
Bloomberg's $5 million donation
BILLIONAIRE BLOOMBERG DROPS THE BIG BUCKS: Billionaire Michael Bloomberg was no fan of Andrew Cuomo when the two served overlapping tenures as mayor and governor. But on Friday all appeared forgiven, with Bloomberg's $5 million donation to a super PAC boosting Cuomo's mayoral bid, POLITICO reports.
It's the largest cash infusion yet to the entity and comes in the final 10 days of the Democratic primary to oust Mayor Eric Adams, once a Bloomberg ally. The former mayor — a party hopscotcher who is now a Democrat — is jumping in as Cuomo faces a threat from democratic socialist challenger Zohran Mamdani, whose views on hiking taxes on the rich and criticisms of Israel are anathema to Bloomberg.
The donation dovetails with the former mayor's endorsement of Cuomo this week and arrives at a critical time for the ex-governor, as he tries to mount a comeback to lead the nation's largest city.
Mayor Bloomberg said it best in his endorsement: there is 'one candidate whose management experience and government know-how stand above the others.' We agree, and we greatly appreciate the Mayor's commitment to ensuring a safe and affordable New York and preserving and building on the Bloomberg legacy by electing Andrew Cuomo,' said Fix the City spokesperson Liz Benjamin.
Bloomberg and Cuomo, longtime rivals, now find themselves united by a mutual loathing of the Democratic Party's left flank. After conversations between their aides, the men met earlier this week following Cuomo's Bloomberg TV interview, someone familiar with the sitdown confirmed.
The donation to the Cuomo-supporting super PAC Fix the City adds to Bloomberg's $2.6 million contributions this election cycle to groups supporting City Council candidates who back charter schools, long a pet issue for the former mayor.
Mamdani represents the opposite of a Bloomberg-style ideal to lead the city: A 33-year-old state lawmaker with a thin resume, an upstart challenger once considered a long shot who wants to hike taxes on rich New Yorkers and has supported the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement targeting Israeli goods.
And so Bloomberg set aside his long-standing animus toward the former governor and instead praised his extensive managerial experience — Cuomo's calling card in the race.
The leading contender has stepped up his criticism of Mamdani in recent days by pointing to his paltry legislative record in Albany and questioning whether the young lawmaker has the chops to stand up to President Donald Trump. The Cuomo campaign on Thursday released a TV ad underscoring both points, and Cuomo raised them during a caustic debate Thursday night.
Some polls show a tightening race in the crowded field, following months of double-digit leads for Cuomo.
Helmed by Steve Cohen, a longtime Cuomo confidant, the pro-Cuomo super PAC has received contributions from wealthy hedge fund managers, real estate developers and Trump supporters like Bill Ackman. Its largest donation until Friday was $1 million from the online delivery firm DoorDash.
The group has spent more than $10 million on TV and streaming ads, according to the media tracking firm AdImpact. And with this donation, it has raised more than $18 million since forming in March.
Spending by the super PAC against Mamdani has backfired in recent days, after a never-sent mailer criticizing the democratic socialist included a doctored photo of him with a darker, heavier beard. Mamdani accused the group of stoking 'the very fears of that division in this city.' A spokesperson for the PAC said the mailer was 'rejected for production and subsequently corrected.'
The entity has also attracted scrutiny from campaign finance regulators who are probing whether Cuomo's campaign improperly communicated with the super PAC through a practice known as 'redboxing' on the candidate's website. Spokespeople for Cuomo and Fix the City have insisted campaign finance laws have been followed. — Nick Reisman
From the Capitol
PRISON REFORM PASSES: A suite of prison reform measures drafted in the wake of inmate Robert Brooks' killing at the hands of correction officers passed both Houses of the state Legislature late last night, a win for lawmakers calling for increased accountability inside the prison system.
'For decades, New York's state prisons have been plagued by a systemic pattern of racism, staff violence towards incarcerated individuals, and human rights abuses, with little to no accountability or oversight,' said state Sen. Julia Salazar, chair of the Senate's correction committee and sponsor of the legislation.
The reforms passed in an omnibus bill, which included a measure to require camera surveillance in almost all areas of state prisons and another to expand the makeup of the State Commission of Correction. Charged with overseeing the prison system, the commission must now include individuals with backgrounds in behavioral health, criminal defense or prisoners' rights, as well as at least one formerly incarcerated person.
