How tragic Somerset bus crash unfolded as one child is killed and two others seriously injured
Avon and Somerset Police declared a major incident and emergency services rushed to the scene of the crash on Thursday afternoon.
Some passengers were taken to hospital with serious injuries, including two children who were air lifted to hospital.
Where was the coach travelling?
The coach was driving on the A396 at Cutcombe Hill on Thursday at 3.15pm when it went off road and slid 20ft down a bank.
It was travelling from Exmoor Zoo, taking the children back to Minehead Middle School after a school trip.
The crash happened just five days away from the end of term.
Who was injured?
About 60 to 70 passengers were onboard the coach carrying Year five children from Minehead Middle School, which caters for pupils aged between nine and 14.
The crash left 21 people injured, including two children who were airlifted to hospital with serious injuries.
Avon and Somerset Police said on Thursday evening that a child had died following the crash.
Speaking outside Bridgwater Police Centre, Chief Superintendent Mark Edgington said: 'A number of other people have presented or been taken to hospital, some with serious injuries.
'This includes two children who were taken to hospital by air ambulance, many passengers either sustained minor injuries or were physically unharmed and were transferred to a rest centre.
'Work to help them return to Minehead has been taking place throughout the evening. An investigation into the cause of this incident will be carried out.'
What emergency services were at the scene?
An off-duty firefighter was travelling behind the coach when it flipped off the road, Gavin Ellis of Devon and Somerset Fire & Rescue Service said.
The firefighter was able to start getting passengers off the coach before additional emergency services arrived including fire, ambulance and police.
Wayne Darch, deputy director of operations for the South Western Ambulance Service said: 'We declared a major incident that has since been stood down.
'We sent 46 resources to the scene, including 20 double-crewed ambulances, three air ambulances, a command team and two hazardous area response teams.
'We treated several patients at the scene and conveyed 21 patients to hospital via land and by air.'
After passengers were evacuated many were held at a rest centre in a pub in Wheddon Cross, while efforts were made to transport them back to Minehead.
What caused the crash?
It is currently not known what caused the coach to slide off the road and down a 20ft bank.
Rachel Gilmour, the MP for Tiverton and Minehead, described the road where a school coach overturned in Somerset as 'very difficult to manoeuvre' and said she was heartbroken for the families affected.
She told BBC Breakfast the crash was 'pretty catastrophic'.
Asked about the area, Ms Gilmour said: 'It's a very difficult road, very, very steep, very windy, and it's just the nature of rural roads in my constituency, you know, Minehead famously, only has one road that takes you into it on the A39 and if you're coming from where I live in Bampton or across the Moor, those are the roads that you have to use.'
An investigation into what caused the crash will now take place, with police urging people not to speculate on the incident.
The trust which runs the school whose pupils were on the coach that crashed near Minehead, Somerset, has said it is working closely with the emergency services.
In a statement, Beacon Education Multi-Academy Trust, which runs Minehead Middle School, said: 'We are working closely with the emergency services and relevant authorities following an incident this afternoon to support our pupils, families, and staff at this very difficult time.
'We will update our school community further as soon as more information becomes available, and we kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we manage this evolving situation with care and sensitivity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Colin Pitchfork could be back on the streets by Christmas as child killer makes a new bid for freedom
Double child killer Colin Pitchfork could be back on the streets by Christmas as he is set to make his latest bid for freedom. Pitchfork was jailed for life in 1988 after raping and strangling two 15-year-olds, Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth, in Leicestershire in 1983 and 1986. Then aged 27, he became the first man to be convicted in the UK using DNA profiling and was handed a minimum jail term of 30 years, later reduced to 28 years. Pitchfork, now 64, was initially released from prison in September 2021, but was back behind bars two months later after breaching his licence conditions when he approached a lone woman while litter-picking. He is now set to tell a Parole Board panel of experts that he is no longer a risk to the public when he pleads his case in October, The Mirror reported. If successful, the convicted killer could be freed within a matter of weeks. His upcoming hearing was delayed from last year and will be held at a date in October. Pitchfork previously lost a High Court bid to challenge Parole Board decisions over an allegation that he sexually assaulted another prisoner. Barbara Ashworth, 79, mother of his victim Dawn said she would not be attending this latest hearing. She said: 'I've always attended parole hearings but I can't do it this time. I've spent too long getting angry about Pitchfork. I can't keep living with it. 