A Gen Xer self-deported to Mexico after 36 years in the US for a safer, more affordable life: "I feel a sense of relief"
Higuera decided returning to her birth country would be safer and help her save money.
Leaving her children and grandchildren was difficult, but she got to reconnect with her 90-year-old mother.
Regina Higuera built a life in the United States. As a single mother in Los Angeles, she raised three American-born children and worked in the garment industry, making pennies per sewn item.
Now, she's moved back to Mexico, the country she left 36 years ago, because Immigration and Customs Enforcement ramped up operations in Southern California this summer.
Data analysis by The New York Times found that ICE arrests have increased by 124% since last year. President Donald Trump's new budget includes $75 billion in extra funding for ICE to bolster immigration enforcement.
"We must expand efforts to detain and deport illegal aliens in America's largest cities," Trump wrote on TruthSocial last month. "I have directed my entire administration to put every resource possible behind this effort."
Higuera, 51, who did not have legal documentation to live and work in the US, was faced with an ultimatum: Stay and risk detention and deportation or voluntarily say goodbye to her children and grandchildren.
"I was really sad that I was leaving my family behind," Higuera told Business Insider. "But at the same time, I was happy that I was going to be able to see my mom, whom I haven't been able to see in 22 years."
Her daughter Julie Ear shared her family's journey to repatriate her mother online. "Come with me to self-deport my mom," she said in a video posted to social media. The moment went viral online, garnering millions of views on Instagram and TikTok.
"We're driving from LA down to TJ to drop her off at the airport, and she'll be flying to Mexico City," Ear said, referring to Tijuana, Mexico.
Higuera was anxious at first that she might be questioned while crossing the US-Mexico border, but everything went smoothly, and she arrived at the Tijuana International Airport with three hours to spare.
"Once we crossed the border into Tijuana, Mexico, I felt a sense of relief," Higuera said. " I am finally home safe, and no one can take that away from me."
Living a better, more affordable life in Mexico
In May, the Trump administration announced a new program to incentivize immigrants without legal status to leave the US by offering them a $1,000 stipend. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to comment on how many immigrants without legal status have applied for the program.
As Higuera and her family were weighing their options, they were watching ICE raids escalate in volume and violence across Southern California. Dozens of viral videos reposted by local news outlets like the Los Angeles Times and LA Taco show federal law enforcement officers using physical force and threats to detain migrants, immigrant activists, and US citizens.
Higuera decided not to apply for the funding and chose to leave on her own.
"I was mostly scared of her getting detained by ICE agents here," Ear told Business Insider. She worried her Gen X mother could be mistreated in federal custody. Investigative reporting by NPR showed that ICE detention centers can be overcrowded and lack food and medical care.
Plus, rent in LA had gotten too expensive for Higuera, who had been splitting $1,700 monthly with her husband and son. As a garment worker, her pay would range between $500 and $1,000 a week. To make ends meet, Higuera also did gig work, delivering food with Uber Eats and DoorDash.
"It was a recurring cycle that we have been working for years: living paycheck to paycheck and have nothing to show," Higuera said.
Higuera said that the cost of living in Mexico is dramatically lower, even though the move itself was expensive. The four-hour flight from Tijuana to Mexico City cost $243, and Higuera had to drive an additional five hours to her home state, Guerrero. Higuera said it cost her over $4,000 to move all her belongings across the border.
To defray the costs, her daughter put together a GoFundMe that has raised $2,635. In Mexico, Higuera said, the cost of living is so much cheaper than in the US; she estimated that she needs to make $500 to $800 a month to live comfortably.
"I have my small two-bedroom house where I don't have to pay rent," she said of a parcel of land she owns that she's been building on for years. "All I have to worry about is my living expenses." Her home is still a work in progress, but Higuera is already enjoying her new residence, which is near her extended family.
Higuera is now semi-retired and looking for side gigs to cover her living expenses. "I honestly have no idea how much I could make out here," Higuera said. She isn't sure what kind of employment is available, but Higuera's semi-rural town still has economic opportunities. Before leaving, she packed some jewelry and items she could sell as a street vendor. "I know that I can always sell things out here the same way I did back in LA."
As she settles in, Higuera can finally see a future that isn't clouded with financial stress or fear. She hopes that her husband can join her soon and that her kids and grandchildren, who are US citizens, can visit her.