To the dismay of advocates, other measures aimed at allowing inmates to leave prison early didn't cross the finish line, including a bill to allow inmates with long-term sentences to apply for judges to take a 'second look' at their case and another to ensure most individuals eligible for release on parole are released.
'There is more work to do, including an expansion of pathways for release, but this is progress, it will make a difference, and I'm proud to stand behind it,' the lawmaker said. — Jason Beeferman
BRAGG GETS HIS WISH: A measure Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is pushing for to reduce recidivism also passed the Assembly last night after the Senate approved it Wednesday.
The SUPPORT Act, sponsored by state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assemblymember Tony Simone, prevents those found mentally unfit to stand trial for non-felony crimes from being immediately released without treatment.
The bill was one way for Bragg to refute the Republican narrative that Democrats' power over the criminal justice system — including the 2019 reforms that brought cashless bail — has enabled repeat offenders. The measure aims to ensure those who are mentally unfit for trial do not reoffend.
'By passing the SUPPORT Act, both houses declared with one voice that supportive services and mental health care are critical to long-term community safety,' Bragg said in a statement. 'This bill will ensure that those discharged from the hospital after being found unfit to stand trial are referred to effective longer-term care.' — Jason Beeferman
FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL
LANDER AND MAMDANI CROSS ENDORSE: Zohran Mamdani and Brad Lander, the highest-ranking progressive candidates in the race, endorsed each other Friday, one day after the final Democratic primary debate during which both attacked Cuomo. The former governor saved most of his fire for Mamdani, who is nipping at his heels in the final stretch of the race.
In backing each other, the two candidates each urged his supporters to rank the other second as they seek every advantage before early voting begins Saturday.
And it comes as the Working Families Party encourages its other endorsed candidates to formally combine forces — something the campaigns have avoided until now.
'Today's cross-endorsement is probably the most impactful,' Ana María Archila, New York Working Families Party co-director, told POLITICO in an interview Friday.
She sidestepped criticism of two other party-backed candidates — state Sen. Zellnor Myrie and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams — for not joining in the cross-endorsement.
'I know that Zellnor really cares about how to guide his voters. I know that the speaker really cares about how to guide her voters,' Archila said. 'It's really a candidate-to-candidate conversation, and because of that, it's very particular to the dynamics between the candidates.'
When asked about the possibility of a cross-endorsement, Adams told PIX11 News this week, 'I am still considering all of the options available.'
Cuomo, until recently appeared locked in a two-person race with Mamdani, a democratic socialist state lawmaker. But Lander, the city comptroller, had a good week with a strong debate performance.
An internal poll conducted by the Working Families Party showed a majority of respondents said an endorsement from their first-choice candidate would greatly impact who they rank second. The party endorsed a four-person slate in March, and placed Mamdani first, Lander second, Adams third and Myrie fourth two weeks ago. At the time, they ranked state Sen. Jessica Ramos fifth but she has since endorsed Cuomo and is off the WFP's slate.
Read more from POLITICO's Emily Ngo about the cross-endorsement shaking up the race
TEACHERS UNION SITS OUT PRIMARY: The city's teachers union is declining to make an endorsement in the Democratic primary, citing a lack of clear consensus among members.
United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew told Playbook education is typically the top issue. But this time around, the endorsement process was preceded by concerns over how the city is being run, affordability and dealing with the Trump administration.
The union then surveys members to see which candidate does the best on each issue with the goal of building consensus, then having bodies like the union-wide Delegate Assembly — chapter leaders and delegates — weigh in. But 'we could never get there,' Mulgrew said.
'On education, the candidate they trust the most and they feel knows the information and would be really good for education is Scott Stringer,' he said. 'But on running of the city, it's Cuomo. On affordability, it's Mamdani. On fighting the Trump administration, it's Cuomo. And both of them [Mamdani and Cuomo] are polarizing figures for different people. At that point, we couldn't even get close to consensus.'
He said a controversial pension plan Cuomo instituted as governor is 'an issue for us.' But members, he said, were moved by his recent pledge to roll it back — and his support for boosting pay for paraprofessionals, teacher aides who assist students with disabilities.
