
Rangers board changes made official as trio stand down
We told how the trio, including former chairman Johnston, would be coming off the Gers board to make way for new faces with the 49ers Enterprises and Andrew Cavenagh sweeping into power.
Their roles will be filled by Americans Mark Taber, Andrew Clayton, and Gene Schneur.
The exits of Johnston, Park and Wolhardt have been officially confirmed in an update on Companies House, all three having their appointments terminated.
Cavenagh takes over from Fraser Thornton as chairman but the latter will continue to be part of the board.
Read more:
Paarag Marathe is the new vice-chairman.
John Halsted and George Taylor remain on the board as directors and chief executive Patrick Stewart stays in his role.
New board member Taber is managing director at Great Hill Partners, a growth equity firm based in Boston.
He specialises in healthcare investments and has been on the boards of over a dozen healthcare companies.
He is also a trustee of Boston Medical Centre's HealthNet health plan and a member of its finance committee.
Clayton is the co-founder and vice-chairman of ParetoHealth, a health insurance company founded by Cavenagh.
Schneur, a board member and co-owner of Leeds United, is the third new face.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump takes big step to make flying cars a reality
"This year, flying cars are not just for the Jetsons. They are also for the American people in the near term," Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, told reporters. Trump in an executive order directed the Federal Aviation Administration to expedite approval for routine commercial drone operations that retailers such as Amazon have said are crucial to expanding airborne deliveries. Orders that Trump signed will also allow manufacturers to begin testing flying cars and removed regulatory barriers his administration says are preventing supersonic over land passenger flights from being introduced in the United States. The changes will also allow drones to be used to be used in emergency response situations, including responding to wildfires, and long-distance cargo and medical delivery, the administration says. Trump's order establishes a pilot program for electrical vertical take-off and landing aircraft, known as eVTOLs, a type of flying car, that his administration hopes will lead to public private partnerships across the country. It is based on a 2017 program from the first Trump administration and will apply to emergency medical services, air taxis and cargo deliveries among other areas. The administration says the program will allow companies that are already conducting this type of testing, such as Joby's air taxi service, to partner with state, local and tribal governments. The California-based company plans to begin flight testing in Dubai within months and aims to launch passenger services on the aircraft in late 2025 or early 2026. Flying cars are coming! Here's how they could change the way you travel. Another order instructs the FAA to establish a standard for noise certification and lift a ban on overland supersonic flight. Kratsios said that advances in aerospace engineering and noise reduction have made over land supersonic flight safe, sustainable and commercially viable but federal regulations have grounded the speedy passenger flights and weakened U.S. companies' competitiveness. "The reality is that Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours," Kratsios said. Trump separately established a federal task force to review and propose solutions to threats to America's airspace from personal unmanned aircraft and directed his administration to step up enforcement of civil and criminal laws against drone operators who endanger the public or violate airspace restrictions. The directives were issued with the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Summer Olympics on the horizon.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The post-fight fallout from Trump-Musk tiff could get even uglier
Neither man can convincingly declare himself a winner in the dissolution of a partnership so mutually beneficial that it helped propel one to the White House and the other to even more ungodly amounts of wealth in the form of government contracts and regulatory relief. The fight began over Musk's public criticism of Trump's "Big Beautiful" budget bill and the projected $2.5 trillion increase it would cause to the federal deficit. But it devolved into a mudslinging spectacle that included Musk publicly accusing Trump of blocking the release of the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking files held by the Justice Department because he's implicated in them. But who will lose most when the proverbial dust from the dustup finally settles? "I don't think anybody knows," said veteran Republican political strategist Doug Heye. "Clearly, what we've seen just in the past few months is that if Trump views you as an enemy, he's going to try and use levers of government against you," said Heye, a senior official since 1990 who served in the George W. Bush White House, the House and Senate and on the Republican National Committee. "And it may be that some of his supporters, or a lot of his supporters, want that. We'll have to see." What does Musk stand to lose? The White House said June 6 that Trump was considering selling the Tesla Model S he purportedly purchased from the CEO of the electric car company when its stock was tanking as a result of Americans opposed to Musk's tactics as head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency. More: 'Elon is going to get decimated:' How Trump's feud with the world's richest man might end Within hours of the Trump-Musk fight going public on June 5, Tesla shares dropped 15%, wiping over $100 billion from the company's $1 trillion market value. More broadly, Musk's various companies have benefited from at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the