currently represented by Labour MPs on the Left of the party. Diane Abbott, the MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary but has already ruled out joining his new party. Nadia Whittome, the MP for Nottingham East, worked closely with Ms Sultana on various issues – most prominently the Gaza conflict – while both women had the Labour whip. In Clapham and Brixton Hill, Ms Ribiero-Addy, a member of the Socialist Campaign Group, was one of the Labour MPs to defy Sir Keir earlier this week by voting against his welfare Bill. Mr Corbyn has already joined forces with Shockat Adam, Ayoub Khan, Adnan Hussain and Iqbal Mohamed since their election as independent MPs last summer. They formed the so-called Independent Alliance in September and have gone on to vote as a bloc in the Commons while also issuing a number of joint statements ahead of key votes. It remains to be seen whether Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana could persuade Apsana Begum, who was stripped of the Labour whip last year, to join their new party.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How to balance the UK books: six options open to Rachel Reeves
Rachel Reeves is under pressure to tackle a multibillion-pound shortfall in the government finances. Labour's high-stakes welfare U-turn and a spike in bond markets triggered by speculation over the chancellor's position has dragged the government's tax and spending plans into the spotlight. Ministers have warned of 'financial consequences' after the backtracking on disability benefits and winter fuel payments for pensioners, which have a price tag north of £6bn. Alongside a sluggish economic outlook and potential downgrade in productivity forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility at the autumn budget, economists at Deutsche Bank warn that Reeves could face a £30bn shortfall against her self-imposed fiscal rules. This has raised questions over how the chancellor responds. Reeves has several options: Likelihood: 1/5 Reeves has said her fiscal rules are 'iron-clad' and 'non-negotiable,' despite mounting economic headwinds that have made them tougher to meet. Her primary target rule requires revenue to meet day-to-day spending by 2029-30. From next year, there is a little extra wriggle room: the rule will shift to a rolling three-year target, and will require the day-to-day budget to be in surplus or deficit by no more than 0.5% of GDP. Several leading economists argue the fiscal rules are not fit for purpose and ought to be replaced, with pressure growing from within Labour ranks, too. Many economists, however, warn that financial markets would balk at higher borrowing. Part of the issue is that Britain's fiscal rules have been repeatedly changed before, testing patience in financial markets. Aiming to hit the rules by a fine margin, weak economic growth, higher interest rates and already elevated debt levels also make conditions challenging. Likelihood: 2/5 After the U-turns on the welfare bill and pensioners' winter fuel payments, the government's ability to find politically feasible budget savings has taken a heavy blow. Labour outlined its priorities up to the next general election at last month's high-profile spending review, which makes it challenging for the chancellor to find further savings. Reopening talks with her cabinet colleagues from a weakened position, so soon after the spending review, would be a tough ask. To make way for bigger cash injections for health and defence the spending review settlements for some departments already entailed cuts in real terms, with the Home Office among the biggest losers. All departments were also tasked with finding savings of at least 5% by the end of the decade. However, some economists say the size of the British state is climbing at an unsustainable rate. Spending as a share of GDP is forecast to remain permanently higher than pre-pandemic levels, at about 44%. A fresh round of cuts would imperil Labour's promises to fix Britain's battered public services and for 'no return to austerity'. They could come with severe political costs if voters saw little progress before the next election. 'Recent events have confirmed one thing: spending cuts have likely reached their political limits,' said Sanjay Raja, senior economist at Deutsche Bank. Likelihood: 3/5 Labour made a manifesto promise not to increase income tax, VAT and employee national insurance contributions (NICs). While party strategists felt this was vital to win the general election, most economists think it was a serious mistake. Several leading experts argue the chancellor should reconsider. Raising the basic rate of income tax by 1p would yield an extra £8bn a year, while a 2p increase in employee NICs would result in about £10bn. The consultancy Capital Economics said one option could be to introduce a new variant of income tax, for example through a new health and social care or defence levy – similar to the plan made by Boris Johnson that was scrapped by Liz Truss. Some economists highlight the £20bn worth of cuts to employee national insurance contributions made in the final months of the last Tory government. Viewed by many as a post-election trap for Labour Reeves did not oppose them. Reversing this position now would be tougher , but could be done by blaming the Tories for an irresponsible and unsustainable decision. One more palatable option could be to extend a freeze on personal tax thresholds. First introduced by the Tories in 2021, the 'stealth' tax-raising measure drags people into paying the higher rate of income tax. Due to end in 2028, a two-year extension would raise £8bn a year extra by 2029-30. