
Why Eating With Hands Is So Alien To The West, Why It Is Not To The Rest
"Disgusting... like animals. I***F if it's culture... still disgusting."
"Spoons exist for a reason, if you ask me."
"That's f***ng psychotic - that's the same hand he literally wipes his a** with."
"So unsanitary and 3rd world."
"Animals such as dogs and cats and even ants etc. have better personal culture when eating than they do."
If you're wondering where these are from, they're just a small sample from the thousands of racist, unfiltered, and dehumanising comments flooding social media in response to a now-viral video of Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old Democratic nominee for New York City's mayoral race in 2025, eating biryani with his bare hands.
Zohran says his worldview is inspired by the 3rd world while eating rice with his hands pic.twitter.com/FDaQfcNSJv
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 29, 2025
Yes, you read that right. A man eating food with his hands. Not committing a crime, not making a policy blunder. Just eating, the way millions do around the world.
Eating with hands may not be a practice familiar to the West, but ridiculing those who do things differently definitely seems to be.
Mamdani, the son of Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani and Indian-American filmmaker Mira Nair, was raised in a household where hand-eating was not just accepted, it was the norm. Like in many South Asian homes, meals weren't just about nourishment. They were rituals of connection, of culture, of comfort.
And here's the thing: Eating with hands isn't just a cultural quirk or family tradition. It's ancient, intentional, and, dare we say, more delicious (A study shows this too).
Since The Oldest Civilisations
Way before forks and knives strutted into European dining rooms, humans were already eating. And eating fine without them. The Egyptians, Greeks, Mesopotamians and, yes, the people of the Indus Valley Civilisation (around 2500 BCE), all ate with their hands. It wasn't messy or uncouth. It was a mindful way of consuming food, believed to prime the body for digestion.
In fact, the sacred Indian texts, the Vedas and the Upanishads, mention eating with hands as a practice that aligns the body and spirit with the act of eating. Each bite becomes a sensory experience involving sight, smell, taste, and touch.
Ayurveda, India's ancient medical system developed more than 3,000 years ago, reinforces this. Wellness expert Luke Coutinho also further explains that touch stimulates digestive enzymes and signals the body to prepare for nourishment.
So, while cutlery may offer convenience, hands offer connection - to food, to tradition, and to self.
Geography Shaped Our Plates
It also comes down to food types.
Indian cuisine, with its fluffy rice, soft breads, aromatic gravies and tangy pickles, lends itself beautifully to hand-eating. Mixing and scooping with fingers allows us to combine textures and flavours exactly the way we want, a piece of naan dipped just right into dal, or a portion of rice mashed with curry to perfect consistency.
In contrast, much of Western food - think roasts, grilled meats, pastas (with less spices and flavour) - is structured, needing to be cut or portioned. Hence, the rise of knives and forks.
But even in the West, hands weren't always shunned at the table.
What The?
Cutlery didn't always rule Western dining tables. Forks first appeared in southern Europe around the 11th century, gained some popularity in 14th-century Italy thanks to pasta, and slowly made their way across Europe. But they weren't always welcome. Many considered them unnecessary.
In America, forks became commonplace only in the late 18th to early 19th century. Before that, early colonists mostly used spoons... and hands. That's right. Hand-eating was once done by Americans themselves.
Formal dining etiquette, and the cutlery obsession that came with it, was largely a classist invention. In medieval and Renaissance Europe, aristocrats used forks and knives as markers of sophistication.
Manuals like The Courtier by Baldassare Castiglione outlined elite table manners to separate the wealthy from the working class. Today, you can spot these 'royalty' people teaching on social media on the 'right' way to eat food items.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by William Hanson (@williamhanson)
Anyhoo, back to history. As the middle class grew, they mimicked the nobility, adopting these customs to climb the social ladder. In the US, women played a major role in establishing table etiquette within families, helping normalise cutlery use among the middle class.
Distinctively, Americans developed a fork-switching method (cutting with the knife in the right hand, then switching the fork over to eat) a practice celebrated as uniquely "American".
