logo
New Era of ‘Supply Shocks' Could Force Higher Long-Term Interest Rates, Says Powell

New Era of ‘Supply Shocks' Could Force Higher Long-Term Interest Rates, Says Powell

Epoch Times15-05-2025
A period of supply disruptions may reshape the U.S. economy, leading to unstable inflation and sustained higher interest rates, says Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
Powell appeared before the Thomas Laubach Research Conference in Washington on May 15 to discuss the U.S. central bank's monetary policy framework review.
In prepared remarks, Powell said that the economic environment has drastically changed since the review was conducted in 2020.
At the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. and global economy witnessed near-zero interest rates to cushion the pandemic era's economic blows, leading to a prolonged period of above-trend inflation.
Five years later, long-term inflation expectations are well anchored and align with the central bank's 2 percent objective. However, according to the Fed chief, it is unlikely that interest rates will flirt with near-zero rates again.
Reiterating comments about fundamental policy changes and the possibility of supply chain snafus, Powell remarked on the new challenges monetary policymakers face.
Related Stories
5/14/2025
5/9/2025
'Higher real rates may also reflect the possibility that inflation could be more volatile going forward than in the inter-crisis period of the 2010s,' Powell said.
'We may be entering a period of more frequent, and potentially more persistent, supply shocks—a difficult challenge for the economy and for central banks.'
Powell said that the Fed needs to maintain inflation expectations at 2 percent, a global standard for advanced economies' central banks.
With the Federal Reserve System entrenched in a policy examination—an assessment completed every five years of the institution's communication strategies, tools, and overall policy framework—central bank officials are pursuing different ways to communicate with the public.
'In periods with larger, more frequent, or more disparate shocks, effective communication requires that we convey the uncertainty that surrounds our understanding of the economy and the outlook,' Powell said.
'We will examine ways to improve along that dimension as we move forward.'
The Fed plans to complete its monetary policy review in September.
State of Trade
Despite supply chain concerns, shipping statistics have indicated a rebound this month, weeks following President Donald Trump's April 2 sweeping tariff announcement.
According to global tracker Vizion, global ocean bookings
U.S. import bookings also soared about 40 percent last week after tanking close to 26 percent in the previous week.
Chinese shipments to the United States have rebounded by more than 70 percent.
In addition, the New York Fed's
Last week, the Trump administration secured a trade deal with the United Kingdom and agreed to a 90-day tariff pause with the Chinese regime.
During an event with executives in Qatar, the president announced on May 15 that India's government offered to eliminate tariffs on U.S. goods.
'It is very hard to sell in India, and they are offering us a deal where basically they are willing to literally charge us no tariffs,' Trump said in a meeting in the Qatari capital of Doha.
President Donald Trump (L) and Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani meet at the Amiri Diwan in Doha, Qatar, on May 14, 2025.
Alex Brandon/AP
Still, U.S. consumers are enduring an overall average effective tariff rate of nearly 18 percent, the highest since 1934, according to Yale's Budget Lab.
Watching Interest Rates
At last week's
Following robust economic data, investors have pushed back their interest rate cut forecasts.
A month ago, the consensus in the futures market was a June rate cut. As of May 15, according to the
Officials have stated they can afford to be patient since the economy remains strong and policy is well-positioned to respond to changing conditions.
So far, both sides of the twin mandate—maximum employment and price stability—are intact.
On the inflation front, the April consumer price index (CPI) and producer price index (PPI) reports indicate that the disinflation trend continues.
In the labor market, the U.S. economy created a better-than-expected 177,0000 new jobs last month.
According to Charlie Ripley, a senior investment strategist at Allianz Investment Management, there is little urgency at the central bank to restart its easing cycle based on the flurry of data.
'The mantra for Chairman Powell's Fed has always been to make sound policy decisions established from the certainty of economic statistics, or in other words, remaining heavily data dependent,' Ripley said in a note emailed to The Epoch Times.
Until signs of sizable weakness exist, Powell and his colleagues will stay in a wait-and-see policy position, Ripley said.
The Fed will hold its next two-day policy meeting on June 17 and June 18.
Investors will pay close attention as officials release the updated Summary of Economic Projections, a quarterly survey of policymakers' expectations for the economy and policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Intel CEO pushes back amid calls for resignation
Intel CEO pushes back amid calls for resignation

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Intel CEO pushes back amid calls for resignation

