Trump announces 'massive' Japan trade deal including 15 percent tariff
Photo:
AFP / Takumi Harada
US President Donald Trump has announced a "massive" trade deal with Japan, cutting a threatened 25-percent tariff to 15 percent ahead of a 1 August deadline.
Trump has vowed to hit
dozens of countries
with punitive tariffs if they don't strike a deal with the United States by next month.
So far, Trump has only announced pacts with Japan, Britain, Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia, while talks continue with other trade partners.
"We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made," Trump said on his Truth Social platform.
Trump said that under the deal, "Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits."
He did not provide further details on the unusual investment plan, but said the deal "will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs."
Japanese imports into the United States were already subject to a 10-percent tariff, which would have risen to 25 percent on August 1 without a deal.
Duties of 25 percent on Japanese autos - an industry accounting for eight percent of Japanese jobs - were also already in place, as well as 50 percent on steel and aluminum.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said on Wednesday in Tokyo that the autos levy was cut to 15 percent.
"We are the first (country) in the world to reduce tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, with no limits on volume," he told reporters.
"We think it is a great achievement that we were able to get the largest cut (in tariffs) among countries which have trade surpluses with the US," he said.
This sent Japanese auto stocks soaring on Wednesday, including Toyota which rocketed more than 12 percent.
US-bound shipments of Japanese cars tumbled 26.7 percent in June, stoking fears that Japan could fall into a technical recession.
Last year vehicles accounted for around 28 percent of Japan's 21.3 trillion yen (NZ$241.2 billion) of exports to the world's biggest economy.
To Trump's annoyance, US-made cars sell poorly in Japan, with only hundreds sold annually for the likes of General Motors, compared to millions of Toyotas bought by US motorists.
The US president also wanted Japan to increase imports of rice, the price of which has soared in recent months in the Asian giant, and of US oil and gas.
But Trump said Tuesday that Japan has agreed to "open their Country to Trade including Cars and Trucks, Rice and certain other Agricultural Products, and other things".
Rice imports are a sensitive issue in Japan, and Ishiba's government - which
lost its upper house majority
in elections on Sunday - had previously ruled out any concessions.
Ishiba, whose future is uncertain following the election, said on Wednesday that the deal does not sacrifice Japan's agricultural sector.
Trump has been under pressure to wrap up trade pacts after promising a flurry of deals ahead of his 1 August tariff deadline.
Earlier on Tuesday, he announced a deal had been reached with the Philippines which would see the country face 19 percent tariffs on its exports.
The White House also laid out details of a deal with Indonesia, which would see it ease critical mineral export restrictions and also face a 19 percent tariff, down from a threatened 32 percent.
Indonesian goods deemed to have been transshipped to avoid higher duties elsewhere, however, will be tariffed at 40 percent, a US official told reporters Tuesday.
After an escalatory tit-for-tat with China, the two major economies agreed to a temporary lowering of tariffs, with another round of negotiations expected next week in Stockholm.
Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has imposed a sweeping 10 percent tariff on allies and competitors alike, alongside steeper levels on steel, aluminum and autos.
Legal challenges to Trump's non-sectoral tariffs are ongoing.
- AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
The far-right in Germany wants to soften its image, not its policies
The AfD's new strategy emerged from an internal analysis of its performance in national elections in February. It ran on an anti-elite, anti-immigrant platform that included promises of mass deportations. It also vowed to reignite the nation's industrial economy, powered by German coal and Russian natural gas. The party finished second, winning more than one-fifth of the vote. But the AfD found itself shut out of government, with no other party in Parliament willing to work with it. Unable to cement its place in the Bundestag, the AfD decided that it needed to expand its appeal at the ballot box and in circles of power in Berlin. Enter the new approach, which takes as its starting point the idea that German voters are fundamentally conservative — an assertion that centre-left parties dispute. It is based largely on a surface read of February's election, when more than half of the voters either backed the AfD or the centre-right sister parties of Merz, the Christian Democrats and Christian Social Union. Merz's voters broadly agree with AfD's view that Germany needs to strengthen the economy and reduce migration, said Beatrix von Storch, a senior AfD Member of Parliament and an architect of the new strategy. Opinion polling shows that Germans are worried about migration and security above all other issues. The AfD, she said, will try to appeal to centre-right voters through those issues. It will also try to provoke Germany's major liberal parties to move to the extreme left on social issues like abortion and transgender rights, she said, by raising the profile of those matters and of Germany's growing far-left party. 'There is a cultural war in the Western world and we will win it,' she said. She said she hoped for an echo of last year's American presidential election. 'Moderate Republicans voted for Donald Trump, even though they don't approve of everything he says or does,' von Storch said. 'But the divide between moderate Republicans and the progressive Democrats is so deep that these reservations no longer mattered.' There are many reasons why the AfD's effort could fail. Merz's voters disagree with the AfD's stances on several issues, surveys suggest, most notably Germany's backing of Ukraine in its war against Russia. And Germans tend to be consensus builders. While its political extremes are growing, many voters still baulk at supporting any party seen as too far on one end or the other. 