
EU delegation ejected from Libya after diplomatic 'trap', source says
The delegation was declared "personae non gratae" and asked to depart Libyan territory upon arrival at the airport of Benghazi.
The mission travelled to eastern Libya after meeting in Tripoli with representatives of the Government of National Unity (GNU) — the internationally recognised executive led by Abdul Hamid Mohammed Dbeibah, which controls Tripoli and western Libya.
The parties had reportedly discussed joint patrols and repatriation strategies to counter illegal migration.
The delegation then journeyed to Benghazi to meet with the Government of National Stability (GNS), which controls the city of Benghazi and eastern Libya. In reality, however, real power lies with the military rule of Khalifa Haftar.
The group — which included European Commissioner for Home Affairs and Migration Magnus Brunner — intended to meet with Benghazi authorities to discuss strategies to stop the departure of migrants to European shores.
Their journey, however, was limited to Benghazi airport, where Prime Minister Osama Saad Hammad and two GNS ministers were waiting for the EU mission, with photographers and cameras in tow.
The seemingly routine reception carried the risk of portraying EU officials alongside representatives of an officially unrecognised government — effectively, at least in the media, a de facto recognition of the GNS.
The EU delegation's objections led first to negotiations, but ultimately to the expulsion of the officials, who were declared personae non gratae. The Libyan government then issued a communiqué accusing them of carrying out an "unauthorised" mission and of "disrespecting Libyan national sovereignty."
The Italian government described the situation as a misunderstanding of protocol. In an interview with Italian broadcaster RAI, Interior Minister Piantedosi attributed the cancellation of the meeting "at the last minute' to 'resentment on the Libyan side over the overzealousness of some European delegation officials.'
He downplayed the incident, calling it a 'serious episode' but insisting it did not undermine cooperation with Benghazi authorities.
Brunner and EU ministers proposed a condition for the meeting
A source familiar with the incident told Euronews however that it had been clearly agreed by the delegation that "only Haftar's people — meaning the military — would be present" at the meeting.
The idea of other political personnel attending 'had been discussed only hypothetically and was to be addressed later, if necessary', according to the source.
As previously reported by Italian and international media, Italy's Special Envoy to Libya Nicola Orlando was instructed to disembark first and politely asked that no photos be taken, due to the potential diplomatic implications.
Once clearance was given, the EU delegation disembarked and was escorted to a waiting room — though apparently, unpublished photos and video footage were already being taken.
When pressed for an explanation, the Libyan organiser of the visit reportedly replied by phone: 'This is the Benghazi government, you have to accept it.'
According to the Brussels source, the Libyan side made clear that 'in the meeting with Haftar, the government and the prime minister will also be present.'
Commissioner Brunner and the EU ministers attempted to resolve the situation, according to the source, by proposing a meeting with GNS representatives, on the condition that the talks be officially framed as involving only Haftar and his military associates.
Despite repeated efforts by the European side, the Libyans refused, insisting: 'We are the government.' The source concluded: 'It was obviously a trap.'
Who is General Haftar and what are his plans for Libya?
After the Libyan civil war and the death of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, Haftar gradually expanded his influence through his Libyan National Army (LNA), eventually controlling much of Cyrenaica and Fezzan.
After more than a decade of military clashes for control of Libya, the Benghazi-based government and the 81-year-old LNA leader have gained the upper hand over the Tripoli administration. The Tripoli government enjoys international backing, but it remains weakened by internal conflicts among allied militias.
'In recent weeks, there have been significant developments, and the eastern government has become emboldened. Now they have Russian weapons, so they are very powerful — and have a lot of money,' said another source familiar with the issue.
