US and Chinese officials meet in London for pivotal trade talks
[LONDON] Top US and Chinese officials were meeting in London on Monday (Jun 9) to try and defuse a high-stakes trade dispute that has widened from tariffs to restrictions over rare earths, threatening a global supply chain shock and slower economic growth.
On the first of likely two days of talks, officials from the two superpowers were meeting at the ornate Lancaster House to try to get back on track with a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva that had briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing.
Since then the US has accused China of slow-walking on its commitments, particularly around rare earths shipments.
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the US team wanted a handshake from China on rare earths after Donald Trump said Xi Jinping had agreed to resume shipments in a rare call between the two presidents last week.
'The purpose of the meeting today is to make sure that they're serious, but to literally get handshakes,' Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC in an interview. He said the US would expect export controls to be eased and rare earths released in volume immediately afterwards.
The talks come at a crucial time for both economies, which are showing signs of strain from Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Customs data showed that China's exports to the US plunged 34.5 per cent year on year in May in value terms, the sharpest drop since February 2020, when the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic upended global trade.
In the US, business and household confidence has taken a pummelling, while first-quarter gross domestic product contracted due to a record surge in imports as Americans front-loaded purchases to beat anticipated price increases.
But for now, the impact on inflation has been muted, and the jobs market has remained fairly resilient, though economists expect cracks to become more apparent over the summer.
Attending the talks in London will be US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and a Chinese contingent helmed by Vice Premier He Lifeng.
The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the US, is one indication of how central rare earths have become. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors.
Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other.
Positive conclusion
The second round of meetings comes four days after Trump and Xi spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's January 20 inauguration.
During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary.
But Trump said on social media the talks focused primarily on trade led to 'a very positive conclusion,' setting the stage for Monday's meeting in the British capital.
The next day, Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the US of rare earths minerals and magnets, and Reuters reported that China has granted temporary export licences to rare-Earth suppliers of the top three US automakers.
China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world.
White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the Fox News programme Sunday Morning Futures that the US wanted the two sides to build on the progress made in Geneva in the hope they could move towards more comprehensive trade talks.
The preliminary deal in Geneva sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and US indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses.
But Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, said while a temporary truce was possible, there was little prospect for the bilateral relationship to become constructive given broader decoupling trends and continued US pressure on other countries to take China out of their supply chains.
'Everyone around Trump is still hawkish and so a breakthrough US-China trade deal is unlikely, especially in the context of other deals that are further along and prioritised,' he said in an analyst note. REUTERS
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
22 minutes ago
- Business Times
Gold's status from ‘theoretical' to ‘tactical' hedge
IN TODAY'S fragile political and financial environment, gold is regaining prominence in the strategies of warily observant reserve managers. 'Gold is good when other assets are not safe,' said a participant at the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum's (OMFIF) annual seminar in London, in partnership with State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) in May. The event brought together senior representatives from central banks, public pension funds and sovereign funds to discuss how geopolitical risks and shifting market dynamics are shaping reserve strategies. The remark, however, encapsulates a growing shift in how central banks perceive gold's role in an increasingly complex global environment. This change has brought gold back to the centre of reserve management strategy. A structural repositioning Central banks have now recorded three consecutive years of elevated demand for the metal, resulting in net purchases of 365 tonnes in the final quarter of 2024 – the highest quarterly figure on record, according to the World Gold Council. This follows annual purchases of more than 1,000 tonnes in both 2022 and 2023. Major buyers have included China, Turkey and India, while countries such as Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have also made notable additions relative to the size of their reserve portfolios. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The rationale behind this shift is not purely tactical. As explored in OMFIF's 2024 report Gold and the new world disorder, gold is once again being treated as a strategic asset, not because it offers yield or efficiency, but because of what it represents. It serves as a symbol of political neutrality and security in times of fragmentation and independence from the liabilities of any one issuer. That argument – once seen as a theoretical hedge – is increasingly propelling real changes in allocation. Political developments have added urgency to these shifts. With the return of US President Donald Trump to the White House this year, concerns over trade tensions, fiscal profligacy and the reliability of global partnerships have resurfaced. The US dollar's politicisation is also a growing concern even among traditional allies of the US. As one roundtable participant noted, the issue is not just what Trump might do, but how quickly markets react to tariff decisions and how long that uncertainty might linger. As a result, central banks are preparing for a more fractured global financial order. Gold as a portfolio stabiliser Across the OMFIF-SSGA discussion, there was broad consensus that structural volatility – driven by sanctions, shifting trade dynamics and rising geopolitical risk – has made diversification more urgent and gold more relevant. One panellist noted that the role of gold is evolving from a legacy asset into a core pillar of portfolio stability. Another panellist pointed out that gold has become what central banks turn to when other assets no longer feel safe, with record prices now seen as a reflection of trust rather than speculative excess. Another observed that reserve management is increasingly influenced by broader themes of strategic autonomy and long-term resilience. Gold, unlike other assets, is seen as consistent with both objectives. Meanwhile, other viable diversifiers to the US dollar remain limited. The euro faces structural challenges and remains institutionally incomplete. The renminbi, despite greater use in bilateral trade, lacks the convertibility, transparency and liquidity required of a global reserve anchor. Other currencies such as the yen, pound and Canadian or Australian dollars lack the scale and liquidity needed to absorb major reallocations. As one panellist remarked: 'This isn't mass de-dollarisation. It's a gradual repositioning driven by a structural loss of trust.' Absence of alternatives In this environment, gold has emerged as the only strategic fallback. It is not a currency, yet it functions as one in times of strain. The forthcoming Global Public Investor 2025 report, launching on Jun 24, examines whether this shift is now translating into a structural increase in gold's share of global reserves. For the past four years, our annual survey of central banks has consistently shown that reserve managers plan to increase their gold allocations. This has now materialised. For many central banks, there seems to be growing signs that this trend will continue as gold evolves from a tactical hedge into a long-term strategic asset. OMFIF The writer is an economist at the Economic and Monetary Policy Institute, OMFIF
Business Times
22 minutes ago
- Business Times
The G7 is at a critical crossroads
THE Group of Seven (G7) could well face an existential crisis at the Kananaskis summit because of US President Donald Trump. Whither the G7? In the 1980s and 1990s, the G7 – led by the US – steered the global economy. But with the rise of emerging market powerhouses, the G7's relative heft declined. The Group of 20's (G20) Pittsburgh summit in September 2009 declared the newer, bigger, broader G20 the premier forum for its leaders' international cooperation, assigning the G7 an informal role. Then, over the following 15 years, the G20 floundered. Economic performance in Russia and Brazil weakened, as did China's subsequently. Russia invaded Crimea and Donbas in 2014 and launched its horrific full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. US-China tensions mounted amid Chinese President Xi Jinping's increased authoritarianism and America's heightened focus on economic statecraft, including the first Trump administration's pursuit of a more protectionist and isolationist course. A reinvigorated role for the G7 As the G20 stumbled, the G7 gathered renewed momentum. It was not a smooth ride, as epitomised by the strained US relations with the rest of the G7 at the 2018 Charlevoix summit, when Trump shamefully disavowed the communique to which all had just agreed and launched verbal attacks on the summit's host, Canada's then-prime minister Justin Trudeau. The administration of former US president Joe Biden, however, helped revive the G7 as a cohesive, democratically aligned forum. The G7 rolled out sanctions on Russia, including blocking US$300 billion in Russian central bank and oligarch assets. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up It helped raise support for Ukraine, including by transferring proceeds from Russia's immobilised assets, although unfortunately failing to seize and send all those Russian holdings to Ukraine. The G7 limited Russian energy revenues, including imposing a price cap on Russia's oil exports. Members worked together on tackling cybersecurity, which would not have been feasible by the G20 given the presence of Russia and China. The G7 adopted a hardened line against China's challenge to Western security. All this cohesion, trust and unity are unravelling as the Jun 15-17 Kananaskis summit approaches. US relations with its longtime allies in Europe have become highly strained. Trump is tearing apart the glue that holds the G7 together, and it now faces the question of whether it can even continue, or function properly, at least, over the next four years while Trump is president. It is hard to reach a positive answer for several reasons. Trump's attacks on the European Union (EU), claiming that the bloc was formed to 'screw' America, fly in the face of transatlantic unity and basic comity, and America's longstanding support for the EU. His tariff threats undermine the liberal trade policies that promoted decades of transatlantic prosperity. He is right in arguing that Europe must do more for itself, especially on defence. But shunning America's closest democratic allies while embracing Russian President Vladimir Putin and other authoritarian leaders undermines the cohesion underpinning the G7's revival. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, always an ardent pro-Atlanticist, shockingly said that his absolute priority will be to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible in order to achieve independence from the US, because Americans under this administration are clearly indifferent to the fate of Europe. Other European leaders have echoed his startling remarks. Avoiding a fragmented future Trump seemingly wishes to abandon the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato), or disregard its responsibilities. He appears to see little value or have any interest in the G7 as a 'democracy' club, given his support for authoritarians. Indeed, he has again called for Russia to be readmitted to the G7, despite its barbaric war against Ukraine and Putin's dictatorship. Other G7 leaders have rejected Trump's call. Trump has shown utter disregard for Ukraine, even denying that Russia was the aggressor, notwithstanding the rest of the G7's steadfast strong support. His berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, supported by Vice-President JD Vance, sent chills up the backs of European leaders and was quickly rebuffed by them. Trump has turned America's policies on climate change on their head, while Europe continues to do its best to forge ahead. European officials have reservations about trusting and working with Trump's intelligence team. Moreover, Trump's deprecations and disdain for Canadian sovereignty will only exacerbate the underlying tensions surrounding the Kananaskis summit. The foundations supporting the Western alliance, Nato, liberal trade and the G7 – and, frankly, American global leadership – are being torn asunder by the current US administration. Whatever the status of these issues at Kananaskis, enormous damage has been done. The G7 Kananaskis summit may be a frigid affair, even if it is warm and sunny outside. OMFIF The writer is US chair of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum

Straits Times
44 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US stocks advance as China trade talks drag on
Traders working on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, in New York City. PHOTO: REUTERS US stocks advance as China trade talks drag on NEW YORK - Wall Street stocks advanced on June 10 as markets hoped for progress in US-China trade talks while digesting the World Bank's lowered economic growth forecast. A second day of high-level talks between the United States and China in London stretched into the evening on June 10 without any concrete announcement. FHN Financial's Chris Low pointed to upbeat comments from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, while also noting that 'there was a TikTok channel associated with Chinese television suggesting that there are still some significant differences between the two sides.' The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished up 0.3 per cent at 42,866.87. The broad-based S&P 500 climbed 0.6 per cent to 6,038.81, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index also gained 0.6 per cent to 19,715.00. The negotiations aim to keep the world's biggest two economies on course for an accord after each side earlier this spring imposed draconian tariffs on each other. Citing trade tensions and the resulting policy uncertainty, the World Bank lowered its 2025 projection for global GDP growth to 2.3 per cent in its latest economic prospects report, down from 2.7 per cent expected in January. Global growth and inflation prospects for this year and next have worsened because of 'high levels of policy uncertainty and this growing fragmentation of trade relations,' said World Bank Group chief economist Indermit Gill. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep,' Gill added. Investors will get a fresh reading on US inflation on June 11 with release of consumer price index data. Among individual companies, Disney rose 2.7 per cent after disclosing that it reached an agreement on the pricing of NBC Universal's 33 per cent stake in Hulu, resolving a years-long appraisal process. Disney will pay an additional US$438.7 million (S$564 million) for the stake. The transaction is expected to close on or before July 24. Tesla shot up 5.7 per cent on anticipation of the company's upcoming launch of self-driving vehicles in Texas. The electric vehicle company teased the introduction on Musk's X social media platform. Chip giant Intel surged 8 per cent on optimism about the company's new technology. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.