
The government needs a viable plan to stop the small boats
The 20,000 crossings threshold has been reached much earlier in 2025 than in previous years. In 2022, the year that total arrivals hit an all-time high of nearly 46,000, the threshold was not reached until August 14. The new figures suggest Britain is on course to break the 2022 record and that illegal crossings could reach 50,000 before the year end. Were that to happen, it would represent another blow for Sir Keir Starmer's credibility: the prime minister has repeatedly promised to succeed where his Conservative predecessors failed and 'stop the boats'.
Ministers are said to be confident that new measures will begin to reduce the numbers, including a promise by French police to intercept boats up to 300 metres from the coastline. These tweaks may result in small decreases but they are no substitute for a serious deterrent for those seeking to cross the Channel. Until there is a realistic prospect that illegal immigrants will be immediately removed from this country and processed elsewhere, the demand for what has become the Channel taxi service will continue apace.
The prime minister pledged in opposition to scrap the Rwanda scheme for processing illegal arrivals offshore, and duly did so on his first day in office. Although the scheme was thwarted by legal challenges, Sir Keir must regret turning his face against a deterrent strategy last year. Small boat crossings have risen relentlessly, forcing the government to accept the inevitable and explore the use of overseas 'returns hubs', most likely in the Balkans.
However, Sir Keir is pinning his hopes for meaningful reductions on a returns deal with France, which has so far eluded him during his first year in office. President Macron will make a state visit to the UK next week, and a 'one-in, one-out' deal is in the offing. The prime minister hopes this can break the business model of smuggling gangs and choke off their trade. If such a pact is struck, Britain would finally be able to send illegal migrants back to France. But in return, it would have to admit an equal number of migrants who have a legitimate case for reuniting with relatives here. Of course, the success of the scheme relies on co-operation with France, which has happily taken British money for years while failing to turn off the flow of small boats. It can only be hoped that this deal, if concluded, will produce some results. It may do nothing to reduce overall admissions but at least the dangerous cross-Channel trade might be curtailed or ended. And it could end also the flow of images of boats crammed with refugees that has benighted successive administrations.
The impact of illegal migration is stark. As well as the burden for the Home Office of processing the claims, analysis reported in The Times suggests that migrants arriving by small boat are 25 times more likely to end up in prison than an average Briton. Mired in the welfare fiasco, Sir Keir needs a win. He must hope Mr Macron will oblige.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
American Mayer announces candidacy for FIA president
SILVERSTONE, England, July 4 (Reuters) - American Tim Mayer announced on Friday he will stand against Emirati incumbent Mohammed Ben Sulayem in a December vote for president of the FIA, motorsport's world governing body. The 59-year-old, who served as a Formula One steward until last year, is the son of former McLaren team principal Teddy Mayer. "I believe I am the right person, at the right time, in the right place," Mayer told a press conference at a hotel near Silverstone, the British Grand Prix circuit. He added that he had been working on his campaign for six months. "What I see is a failure in leadership right now," he said. "Instead of reform, we've seen performance. Behind the stagecraft, we've been left with the illusion of progress; and the illusion of leadership, while the most senior team he appointed has departed." Mayer said last November he had been dismissed as a steward via text message by an assistant to Ben Sulayem. The FIA disputes that detail. The American said standing was not an act of revenge but about driving the organisation forward -- with his campaign branded FIAforward. There was no immediate response from the FIA. Ben Sulayem, who has made much of returning the governing body to profit, has been a controversial figure since his election in 2021. There have been battles with Liberty Media over commercial matters and accusations of sexism, and there has been a high turnover of senior staff. Critics also say statute changes , approved by FIA members, limit the powers of audit and ethics committees and make it harder for rivals to stand against him. Mayer described his bid as a Herculean task with the deck stacked in Ben Sulayem's favour, given recent statute changes, and only five months to campaign and win votes from member federations. Mayer did not say who would be on his presidential list, a requirement for standing, which he admitted still had some open positions. He said he had good support from Motorsport UK and had informed Stefano Domenicali, chief executive of Liberty Media-owned Formula One, of his plans. "The job now is to go out and explain to lots of small clubs around the world ... why we can do a better job," said Mayer. "Explaining how we can bring value and restructure the FIA to do a better job. "I do feel restructuring needs to happen." Ben Sulayem has already announced he is seeking a second term and until Friday had no declared opponent, with Spain's double world rally champion Carlos Sainz Sr. recently deciding not to stand. Mayer said he would have stood even if Sainz had decided to run. He also dismissed any suggestion of a conflict of interest regarding the historic family connection with McLaren. The FIA is the governing body for F1, the world rally championship and Formula E among other series.