'It was Dawn's birthday at the end of June and it's nearly the anniversary of her death on July 31. I can't tell you how difficult it is to deal with. But I'll say what I always say: he should die in prison, they need to throw away the key. He's a danger to the public, he always will be.' The latest hearing, due to take place in private, is expected to last three days. In June last year, the Parole Board found the decision to recall Pitchfork to prison was flawed and said his detention was no longer necessary for public safety. But this ruling was blocked by then-justice secretary Alex Chalk as he called for the decision to release Pitchfork to be reviewed. Although Pitchfork lost his latest bid for freedom in December, earlier this year he successfully challenged the ruling to keep him behind bars. It means this upcoming parole hearing, which was originally due to be held in public, will decide if he can be freed from jail. Parole Board hearings are typically conducted behind closed doors but can, in certain circumstances, take place in public following changes in the law in a bid to remove the secrecy behind the process. According to a document outlining the decision to have Pitchfork's case heard in public, the Parole Board said he had changed his name by deed poll a number of times since his conviction due to an apparent 'desire to protect his identity given the public reaction to his offences and his potential release'. The name he is currently using has not been disclosed. Pitchfork's first application for parole was rejected after it emerged that he had been loitering in forests and parks, even approaching lone women during his spell of freedom. He had been released under ultra-strict licence conditions in June 2021 before being recalled to prison just three months later in September that year. The killer became eligible for release again in June 2023 but the decision was blocked by the government after pressure from MP Alberto Costa, who represents South Leicestershire where the vile crimes were committed. The double child-rapist and murderer successfully appealed the December 2023 decision to keep him behind bars triggering a fresh parole hearing this summer. Mr Costa previously wrote to Parole Board chair Caroline Corby calling for the hearing to be held in public due to his concerns about how the Parole Board has handled Pitchfork's case. During the Parole Board hearing last year, in which Pitchfork's bid for release was rejected, previously unknown details about why he had been recalled to prison came to light. After his release in a town on England's south coast, on one occasion the monster was spotted by his parole officer approaching a lone female - a direct contravention of his licence term - in the car park directly outside his parole office. On a different occasion Pitchfork shouted at a parole officer after trying to cheat a polygraph test by controlling his breathing. During the December hearing the Parole Board was told that prior to Pitchfork's arrest in 1987 he held 'deviant fantasies', felt entitled to sex where and when he wanted, and enjoyed sexual violence against women. The board's decision to deny his release was because of a lack of information about Pitchfork's current attitudes towards sex and 'protracted and inconsistent explanations from the killer as to why he was recalled to prison'. Pitchfork killed Lynda in Narborough, Leicestershire, in November 1983, and Dawn in the nearby village of Enderby in July 1986. Lynda was brutally murdered as she made her way home from babysitting in Narborough. Dawn disappeared three years later while on a short walk to her home in Enderby. Her body was discovered dumped in the corner of a field hidden under branches. Pitchfork was arrested on September 19 1987 and sentenced to life imprisonment the following January after pleading guilty to both murders, with the judge giving him a 30-year minimum term, later reduced to 28 years on appeal. He was also convicted of having sexually assaulted two more girls, including a 16-year-old who he threatened with a screwdriver and a knife. The Parole Board has been contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revenge of the Taliban continued: Warlords now arresting Afghans trying to check British government website at internet cafes to see if their details lost in UK's worst ever data breach
Afghans said to have applied for sanctuary in Britain are being arrested as they try to use the UK government 's website to check if their details were on the leaked dataset. At least five, including former members of the Triples Special Forces, have been held as the Taliban targets internet cafes. The Ministry of Defence sent out an email, to those whose data was suspected of being compromised, apologising. It was followed by a second email with a link for those who had risked their lives for the UK to confirm if they their details provided when they applied for the Afghan Relocation and Assistance Policy (ARAP) were included. Those whose details were breached received a message on a red background confirming they are a victim of the blunder, while those whose data was not part of the leak received a message on green. But Afghans – and campaigners in the UK – warn that they believe the Taliban is using this to arrest those who worked for Britain as they carry out the necessary checks. Many Afghans do not have Wi-Fi at home and are forced to use internet cafes which are in the major cities and towns. The Taliban hunting those who worked for UK are said to have stepped-up the monitoring of the cafes in recent days. The Mail knows the cities the arrests have taken place in but is not naming them. At least five men and two women are reported to have been arrested while checking their emails. British lawyers and campaigners have sent out warnings to their clients in hiding telling them to stay away from the cafes. Former frontline interpreter Wazir, 38, said: 'We are aware of the arrests. Unfortunately, those whose data may have been leaked want to check and have gone to the cafes. I am told they may have been arrested, with the proof that they worked beside the British in front of them (on the screens).' The details of Wazir, who worked for five years with UK forces, together with that of his family are on the list but he said he had been able to confirm that on the MOD website from his home. 'Many do not have Wi-Fi and this makes them vulnerable,' he said. 'The Taliban has the technology from China also to monitor and track our phones so we know how vulnerable that makes us. 