'This government is trying to assert itself and is using all forms of pressure,' the source added, citing migrant departures to Europe as an example. Their aim is to 'to push Tripoli aside and be the only government."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Haunted by Merkel: Trump still grappling with Europe's lost leader
When US President Donald Trump issued a warning on Tuesday about the trade deal he agreed with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland on 27 July, it was another German – former Chancellor Angela Merkel - who appeared to be on his mind. Despite being out of power for almost four years, the former German leader's complex relationship with Donald Trump - marked at times by respect and dislike – appears to continue to exert influence over the US president. When quizzed on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' via phone Trump said of the trade deal that a pledge for the EU to invest $600 billion (€550 billion) in the US by the end of his second term will need to be honoured by the EU, or 35% blanket tariffs will be applied to the bloc. Before issuing that warning however the US president expounded in general on the benefits of his trade policy. Referring to the EU, Trump appeared to cast his mind back to a conversation with Merkel about the auto sector. 'I said to... let me just say a prime minister, a very nice prime minister, a couple [sic] of years ago, I said: 'How many [US] cars are you taking a year? Let me guess, is it one or two?'' 'She said: 'No, no, no, we don't take any of your cars,' he said, before adding: 'I said: 'That's not right, that's not a nice thing Angela.'' 'And now they take all our cars, all our trucks, 100%, in addition the EU is going to pay us $600 billion dollars,' Trump said. Addressing the 55th Munich Security Conference in February 2019, Merkel rejected Trump's claims that German cars represented a security threat to the US. Merkel told the conference that German auto giant BMW's largest plant is in South Carolina, rather than its home in Bavaria in southern Germany. 'If these cars, which are no less a threat than those built in Bavaria, are suddenly a national security threat to the US, then that's a shock to us,' she said. Last year, Merkel told Italian daily Corriere della Sera in an interview that 'Donald Trump was obsessed by the fact that, in his view, there were too many German cars in New York.' 'He had always said that, if he were to become president, he would have imposed such high tariffs that they [German cars] would have disappeared from the streets of Manhattan,' Merkel told the newspaper in an interview she gave ahead of the publication of her memoir. A see-sawing relationship In August 2015, before his first election, Trump complimented Merkel in an interview with Time magazine, saying "she's fantastic … highly respected'. But he soon changed his mind. By the time the former chancellor visited the White House in 2017 during Trump's first term, he attempted to embarrass her by refusing to shake her hand before the cameras, and then grilled her for allowing around one million refugees – mainly from Syria and Iraq – into Germany. When her memoir, Freedom, was published last year, Merkel said she misread Trump during that first meeting. 'Instead of stoically bearing it, I whispered to him that we should shake hands again,' Merkel wrote, adding: 'As soon as the words left my mouth, I shook my head at myself. How could I forget that Trump knew precisely what he was doing … He wanted to give people something to talk about with his behaviour, while I had acted as though I were having a conversation with someone completely normal.' 'It seemed that his main aim was to make the person he was talking to feel guilty… At the same time I had the impression… that he also wanted the person he was talking with to like him,' Merkel wrote of Trump's mercurial character. Merkel publicly registered regret when Trump did not concede defeat in November 2020's US election, saying: "A basic rule of democracy is: After elections, there are winners and losers. Both have to play their roles with decency and a sense of responsibility, so that democracy itself remains the winner." When German Chancellor Friedrich Merz visited The White House earlier this year, much preparation went into ensuring that the meeting with Donald Trump would not evolve into an on-air fiasco similar to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's earlier Oval Office confrontation. In the end Merz had nothing to worry about. Trump's only criticism was reserved for Angela Merkel, whom he slammed for building the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, and once again for opening up her country to refugees, telling her successor: 'I told her it shouldn't have happened.'