'You could say that the political centre is a kind of ideal in Germany, which is why I believe that, despite the potential for polarisation, there is no great desire for division among the German population,' said Johannes Hillje, a political scientist who has studied the new AfD strategy. Some voters have also been turned off by the AfD's sharp rhetoric, particularly on immigration. German intelligence has formally declared the AfD to be extremist over what the Government called an unconstitutional campaign to treat migrants differently from other German residents. The extremism designation could someday lead to the party being banned from German politics. The force of many voters' distaste for the AfD helped prompt the other part of its strategy, the effort to soften its image without retreating on policy. In May, AfD drafted penalties for members who had acted uncivilly in parliament, including fines of up to €5000 ($9760) and a three-month ban from giving speeches in the chamber. Earlier, it dissolved the Junge Alternative, the party's notoriously radical youth wing. The AfD is now polling around 25% nationally, but it has lost ground to the centre-right since Merz took office in May. His party gained support after loosening government borrowing limits, cutting some taxes and tightening border controls. The Chancellor has rallied Germans around increased military spending, as long-standing American security guarantees for Europe have faltered. Until recently, he had avoided the sort of coalition bickering that brought down former Chancellor Olaf Scholz's Government last year. To rattle Merz's coalition, the AfD needed a controversy — one that combined hot-button social issues and hot-tempered political infighting. This month, Merz's Government provided both. A progressive law professor named Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf had been nominated for a seat on the nation's constitutional court by Merz's centre-left coalition partner, the Social Democrats. But Merz's party was baulking at supporting her. The far-right had helped provoke the dispute. The AfD and social conservatives had been attacking Brosius-Gersdorf, claiming without evidence that she supported legalised abortion to the ninth month of pregnancy. Such a stance would have been far outside the German mainstream, were it true. Abortion is illegal in Germany, but there are no penalties for the procedure through to 12 weeks of pregnancy. Brosius-Gersdorf had worked on a commission to change the law to decriminalise those early-term abortions, but she never publicly supported late-term abortion. The AfD, which opposes abortion, cares little about that distinction. When Merz took questions in Parliament this month, von Storch asked whether he could in good conscience vote to seat Brosius-Gersdorf. After verbally attacking von Storch, Merz said yes. Soon, an edited version of the exchange raced across social media. Outrage built among conservatives, who fumed that Merz had effectively endorsed legalised abortion. Some Catholic bishops warned against confirming the nominee. Merz's governing coalition had to postpone the vote, fearing Brosius-Gersdorf had insufficient support. The nomination remains unresolved, though Merz has refocused his attention in recent days onto foreign policy. Government aides say the best way for Merz to thwart the AfD is to stay out of culture wars and stick to solving problems that rank high among voters' concerns. That includes restarting economic growth, reducing migration and restoring German leadership on the global stage. And doing so while projecting unity inside the government. Some AfD leaders agree that policy wins would be Merz's best weapon against them. Von Storch said AfD voters could flock to Merz if he effectively adopted the party's platform on immigration, including blocking new migrants from crossing the German border and deporting millions of asylum-seekers from Syria and elsewhere. Merz has tightened border controls and stepped-up deportations, but there is no indication he would support anything close to the full AfD migration agenda. Even as she stressed the importance of culture wars to divide the Merz coalition, von Storch said that for the AfD to grow in popularity, it must sell Germans on its plans for their wallets. 'Voters want a government that can lead the economy out of crisis, secure prosperity and ensure sound public finances,' she said. 'The AfD will gain massive acceptance and support if we aggressively stake out these areas.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Jim Tankersley and Christopher F. Schuetze Photograph by: Lena Mucha ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
US prison officials get tips on how to modernise jails during trips to see how they are run abroad
'They treat their maximum-security prisoners like minimum-security prisoners,' Davison marvelled. And yet, Tegel Prison is far less violent than many American prisons. Over the course of a week, officials from Massachusetts, North Dakota, and Oklahoma toured four German prisons where inmates wore street clothes, maintained their right to vote, cooked their own meals, played in soccer leagues, and learned skills like animal husbandry and carpentry. One, called the Open Prison, allowed residents to come and go for work, school, and errands. A growing number of American states are looking abroad for ideas that can be adapted to their state prison systems, most often to Scandinavian countries famous for the IKEA-utopia design of their correctional institutions, but also to places like Germany and New Zealand. In the past two years, California, Arizona, and Oklahoma's prison systems have shifted their focus to rehabilitation rather than punishment. In 2022, Pennsylvania opened a unit known as Little Scandinavia, and last year Missouri began a similar transformation project in four prisons. Six other states have established European-style