
Heads of State Review Roundup: What Critics Are Saying About Upcoming Action Comedy Film
The movie has not received a favourable response from the critics. As of Tuesday (July 1), the film had a score of 60 percent from 15 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, and clocked in at 53 percent on Metacritic from six reviews. The movie, from Amazon MGM Studio, is all set to premiere on Prime Video on Wednesday (July 2). It also stars Priyanka Chopra, Jack Quaid, Paddy Considine, Stephen Root, and Carla Gugino.
Here are the key excerpts from a few prominent critics following the pre release last week:
The Hollywood Reporter's film and television critic Caryn James wrote in her review, "An alternate history with different world leaders would be great escapism at the moment. Heads of State isn't that, despite a here-and-there subtext that turns out to be more pointedly political than you see coming. The film, from Nobody director Ilya Naishuller, is a typical action-comedy that benefits greatly from its two stars, and slightly from their unexpected characters, before plunging fast into explosive but trite set-pieces. You've never before seen John Cena as the American president and Idris Elba as the British prime minister, but by the end you may feel as if you've seen it all before".
Deadline's Chief Film Critic Pete Hammond wrote, "Heads of State is solely interested in burning the whole thing down, doing its stars no service, and letting the explosions and gunplay take center stage in a movie where action-to-the-max is our filmmaker's mantra. [It is] a movie full of explosions, chases, and stuntmen being paid overtime".
Collider's film and television critic Nate Richard wrote in his review, "Make no mistake, Heads of State is not the kind of movie that will make your best-of-the-year list. But if you need a big, dumb action movie with two buff guys to kick back and down some beers while watching, you are in luck. Like the movies it was clearly inspired by, the "plot" of Heads of State is nonsensical. None of it is remotely realistic (but who cares in a movie like this), there are plot-holes galore, and the film wastes much of its supporting cast, such as Considine, Carla Gugino, Sarah Niles, and Stephen Root, in roles that don't give them anything remotely interesting to do. It's the very definition of a movie that requires the viewer to turn off their brain, which sometimes is to its detriment".
Screen Rant's senior film critic Mae Abdulbaki wrote, "Directed by Ilya Naishuller from a screenplay by Josh Applebaum, André Nemec, and Harrison Query, Heads of State is the kind of movie that doesn't require much from its audience beyond shutting off our brains while simultaneously leaning into political stereotypes. It's not a particularly good movie, and, at nearly two hours long, the film overstays its welcome. Its saving grace is the decision to ground the film with an enemies-to-friends trope for its leading duo that mostly works in its favor".
CinemaBlend's TV Editor Nick Venable wrote in his review, "With its surprisingly deft blend of high-stakes action and light-hearted comedy that bumps against the PG-13 rating, Heads of State is 100% the kind of guilt-free popcorn-chomping good time that Amazon MGM should be making, and is definitely worthy of a trip to the theater, as opposed to streaming at home. President John Cena's biceps deserve to be seen on the biggest screen possible... because America".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


International Business Times
2 hours ago
- International Business Times
Ghislaine Maxwell Says She Never Saw Trump Doing Anything Concerning Around Her During Interview With DOJ
Jeffrey Epstein's madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, reportedly told Justice Department officials during recent interviews that she never saw President Trump engaging in any troubling behavior. Sources told ABC News that the infamous sex trafficker did not provide any details that could damage Trump's reputation. Maxwell met Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who also previously served as Trump's criminal defense attorney, late last month for more than nine grueling hours. Her lawyer had earlier revealed that Maxwell without hesitations answered all the questions regarding "around 100 different people" as she tries desperately to negotiate a deal with federal authorities to reveal more information and dirty secrets about her late pedophile ex-partner Epstein. Nothing Unnatural About Trump X Trump has consistently denied any prior knowledge of Epstein's criminal activities, maintaining that he ended their relationship years ago. "The deputy attorney general is seeking the truth," her lawyer, David Oscar Markus, said immediately after the sitdown. "He asked every possible question, and he was doing an amazing job." Donald Trump X Markus said that he didn't request anything on Maxwell's behalf — though he admitted that Trump does have the power to grant her a pardon. Following the second day of questioning, her lawyer, David Oscar Markus, stated that they had not formally submitted a pardon request to the White House. Maxwell with Jeffrey Epstein Twitter However, he didn't dismiss the possibility of making such a request later, noting that "things are moving very fast." "Listen, the president this morning said he had the power to do so. We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way," Markus said at the time. Maxwell Trying for Presidential Pardon Markus also said that his client was completely forthcoming during the Justice Department's questioning, which has now been confirmed to have been recorded. He further claimed that Maxwell is being made the "scapegoat" in the Epstein case and has endured "unfair treatment" over the past five years. X Shortly after her meetings with the DOJ, Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for helping Epstein in the sexual abuse of underage girls, was transferred to a comfortable Texas facility often referred to as a "Club Fed." However, DOJ officials have yet to clarify why the disgraced British socialite was moved to a facility usually designated for inmates serving much shorter sentences.