'We are terrified our data entrusted to Britain will be used to hunt us down. Since news of the leak, I have moved my family's hiding place and will do so again next week.' In a rare official announcement yesterday, the Taliban did not confirm or deny it had the dataset but claimed it already had the details of those who had worked for the UK and US, including biometrics, as they were left behind during the chaotic pullout in August 2021. It was reported yesterday that up to ten former members of the Afghan forces had been killed by the Taliban near the border with Iran and Pakistan. The Mail's report revealing Taliban assassins had murdered at least ten, who may have helped the West, in the days after the data leak was revealed. Four are said to have been killed in one ambush. The MOD said: 'The independent Rimmer Review concluded that it is highly unlikely that merely being on the spreadsheet would be grounds for an individual to be targeted, and this is the basis on which the court lifted its super injunction last week. The review also found that the Taliban already had access to a wealth of data. 'The Taliban Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement last week announcing an amnesty for individuals named as part of the data breach, declaring those named it would not face persecution. 'We continue to urge the Taliban to honour their public amnesty towards members of the former Government and special forces.' After the Daily Mail was the first newspaper in the world to discover the data breach, in August 2023, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) mounted a cover-up and successfully hushed up our exclusive. They obtained a superinjunction and ever since then, cloaked by the unprecedented news blackout, ministers have been clandestinely running one of the biggest peacetime evacuation missions in modern British history to rescue people the UK had imperilled: smuggling thousands out of Afghanistan and flying them to Britain at vast cost, with taxpayers being neither asked nor informed. Meanwhile secret hearings in the High Court have heard how Parliament has been deliberately kept oblivious – or even 'misled', as a judge was told. So far 18,500 Afghans whose data was lost have been flown to Britain or are on their way in taxpayer-funded jets. A total of 23,900 are earmarked for arrival. They are living in MOD homes or hotels until permanent homes are found. More than 70,000 others will be left behind in Afghanistan and will have to fend for themselves against vengeful Taliban warlords. Incredibly, hundreds of the Afghans rescued by the Government are now poised to sue the UK for leaking their data in the first place – potentially adding a further £1billion compensation bonanza to the colossal costs of the rescue and rehousing mission.
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How an influencer mum's trip to Israel triggered a referral to anti-radicalisation police... and to officers knocking on her door
A mother was referred to anti-radicalisation group Prevent and investigated by the police over concerns she had been radicalised because she had visited Israel. Holly Passmore, 43, was stunned to find officers at her door two weeks after her visit to the country. The single mother-of-two, who is not Jewish, had been part of a delegation of social media influencers invited by the Israeli embassy for a trip that included visiting Kfar Aza, one of the kibbutzim where British hostage Emily Damari was abducted by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023. The police demanded to know why she had visited Israel, whether she was planning to go back and whether she felt safe to go there. 'I asked them, 'What do you think happened? That the Jews kidnapped me?'' said Ms Passmore, who has had an interest in Jewish people after studying the Holocaust for her degree. 'I kept saying to them, 'I don't understand why you are here' and they said only that they were there to check on me.' She said when the officers first knocked on the door of her County Durham home and explained they were there to talk about safeguarding, she worried it was about her autistic son. 'But then they mentioned Israel and said, 'We aren't here about your son, but about you, we've had a complaint'. I was absolutely gobsmacked,' said Ms Passmore of the July 4 visit. 'Then they came out with all these questions, 'When did you go? Why did you go? Who did you go with? Why are you interested in this?' I said to them, 'Is this real?' She had a second visit ten days later after she complained about her doorstep interrogation to local Reform councillor and former television presenter Darren Grimes, who wrote to Durham Constabulary. This time Ms Passmore, who posts on X as @MummyisTired and has nearly 17,000 followers, faced a Prevent officer and a police superintendent. It was the first time she learned someone had reported her to Prevent. 'They kept saying to me that if the person has vulnerabilities, they have to be checked out, but I've looked into Prevent since and that doesn't explain the processes they've had to get through to being on my doorstep,' said Ms Passmore, who is on the autism spectrum and has ADHD. 'The Prevent wording is that it's for people who are vulnerable to exploitation but that is theoretically anybody. Who do they think is exploiting me into what?' Ms Passmore said that on the second visit she was told the investigation wasn't about her trip to Israel, even though that is what all of the questions on the earlier interrogation were about. Fiona Sharpe, a spokeswoman for Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'The stated aim of Prevent is to safeguard against people, particularly vulnerable ones, from being radicalised. It is hard to understand what evidence was given to them to warrant visiting a woman just because she had visited Israel. Visiting Israel is certainly not a crime.' Dr Daniel Allington, an expert on anti-Semitism at King's College London, said attacking people who support Israel is a new tactic of extremists. He said: 'People of a certain political persuasion love to make the malicious insinuation that Britons travelling to Israel are somehow equivalent to Britons travelling to Isis. But Israel is an ally, a trading partner, a democracy – in every sense a friend of the UK.' A Durham Constabulary spokeswoman said: 'Each Prevent referral is reviewed to determine whether further action is required including, where appropriate, assessment to determine if there is an immediate security threat, or whether a vulnerable person is at genuine risk of radicalisation.'