units for younger prisoners. The efforts are still small, dwarfed by the sheer size of the American prison population, and limited by political and financial roadblocks. Prison conditions are not a priority for voters, polls show, and changes are sometimes unwelcome. In March, thousands of corrections officers in New York state walked off the job to protest against new limitations on the use of solitary confinement, saying the changes would make their jobs more dangerous. In Arizona, a new head of prisons who had sought to make them more humane faced sharp criticism after a prisoner who had been moved out of maximum security killed three fellow inmates. And harsh punishments are part of the American DNA. US President Donald Trump has said he would 'love' to send American convicts to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Still, making prison life more like normal life is catching on in some surprising places. 'I'm amazed by how quickly these ideas are taking off across the US,' said Keramet Reiter, a criminology professor at the University of California, Irvine. Prisoner advocates say the changes make communities safer by better preparing prisoners for their eventual release and create a less stressful environment for prison workers. However, the real catalyst is that US prisons are in crisis, struggling with severe staffing shortages, crumbling facilities and frequent violence. A common room in a ward for Berlin's most dangerous prisoners at Tegel Prison. Photo / Lena Mucha, the New York Times Inmates in US prisons often endure extreme temperatures, vermin-infested food and years, or even decades, in solitary confinement. High-profile cases have brought attention to prolonged shackling, fatal beatings, and sexual abuse. 'It's unsustainable, which is why we have to change the justice system to lock up only those who are a danger to others,' said Tricia Everest, secretary of public safety for Republican-led Oklahoma. The state once had the country's highest incarceration rate. In 2016, voters approved measures to lower the penalties for some crimes and to direct the savings into mental health and substance abuse treatment. Everest has presided over the closure of four prisons. European prisons are far safer than those in the US, experts say, with lower recidivism rates and healthier, happier employees. In Berlin, which has 3.9 million residents and operates a correction system analogous to that of an American state, suicides are rare, and homicides are virtually non-existent. Of course, the US has higher crime than European countries. America's system of prisons and jails is the largest in the world, incarcerating nearly two million people, according to the World Prison Brief, which tracks global data on incarceration. Change on that scale is difficult to accomplish, especially when the American public can be sceptical of spending money on what they regard as prisoners' comfort. Even in states that have been noted for overhauling some aspects of their criminal justice system, like Georgia and Texas, prison conditions can remain abysmal. Georgia was singled out by the Justice Department last year for failing to protect inmates from 'frequent, pervasive violence', and in March a federal judge declared the heat in Texas prisons to be 'plainly unconstitutional'. By contrast, German prison officials say they consider loss of liberty to be punishment enough. The courts have ruled that new prisons must provide single-occupancy cells at least 10sqm in size. Many have kitchens where residents may cook their own meals. One prison for young adults is experimenting with removing bars from some of the windows, on the premise that looking at bars is depressing. Many of the rules were made in response to the shame of the country's Nazi past, when prisons were used to suppress dissent and concentration camps held unspeakable horrors. 'What it all boils down to is the core principle, human dignity,' said Deputy Warden Johanna Schmid as she led the group through Tegel Prison's leafy courtyards. At Heidering Prison, warden Andreas Kratz showed off a visiting room with a kitchenette, bed, crib and balcony. Colby Braun, head of prisons for North Dakota, and Tricia Everest, the secretary of public safety for Oklahoma, view a work area at Heidering Prison, in Grossbeeren, Germany. Photo / Lena Mucha, the New York Times Time with family, German officials said, helps prisoners maintain the ties they will need to stay out of trouble when they are released. In the US, privacy, time outside of cells and family visits are considered risky, and 'overfamiliarity' between correction officers and inmates is prohibited. German prisons take the opposite approach, known as dynamic security. Correction officers are expected to develop relationships with inmates and know when problems may arise. Yvonne Gade, a correction officer in a ward that houses a small number of prisoners deemed particularly dangerous, shrugged off concerns about their access to a gym with free weights. 'It would be a huge potential for violence if you locked them up all the time,' she said. Prisons in Europe are certainly not perfect. The Americans and Germans shared frustrations over gangs and a recent influx of synthetic marijuana. Some of Germany's problems show just how different the system is. In one facility for young adults, a resident set his curtain on fire using a lighter he was permitted to have. In Saxony-Anhalt in April, a prisoner was accused of killing his wife during a five-hour, unsupervised conjugal visit. The idea of showing US policymakers how European prisons work originated with a civil rights lawyer named Don Specter, whose lawsuits have led to changes to the California prison system. In 2011, he accompanied a group of students on a visit to prisons in Germany and Scandinavia and was struck by how it changed the 'hearts and minds' of people with diverse political views. 