Liberal MP says women prefer hairdressing and men drawn to maths in debate over gender quotas
The Longman MP said that men were more drawn to jobs involving maths or physical exertion, including construction or trades.
Labor pounced on the comments in question time on Tuesday, with the infrastructure minister, Catherine King, likening them to statements by former prime minister Tony Abbott.
'A note to the Liberals and Nationals: it's 2025,' King said. 'Your gender never means a job is off-limits.'
Young made the comments in a speech to Parliament's Federation Chamber. Describing himself as speaking on behalf of 'the forgotten Australians,' Young said 'crazy policies and ideologies' were damaging the country, insisting he would be 'filthy' if one of his three daughters did not get a job because of their gender.
'But I would be just as filthy if they got a job because of their gender,' he said.
'I simply cannot understand why we cannot accept that men and women have vocations that the majority of each gender is drawn to. Men tend to be more drawn to vocations that involve maths, physical exertion like construction and trades.
'Whereas women in the main tend to be drawn to careers that involve women and care and other people. Vocations like hairdressers, nursing, social workers and the like will always be more female-dominated.
'We need to ensure those who aren't wired this way from the opposite sex have the same opportunities as everyone else. That is only right.
'The days of posters of half-naked women in lunchrooms needs to be put away.'
Young said in his business career, he had promoted and hired exclusively on merit.
'One of the other problems created by this well-meaning but deluded ideology [of quotas] is that many who achieve positions on their own merit have no respect from work colleagues, as many of them say they got the job because they are this gender, or this sexuality, or Indigenous.
'Quotas say women or Indigenous people or any other cohort that aren't good enough to get a position on merit … we'll create a quota for them. This is demeaning and it is insulting to these people and should never be. [Work positions] should always be based on merit.'
Young labelled Labor a 'mental' government before canvassing vehicle emissions standards, housing shortages, immigration, criticism of the UN and opposition to large-scale renewables projects.
Young even suggested Prime Minister Anthony Albanese might be suffering from Munchausen syndrome, a condition where individuals fake illnesses to receive attention or sympathy.
King told question time that Young's comments ignored the many women of diverse backgrounds already in parliament.
'What an absolute crock,' she said. 'People used to think women were not drawn to this place.'
The Liberal party is currently debating mechanisms to boost female representation in its parliamentary ranks. The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, said last month she was a 'zealot' on recruiting more women but stopped short of endorsing quotas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sam Groth's wife Brittany publicly defends couple's relationship as they threaten legal action against minister
Brittany Groth, the wife of the Victorian Liberals deputy leader, Sam Groth, has defended the timing of her relationship with her former tennis star husband as the pair threaten legal action against News Corp and a Labor minister. On Wednesday, the couple's legal firm sent a defamations concerns notice to the Herald Sun, alleging two articles and social media posts by the publication were both a serious invasion of Brittany's privacy and harmful to Sam's reputation. The articles – which were condemned by the premier, Jacinta Allan, and the opposition leader, Brad Battin – claimed unnamed Liberal colleagues raised concerns over when the couple's relationship began, as they feared the issue could be weaponised by their political opponents. But in a statement distributed by the pair's legal team on Thursday, Brittany said the timeline suggested by the Herald Sun report was 'baseless and false'. She said she was in a 'relationship with someone else' when she first met Sam in September 2011, that he was not her tennis coach and he resumed his professional tennis career a month later, in mid-November 2011. 'We did not engage in any conduct that would even arguably fall within the provisions quoted by the Herald Sun,' Brittany said. She said never imagined she would be 'forced to defend myself or my family against outrageous insinuations and a public dissection of my private life by a newspaper'. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'The Herald Sun's decision to speculate salaciously about my personal life from 14 years ago, when I was a teenager, is not journalism. It is a disgraceful smear campaign, devoid of fact, public interest or even basic decency,' Brittany said. She alleged the Herald Sun 'never once' attempted to contact her, deliberately published 'clickable' photos and allowed the publication on their platforms of 'hundreds of vile and defamatory comments' by members of the public about her family. 'You have now hidden them, but only after the damage was already done,' Brittany said. She alleged the publication's conduct 'has amounted to pressure on me to disclose intimate details of my personal and private life, including when I first had sex with my husband, to defend myself against fiction.' The legal letter to the Herald Sun demanded all the articles and posts be removed permanently by 5pm on Wednesday and the paper publish an apology. But the Herald Sun refused and published another report, claiming the Groths were attempting to 'shut down discussion' on a matter of public interest. Editor Sam Weir was quoted in the Herald Sun: 'We stand by our reporting on a matter of public interest, covering important issues which could have a major impact on Victorian politics in the lead-up to an election.' Brittany, however, disputed that her 'teenage private life' was in the public interest. 'There is no excuse for using the democratic process as a shield for harassment. There is no justification for attacking a woman's integrity, let alone her children, in the pursuit of gossip,' she said. 'I am the only person who owns my story. And I will not sit back while my family is dehumanised for headlines.' The couple's lawyers have also written to the health minister, Mary-Anne Thomas, asking her to publicly apologise for comments she made outside parliament on Tuesday about when the pair's relationship had begun. The letter accuses her of making comments that were both defamatory and 'highly inappropriate'. 'They appear to have been made by you without any personal knowledge or understanding of the background facts about Mr and Mrs Groth's relationship, without you having taken any steps to approach Mr Groth or his wife to discuss the situation with them,' the letter from Patrick George claimed. Thomas has been contacted for comment. The premier told reporters Thomas was 'asked a more general question' and noted the reporting was the result of 'deep division within the Victorian Liberal party'. 'I reiterate my view that families should very much be off limits,' Allan said.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The NT's newest youth justice law changes will heap more trauma on to traumatised kids while worsening youth crime