In contrast, Indian dining didn't evolve as a display of wealth or class but as an expression of spirituality and culture. Eating with hands wasn't about status - it was about sustenance.
What About Chopsticks?
And then there are chopsticks. Slender sticks of wood or metal that have travelled across continents to become symbols of elegance and finesse. Originally developed in China over 3,000 years ago, chopsticks were first used for cooking and serving. By around 400 AD, they evolved into the main utensil for eating, spreading to neighbouring countries like Japan, Korea and Vietnam. But much like the fork in Europe, chopsticks were once a marker of sophistication and class, associated with refined etiquette and deeply rooted cultural values.
In Japan, chopsticks (hashi) are more than just tools, they're part of a dining philosophy. From the way food is prepared into bite-sized pieces to the rules about how you rest your chopsticks between bites, every gesture reflects mindfulness and respect for the meal.
Using them incorrectly, like pointing them at someone or sticking them upright in a bowl of rice, is considered not only rude but spiritually inappropriate, as it mimics funeral rituals.
In Korea, the tradition is different. Chopsticks are often made of metal, and they're used alongside a spoon, a practice believed to have originated in royal court dining. Meals are communal, laid out with many side dishes, and using both chopsticks and a spoon ensures shared food is handled delicately and respectfully.
Today, chopsticks have shed their once "exotic" label in the West and are now celebrated as markers of taste and cosmopolitan flair. From sushi restaurants, ramen bars, to pan-Asian fine dining spots.
Religion Too
Now, back to our fork, knife, spoon and eating with hands debate. Out of everything else, religion too played a significant role in promoting eating with hands.
The right hand holds a significant place in Indian cultural beliefs and practices, deeply intertwined with many religious rituals and traditions. It is customary for Indians to use their right hand not only for eating but also for a variety of auspicious activities (like sharing prasad or applying tilak or giving blessing). This stems from a shared belief system where the right hand is considered pure, representing good deeds and positive intentions.
This tradition is rooted in several religions in India, including Hinduism, Islam, Sikhism, and Jainism.
The left hand, on the other hand, is traditionally viewed as impure, often reserved for tasks associated with personal hygiene.
Let's Talk Dirty: The Matters Of Hygiene
The only argument that the people who are calling eating with hands seem to be clinging to is hygiene. However, according to cultural anthropologist Dr Aditi Verma, "In Indian society, dining practices are not just about satisfying hunger; they are symbols of the society's broader perception of cleanliness and respect."
Washing hands before and after the meals were also practiced as a tradition, which by the way, eliminates the question of hygiene.
In every gesture made with the right hand, there lies a respect for the spiritual and physical purity that Indian culture holds dear. The influence of these beliefs extends beyond the dining table into daily life.
For instance, when exchanging goods or money, or even shaking hands, many Indians still prefer using their right hand, as a gesture of goodwill. As urban lifestyles evolve, there has been a slight shift away from these customs, but they remain a vital element of cultural identity and heritage, especially in traditional communities.
So, hand, knife, fork, spoon or chopsticks - whatever you want to use, the bottom line is this: people should be able to eat the way they want to without being subjected to racism, ridicule or mockery. Especially not for enjoying a plate of biryani the way it's meant to be eaten - by licking your fingers clean.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump envoy Witkoff lands in Russia, India's NSA Doval in Moscow; meeting on the cards?
