Anthropic hires a top Biden official to lead its new AI for social good team (exclusive)
The new team will be led by Elizabeth Kelly, who in 2024 was tapped by the Biden administration to lead the U.S. AI Safety Institute within the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Kelly helped form agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic that let NIST safety-test the companies' new models prior to their deployment. She left the government in early March, and in mid-March joined Anthropic.
'Our mission is to support the development and deployment of AI in ways that are good for the world but might not be incentivized by the market,' Kelly tells Fast Company.
Anthropic views the new group as a reflection of its mission as a public benefit corporation, which commits it to distribute the advantages of its AI equitably, not just to deep-pocketed corporations. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei emphasized in an essay he published last year AI's potential to drive progress in areas like life sciences, physical health, education, and poverty alleviation.
The Beneficial Deployments team sits within Anthropic's go-to-market organization, which it says ensures that the company's AI software and services are designed and deployed with customer needs in mind. Kelly says her team will collaborate across departments—including with Anthropic's Applied AI group and sciences and social impact specialists—to help mission-aligned customers build successful products and services powered by Anthropic models.
'We need to treat nonprofits, ed techs, health techs, those organizations that are developing really transformative solutions the same way that we treat our biggest enterprise customers,' Kelly says. In fact, the smaller organizations, which often lack budget and in-house AI expertise, may get a level of support that's not considered standard for Anthropic's larger customers.
'Our primary focus here is making sure that … the work that we're doing has the biggest impact in terms of lives that we're improving, diseases that we're curing, educational outcomes we're improving,' Kelly says. When considering new beneficiaries, Kelly says she'll take input from members of Anthropic's 'long-term benefit trust,' an independent governance body whose five trustees have experience in global development.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
21 minutes ago
- Fast Company
The future of manufacturing depends on empowering workers
There is a very real anxiety around automation, especially in America—where once-thriving communities have been gutted by waves of displacement, offshoring, and the unchecked application of technology. The narrative around manufacturing automation has long been framed as a zero-sum game: Either humans do the work, or machines do. But that binary thinking is outdated and dangerous. Not only does it threaten millions of livelihoods, but it jeopardizes innovation and efficiency. It overlooks a more powerful and sustainable vision for manufacturing's future, one where AI empowers people instead of replacing them. AI is key to a more resilient workforce and more competitive industries. And when people leverage manufacturing intelligence platforms, they can outperform full automation. Manufacturing at the crossroads America's manufacturing sector is at a crossroad. On one hand, we face a growing shortage of skilled labor amid major sector growth. Companies are announcing new factories in the United States every month, but the National Association of Manufacturers projects that by 2030, more than two million manufacturing jobs could go unfilled due to a lack of qualified workers. On the other hand, we're in the middle of an extraordinary wave of technological advancement—AI, augmented reality, robotics, and more. By using AI to make expertise more accessible, repeatable, and scalable, we can build a more efficient and safer workforce—and actually fill our empty jobs. Today's factory jobs are more art than science, where years of built-up knowledge are critical to getting things done the right way. They rely on software, sensors, and split-second subjective decisions. But the tools on the factory floor haven't evolved past a checklist and a hope. We're asking workers to operate with 20th-century instructions in a 21st-century environment. Manufacturing intelligence platforms aid operators Empowerment in a 21st-century environment starts with manufacturing intelligence platforms. It involves equipping operators with the context and support they need to thrive on the factory floor. A new hire should be able to perform a task with the confidence of a 10-year veteran. Seasoned workers should be free to focus on high-value tasks where their expertise has the greatest impact. And those on the frontline of work should have the tools and agency to shape the future of AI—imagining potent use cases no boardroom could conceive. This vision is not just better for operators. It's better for business. The most forward-thinking companies aren't chasing full automation. They're investing in tools that help their people work smarter, faster, and with more precision. They recognize that machines can't replicate everything humans do. The real opportunity lies in upskilling and empowering people, not replacing them. And this vision is better for national competitiveness. As stress on global supply chains intensifies, the United States faces a defining challenge: to rebuild and reimagine industrial strength. The future of American manufacturing depends on revolutionary efficiency and innovation for the people actually doing the work. Human adaptability is a competitive advantage, not a liability, and human intelligence enhances artificial intelligence just as much as the reverse. To deliver that efficiency where it matters most and truly expand domestic capacity, we need to harness the power of AI to accelerate human potential. Make progress There's a broader economic and cultural truth here, too. Manufacturing isn't just about making things. It's about making progress. And progress requires us to unlock the full capabilities of our people. America's strength in the 20th century didn't come from labor automation. It came from the transformation of it. From the GI Bill to labor protections to the rise of technical education, we invested in our people. And now, as we enter a new industrial era, we have a chance to do it again. This time with smarter tools, more connected systems, and a deeper understanding of what humans are best at: problem solving, adaptability, and creativity.
Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
The AI Bubble Paradox: Why OpenAI's $500 Billion Valuation Proves The Opposite
It's an odd spectacle: Sam Altman warning about an AI bubble while his company, OpenAI, rockets toward a $500 billion valuation. If there's more obvious proof that we're not in traditional bubble territory, it's hard to imagine what it might be. Speaking to The Verge, Altman acknowledged what many observers already suspected. "If you look at most of the bubbles in history, like the tech bubble, there was a real thing. Tech was really important. The internet was a really big deal. People got overexcited. Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes," he said. But here's where Altman's bubble warning breaks down into paradox. In the same conversation where he cautioned about investor overexcitement, he casually mentioned expecting OpenAI to spend "trillions of dollars on its data center buildout in the not very distant future." His attitude toward the inevitable criticism? "You should expect a bunch of economists wringing their hands, saying, 'This is so crazy, it's so reckless,' and we'll just be like, 'You know what? Let us do our thing.'" This isn't the language of someone truly concerned about unsustainable speculation. It's the confidence of someone who sees the long-term trajectory clearly, even if the short-term valuations seem frothy. The Infrastructure Reality Check The numbers backing Altman's confidence are staggering. OpenAI just secured $8.3 billion in new funding at a $300 billion valuation round that was five times oversubscribed. Employee share sales could push the company's valuation to $500 billion, making it one of the most valuable private companies in history. These aren't the desperate funding rounds of bubble companies scrambling for survival; they're the measured capital raises of a company planning for massive scale. OpenAI isn't alone in this infrastructure binge. Microsoft plans to spend $80 billion on AI data centers this fiscal year alone. Meta is projecting up to $72 billion in AI and infrastructure investments. These aren't speculative bets — they're calculated investments in what companies see as the next fundamental computing platform. When Altman tweets that OpenAI will bring "well over 1 million GPUs online by the end of this year," he's not describing bubble behavior. He's describing the build-out of critical infrastructure for a technology that's already demonstrating real utility and rapid adoption. The Usage Explosion Adoption metrics tell a story that bubble skeptics often miss. Altman recently revealed that reasoning model usage among OpenAI's customers is exploding. Free users went from less than 1% to 7% daily usage, while Plus users jumped from 7% to 24%. This isn't the shallow adoption curve typical of bubble technologies; it's the steep trajectory of tools becoming indispensable. Our research at Futurum Group suggests AI inference workloads could account for more than 80% of computing by 2030, when factoring in on-device processing, autonomous driving, edge computing, and agentic AI systems. If accurate, we're not looking at a bubble but at the early stages of the most significant computing platform shift since mobile. Tuesday's tech selloff, triggered partly by an MIT study claiming 95% of companies see no returns from generative AI, exemplifies the market's nervous energy around AI investments. NVIDIA Corp. dropped 3.5% and Palantir nearly 10%, suggesting investors are increasingly sensitive to any hint that AI returns aren't materializing fast enough. But as I have been saying since the arrival of ChatGPT, this build out will last decades as AI will be the arbiter of the world's leading economies and all the others. We are just getting started. The expectation that enterprise AI deployments should show immediate, measurable returns reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how transformative technologies get adopted. Companies don't typically see ROI from major technological shifts in quarters. They see it in years. The Bubble Brigade Crowd High-profile financial figures Ray Dalio and Joe Tsai have warned about AI investment pacing ahead of sustainable growth, drawing parallels to the dotcom crash. Apollo Global's Torsten Slok argues the current situation could eclipse the 1990s internet bubble, noting that the 10 largest S&P 500 companies are more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the dotcom peak. These warnings deserve attention, but they conflate different types of risk. Yes, some AI startups are overvalued, and some applications overhyped. But the core infrastructure investments driving the boom