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Reeves has previously vowed not to repeat anything of the scale of her £40bn tax-raising autumn budget, and has said Britain's tax levels as a share of the economy are already at record levels. While the UK tax bill is historically high, at about 35%, it remains below many comparable advanced economies; including France, Germany, and the high-tax and spend Nordic states. Likelihood: 4/5 Reeves could dust off a memo from Angela Rayner sent to her before the March spring statement, in which the deputy prime minister urged the chancellor to consider a series of wealth taxes to raise up to £4bn a year. Suggestions included ending inheritance tax relief on shares listed on the smaller Aim stock market, scrapping the £500 dividend tax-free allowance, and freezing the threshold at which the 45p additional income tax rate applies. With voters broadly supporting higher taxes on wealth, and facing mounting pressure from her own backbenchers, such measures would be politically astute. One option could be to target the pension tax free lump sum. At present, individuals can withdraw 25% of a pension pot up to £268,000 as a tax-free lump sum. Restricting this to £100,000 could raise about £2bn a year. Another commonly floated idea, adding pensions to inheritance tax, could also raise about £2bn. Likelihood: 3/5 Reeves has tried to court business leaders and pledged not to raise the headline rate of corporation tax. However, businesses bore the brunt of her October budget through a £25bn increase in employer NICs, and are loudly warning that further tax rises would hit jobs and growth. Rayner's memo suggested raising corporation tax rate for banks. Reeves has prioritised supporting the City of London. However, banks have benefited from higher interest rates, as well as a windfall on reserves held at the Bank of England under its quantitative easing programme, which is losing the Treasury money. Reversing a Tory-era cut to a levy on bank balance sheets, from 8% to 3%, could raise about £1.5bn. Other options could include higher taxes on the gambling industry, raising about £3bn. Breaking the manifesto promise on headline corporation tax could raise about £4bn through a one percentage-point increase. Likelihood: 2/5 Economic conditions have turned against Reeves since the autumn, but the chancellor could get lucky. Britain's economy grew at the fastest rate in the G7 in the first quarter and the Bank has cut interest rates twice in 2025. City investors are betting on at least two more reductions. Despite Wednesday's bond market wobble, the UK's borrowing costs are still lower than earlier this year. If sustained, this could lead to improved forecasts for the government's debt servicing costs from the OBR. Monthly borrowing figures coming in below predicted levels would also help. The chancellor will be hoping efforts on deregulation, infrastructure investment, and labour market support could bolster the economic outlook. Trade deals with the US, India, and closer ties with the EU could also help. However, economists warn a rapid turnaround is unlikely. Labour's tax increases introduced in April have weighed down activity, while geopolitical tensions and Donald Trump's trade wars cloud the global outlook.
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Branding Palestine Action terrorists ‘completely ludicrous', say supporters
Supporters of Palestine Action have described the Government's intention to brand the group as terrorists 'completely ludicrous' and said ministers are 'desperate to stifle free speech'. Hundreds gathered outside the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday where Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, is asking the High Court to temporarily block the Government from proscribing the group as a terrorist organisation. Among the fluttering flags of green, black, white and red were demonstrators holding signs saying 'Free Palestine' and 'We are all Palestine Action'. Others masked themselves in sunglasses and a keffiyeh while speakers took turns to address the crowd through a PA system. Sara, who was standing on the edge of the crowd, said many of the supporters present were carrying 'a lot of rage and anger' about the violence in Gaza. She said: 'We think that the British Government needs to stop funding the genocidal regime in Palestine against Palestinians. 'They need to listen to protest groups instead of this massive overreach which is trying to stifle legitimate resistance and protest against one of the most horrific instances of violence against humanity in our time.' One woman, who preferred not to be named, stood in the shade next to a pile of pink boxes containing cupcakes decorated with Palestinian flags. She said she was raising money to send to a friend in Gaza because the price of basic food there has become so high. Speaking outside court, she said: 'I think it's completely ludicrous that the Government is, rather than stopping supporting a genocide that is happening, they would rather criminalise people who are trying to stop it on the Government's behalf, seeing as though they are not doing anything. 'They have a legal obligation under the Genocide Convention to do all they can to prevent genocide. And they are choosing to, rather than follow their obligations, remain an active participant in this genocide. 'So civilians of conscience have decided to take up the mantle instead and do what they can.' David Cannon, chairman of the Jewish Network for Palestine, stood wearing a sunhat and bore on his shoulder a white banner adorned with a Palestine flag and the name of his organisation. His Jewish upbringing made him proud of Israel, he said, until he realised that the conflict in Gaza has been a 'slow-burn genocide for the last 80 years'. He said: 'Israel is founded on stolen land and stolen lives. It has not only stolen Palestinian land and lives, it has also stolen the identity of Jewish religion. 'So it's vital that there is a Jewish voice saying there is nothing Jewish about apartheid, nothing Jewish about ethnic cleansing, nothing Jewish about genocide. 'The (UK) Government are desperate to stifle free speech which is trying to point out the truth. It's a desperate action and it may well backfire.' Not every protester outside the court building was there in support of Palestine Action. A small group stood across the street, next to several police officers, holding up a blue and white banner that said 'there is no genocide in Gaza'. Mark Birbeck, from the pro-Israel group, called Our Fight, said they do not support the aims of Palestine Action but neither do they support them becoming a proscribed terrorist organisation. Speaking on the street, he said: 'We don't actually support proscribing Palestine Action. 'We don't think they are a terrorist organisation, and in fact our argument is that it makes a mockery of what terrorism is. 'It's bizarre that (the Government) is presenting this as some kind of aggressive step. 'My suspicion is that Palestine Action are going to run rings around them. 'These people know what they are doing. 'I don't agree with them, I don't agree with their politics, but they've been doing this for years. 'Our argument against Palestine Action though is not that they are terrorists, but what we do believe they are doing is trying to claim the moral high ground and effectively they are doing that to isolate Israel.'