North Wales Chronicle
22 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Palestine Action ban would be ‘authoritarian abuse' of power, High Court told
Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, is asking the High Court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move is set to come into force at midnight after being approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week, and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The Home Office is opposing bids to delay the ban from becoming law, and the potential launch of a legal challenge against the decision. At a hearing on Friday, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the London court: 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' The barrister said that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq war activists'. Quoting Ms Ammori, the barrister continued that the group had 'never encouraged harm to any person at all' and that its goal 'is to put ourselves in the way of the military machine'. He continued: 'We ask you, in the first instance, to suspend until July 21 what we say is an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power which is alien to the basic tradition of the common law and is contrary to the Human Rights Act.' The barrister later said that the Home Office 'has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now'. He added: 'The discretion to proscribe an organisation must be exercised with respect to the central concern of the Act, which plainly is not to simply proscribe any organisation which fits the definition.' Mr Husain later said that to proscribe an organisation, the Home Secretary 'has got to believe that the organisation is concerned in terrorism'. 'If you get isolated conduct associated with Palestine Action that meets the statutory definition, that is not enough because you have got to look at the organisation as a whole,' he said. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that if the ban came into effect the harm would be 'far-reaching', could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. The barrister named Normal People author Sally Rooney, who lives abroad and 'fears the ramifications for her, for her work, for her books, for her programmes' if she shows support for Palestine Action. 'Is the Prime Minister going to denounce her, an Irish artist, as a supporter of a proscribed organisation?' 'Will that have ramifications for her with the BBC, etc?' Ms Ghralaigh asked. Mr Justice Chamberlain previously said that if he decided to temporarily block the ban, he could do that with either an 'interim declaration' or by making an injunction 'requiring the Secretary of State to make an order'. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the ban of Palestine Action. The barrister also said that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. He said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Mr Watson said: 'At its heart, it is a challenge to the proscription of the organisation … POAC is the forum of first resort.' He continued: 'Even if the court does conclude that there is some residual scope for judicial review … then we respectfully submit that the court needs to look at the bespoke regime that Parliament has provided.' Friday's hearing comes after an estimated £7 million worth of damage was caused to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. He said: 'The process or assessment on the basis of which that proscription decision was made preceded that, in March.' Police said that the incident caused around £7 million worth of damage, with four people charged in connection with the incident. Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22, are accused of conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage. They were remanded into custody after appearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court and will appear at the Old Bailey on July 18. The hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain will conclude later on Friday, with the High Court judge expected to give his decision at the end of the hearing. A further hearing to decide whether Ms Ammori will be given the green light to challenge the decision to ban Palestine Action is expected to be heard later this month.


BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Discussions ongoing about new party, says Jeremy Corbyn
Jeremy Corbyn has said "discussions are ongoing" after ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana announced she was quitting the party to co-lead the founding of a new party with ex-Labour leader congratulated Sultana on her "principled decision" to leave and said he was "delighted that she will help us build a real alternative".He said "the democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape" but stopped short of providing details as to who would lead the movement. Making her announcement on Thursday evening, Sultana said Westminster was broken adding: "We are not going to take this anymore."