Ahead of US President Donald Trump's deadline for a ceasefire in Ukraine, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff has arrived in Moscow to hold talks with Russian officials. Incidentally, Indian National Security Advisor Ajit Doval is also in Moscow. read more Ahead of US President Donald Trump's deadline for a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Wednesday arrived in Moscow to hold talks with Russian officials — possibly Vladimir Putin as well. Late last month, Trump shortened the 50-day ultimatum to Putin to agree to a ceasefire in his war on Ukraine to 10-12 days. The deadline will expire this week. With his continued attacks on Ukrainian civilians and statements, Putin has so far shown no indication that he wants a ceasefire. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On the failure to reach a ceasefire, Trump has threatened to impose tariffs and sanctions on Russia and those countries buying Russian oil. He has already slapped 25 per cent tariff on India and has said he would 'substantially' increase that and impose additional penalties over the trade with Russia. Incidentally, Indian National Security Advisor Ajit Doval is also in Moscow in the moment. Even though Doval's visit had been planned in advance of Witkoff's visit, there has been speculation about a meeting between the two officials, possibly to manage the spiralling relations between the two countries. Witkoff arrives in Moscow as Putin remains defiant Witkoff's visit comes just ahead of Trump's Friday deadline to Putin to agree to a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin has previously said that Witkoff could have a meeting with Putin. However, Putin so far not indicated that he wants peace — or at least real peace. Last week, in an apparent reference to Trump's deadline, Putin said that 'all disappointments arise from inflated expectations'. Making it clear that he had no intention to stop ongoing ground offensive, he said that 'to stop our advance at any cost' was the objective of Russia's enemies and ill-wishers. Separately, Reuters on Tuesday reported three sources as saying that Putin's determination to keep going with the offensive is prompted by his belief that Russia is winning the and belief that any new US sanctions will not have much of an impact on Russia. Even though Putin does not want to anger Trump, the war goals take precedence, two of the sources told the news agency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD One of the sources said that Putin's goal now is to completely capture Ukraine's four provinces of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. However, there is a possibility that Putin may be able to convince Trump via Witkoff. Analysts have said that Putin has been looking for a short-term break in the war to replenish the Russian forces and rearm the troops. For such a purpose, Putin may very well agree to a ceasefire now to escape Trump's immediate wrath and return later to war. Witkoff, who has long been very friendly to Putin and Russia, may be the best person to convince Trump if this is what Putin has decided. 'For Putin, the ideal scenario is to freeze the conflict for a while, build up strength, and then resume the war — ideally with a more plausible pretext, such as accusing Ukraine of failing to comply with peace agreements,' Kseniya Kirillova, a Russia analyst at Jamestown Foundation, previously told Firstpost. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is Witkoff-Doval meeting on the cards? As Witkoff and Doval are both in Moscow, there is speculation about a meeting, but there not been any official confirmation. Doval's visit had been planned before and he is expected to speak to Russian officials about the delivery of S-400 air defence systems, according to The Hindu. The S-400 is among the many Russian defence deals that are running late by several years. As Russia has devoted all resources to the war on Ukraine, it has not been able to deliver the various platforms it has signed deals for, such as the S-400 air defence systems and navy vessels. The Hindu reported that US tariffs are also expected to feature in Doval's meetings in Moscow.


Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why is Trump upset with India? It is not about peace in Ukraine
As India and the United States failed to clinch a trade deal by the stipulated deadline, President Donald Trump announced on his social media post that all imports from India would now be subject to a 25 per cent tariff, and an additional penalty for importing Russian energy. While a higher tariff across the board was expected if the deal fails, the additional penalty for trading with Russia has irked the Indian establishment. The MEA issued a statement criticising the US and the EU by exposing their own hypocrisy on the issue of doing business with Russia. It is true that India's energy imports, mostly crude oil, from Russia have increased. But Russia's emergence as India's major supplier of crude oil is a consequence of US policy itself. To begin with, US sanctions on Venezuelan crude oil continue to be in force, blocking off a major source of supply. This is significant because Venezuela holds the world's largest reserves of crude oil. A fear of secondary sanctions has prevented the world from importing from Venezuela. Then, in 2019, the US, during the first Trump presidency, imposed sanctions on Iranian oil after it pulled out of the JCPOA. Iran was one of India's major oil suppliers, but the threat of secondary