A day after Intel (INTC) stock slid more than 3% following political calls for his resignation, CEO Lip-Bu Tan publicly defended his record and emphasized his commitment to U.S. national security. The move indicates Tan is not stepping aside, despite pressure this week from U.S. President Donald Trump and Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton over Tan's past business ties to China. "We are engaging with the Administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts," Tan said in a statement. "I fully share the President's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security, I appreciate his leadership to advance these priorities, and I'm proud to lead a company that is so central to these goals." Related: Leaked data shows Nvidia taking page from Zuckerberg's playbook Tan added that he has the backing of the company's board of directors and has "always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards." Trump's call for Tan to resign, posted on Truth Social on Thursday, alleged the CEO was "highly CONFLICTED" but offered no further specifics. The demand came shortly after Cotton sent a letter to Tan raising concerns about his investments in Chinese semiconductor and manufacturing companies, including some allegedly linked to the Chinese military. Before joining Intel in March, Tan was a prominent venture capitalist who made significant investments across East Asia, including in China. That track record is now drawing scrutiny in Washington, where lawmakers are increasingly linking leadership choices at critical technology firms to broader geopolitical competition. Image source: Annabelle Chih/Bloomberg via Getty Images Intel is a central player in the U.S.-China technology rivalry, particularly in advanced semiconductor manufacturing. The company is expected to begin ramping production of its next-generation "Nova Lake" CPUs in the coming quarters. Cotton's letter warned that Tan's financial and professional associations could undermine public trust in Intel's ability to safeguard sensitive technology, especially given the nearly $8 billion in subsidies the company was awarded under the CHIPS and Science Act - the largest grant under the act to any single company. The matter has taken on additional political context as major tech executives appear to be deepening ties with the Trump administration in his second term. Earlier this week, Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook presented Trump with a custom-made glass plaque featuring a solid gold base, a gesture conciding with Apple's pledge to invest $100 billion in U.S. manufacturing. Related: Analysts revamp Meta price target after earnings Intel's board is now in a position where it must weigh the reputational and regulatory risks of keeping Tan in place against the potential disruption of a leadership change during a critical restructuring. Since taking the helm following his appointment as CEO in March 2025, Tan has announced sweeping cost cuts, scaled back overseas projects, and slowed construction on a major U.S. chip plant in moves aimed at shoring up profitability at the firm. More AI Stocks: Google plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion moveMeta delivers eye-popping AI announcementVeteran trader surprises with Palantir price target and comments At the same time, the fact that the board has publicly signaled support for Tan could stabilize investor sentiment in the short term, although uncertainty remains. Tan's comments also come as Reuters reported this week that Intel has faced quality control issues in manufacturing its next-gen chips, a potential complication as the company pushes to regain leadership in the global semiconductor race. Whether the CEO's outreach to the U.S. presidential administration will defuse tensions, or whether the political calls for his removal will grow louder, may determine not only Tan's future at Intel but also how Washington shapes the rules for companies operating at the heart of the U.S.-China tech rivalry. Related: The alarming reason so many tech companies are raising cash The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Does President Donald Trump's Tariff and Trade Policy Have America on a Collision Course With Stagflation?
Does President Donald Trump's Tariff and Trade Policy Have America on a Collision Course With Stagflation?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Does President Donald Trump's Tariff and Trade Policy Have America on a Collision Course With Stagflation?

