logo
Tailor pleads not guilty to molesting teen with disability

Tailor pleads not guilty to molesting teen with disability

The Star06-06-2025
KUALA LUMPUR: A tailor pleaded not guilty in the Ampang Sessions Court to a charge of outraging the modesty of a teenage girl with a disability last month.
Muhammad Arif Zulfakar Abdul Razak, 25, is accused of committing the offence against the 17-year-old girl in the restroom of a vocational training centre in Taman Keramat, here, around 6.30pm in early May.
Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Norhidayah Abdullah Sani requested bail of RM6,000 with additional conditions that the accused be prohibited from approaching the victim or tampering with prosecution witnesses.
The accused's lawyer, Lingswaran Singh, applied for minimal bail, citing his client's employment as a tailor and responsibility as the family's sole breadwinner.
Judge Nurulizwan Ahmad Zubir allowed the accused to be released on bail of RM4,000 with the additional conditions requested by the prosecution and fixed July 21 for case mention.
In the same court, technician Ahmad Nizar Ahmad Aminudin, 51, pleaded not guilty to threatening a 46-year-old man with a knife at a restaurant in front of a flat in Taman Dato Ahmad Razali on May 28.
He was charged under Section 506 of the Penal Code, which carries a maximum sentence of two years imprisonment, or a fine, or both, upon conviction.
DPP Norhidayah proposed a bail of RM5,000 with one surety. However, the accused's lawyer, Vinobha Doss from the National Legal Aid Foundation, requested a lower bail on the grounds that his client is the sole breadwinner of his family.
The court granted bail at RM3,000 with one surety and fixed July 10 for case mention.- Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Project manager claims trial to 68 money laundering charges involving over RM688,000
Project manager claims trial to 68 money laundering charges involving over RM688,000

The Star

timea few seconds ago

  • The Star

Project manager claims trial to 68 money laundering charges involving over RM688,000

SHAH ALAM: A part-time project manager has been charged with 68 counts of money laundering involving more than RM688,000. R. Vikram Menon, 46, pleaded not guilty after all the charges were read to him before Sessions judge Awang Kerisnada Awang Mahmud here on Tuesday (Aug 12). He is accused of transferring and disposing of illicit funds totalling RM688,916.85 between Oct 17, 2023, and Oct 15 last year in Damansara. The offences allegedly involved 301 transactions to 67 bank accounts for fund transfers, and 159 transactions for online and cash disposals ranging from RM1,000 to over RM90,000. Vikram Menon was charged under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, which carries a maximum jail term of 15 years and a fine of at least five times the value of the illicit proceeds or RM5mil, whichever is higher, upon conviction. Deputy public prosecutor Wan Nur Amanina Wan Din sought bail of RM80,000 for all charges with one surety. The accused's lawyer, S. Kulasegaran, appealed for a lower amount of RM30,000, arguing that bail was intended to secure the accused's attendance in court and not to serve as punishment. The court set bail at RM70,000 with one surety, and ordered the accused to report to the Sungai Buloh police headquarters at the start of every month, surrender his passport, and refrain from contacting prosecution witnesses. The next case mention was fixed for Oct 13. – Bernama

Melaka technician claims trial to 52 charges including raping, sexually assaulting daughter
Melaka technician claims trial to 52 charges including raping, sexually assaulting daughter

The Star

timea few seconds ago

  • The Star

Melaka technician claims trial to 52 charges including raping, sexually assaulting daughter

MELAKA: A 41-year-old technician claimed trial at the Sessions' Court in Ayer Keroh here to 52 counts of charges including raping, committing physical sexual assault and taking nude photographs of his biological daughter. The accused's plea was recorded before Judge Haderiah Siri on Tuesday (August 12). Under 17 charges of rape, the father of six was accused of committing incest with his 18-year-old biological daughter, an offence under Section 376B of the Penal Code, which carries a prison sentence of between 10 and 30 years as well as whipping upon conviction. He also faced 34 charges of intentionally committing physical sexual assault by forcing his daughter to perform sexual acts. These offences are punishable under Sections 14(b) and 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, read together with Section 16 of the same Act. Sections 14(b) and 14(a) each carry a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and whipping, while Section 16 provides for a jail term of up to five years and a maximum of two strokes of the rotan, if convicted. All 52 offences were allegedly committed between 6.50am and 7.15am from May 12, 2025 to Aug 2, 2025, at a house in Tambak Paya in the Melaka Tengah district. The accused also faced one charge of producing child pornography by taking two nude photographs of his daughter in the bathroom when she was 17 years and 11 months old. The alleged offence took place at the same address at about 7am on July 9. Deputy Public Prosecutor Muhamad Ehsan Nasarudin proposed that the unrepresented accused be granted bail of RM20,000 for each of the 52 charges, along with additional conditions. These included a prohibition on contacting the victim and prosecution witnesses, reporting to the nearest police station once every two weeks and surrendering his passport to the court. The court granted bail of RM90,000 and imposed all additional conditions sought by the prosecution. The next mention date is fixed on Sept 18.

Judge in Sarawak DAP chief's defamation case ordered to produce judgment
Judge in Sarawak DAP chief's defamation case ordered to produce judgment

New Straits Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New Straits Times

Judge in Sarawak DAP chief's defamation case ordered to produce judgment

KUCHING: The Court of Appeal has ordered the trial judge in the defamation trial of Stampin MP and Sarawak DAP chairman Chong Chieng Jen to provide the written grounds of judgment within one month from today. This is to enable the hearing of Chong's appeal to be heard. The hearing of the appeal today had to be postponed as the written judgment was not available. "As directed by the Court of Appeal, my lawyers will also be writing to the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak on this matter," Chong said. He hoped to receive the grounds of judgment soon for the appeal to proceed. Chong said the trial had concluded four years ago and "yet there is still no grounds of judgment from the trial judge". In 2012, Chong criticised the state's budget, pointing to what he described as a recurring line item titled "government's contribution towards government-approved agencies trust fund". He argued that this allocation acted as a "black hole" since it lacked transparency as substantial sums in billions of ringgit were transferred without disclosure of the actual recipients or their uses. In 2013, the then Sarawak government and State Financial Authority (SFA) filed a defamation lawsuit against him following his published claims, including in leaflets and news outlets, that RM11 billion in public funds had gone into this "black hole". The suit was filed in the Kuching High Court, and the trial started on Jan 7, 2021. On August 30, 2022, the judge ruled in favour of the state government, determining that Chong's "black hole" remark was defamatory, and that his defences — justification, fair comment, and qualified privilege — did not hold. The judge ordered Chong to pay RM150,000 in damages and RM50,000 in legal costs, and issued an injunction preventing him from repeating the statement. Chong said the trial judge then did not provide the grounds of judgment. "After almost three years from the decision of the High Court judge, or four years after the conclusion of the trial, the judge has not provided the grounds of his judgment. "Over the years, we have written five times to the High Court to request the grounds of judgment, but all to no avail," Chong said. He said because there were no grounds of judgment, his appeal, which was to have been heard today, had to be postponed. Chong filed the appeal on Sept 12, 2022, arguing that allowing the government to sue individuals for defamation was a dangerous erosion of freedom of speech and that the judgment posed a threat to democratic rights across the Commonwealth. The judge who presided over the trial was a judicial commissioner at the time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store