past two decades, often at critical moments. Most have come from contracts between his SpaceX satellite firm and the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). And while Musk's myriad businesses are deeply intertwined with the U.S. government in the form of multi-year contracts, his feud with Trump jeopardizes those, too. Also at risk: Musk's burgeoning projects like self-driving cars and trucks, protections from tariffs and other proposed alliances with the government. Musk has also used his Trump connections to sell his Starlink satellite communications services to various U.S. agencies and foreign governments, as well as his The Boring Company tunneling firm, his xAI artificial intelligence firm and other products. More: President Trump threatens Elon Musk's billions in government contracts as alliance craters Without Trump's support, those current and proposed government contracts could dwindle or disappear, though the latter likely would result in protracted litigation. Trump could also, conceivably, sign an executive order to seize SpaceX under the Defense Production Act and even deport Musk for immigration violations, two nuclear options proposed Thursday by former Trump advisor Steve Bannon. What does Trump stand to lose? While Trump controls the levers of government, Musk has at least one ace in the hole - his control over X, which he claims not only handed Trump his November election victory but also Republican control of the House and possibly Senate. Musk is already using X - and his 220.8 million followers on it - to try to turn public opinion against Trump after trashing Trump's deficit-hiking budget bill. Musk said this week he would pull SpaceX's support of its Dragon spaceship that ferries astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. He's predicted that Trump's tariffs would cause a recession this year. The tech billionaire has also conducted one of his rhetorically slanted polls on X to see how many people want a third political party "that actually represents the 80% in the middle" between the Republican and Democratic parties. Its results, pinned to the top of Musk's X profile, were predictably in favor of it, 80.4% to 19.6%. Those kinds of broadsides could be a particularly powerful cudgel against Trump just five months into his second term. Musk could also wield a political tactic he's used to help Trump in the past, but this time, financing opponents of his political candidates in the upcoming mid-term elections. A win-win for both Trump and Musk? Heye said that despite all the incendiary rhetoric, there's still room for reconciliation or even a public recoupling. Heye, the veteran GOP official, cited the case of Reince Priebus, Trump's former White House Chief of Staff, who found out Trump fired him on a rainy airport Tarmac in 2017 after traveling with the President on Air Force One. Priebus was forced to find his own way home, Heye said, but soon found himself back in Trump's good graces. "A relationship with Donald Trump going south is not something new in this political world," Heye said. "But Donald Trump always allows people to come back if they say the right things." Already, Musk has appeared to back down from his threat of taking his Dragon spacecraft out of operation, after an X poster told him, "This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days." In response, Musk replied late Thursday, "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon."


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data for now
The court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson - disagreed with that decision. "The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now --before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful," Jackson wrote in a dissent joined by Sotomayor. In March, U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland said DOGE was intruding on "the personal affairs of millions of Americans" in a fishing expedition that's based on little more than suspicion." Hollander limited DOGE's access to the information while the courts assess the legality of the Trump administration's actions. The administration argued the judge overstepped, viewing DOGE staffers as the equivalent of intruders breaking into hotel rooms rather than as employees trying to modernize the agency's technology and root out waste - as DOGE officials said they intended to do. "District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government's 'needs' for that of the President and agency heads," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court in an emergency appeal. DOGE has sought access to multiple agencies as part of its mission to hunt for wasteful spending and dramatically overhaul the federal government. Musk has falsely claimed that millions of Americans who are deceased are still receiving Social Security checks. Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued the SSA after DOGE began digging into personal data. They told the Supreme Court justices they shouldn't intervene because the administration hadn't shown an emergency need to access data beyond what the district judge allowed. In addition to overseeing Social Security benefits for retirees and disabled people, the Social Security Administration helps administer programs run by other agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. A divided federal appeals court on April 30 rejected the Trump administration's request to block the district judge's order. U.S. Circuit Judge Robert King of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, said the government hadn't shown a need for unfettered access to the highly sensitive personal information that the American people had every reason to believe would be "fiercely protected." DOGE's mission can be largely accomplished through anonymized and redacted data, which is the usual way the agency has handled technology upgrades and fraud detection, he wrote.