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
The world's newest emerging market
YOU do not have to place your ear to the ground to hear the rumble. People are saying what was once unthinkable: The US could be headed towards a public-debt crisis. One common refrain is that the US has been behaving like an emerging market since President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' on Apr 2, when he declared a tariff war on the world. What exactly does that mean? And what do we know from emerging markets about how debt crises happen? Here is the cleverest definition of an emerging market: one from which you cannot emerge in an emergency. But that does not yet apply to the US, where huge and liquid markets mean you can always get out, even if you lose money in the process. A better definition is wonkier, so bear with me. The workhorse model in macroeconomics, named after the Canadian Nobel laureate Robert Mundell and the British economist John Marcus Fleming, predicts that after a fiscal expansion (that is, either a tax cut or an increase in government spending), the local currency should rise in value. As the government tries to borrow more, it puts upward pressure on interest rates, triggering capital flows from abroad, fuelling currency appreciation. That is what typically happens in a developed market. But try the same formula in Argentina or in Turkey, and you will likely get different results. If the government announces a big fiscal expansion, the Argentine peso or the Turkish lira are likely to lose value, as investors bet that higher inflation will eventually be needed to erode the value of the growing public debt. They run for the exits, capital flows out of the country and the domestic currency depreciates. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up So, an emerging market is one in which doubts about debt sustainability drive the exchange rate. That is exactly what has been happening in the US. The recent enactment of Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill amounts to a big, not-so-beautiful fiscal expansion. Whatever revenue his tariffs generate will be far smaller than the combined effect of tax cuts and expenditure increases. A conservative estimate is that by 2034, Trump's signature legislation will increase US public debt by US$3.3 trillion, bringing it to 125 per cent of the gross domestic product. Give markets credit for getting this one right. A measure of the US dollar exchange rate computed by the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis began dropping in mid-January 2025, the week before Trump was sworn in, and has been on a downward trajectory ever since, pushed by the president's tariff madness and passage of the Bill. Countless emerging-market debt crises have taught us how these episodes evolve. It is as the Hemingway character said of how one goes bankrupt: gradually, then suddenly. It begins with nasty debt dynamics. As debt mounts, so does the cost of servicing it. Interest rates must rise to induce savers to provide extra funds to the government. The larger interest burden then causes larger deficits, which mean more debt, even higher interest rates and so on. That logic is at work in the US. In 2025, interest payments on the federal debt could reach US$1 trillion, or 3.2 per cent of GDP, which is more than the country spends on defence. The Bill can only grow as the fiscal deficit hits 7 per cent of GDP. The next step, as we know from emerging markets, is a shortening of debt maturities. It was President Joe Biden's administration that first took that step, but the Trumpists have continued marching right to the edge of the precipice. If long-term interest rates are high, then the government borrows short. When asked recently if he would lengthen the maturity of the debt, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent replied: 'Why would we do it at these rates?' The danger is that an ever-larger share of outstanding bonds must be rolled over every month. That is how emerging-market debt crises happen: the government holds a bond auction and no one shows up. Anticipating this risk, ratings agencies downgrade the debt – as happened to the US in May. The final step is the so-called doom loop: fears grow, bond prices drop and debt holders – whether banks, insurance companies or pension funds – begin to feel the strain. Their ability to purchase new debt is reduced, which further lowers the price of old debt, exacerbating the problem – as the UK painfully learnt in 