'It seemed that the magic sauce was actually seeing it in person,' Specter said. When Specter was awarded a large fee in one of his cases, he used it to fund a trip abroad for prison officials in 2013. Out of that grew the Global Justice Exchange Project at the Vera Institute of Justice, which organises regular trips to Germany, and a programme at the University of California, San Francisco called Amend, which has worked with Washington, Oregon, California and other states to change prison culture. Working with Vera, six states have gone on to create special units for 18- to 25-year-olds that allow more frequent visits with family, shared responsibility for resolving conflicts and more out-of-cell time. The effect of these transformations is difficult to measure, in part because many of the units are quite new and in part because doing research in prison is inherently complex. However, a randomised, controlled trial in South Carolina showed that residents who were placed in the special units were 73% less likely to be disciplined for violence and 83% less likely to be sent to restrictive housing. An inmate works with a pony on a small farm at the Neustrelitz Prison in Neustrelitz, Germany. Photo / Lena Mucha, the New York Times Such efforts can also improve staff morale. Guards whose interactions with prisoners go beyond shackling and unshackling them are likely to consider their work more meaningful, said Reiter, the criminology professor. Throughout the German tour, US officials were intrigued but also wrestled with how much of what they saw would work at home. The biggest obstacle was cost, especially increasing staff-to-inmate ratios when states are already struggling to recruit officers. But even simple acts like a guard and inmate sharing a cup of coffee could require an overhaul of long-standing policies designed to prohibit fraternisation. Differing concepts of liability also get in the way. In Germany, prisoners can use the toilet behind a closed door, while in the US toilets are typically installed in open cells, said Colby Braun, director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. 'You live in your bathroom,' he said. 'With another person.' When the state was planning a new prison, designers tried for a more dignified arrangement but could not achieve it, Braun said, because of a requirement that officers be able to see prisoners on their rounds. The officials compared notes on how to overcome political resistance in their own states. Braun said he tried to develop relationships with lawmakers so he could fend off proposals he viewed as counterproductive, like a recent one that would have ended the use of rehabilitation programmes and halfway houses. On the other hand, members of the Massachusetts delegation were frustrated because, they said, its liberal legislature did not want to replace their prisons, some of which are more than 100 years old, even though new ones could make incarceration more humane. For her part, Everest said she had learned how to speak the language of her state's legislators and law enforcement officers. 'I don't do criminal justice reform. It's been politicised,' she said. 'We are modernising the system.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Shaila Dewan Photographs by: Lena Mucha ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Donald Trump says he turned down invitation to Jeffrey Epstein's island
Composite image of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump. Photo: AFP / NEW YORK STATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY/HANDOUT By Andrea Shalal and Nandita Bose , Reuters US President Donald Trump said on Monday he "never had the privilege" of visiting Jeffrey Epstein's island, saying he turned down an invitation from the convicted sex offender in what the president called a moment of good judgment. Trump's remarks were his latest effort to distance himself from the political furor over his administration's handling of files related to Epstein's case and renewed questions over his past relationship with the disgraced financier, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019. "I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down," Trump told reporters during a trip to Scotland. "In one of my very good moments, I turned it down." Epstein owned a private island in the US Virgin Islands where he entertained prominent people from politics, business and entertainment. Prosecutors have alleged he used the compound to conceal the sex trafficking and abuse of under-age victims. Trump, who socialised with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, also offered new insight into why their relationship ended. The president said he cut ties after Epstein attempted to recruit staff who worked for Trump. "He hired help. And I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He stole people that work for me," Trump said. "He did it again. And I threw him out of the place persona non grata." Last week, White House communications director Steven Cheung said Trump had cut ties with Epstein because he regarded him as a "creep." The White House has been under growing pressure from Trump's supporters and political opponents to release more information about the Justice Department's investigation into Epstein. After Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this year promised to release additional materials related to possible Epstein clients and the circumstances surrounding his death, the Justice Department reversed course this month and issued a memo concluding there was no basis to continue investigating and no evidence of a client list. Those findings sparked an angry outcry from some of Trump's supporters who have long believed the government was covering up Epstein's ties to the rich and powerful. Trump's efforts to deflect attention from the case have so far faltered. On Monday, the president again called the story "a hoax." "It's a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion," Trump said, saying Democrats controlled the Epstein files for several years and would have used them against him during the last presidential election if there was anything in them. Trump flew with Epstein aboard his plane at least six times, according to logs for flights spanning from 1991 through 2005. None of those trips were to Epstein's private island. Trump has denied ever being on the plane and has not been accused of any wrongdoing. - Reuters
