logo
Rosmah awarded RM100,000 in TikTok defamation lawsuit

Rosmah awarded RM100,000 in TikTok defamation lawsuit

The Star08-07-2025
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has awarded Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor (pic) RM100,000 in damages in her defamation lawsuit against a TikToker concerning her appearance.
Justice Ahmad Shahrir Mohd Salleh ruled that Rosmah had successfully established her entitlement to damages in her lawsuit against Ku Muhammad Hilmie Ku Din, with a global award of RM100,000 deemed just and proportionate.
"This global award in the sum of RM100,000 comprises general and aggravated damages. The claim for exemplary damages is not allowed as there is no cogent evidence before this court to support such an award," he said during the decision for the assessment of damages on Tuesday (July 8).
The court ordered interest at a rate of 5% per annum on the judgment sum to be imposed from the date of judgment until full satisfaction of the award.
On May 28, last year, the court allowed Rosmah's application to enter a judgment in default (JID) against TikTok account owner Ku Muhammad Hilmie, who failed to appear in the case. The decision on damages was deferred for later assessment.
Rosmah filed the suit through Messrs Hafarizam Wan & Aisha Mubarak on Sept 19, 2023. She claimed that Ku Hilmie had uploaded a TikTok video on March 2, 2023, containing defamatory content against her.
The wife of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak alleged that the post implied she committed a sin, was linked to bomoh activities and Satan, practised polytheism, and needed to repent.
She stated that the TikTok post prejudiced her reputation as the wife of a former Malaysian prime minister and a patron to charities, leading to public criticism and damage to her reputation as a public figure.
Rosmah sought general, aggravated, and exemplary damages to be assessed by the court, and an injunction to prevent Ku Hilmie or his agents from repeating the defamatory post, among other relief deemed fit by the court.
However, the injunction application was withdrawn due to the defendant's non-appearance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Couple claims trial to over RM3.6 mil in false claims
Couple claims trial to over RM3.6 mil in false claims

New Straits Times

time30 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Couple claims trial to over RM3.6 mil in false claims

KOTA KINABALU: A couple was charged at the Special Corruption Court here with submitting false claims worth over RM3.6 million, involving the supply of machinery and certification under the Small and Medium Industry (SMI) Assistance Programme. The claims were allegedly submitted to the Department of Industrial Development and Research (DIDR) in 2022 and 2023. The accused, Ang Ka Fat @ Kenny, 57, and Anita Mohamed, 54, who are husband and wife, pleaded not guilty before Sessions Court judge Jason Juga. Anita and Ang each face two separate charges and one joint charge. On the first charge, Anita and Ang are accused of abetting a company manager in submitting a set of documents containing false particulars, namely claims for MeSTI and halal certification services in the food industry for entrepreneurs under the Sabah SMI Assistance Programme (BAIKS) 2022, including renovation work, worth RM500,000, although the services were never carried out. On the second charge, both accused are alleged to have committed a similar offence by submitting a set of documents containing false particulars, namely claims for MeSTI, My Food Tag and halal certification under BAIKS 2023, including renovation work, worth RM2.7 million, which were also never carried out. Both charges were under Section 28(1)(c) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009. If convicted, the couple can be jailed up to 20 years imprisonment and fined. For the joint charge, they are accused of jointly submitting an invoice from another company dated Nov 7, 2023, along with 13 supporting Delivery Order documents containing false particulars. These involved claims for the supply of 11 units of 100-litre machine retorts, two units of 150-litre machine retorts, registration and approval from the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DoSH), hydrostatic tests by DoSH, and premises registration for 13 units, worth RM414,400, none of which were carried out. The pair was charged under Section 18 of the MACC Act 2009, which is punishable under Section 24(2) of the same Act, read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code. The court fixed Sept 23 for pre-trial case management. For the first and second charges, the court set bail at RM20,000 with a RM3,000 deposit and one local surety for each accused. For the joint charge, bail was also set at RM20,000 with a RM3,000 deposit and one local surety. The court also imposed additional conditions, including reporting to the MACC office every two months, surrendering passports, and refraining from contacting prosecution witnesses pending the conclusion of the case. Failure to comply with the conditions may result in bail being revoked. MACC prosecuting officer Dzulkarnain Rousan Hasbi, standing in for Deputy Public Prosecutor Rustam Sanim, prosecuted the case.