2022. Once issuing more bonds becomes impossible, the only alternative is monetary financing of deficits, which requires the government to browbeat the central bank into submission. America is not there yet, but the scene of Trump in a hard hat scolding Jerome Powell, the flustered US Federal Reserve chair, for cost overruns on a building completed five years ago suggests that the scenario is getting close. So does Trump's recent firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner after the BLS released unflattering employment data. Will this lethal sequence play out in the US? The standard answer is that a run on government debt cannot happen because US debt is denominated in dollars, and the Fed can always print more dollars to bail out panicking debt holders. But to serve as a lender of last resort, the Fed must make an ironclad commitment that it will not inflate away the value of the debt – and Trump is doing his best to erode the credibility of that promise. Recall also that the Fed is a US government agency, so Fed bailouts always rely on the fiscal backing of the Treasury. Once the Treasury is judged to have too much debt, however, its ability to back anyone, let alone the Fed, will be called into question. One way out may be financial repression, which is a polite form of default in which the government forces bondholders to buy debt at an interest rate lower than they would voluntarily accept. That, too, has been a common emerging-market practice. Is Trump a secret Peronist? A closet Chavista? These questions no longer seem far-fetched. PROJECT SYNDICATE The writer, a former finance minister of Chile, is dean of the School of Public Policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science

Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Weapons movie review: Zach Cregger's horror masterpiece gets 4 stars
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Julia Garner is excellent as the young teacher put through the emotional wringer in Weapons. Weapons (M18) 128 minutes, opens on Aug 7 ★★★★☆ The story: In an ordinary American town, something bizarre has happened. In the middle of one night, 17 children wake up, run out of their homes and disappear. Each one is a student from the class taught by Justine Gandy (Julia Garner). Only she and one student, Alex (Cary Christopher), have not gone missing. Parents like Archer Graff (Josh Brolin) are distraught and desperate for answers. Weapons' early scenes play out like a psychological drama – the kids vanish overnight, a town is in shock and in mourning, and the audience is introduced to characters dealing with the fallout of the event. It is all reminiscent of what happens after a school shooting. Alcohol, failed marriages, anger and blaming become the norm, and especially infuriating – and blackly funny – is the soothing psychobabble spouted by professionals offering insurance-mandated mental health options. But as with American writer-director Zach Cregger's previous film Barbarian (2022), the movie becomes something else altogether at the midpoint. The threads of suspense set up in the first act solidify into a story that is as thrilling as it is unapologetically gruesome, delivered in a style that marries Stephen King-style suburban creepiness with the aesthetics of a slasher movie. Cregger is the new kid on the block, joining the likes of Jordan Peele (Get Out, 2017; Nope, 2022) and Coralie Fargeat (Revenge, 2017; The Substance, 2024) in the ranks of writer-directors who deliver character-driven stories that shock and scare. Garner is excellent as the young teacher put through the emotional wringer. Like the main character in a Coen brothers movie, she suffers the twin injustices of being falsely accused, while those who claim to be on her side gaslight her at every turn, replacing her reality with a version that makes their own lives more comfortable. The story is told through chapters that replay events through the eyes of different characters. But the format is not quite the one used most famously in the Japanese classic Rashomon (1950). The unfolding events in Weapons are real and factual, but each new perspective unravels the mystery further. The climax arrives, as happens in many good horror movies, with a bonkers intensity that feels satisfying and fully deserved. Cregger handles the mayhem without sacrificing the sense of mystery that precedes it. Hot take: When a suburban chiller turns into a gruesome Stephen King-meets-slasher masterpiece, Weapons delivers its killer blow.