Russia becomes first nation to recognize Taliban government of Afghanistan since 2021 takeover
'We believe that the act of official recognition of the government of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will give impetus to the development of productive bilateral cooperation between our countries in various fields,' the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement.
'We see significant prospects for cooperation in the trade and economic area with an emphasis on projects in the fields of energy, transport, agriculture, and infrastructure,' the statement continues. 'We will continue to assist Kabul in strengthening regional security and combating the threats of terrorism and drug-related crime.'
The statement by the Russian ministry was accompanied by a photo of the new Afghan ambassador to Russia, Gul Hassan Hassan, handing his credentials to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko.
In a post on X, alongside pictures of Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi meeting with Russian Ambassador to Kabul Dmitry Zhirnov, the Taliban's foreign ministry hailed the decision as positive and important.
Russia's recognition is historically significant. The former Soviet Union fought a 9-year war in Afghanistan that ended with Moscow withdrawing its troops in 1989 following their defeat by the Afghan mujahideen, some of whom later founded the modern Taliban.
In the aftermath of the 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan, Russia was one of a few nations to maintain a diplomatic presence in the country. Russia removed its designation of the Taliban as a terrorist group in April 2025.
While the Taliban has exchanged ambassadors with China and the United Arab Emirates, and has a long-standing political office in Qatar, those countries do not recognize it as the government of Afghanistan.
The lack of recognition has not prevented Afghanistan's new rulers from doing business with the outside world. In 2023, a Chinese oil company signed an oil extraction deal with the Taliban.
Moreover, the Taliban has angled for the recognition of another former adversary: the United States. Efforts have reportedly ramped up since US President Donald Trump began his second term earlier this year. March 2025 saw the release of two Americans from Afghanistan, along with the US removing millions of dollars of bounties from three Taliban officials.
People familiar with American conversations with the Islamist group told CNN in April that the Taliban has proposed numerous steps toward US recognition, including the creation of an embassy-like office within the US to handle Afghan issues.
'You need to be forthcoming and take a risk,' US officials told the Taliban during a March meeting to secure an American prisoner's release, according to the person familiar with the proceedings. 'Do this, it will likely open up the door for a better relationship.'
It wasn't the first time the US had diplomatically engaged with the Taliban. In the last year of his first term, Trump reached an agreement with the group for a full US withdrawal by 2021. The deal achieved a chaotic fulfillment as the Taliban swept to power during former US President Joe Biden's first summer in the White House.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Mexicans protest Americans moving into their neighborhoods
The influx of Americans moving to Mexico is pushing housing prices up and forcing Mexicans out of some cities. CNN's Valeria León reports.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Blue state lawmakers' response to Medicaid cuts: Keep calm and bash Republicans
Democrats can, generally speaking, afford to wait. Many of the cuts won't hit until fall at the earliest, with the bulk going into effect next year. Most Democrats believe that Republicans will largely take any blame leveled. Part of the problem for Democratic lawmakers is that no matter what they do, an insurmountable gulf remains between what their states can contribute versus what they will lose in federal dollars. 'We're going to do everything we can to preserve health care, but there's no way we can get … billions of dollars that they're taking away,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker told reporters Wednesday. The governors of Washington, Pennsylvania, Colorado and Arizona echoed Pritzker's sentiment in recent days. In New York and California, leaders are already hedging their bets. Democratic Govs. Kathy Hochul of New York and Gavin Newsom of California could face pressure from supporters hoping they'll be compelled to make up at least some of the gap left by Congress and President Donald Trump. Hochul was already putting blame squarely on the state's Republican House members as the GOP megabill neared the finish line. 'They're in the majority, they have the power,' Hochul said of the delegation . 'You have the power, and if you don't use that power, then you are complicit in this attack on the American people.' Some states — including New Mexico, Massachusetts and Oregon — have already made preparations for the anticipated cuts by preemptively increasing state health care program dollars or leaving an unallocated surplus in budgets passed this spring.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Beijing and Washington lift export restrictions on key products
The list of items that the U.S. had lifted export curbs on included aircraft engines, semiconductor design software and ethane, the statement said. Reuters and CNN reported this week that Washington had given a green light for a resumption of shipments of those items to China. Background: The resumption in exports of key products signals Beijing and Washington's desire to maintain a fragile truce in a tit-for-tat trade war that in April resulted in tariffs in excess of 100 percent from both sides. The Trump administration reduced those tariffs to 55 percent last month while China trimmed its levies on U.S. imports to 10 percent as the two sides negotiate a wider trade agreement. But the willingness of the two sides to weaponize nontariff barriers — including widening limits on shipments of certain chemicals and software to China and Beijing's embargo on rare earth exports — poses an ongoing threat to industries in both countries. Big picture: The move to restore bilateral trade of key tech and minerals is good news for industry and markets. But the durability of those exports is vulnerable to any future flare-up in U.S.-China tensions. Beijing's dominance of the rare earths supply chain is of particular concern to the U.S. defense industry, which requires China-supplied minerals to produce everything from munitions and precision weaponry to military night vision equipment. What's next: An agreement on limitations of export restrictions is likely a key agenda item in ongoing efforts to broker a wider U.S.-China trade agreement. But it's uncertain whether Beijing will surrender its advantage in rare earths supply, given that the U.S. is years away from developing reliable domestic sources of those critical minerals.