'That actually had an effect on a lot of members and moved them towards Cuomo,' he added.
It's not the first time the union has declined to make a mayoral endorsement. The UFT skipped several races, and has not backed a successful candidate since 1989. An endorsement of Cuomo, the frontrunner, would have likely ruffled feathers with members wary of his past education agenda that included an overhaul of the state's teacher evaluation system.
Mulgrew declined to say which candidate he would have personally wanted to endorse. — Madina Touré
FROM CITY HALL
ERIC ADAMS SAYS NO FEDS: With a wave of anti-Trump protests expected across New York City this weekend, Mayor Eric Adams and Police Commisioner Jessica Tisch said they don't expect intervention from federal agents.
'We have made it clear to the federal government that just three simple words: 'We got this,' Adams said at today's security briefing.
The upcoming protests are part of 'No Kings Day,' a nation-wide event in objection to the Trump administration and coinciding with the president's multimillion-dollar military parade in Washington on Saturday. The commander in chief warned that protesters during the weekend's demonstration would be met with 'very heavy force.'
Adams and Tisch's assurances come as thousands of National Guard troops remain in Los Angeles to quell protests against Trump administration immigration policies, despite forceful objections from state and local authorities. — Amira McKee
IN OTHER NEWS
— STRAW DONOR SCHEME: A candidate for Assembly from Queens last year, Dao Yin, was charged with using fake donations and forged signatures to get more matching funds. (The New York Times)
— 'WE HAVE TO KILL YOU': State Conservative Party Chair Gerard Kassar made a threatening phone call to NY-21 Republican hopeful Anthony Constantino, who says his top political aide mysteriously had his brakes cut. (Watertown Daily Times)
— MORE DELGADO RESIGNATION CALLS: A second state lawmaker, Assemblymember Simcha Eichenstein, is calling for the lieutenant governor and gubernatorial candidate to resign. (Times-Union)
Missed this morning's New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
16 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) led the entire Senate Democratic in writing to President Trump Sunday, demanding he remove all military forces from Los Angeles and cease threats to further deploy troops, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Padilla was physically removed from a press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and handcuffed Thursday, triggering a five-alarm fire for Democrats. The letter from Padilla and 46 other Senate Democrats asked Trump to "immediately withdraw all military personnel that have been deployed to Los Angeles in recent day." Trump federalized California's National Guard without the state's consent and mobilized more than 700 Marines to the state to try to quash protests over his mass deportation program. "Respect for our Constitution and for our civilian law enforcement demands nothing less," the Senate Democrats wrote. Driving the news: A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that the Trump administration's deployment of the California National Guard can continue, for now. The Pentagon said on Friday that U.S. troops will not be responsible for law enforcement at the Los Angeles riots. Instead, they will protect federal property and personnel. Protests over the deportations have spread to numerous cities across the country, and Trump has warned that he may deploy troops to different areas. The Democrats asked Trump to "cease any further threats of deploying National Guard or other active duty military personnel into American cities absent a request from the Governor." Between the lines: The fight against the White House's deportation program is becoming a rallying point for Democrats who have largely been split over how to push back against Trump. Padilla's incident at the Noem presser on Thursday added more fuel to the flames. Democrats almost universally panned the manhandling of a sitting U.S. senator.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
America Is Finally Getting A Fascist Dictator Parade, Courtesy Of Donald Trump
WASHINGTON — After years of admiring autocrats like Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping and envying the sort of military parade they get to enjoy, President Donald Trump is finally getting one of his own. America's capital city will resemble Pyongyang, Beijing and Moscow's Red Square on Saturday evening, with tanks and missile launchers rolling down the street, thanks to Trump's $45 million birthday gift to himself at taxpayer expense. 'I don't really think the symbolism of tanks and missiles is really what we're all about,' Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul told HuffPost. 'If you ask me about a military parade, all the images that come to mind, the first images, are of the Soviet Union and North Korea.' Trump and his administration claim that the parade was actually organized for the U.S. Army's 250th birthday, not Trump's 79th. Both the Navy and the Marines also have founding date anniversaries this year, however, and there has been no discussion about holding $45 million celebrations for either. White House officials did not respond to HuffPost queries on the matter. Democracy advocates warn that Trump's use of the military to honor himself should not be downplayed as harmless, particularly given his deployment of thousands of troops in Los Angeles to put down protests against his deportations, his repeated attacks on judges, his use of his executive power to attack critics and his willingness to defy a Supreme Court order for months. 