are based on demonstrated utility and clear demand trajectories. Meta's approach illustrates why the smartest companies aren't treating this as bubble territory. It is optimizing for the future while continuing to be one of the best plays for real world AI consumption. The company is simultaneously laying groundwork for AGI while embedding AI into everyday products that millions use daily. This dual approach of building for the long term while monetizing current capabilities reflects confidence in AI's staying power. On Thursday, the company confirmed a Wall Street Journal report that it has paused hiring for its new AI division amid the restructuring. But it doesn't signal Meta intends a major cutback in AI spending – it is simply in digestion mode after a massive spending spree that included several acquisition-sized offers and hires in the nine-figure range. Before pouring more investment into its AI teams, Meta needs time to place and access its new talent before forging to new breakthroughs like superintelligence. Altman's apparent contradiction — warning about bubbles while planning multitrillion-dollar infrastructure investments— makes perfect sense. He's distinguishing between short-term market froth and long-term technological transformation. Investor overexcitement in the near term doesn't negate the fundamental importance of the underlying technology. The AI sector may be experiencing speculative excess in valuations and expectations. And certainly not all names that have benefitted from AI are of the same quality. But when the CEO is most positioned to benefit from that speculation, it suggests we're witnessing something more substantial than a bubble. We're watching the expensive, messy process of building the next computing platform, one that promises to be worth every overexcited dollar invested in its foundation. In bubbles, the smart money gets out early. In genuine technological revolutions, it doubles down on infrastructure. OpenAI's $500 billion trajectory signals which category we're really in.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The stock market is near all-time highs but only a few stocks are driving it — Investors should be wary
The Nasdaq 100 is now just days away from its all-time high, but at least one sign suggests that investors should tread carefully. The number of stocks that have driven one of the most-followed indexes is suspiciously narrow. That is, the index has moved up mostly due to a few of the most popular stocks — the artificial intelligence (AI) companies — including those in the Magnificent 7. Here's why investors should pay particularly close attention to this 'narrow' stock rally. Nasdaq, S&P 500 rallies are narrow: What it means Last week, the Nasdaq 100 stock index hit an all-time high. The index had been powering higher for months, following the market meltdown that ensued after President Donald Trump's tariff announcement in early April. Like other major stock indexes such as the Standard & Poor's 500, the Nasdaq 100 has been enjoying a rather blissful market melt-up. Investors have been anticipating companies posting strong earnings in 2025 and the Fed lowering interest rates, which would help to ease financing. But this new all-time high wasn't a broad-based celebration. In fact, just seven stocks in the index hit their 52-week highs that day, according to Bloomberg, suggesting a problem with this rally that bullish investors may want to pay attention to — what experts call the market's 'narrow breadth.' Learn more: Best ways to get free financial advice It's a similar situation in the S&P 500, according to DataTrek Research. Since the market's April bottom, the index's top 20 largest stocks have climbed 40.6 percent compared to a total return of 27.9 percent for the index. But this performance means that the 20 largest stocks alone pulled the index higher, while the index's remaining 480 stocks were actually net negative. While investors may be concentrating their bets on key tech stocks such as Nvidia (NVDA), Microsoft (MSFT)and Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL), which are all big AI plays, it may also be symptomatic of an unhealthy market. In contrast, a broader market would see more stocks hitting highs, as 'a rising tide lifts all ships.' 'The fact that the market breadth has continued to narrow in the latest rally, given rising trade and geopolitical risks, suggests investors see it is a 'flight to quality' trade as well,' says Mark McCarron, CFA, chief investment officer at Wescott Financial Advisory Group in Philadelphia.A flight to quality trade happens when investors begin to get more defensive and risk-averse, buying stocks that they perceive as higher-quality and avoiding low-quality ones. It's typical of a market that is seeking safety as some investors bail out, and may presage a market drop. 