Key Points Stagflation is the scariest scenario for the nation's central bank, because there's no blueprint to quickly fix a weak economy and jobs market, and lower the prevailing rate of inflation. President Trump's tariff and trade policy is having a modest inflationary impact at a time when job report revisions point to a weakening labor market. Despite near-term stagflation concerns, which remain minimal per Fed Chair Jerome Powell, the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite are positioned for long-term success. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index › At any given time, there are one or more significant market headwinds threatening to drive the benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI), and innovation-inspired Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) lower. For instance, the S&P 500's Shiller Price-to-Earnings Ratio, which is based on average inflation-adjusted earnings over the prior 10 years, recently achieved a closing multiple of almost 39. This makes the current bull market the third-priciest when back-tested 154 years. Historically speaking, when valuations get extended to the upside, the S&P 500, Dow Jones, and/or Nasdaq Composite eventually fall 20%, or considerably more. For Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and the nation's central bank, these correlative events and historical headwinds aren't of much concern -- but there is one exception. Nothing scares the Fed more than the prospect of stagflation, which is characterized by a period of higher inflation, slower economic growth, and generally higher unemployment. While Powell and the Fed aren't panicking, Donald Trump's tariff and trade policy certainly has the central bank more concerned about the prospects of stagflation in America than they were prior to the president's January inauguration. The groundwork for the Fed's worst-case scenario is being laid Normally the Federal Reserve is doing its work at one end of the spectrum or the other. If the economy is firing on all cylinders, its primary goal is to keep inflation (rising prices) from getting out of hand. A growing economy is generally going to exhibit a healthy job market. On the other hand, if U.S. economic growth has weakened or a recession has taken hold, the Fed will turn its attention to spurring job growth by lowering the federal funds rate. When the economy is weak, the prevailing rate of inflation tends to decline. Stagflation presents a nightmare scenario for Jerome Powell and the Fed because there's no blueprint for how to approach it. Lowering interest rates to spur growth can fan the flames of higher-than-desired inflation. Meanwhile, raising interest rates to cool the prevailing rate of inflation can weaken an already stumbling economy and jobs market. Regardless of the actions the central bank employs, it tends to be bad news for workers and the stock market. The concern is that stagflation fears are mounting specifically because of President Trump's tariff and trade policy. In early April, the president unveiled a 10% global tariff rate, as well as higher "reciprocal tariffs" on dozens of countries deemed to have adverse trade imbalances with America. Since initially introducing these reciprocal tariffs, numerous pauses, adjustments, and trade deals have been hashed out. However, the June inflation report, announced in mid-July by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), pointed to an uptick in the prevailing rate of inflation -- from 2.35% in May on a trailing-12-month (TTM) basis, per the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, to 2.67% in June on a TTM basis. While a 32-basis-point uptick might not sound like much, it represents the first report where the full impact of Donald Trump's tariff policy is being felt. According to a December-published report ("Do Import Tariffs Protect U.S. Firms?") from four New York Fed economists working at Liberty Street Economics, the duties President Trump placed on China during his first term in 2018-2019 did a poor job of differentiating between output and input tariffs. Whereas an output tariff is placed on a finished product imported into the U.S., an input tariff is a duty applied to a good used to complete the manufacture of a product domestically. Input tariffs run the risk of meaningfully increasing costs for businesses and consumers... and this may be happening, yet again. Following the Federal Open Market Committee's June 2025 meeting, the Summary of Economic Projections forecast a 3.1% core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) inflation rate by the end of 2025, which is up from its prior forecast of 2.8% for core PCE. In other words, inflation is expected to modestly pick up, with tariffs driving this trend. At the same time, the BLS made a major downward revision to previously reported job gains for May and June when it released the July jobs data. May was revised down by 125,000 jobs to a gain of just 19,000, while June was slashed by 133,000 jobs to a gain of only 14,000. Though the unemployment rate of 4.2% (as of July 2025) remains near its historic low, these not-so-subtle BLS revisions intimate weakness in the job market. Rounding things out, Liberty Street Economics' analysis of Trump's China tariffs in 2018-2019 found that public companies whose stock was negatively impacted on tariff announcement days produced worse future real outcomes. Specifically, companies directly impacted by these tariffs saw an average across-the-board decline in sales, profits, labor productivity, and employment from 2019 to 2021. Based on existing economic data and historical precedent, President Trump's tariff and trade policy is laying the groundwork for possible stagflation, with higher inflation, a weaker job market, and potentially weaker economic growth. The stock market's resiliency is unparalleled While the possibility of stagflation exists, Fed Chair Powell doesn't believe this nightmare scenario will manifest in the U.S. "We have warned of it, but it is not something that we are facing or that we expect to face," said Powell. Nevertheless, certainty may be hard to come by over the coming weeks or months for Wall Street's major stock indexes. When things are uncertain is often when the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite become more volatile than usual. But when the lens is widened and historical precedent is applied to Wall Street over a span of one or more decades, it becomes easy to see just how resilient the major stock indexes are to short-term headwinds and emotion-driven fear. At the heart of this long-term optimism is the nonlinearity of economic and stock market cycles. Even though adverse events are inevitable and sometimes uncomfortable, they're historically short-lived. For instance, the U.S. economy has navigated its way through a dozen recessions since the end of World War II. The average length of these downturns is a mere 10 months, with no recession enduring longer than 18 months. In comparison, the average economic expansion has lasted for about five years, with two periods of growth surpassing the 10-year mark. Angling your portfolio to take advantage of these extended periods of growth is how significant wealth is created on Wall Street. Speaking of stocks, this clear-as-day disparity can be seen in Wall Street's benchmark index, the S&P 500. In June 2023, shortly after the S&P 500 was confirmed to be in a new bull market, the researchers at Bespoke Investment Group published a data set on X (formerly Twitter) that calculated the length of every bull and bear market dating back to the start of the Great Depression (September 1929). In one corner, the average 20% (or greater) downturn in the S&P 500 has lasted just 286 calendar days, or less than 10 months. Comparatively, the average S&P 500 bull market endured for 1,011 calendar days (as of June 2023), which is about 3.5 times longer than the typical bear market. Regardless of what's thrown Wall Street's way, the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite always find a way to power through it over the long run. Not even stagflation fears precipitated by President Trump's tariff and trade policy can keep these major stock indexes from hitting new highs over the long run. Should you buy stock in S&P 500 Index right now? Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,563!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,108,033!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Does President Donald Trump's Tariff and Trade Policy Have America on a Collision Course With Stagflation? was originally published by The Motley Fool

What would a September Fed rate cut mean for mortgage rates?
What would a September Fed rate cut mean for mortgage rates?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What would a September Fed rate cut mean for mortgage rates?

Mortgage rates are inching lower as jobs data cools and traders price in a Federal Reserve interest rate cut. Mphasis Digital Risk founder Jeff Taylor explains how that could impact homebuyers and why new builds may offer better value than existing homes. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store