sanctions forced it to immediately cut its imports from Iran to 0.76 per cent of its total oil imports by 2020. Today, the share has fallen below 0.04 per cent. Finally, after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the EU, which felt morally compelled to reduce its energy dependence on Russia, undertook measures to gradually phase out Russian coal and oil imports. The EU's decision to transition from traditional suppliers to new ones threatened to drive up global oil prices. To further worsen the situation, OPEC's practice of capping output to create artificial scarcity threatened to trigger inflationary pressures worldwide. And even then, Russian oil was not under any direct sanctions, like Iran or Venezuela. While the G7 placed a price cap on Russian oil, which they were able to enforce globally, India didn't violate any understanding. And thus, Trump's sudden frustration with India's trade with Russia is bizarre. Moreover, while Trump has singled out India, alongside China, he chose to conveniently absolve the EU for the same. For all its moral chest-thumping, the EU has only been successful in cutting its coal dependence on Russia. It continues to import crude oil from Russia even as imports have reduced substantially. But most importantly, the EU has not stopped importing Russian gas, LNG and pipeline gas. In fact, it continues to be Russia's top export destination for both LNG (51 per cent) and pipeline gas (37 per cent). Additionally, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, India emerged as the top supplier of refined oil to the EU, overtaking Saudi Arabia. The EU had no problems until very recently in importing Russian crude oil refined in India. Trump's actions appear, more than anything else, to be a result of his frustration and exasperation in dealing with Russia, India, and China. That he doesn't care about Ukraine or the Ukrainian cause is quite evident. However, it is no secret that when Trump assumed the presidency earlier this year, he made some tall claims regarding Russia, China and India. He vowed to bring the Russian war on Ukraine to an end. He also expressed confidence in concluding a favourable trade deal with both India and China. Trump expressed his admiration for the three leaders of all three countries. He was hoping to bank on his personal working relationship with them to deliver on these promises. Yet, more than six months after Trump took office, Putin has shrugged off repeated deadlines set by Trump to end the war. Xi Jinping, too, has refused to buckle under pressure and instead coerced Trump into agreeing to a 90-day truce amidst the ongoing tariff war between the US and China. Finally, India's decision to refute Trump's claim of mediating a ceasefire with Pakistan and its refusal to compromise on some core issues during the trade talks seems to have further infuriated the US president. Trump's decision, therefore, to sanction Russian crude oil, all of a sudden, is an expression of his disappointment arising from the mismatch between his expectations and reality. The writer is with Takshashila's Indo-Pacific Studies programme


Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
UP prepares to commemorate 100 years of Kakori Train Action
Lucknow: The Uttar Pradesh government will observe the 100th year of the Kakori Train Action with a string of activities, such as creative writing competitions and a Tiranga Mela, it said on Tuesday. On August 9, 1925, in Kakori, Indian freedom fighters looted the treasury of the British government to buy arms for their fight against the British Raj. In 1927, Ram Prasad 'Bismil', Ashfaqulla Khan and Thakur, and Roshan Singh were hanged by the British government for their involvement in the incident. The culture department of the government has announced Prabhat Pheri, a motorcycle rally, an exhibition of the freedom movement, and a plantation drive to mark the day, according to a statement. On August 8, an instrumental version of the National Anthem will be played at various martyrs' memorials in the state, officials said. 'Around 300 students from various schools of Kakori are expected to participate in various cultural and literary events,' the statement read. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is likely to be a part of the events. In a meeting on Monday evening, Lucknow Divisional Commissioner Roshan Jacob directed that preparations be completed at Kakori Smriti Sthal in Baaznagar in Kakori. On July 13, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said that the centenary year of the Kakori train robbery will be grandly celebrated in Lucknow. 'Kakori is located at a short distance from Lucknow, and Lucknow has a very close relationship with this historical event. Therefore, my effort will be to celebrate the centenary year of the Kakori incident in a grand manner in the city as well as other places,' the minister then said. 'In August 1925, an incident took place at a railway station near Lucknow which shook the foundations of British rule. The revolutionaries fighting for freedom looted the British treasury near the Kakori Railway Station for the freedom of India,' he said. Revolutionaries Ram Prasad Bismil, Ashfaqullah Khan, and Sachin Nath Bakshi were involved in the incident. 'When the trial of the Kakori case began, (former UP chief minister) Chandra Bhanu Gupta stood in the court with eminent lawyer Govind Ballabh Pant (first chief minister of UP, then United Provinces) on behalf of the revolutionaries,' the defence minister said.