‘Clarify stance on deportation of woman, kids found in cave'
On July 23, Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav said the Centre must take a clear stand on whether the woman's two minor daughters have valid travel documents and proof of birth, and if they can be deported. The judge granted the government two weeks to clarify its stand and said it must inform the court if any decision on deportation is taken before the next hearing.
The court was hearing a petition filed by Dror Shlomo Goldstein, the estranged husband of the Russian woman, Nina Kutina, and the father of the two girls, seeking directions to the Centre to not deport her minor daughters Prema and Ama from India to 'any other country.' The petitioner has also urged the court to release his daughters from the detention centre, where they have been residing after they were rescued by the local police, and to hand over their custody to him.
Additional Solicitor General of India, Arvind Kamath, who appeared for the Union government, told the court that Ama did not have any travel documents or proof of birth and the question of deportation will be considered by the government only after a clear stand is taken regarding the travel documents.
The law officer also told the court that at present, the central authorities had merely restricted the movement of the girls and their mother and that the three of them were safe at the detention centre. He added that the petitioner's apprehension over his daughters being 'suddenly deported' was premature and unreasonable.
The court recorded the government's submissions and granted it two weeks to 'take their stand in writing.' It posted the matter on August 18.
Kutina and her daughters were found living in a cave in the Ramatirtha hills in Uttar Kannada district's Gokarna earlier this month during a routine inspection of the area by the police. Police maintained that Kutina has overstayed her visa in India by eight years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade: Officials react cautiously to Russia penalty threat
NEW DELHI: As President Trump threatened to impose a penalty on India for its trade ties with Russia, Indian officials reacted cautiously as they reiterated India's position that securing energy needs of the Indian people is the overriding priority. A source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said India is buying oil not because it wants to help Moscow but because it's the right thing to do based on the prevailing market conditions and the global geopolitical situation. Trump said India has always bought "a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy along with China". However, India had been keen on announcing new plans for defence procurement and co-production arrangements with the US too. During PM Narendra Modi's visit to the US in Feb, Trump pushed India to lower tariffs and buy more defence products from the US that would facilitate a fair trade deal. With the US encouraging India to reduce its dependence on Russian-origin equipment, the leaders had agreed to expand defence sales and co-production to strengthen interoperability and defence industrial cooperation. In that context, govt sources here said some of Trump's claims don't stand up to scrutiny. "The fact is that India-US defence trade has been increasing since 2008, while the dependence on Russia continues to reduce considerably," said an official on condition of anonymity, adding that the US is now among the top arms suppliers to India along with Russia and France. While much has been made of India's imports from Russia, little attention has been paid to the fact that its crude imports from the US have seen a significant jump too with the US emerging as the 4th largest supplier to India in April this year, according to Indian officials. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Odisha yet to set timeline for notifying PESA Rules: Min
1 2 Bhubaneswar: Odisha govt has not yet set a timeline for notifying the PESA Rules to implement the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, across all scheduled areas (tribal-dominated) in the state, Union minister of state for panchayati raj, S P Singh Baghel, informed the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday. The Act gives powers to gram sabhas in scheduled areas for managing natural resources. In response to a query from BJD member Sasmit Patra, the minister said the Odisha govt has not specified a timeline for the notification of PESA Rules. However, the state has indicated that the rules will be implemented after thoroughly examining objections, suggestions and feedback from relevant stakeholder departments. To implement the PESA provisions in Odisha's Fifth Schedule areas, state govt has incorporated them into the Orissa Grama Panchayats Act, 1964. Baghel further informed that a draft notification for the Odisha Grama Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Rules, 2023, was published in the Odisha Gazette on Nov 10, 2023. The state invited objections and suggestions from all affected parties. Following this, state govt conducted personal hearings with individuals and organisations that submitted objections or suggestions regarding the draft notification. These hearings were held in phases to finalise the draft. Additionally, the panchayati raj and drinking water department has held numerous consultative meetings with various stakeholder departments. After considering the objections and suggestions, state govt has modified the draft PESA Rules and shared them with all stakeholder departments for review and constructive feedback. The process remains ongoing as the state seeks to finalise the rules for effective implementation. In Sept 2024, state panchayati raj minister Rabi Naik announced in the assembly that the govt is planning to notify PESA rules and implement the PESA Act soon. Naik said draft rules were translated into Odia and Santhali languages and sent to collectors of districts having scheduled areas to ensure wider consultation among the stakeholders. The rules are needed to implement the central Act. Malkangiri, Koraput, Rayagada, Nabarangpur, Sundargarh and Mayurbhanj districts fully come under Fifth Schedule areas, besides, parts of Kalahandi, Kandhamal, Ganjam, Gajapati, Sambalpur, Keonjhar and Balasore.
Economic Times
31 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Coup in Ukraine? Russia claims US-UK planning to oust Zelensky and replace him with former Ukrainian Army chief
Political context and anti-corruption controversy Resetting Kiev-West relations and aid continuity Live Events Background on Valery Zaluzhny (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service ( SVR ) has accused the United States and the United Kingdom of orchestrating a secret plan to remove Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and install former Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Valery Zaluzhny , as the new president, reported TASS According to the SVR, a clandestine meeting was held in an Alpine resort involving high-level Ukrainian officials Andrey Yermak (head of Zelensky's presidential office), Kirill Budanov (chief of Ukraine's Defense Ministry intelligence), and Valery Zaluzhny himself, alongside US and UK representatives. During this meeting, the Western allies purportedly decided to support Zaluzhny's candidacy for the SVR alleges that Yermak and Budanov quickly agreed ('snapped a salute') to this decision after securing promises from the US and UK to allow them to retain their current influential positions and have their interests taken into account in future Ukrainian personnel to Russian intelligence as reported by TASS, this secret arrangement sheds light on recent political maneuvers within Ukraine, notably Zelensky's controversial attempts to restrict the powers of local anti-corruption agencies. The SVR claims that these moves were engineered by Yermak to clear the political field for Zaluzhny's subsequent rise and provided a pretext for Western powers to paint Zelensky's administration as authoritarian, thereby justifying plans to remove him from power in the name of defending attempts to curb independent anti-corruption bodies had sparked protests in Ukraine and criticism from Western governments, which contributed to political instability. Following backlash, Zelensky even submitted a bill reversing the curtailment to reinforce the powers of these watchdogs, though with conditions such as security vetting of employees six months SVR asserts that the decision to replace Zelensky with Zaluzhny was framed as a necessary step to 'reset' Ukraine's relations with Western partners, particularly Washington , and to ensure continued military and financial aid amid Ukraine's ongoing conflict with officials question the democratic legitimacy of a top-level political decision made in secret at a foreign resort, asking Ukrainians if this is the democracy, independence, and self-determination they dreamed Zaluzhny served as Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces until early 2025 and currently acts as Ukraine's ambassador to the United Kingdom. He is credited with significant military leadership during Ukraine's resistance in the ongoing war. The SVR claims that both Western countries and certain Ukrainian officials see Zaluzhny as a preferable successor to official statements have been issued by the US, UK, or Ukrainian governments to confirm or deny the SVR's allegations.