Police open 3 cases after attack on Rafizi Ramli's son
Police open 3 cases after attack on Rafizi Ramli's son

The Sun

time30 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Police open 3 cases after attack on Rafizi Ramli's son

PETALING JAYA: Selangor police have confirmed that former Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli's son was attacked by an unknown individual at IOI City Mall in Putrajaya on August 13, 2025. In an official statement released today, Selangor police chief Datuk Shazeli Kahar (pic) confirmed that a police report was lodged regarding an incident involving a male child who was physically approached and pricked with an unidentified device by an unknown individual. The attack occurred at the entrance of Symphony 2, IOI City Mall, Putrajaya, in front of K-FRY premises. Preliminary investigations confirmed that the victim is the son of Datuk Seri Mohd Rafizi Ramli, who is Pandan MP and former Minister of Economy. Following the incident, police have opened an investigation paper under three separate provisions: - Section 14(D) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 (Act 792) - If convicted, the perpetrator faces a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment and whipping. - Section 324 of the Penal Code - Provides for imprisonment of up to 10 years, or fine, or whipping, or any combination of two of these punishments. - Section 352 of the Penal Code - Provides for imprisonment of up to three months, or a fine of up to RM1,000, or both. Shazeli also said that reported that the victim's condition is stable. A comprehensive investigation involving various aspects is being conducted by Selangor police contingent with assistance from the Criminal Investigation Department at Bukit Aman headquarters. The investigation focuses on multiple angles, including efforts to identify the motive behind the incident and the object used by the suspect. As of now, the suspect has not been identified, and further investigations are being actively pursued. The public will be informed of any developments from time to time. Public Advisory Authorities have advised the public not to make any speculation or assumptions that could cause unrest and uncontrolled provocative actions. Anyone with information related to the case can contact the investigating officer, ASP Mahafiz Mat Lawi at 010-2396533, or directly contact Sepang district police chief ACP Norhizam Bahaman at 012-2153239.

Sept hearing in High Court for Tuan Ibrahim's RM2.3b defamation suit against Rafizi over flood mitigation project
Sept hearing in High Court for Tuan Ibrahim's RM2.3b defamation suit against Rafizi over flood mitigation project

Malay Mail

time30 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Sept hearing in High Court for Tuan Ibrahim's RM2.3b defamation suit against Rafizi over flood mitigation project

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 14 — The High Court here will hear the defamation suit filed by former environment and water minister Datuk Seri Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man against former economy minister Datuk Seri Mohd Rafizi Ramli over six days in September, beginning Sept 8. The suit, filed on Nov 17, 2022, relates to statements allegedly defamatory concerning the approval of several projects, including a flood mitigation project, awarded to a company. Lawyer Yusfarizal Yussoff, representing Tuan Ibrahim, said Judge Datuk Aliza Sulaiman has set Sept 8, 9, 10, 11, 29, and 30 for the trial. This was also confirmed by lawyer Nik Zarith Nik Moustpha, representing Mohd Rafizi. Neither of the two former ministers was present at today's proceedings, which were conducted in chambers. In his statement of claim, Tuan Ibrahim alleged that Rafizi made defamatory statements against him at two press conferences at the PKR headquarters in Petaling Jaya, which were streamed live on the defendant's YouTube account, on Jan 7 and 9, 2022. The statements allegedly implied that he was involved in approving a project worth RM2 billion for the Sungai Langat flood mitigation project, as well as a sewage treatment plant and sewerage pipe network projects in Kinta and Petaling Jaya, bringing the total value to more than RM2.3 billion. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store