'We expect the usual offender apologists to criticise our efforts'. So said the Northern Territory's chief minister, Lia Finocchiaro, in an Instagram post this week announcing her Country Liberal party government's newest changes to the NT's youth justice laws since coming to power in August. The most notorious among the CLP's third set of amendments to youth justice laws in under a year is the reintroduction of spit hoods, now to be called 'anti-spit guards', into youth detention centres including Don Dale. Spit hoods became emblematic of what a royal commission found in August 2016 was a system in which children were verbally and physically abused and humiliated contrary to international law in prison-like youth detention centres that were unfit for accommodating children, let alone rehabilitating them. Among the critics of the reintroduction of 'anti-spit guards' have been Mindy Sotiri, executive director of the Justice Reform Initiative; Karly Warner, the chair of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services; and the NT's own children's commissioner, Shahleena Musk. Are these leaders 'offender apologists'? Finocchiaro wants to cast the CLP's critics as people who are somehow accepting of terrible violence. In the same Instagram post, Finocchiaro justified these latest changes – which also include lowering the bar before force is used against children in detention, and broadening the kinds of force that can be used to include dogs – by referring to a shocking incident last weekend in which a 15-year-old boy was stabbed at the Royal Darwin Show. The CLP's pattern is now clear. The opposition leader, NT Labor's Selena Uibo, called the newest amendments a 'reactive, knee-jerk response'. But it's more likely that they've sat in Finocchiaro's 'to be actioned' tray for some time. It takes time to draft laws, and these latest changes appeared just three days after the Royal Show. In its first sitting week after returning to power, the CLP lowered the age of criminal responsibility back down to 10. And following a horrific home invasion, the CLP immediately tightened bail laws. Rather than rushed and kneejerk, the CLP's trilogy of amendments to youth justice laws have been patient and opportunistic. They are consistent with an ideological opposition among many detention centre staff and corrections and police officers to the changes demanded by the royal commission into the protection and detention of children in the Northern Territory. Most youth crime is committed by a relatively small number of children, some of whom commit an enormous number of offences. Evidence, in the form of research into this small cohort of repeat offenders and why they behave as they do, supports targeted, therapeutic approaches that aim to address underlying reasons and causes. The overwhelming majority of kids who offend have led extraordinarily traumatic lives. Often, they were victims of serious abuse and neglect long before they began breaking and entering, or hurting people. The evidence shows that reacting to these kids' bad behaviour with violence (or 'force') and aggression simply heaps more trauma on existing trauma – and makes it more likely that the offending behaviour escalates rather than resolves. People like Sotiri, Warner and Musk accept this evidence base. The reason they're critical of laws that authorise reactive force rather than encourage therapeutic intervention is that they know such laws will only make the existing problem worse. But therapeutic intervention just doesn't exist, even when it's been court-ordered. When children who have been traumatised inside detention centres are released, they will be more, not less, likely to commit further offences. In stark terms: there will be more victims as a result of the CLP's policies. But the people who accept this evidence base are not the CLP's constituents. During the last decade, non-Labor parties across the country have discovered a growing appetite among communities of resentment – fuelled by online echo-chambers and shock-jock opinionistas – for reactionary approaches that get tougher and tougher on criminalised kids, and that blame what it calls 'soft' approaches by governments more interested in the evidence. (Finocchiaro herself talks about the 'soft, offender-first policies' of her Labor predecessors.) The CLP was the first to ride this wave of reaction into power. The Liberal National Party in Queensland was the second, in October, by promising what it called 'adult crime, adult time'. Ironically, most of this crime is more accurately characterised as juvenile, in the sense that it's perpetrated by kids and young adults with damaged or under-developed pre-frontal cortexes. But it's politics and ideology, not evidence, that guide what we might call the 'Northern approach' to youth crime, following the united approach announced by Finocchiaro and Queensland's police minister, Dan Purdie, after he visited Darwin this month. No doubt we haven't seen the last of its regressions. Russell Marks is a criminal defence lawyer and adjunct research fellow at La Trobe University. His latest book is Black Lives, White Law: Locked Up and Locked Out in Australia (La Trobe University Press, 2022)
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Guardian Essential report: Albanese starts second term with solid approval, but Trump presidency looms
Guardian Essential poll: most Australians doubt we will ever receive Aukus submarines amid Trump uncertainty All the way with Donald J? Albanese's second term will be defined by how he handles the elephant in the room – Peter Lewis