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
YouTube misinformation tools are inconsistent in Europe: report says
Two of Google's major tools to fight misinformation on YouTube only work sometimes, and only in certain European languages, a new study has found. When users watch a YouTube video on a topic that is often embroiled in misinformation, such as COVID-19 vaccines or climate change, a label should pop up to direct them to third-party sources with more information on the issue, for example Wikipedia. The information panel is also meant to appear in users' search results in their operating language. However AI Forensics, a Europe-based nonprofit that investigates major tech companies, found that this is often not the case. The researchers built a web crawler to test the panels, and found that across the 83 languages on the video platform, the information panels are applied inconsistently to 12 topics on Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories as well as four types of publisher labels. All of the panels are available in English. In German, videos on all but one topic – the Armenian genocide – have these labels. Meanwhile, very few panels are available in Icelandic or Lithuanian. AI Forensics said the tests show YouTube pays 'disproportionate attention towards Western languages' and 'neglects' regional languages like Basque, Catalan, and Galician. YouTube's content disclaimers go beyond misinformation-prone topics. It also includes labels for news sources and fact-checkers that explain whether they are partially or fully funded by government sources, as a way to 'help you better understand the sources of news content,' the company says. But public funding was flagged in some countries and not others, the AI Forensics report found. Euronews, for example, receives some funding from the European Union. YouTube flagged this in some countries, but not in Denmark, Greece, Norway, Iceland, Finland, or Portugal. 'We are scared … there might be some group of people that have differential access to safety' measures to fight misinformation on the platform, Salvatore Romano, head of research at AI Forensics, told Euronews Next. 'Instead of increasing [the] trust of users on the platform, it is undermining [it],' Romano added. Unclear whether YouTube will address discrepancies YouTube's website notes that 'information panels may not be available in all countries/regions and languages,' and that the company is working to expand their reach. The AI Forensics team said they have met with YouTube to present their research. During those meetings, YouTube allegedly indicated that the discrepancies between languages were not supposed to happen, and that it didn't have a way to systematically check how the panels are deployed across Europe. AI Forensics said YouTube agreed to address these discrepancies but did not go into detail. YouTube did not respond to a Euronews Next request for clarity on the alleged meetings or the measures it plans to take. YouTube, under parent company Google, is a signatory to the European Commission's Code of Practice on Disinformation, a voluntary agreement that sets standards for tech companies to fight disinformation. In March, YouTube said that as part of its commitment, it will 'assess and update the topics prone to misinformation that receive additional context from information panels'. But Romano believes the haphazard content labeling could be even more extensive than the AI Forensics researchers found, given the report says it shows only a 'partial view' with a small sample of panels. Commission could put 'pressure on YouTube' over inconsistencies: AI Forensics Romano said he's hoping YouTube will correct the discrepancies. If it doesn't, he said he will call on the European Commission, the EU's executive body, to investigate a potential breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The Commission could, for example, request more information from YouTube about how it administers its panels, which is the first step of any DSA investigation, he said. 'The EU Commission could put pressure on YouTube to show them that this type of inconsistency is unacceptable across platforms and across products,' he said, noting that it creates 'second-rate markets' throughout Europe where standards meant to protect against misinformation are not being met. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to confirm whether it would be asking for more information from YouTube but did not receive an immediate reply. Romano, at least, will be watching. He said his team built a tool to track how regularly YouTube's information labels come up in various languages. Through the publicly available tracker, people can see which topics have content labels in their language. It will also allow researchers to identify any changes to the information panels, Romano said.


Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
India attacks US and Europe's 'double standards' in trade with Russia
India has lashed out at the United States and the European Union, criticising what it described as "double standards" over their trade relations with Russia, after US President Donald Trump threatened to impose higher tariffs on Indian goods due to New Delhi's continued import of Russian oil. "The countries criticising India are themselves engaged in trade with Russia," India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement on Monday evening, adding that "it is unjustified to target India alone". It noted that the European Union conducted trade with Russia worth €67.5 billion ($78.02bn) in 2024, including record LNG imports of 16.5 million metric tonnes. According to the statement, the US continued to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in the nuclear power sector, along with palladium, fertilisers and chemicals, without clarifying the source of this information. This escalation follows direct threats made by Trump on 31 July, announcing 25% tariffs on Indian goods exported to his country, while also threatening unspecified sanctions against India's purchases of Russian oil, in what observers described as a sudden escalation in relations between Washington and New Delhi. India, one of the largest importers of Russian oil, imported about 1.75 million barrels daily between January and June 2025, up 1% from the same period last year. The EU in July imposed sanctions on India's Nayara Energy, a major refiner in which Russia's Rosneft holds a majority stake. New Delhi has maintained that it does not recognise "unilateral sanctions" imposed by the EU. New Delhi's scathing response Both Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the main opposition Congress Party condemned the ongoing US criticism. "Trump's insulting remarks hurt the dignity of Indians," said Congress MP Manish Tiwari, adding: "It is time to put an end to this incessant bullying and intimidation." BJP vice-president Baijayant Jai Panda recalled a famous quote by Henry Kissinger on the X platform: "To be an enemy of America may be dangerous, but to be a friend of America is deadly." Trade experts believe that the upcoming US tariffs could cause significant damage to the Indian economy. Ajay Srivastava, of the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi, said he expects India's exports to the US to fall 30% in the current fiscal year to $60.6bn from $86.5bn in fiscal 2025. The trade tension was directly reflected in the markets, with Indian stock indices plummeting after Trump's latest threats.