'The military parade is a blatant adoption and celebration of authoritarian power display,' said Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz who is now with the group Protect Democracy. 'Given this is coupled with the deployment of U.S. troops to police American streets, by no means should it be considered as only optics.' John Bolton, Trump's third of four national security advisers during his first term, said Trump has been infatuated with the idea of his own parade after attending France's Bastille Day celebration in 2017 at the invitation of that country's president, Emmanuel Macron. Bolton said Trump's advisers were able to talk him out of ordering one back then. 'He was dissuaded by a number of factors, not the least of which was how much it would cost, and how bad that would appear, and what damage the tank treads would do to the streets of Washington,' he said. Gen. Paul Selva, the vice chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, reportedly told Trump that a military parade was 'what dictators do.' The United States has had few military parades in its history, the last one taking place in 1991 during the presidency of George H.W. Bush after U.S. forces successfully pushed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, which he had invaded. 'It was a parade to celebrate winning the war, which is a good reason to have a military parade,' Bolton said. 'That's not what this is about. It's about Donald Trump.' Patty Murray, a Democratic senator from Washington state, said during a hearing Wednesday that Trump's casual use of the military should alarm Americans. 'President Trump is promising heavy force against peaceful protesters at his D.C. military parade. Those sorts of actions and that sort of rhetoric from a president of the United States should stop every one of us cold. Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented,' she said. 'It is unconstitutional and it is downright un-American. We should all be speaking out against this and demanding accountability now.' Despite his frequent claims of support for the armed forces and service members, Trump has a decades-long history of disrespect, even disdain, for both. As a young man, Trump had the opportunity to fight in the Vietnam War but instead avoided service with a diagnosis of 'bone spurs' from a doctor who was a friend of his father. In 2015, running for president, Trump declared that Arizona Sen. John McCain, who spent nearly six years in a Hanoi prison undergoing routine torture, was not a war hero just because he was captured. Trump said he preferred those who were not captured. During his first term in office, when he was unable to get fellow Republicans running both chambers of Congress to approve billions of dollars for a border wall he had repeatedly promised Mexico would pay for, Trump instead raided a Pentagon fund for service members' housing and schools to pay for it instead. Also in those years, Trump disparaged those in the military who had died for the United States as 'suckers' and 'losers,' according to his own chief of staff. And just months into his second term, Trump broke the tradition of the commander-in-chief shaking the hand of every graduating cadet at a military academy by immediately leaving West Point after his speech and returning to his golf resort in New Jersey. Trump's predecessor Joe Biden spent 70 minutes congratulating each graduate last year, as Trump himself had done five years earlier, although he later complained about how many times he had to raise his arm to salute. To this day, Trump still does not seem to understand military protocol. On his recent trip to the Middle East, Trump saluted Saudi military officials, just as he had saluted North Korean officers during his summit meeting with Kim in 2018. Protect Democracy's Carpenter said Americans need to take Saturday as a warning of things to come. 'Americans should see this plainly for what it is: Troops in the streets are troops in the streets, whether it's a parade or a raid,' she said. Trump Says Protesters At Weekend Military Parade Will Face 'Very Heavy Force' GOP Senator Says Trump's Military Parade Reminds Him Of North Korea Trump's Real War Is Against America
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Memo: Trump grapples with prospect of all-out Israel-Iran war
President Trump faces a volatile, fast-moving global crisis as Israel and Iran teeter on the brink of all-out war. The situation is shifting by the moment in the wake of Israel's attack on multiple sites in Iran in the early hours of Friday, local time. Iran launched a retaliatory barrage against Israel later on Friday. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said that Israel's initial attacks had killed 78 and injured more than 320. Iranian officials have said they regard Israel's actions as a declaration of war. There has been no such explicit declaration from the Israeli side, but clearly the two nations are in the middle of a grave clash that could easily spiral even further. Such a confrontation has the potential to scramble American politics, too. In some ways, it already has. The price of oil spiked as soon as the Israeli attack happened, rising by more than 8 percent at one point on Friday. An elevated oil price for any significant length of time could feed inflation and dampen economic growth. That unpleasant combination is one reason why the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by roughly 1.8 percent on Friday. The broader based S&P 500 declined by more than one percent. To be sure, a cooling of tensions between Israel and Iran could happen, calming oil prices and producing an instant rebound on the financial markets. But such a de-escalation is far from certain. The more negative scenario — military actions by two foreign nations causing economic trouble in the U.S. — would be an especially galling development for Trump. Then there are the intertwined issues of Trump's general attitude toward Israel, his pursuit of a fresh nuclear deal with Iran, and his broader skepticism of interventionist military policies overseas. Trump is on one level a fervent support of Israel. He often boasts to pro-Israel crowds about the actions he took in his first term, including moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and facilitating agreements to normalize relations between Israel and two Gulf nations, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. But Trump has had a checkered relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump reportedly took umbrage at Netanyahu accepting former President Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election. In a 2023 speech, Trump complained that Netanyahu had 'let us down' by backing out of what Trump said was a planned joint action to kill Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani. The U.S. went ahead and killed Soleimani. In Trump's second term, the president pressed Israel to agree to a ceasefire in the first couple of months of his term. But he also outraged Palestinians and their supporters by suggesting Gazans could be pushed out of the strip of land that is home — which Trump proposed could be redeveloped as a tourist destination. Similar complexities surround Trump's suggestion that there could be a new nuclear deal with Iran. He had excoriated the 2015 deal that was made during former President Obama's tenure, withdrawing the United States from it in 2018, during his first term. But he has recently been pursuing a new agreement, and at one point it was reported that the U.S. might be willing to countenance some element of uranium enrichment on Iranian soil. Trump has more recently said that is not the case. The latest round of talks involving Trump's negotiator Steve Witkoff and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, had been set for Sunday. Trump, on Thursday at the White House, responded to what were then rumors of an Israeli attack on Iran by saying, 'I don't want [Israel] going in, because I think that would blow it.' When the attack went ahead, there was instant speculation that Netanyahu was seeking to vaporize any hope of a U.S.-Iran deal. This thesis was strengthened in the immediate wake of the attack when Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement emphasizing that 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran.' But that all changed by the next day. Trump, always sensitive to any suggestion that he has been outflanked or sidelined, seemed to take exception to a Wall Street Journal reporter's question about whether the U.S. had been given a 'heads-up' by Netanyahu, insisting that the White House knew all about the attack in advance. Some of his allies also advanced the idea that the earlier expression of misgivings had been a tactical sleight-of-hand intended to make the Iranians think an Israeli attack would not come. In any event, the Iranians have now pulled out of the talks. Trump, on Truth Social, posted that he had offered Iran the chance to reach a new deal in recent months 'but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' In the short term, it appears extremely unlikely that Iran would sign onto a deal on Trump's terms in the wake of an Israeli attack. Such a move would surely look to many in the Islamic Republic and the rest of the Middle East like a humiliation. Trump is also navigating between his instinctual backing of Israel and his more isolationist tendencies. Both impulses have their advocates in different parts of the Republican universe. Among office holders, the views expressed in recent days by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) were typical. Graham said that if Iran continued to balk at a nuclear deal, the U.S. should 'go all-in to help Israel finish the job.' Cruz said, 'Israel is acting to defend itself. I stand with Israel.' But in the broader MAGA universe, prominent figures including Tucker Carlson and Matt Walsh are exponentially more skeptical. Carlson inveighed against 'warmongers' who wanted 'direct US military involvement in a war with Iran,' on X on Friday. Walsh, on the same platform, wrote, 'Israel is its own country and perfectly capable of taking care of itself. We do not need to be involve in this and should not be.' While some dismiss Carlson and Walsh as mere media figures, they have a combined X following of roughly 20 million people. The political impact of the current crisis is impossible to predict at this point. It is certainly possible that it could rebound to Trump's advantage, especially if the intensity of the confrontation wanes quickly. In the very short term, Friday's escalating crisis in the Middle East saw a big story from the previous day that was to Democrats' advantage – the handcuffing of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) after he sought to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem – fade toward the margins. But there are dangerous waters churning, and any missteps by Trump could cost him dearly. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.