'A broader market would be more bullish and the fact that it remains narrow suggests that investors may be concerned about weakening economic growth,' says McCarron. While a broad market is generally more bullish than a narrow one, experts say not to get spooked by a narrowing of the market's breadth alone. 'It is important to note that breadth is just one input in a market forecast, and that narrow breadth doesn't necessarily mean stocks will perform poorly going forward,' says Corbin Grillo, CFA, director of investment strategy, Linscomb Wealth in Houston. MORE: How to turn $1,000 into $1 million, according to a top wealth advisor But why are investors turning to AI stocks? They're the high-quality names of the moment, and they're also key spots of sustained strength in a tougher economy that's starting to see cracks. 'Some of the larger stocks in the Nasdaq 100 index are also the stocks perceived to be the biggest beneficiaries from ongoing investment in, and eventually utilization of, AI,' says Grillo. 'Investors see the demand for artificial intelligence as a stable source of earnings growth and therefore, even in a recession, it's likely that capital expenditures for AI-enabled technology will continue, benefiting firms like Nvidia, Broadcom and Advanced Micro Devices,' says McCarron. But the narrow breadth in AI stocks also means that if AI doesn't continue to meet the market's lofty expectations, then key tech-heavy indexes such as the Nasdaq 100 may be priced too high. The Nasdaq 100 is a top-heavy index The stock market is dominated by big tech companies such as Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft and Apple (AAPL), which is reflected in indexes like the Nasdaq 100, S&P 500 or the Nasdaq Composite. So these stocks are key to how those indexes move anyway. But the fact that just a handful of stocks are driving the market's performance — and those heavily concentrated in AI-focused areas — is telling. The weightings in the Nasdaq 100 are particularly heavily tilted toward tech (according to Slick Charts as of Aug. 19): Nvidia – 14.10% Microsoft – 12.44% Apple – 11.21% Amazon – 7.97% Meta Platforms – 6.20% Broadcom – 4.53% Alphabet Class A – 4.14% Alphabet Class C – 3.88% Tesla – 3.48% Netflix – 1.69% In total, these 10 stocks make up 69.64 percent — nearly a full 70 percent — of the index's movement. So this select group of stocks almost has to be doing well for the Nasdaq 100 to fare well. The fact that only a few stocks are hitting 52-week highs as the index does suggest that the strong performance is concentrated in these stocks and mostly not in the index's 90 others. And with the exceptions of Tesla (TSLA) and Netflix (NFLX), the two smallest on the list, they're all AI plays, too. 'Historically, market indexes like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 have often been driven by a concentrated number of companies, but with the top 10 constituents of the Nasdaq 100 representing over 50 percent of the index, company-specific risks can dominate,' says McCarron. Get started: Match with an advisor to help you achieve your financial goals For investors, this concentration means that an index may not be nearly as diversified as it may appear to be. So it may be exposed to the performance of relatively few companies. And if those companies are exposed to similar risks — such as a potential slowdown in AI spending — then investors may have a lot more concentrated risk on their hands than it seems at first. This concentration means investors must bear another risk as part of the AI-driven market, and it means they need to make smart investing moves. 'It is more important than ever to stay disciplined, diversified, and stick to a long-term strategy,' says Grillo. 'It's natural to want to allocate more to stocks that are generating excitement and that have performed well recently. But there's no guarantee that the factors that drove outperformance in the past will persist going forward, especially with the increase in valuations.' Bottom line Investors' focus on the market's largest, tech-heavy companies creates risks, and this concentration may signal the market is getting ready for a shift. That shift may be down, but it may also be a broadening out of the market to other key areas such as small- and mid-cap stocks. So, while downturns can be unsettling, it's vital to take a long-term perspective on your investments and try to not get too rattled when stocks get shaken up. Sign in to access your portfolio