Higuera said the best part of coming back home is making up for lost time with her 90-year-old mother. "I love that my mom is just a couple of steps from me, and I have breakfast with her every morning."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tally of Microsoft Victims Surges to 400 as Hackers Exploit SharePoint Flaw
(Bloomberg) -- The number of companies and organizations compromised by a security vulnerability in Microsoft Corp.'s SharePoint servers is increasing rapidly, with the tally of victims soaring more than six-fold in a few days, according to one research firm. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Hackers have breached about 400 government agencies, corporations and other groups, according to estimates from Eye Security, the Dutch cybersecurity company that identified an early wave of the attacks last week. That's up from roughly 60 based on its previous estimate provided to Bloomberg News on Tuesday. The security firm said that most of the victims are in the US, followed by Mauritius, Jordan, South Africa and the Netherlands. The National Nuclear Security Administration, the US agency responsible for maintaining and designing the nation's cache of nuclear weapons, was among those breached, Bloomberg reported earlier. The National Institutes of Health was also impacted through the SharePoint flaws, according to a person familiar with the matter. Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, said, 'The Department and its security teams are actively engaged in monitoring, identifying, and mitigating all risks to our IT systems posed by the Microsoft SharePoint vulnerability.' 'At present, we have no indication that any information was breached as a result of this vulnerability,' he said, adding that the department is collaborating with Microsoft and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The Washington Post previously reported that NIH was breached. The hacks are among the latest major breaches that Microsoft has blamed, at least in part, on China and come amid heightened tensions between Washington and Beijing over global security and trade. The US has repeatedly criticized China for campaigns that have allegedly stolen government and corporate secrets over a period spanning decades. The real number of victims from the SharePoint exploits 'might be much higher as there can be many more hidden ways to compromise servers that do not leave traces,' Eye Security's co-owner Vaisha Bernard said in an email to Bloomberg News. 'This is still developing, and other opportunistic adversaries continue to exploit vulnerable servers.' The organizations compromised in the SharePoint breaches include many working in government, education and technology services, Bernard said. There were smaller numbers of victims in countries across Europe, Asia, the Middle East and South America. State-backed hackers tend to exploit major cybersecurity weaknesses, like the SharePoint vulnerability, in waves, according to Sveva Scenarelli, a threat analyst with Recorded Future Inc. They start with secretive, targeted hacks and then, once the vulnerability is discovered, will begin using it more indiscriminately, she said. 'Once access has been acquired, individual threat groups can then triage compromised organizations, and prioritize those of particular interest for follow-on activity,' said Scenarelli, of the cyber intelligence firm's Insikt Group. She said this can include finding ways to maintain access to a compromised network, burrowing deeper and setting up paths to steal sensitive information. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is set to meet his Chinese counterparts in Stockholm next week for a third round of trade talks, suggested in a Bloomberg Television interview Wednesday that the SharePoint hacks will be discussed. 'Obviously things like that will be on the agenda with my Chinese counterparts,' he said. The security flaws allow hackers to access SharePoint servers and steal keys that can let them impersonate users or services, potentially enabling deep access into compromised networks to steal confidential data. Microsoft has issued patches to fix the vulnerabilities, but researchers cautioned that hackers may have already got a foothold into many servers. Microsoft on Tuesday accused Chinese state-sponsored hackers known as Linen Typhoon and Violet Typhoon of being behind the attacks. Another hacking group based in China, which Microsoft calls Storm-2603, also exploited them, according to the company. The Redmond, Washington company has repeatedly blamed China for major cyberattacks. In 2021, an alleged Chinese operation compromised tens of thousands of Microsoft Exchange servers. In 2023, another alleged Chinese attack on Microsoft Exchange compromised senior US officials' email accounts. A US government review later accused Microsoft of a 'cascade of security failures' over the 2023 incident. Eugenio Benincasa, a researcher at ETH Zurich's Center for Security Studies who specializes in analyzing Chinese cyberattacks, said members of the groups identified by Microsoft had previously been indicted in the US for their alleged involvement in hacking campaigns targeting US organizations. They are well known for their 'extensive espionage,' he said. It's likely that the SharePoint breaches are being carried out by proxy groups that work with the government rather than Chinese government agencies directly carrying out the hacking, according to Benincasa. Private hacking companies in the country sometimes participate in 'hacker for hire' operations, he added. 'Now that at least three groups have reportedly exploited the same vulnerability, it's plausible more could follow,' he said. 'Cybersecurity is a common challenge faced by all countries and should be addressed jointly through dialogue and cooperation,' said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun. 'China opposes and fights hacking activities in accordance with the law. At the same time, we oppose smears and attacks against China under the excuse of cybersecurity issues.' According to Microsoft, the hacking group Linen Typhoon was first identified in 2012, and is focused on stealing intellectual property, primarily targeting organizations related to government, defense, strategic planning, and human rights. Violet Typhoon, first observed in 2015, was 'dedicated to espionage' and primarily targeted former government and military personnel, non-governmental organizations, as well as media and education sectors in the US, Europe, and East Asia. The hackers have also used the SharePoint flaws to break into systems belonging to the US Education Department, Florida's Department of Revenue and the Rhodes Island General Assembly, Bloomberg previously reported. Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said that while the National Nuclear Security Administration possesses some of the most restricted and dangerous information in the world, the networks where classified information are stored are isolated from the internet. 'So even if those networks were compromised, I'm not sure how such information could have been transmitted to the adversaries,' Lyman said in an email. 'But there are other categories of information that are sensitive but unclassified, that may be treated with less care and might have been exposed. This includes some information related to nuclear materials and even nuclear weapons.' --With assistance from Lucille Liu, Ari Natter and Jessica Nix. (Updates with details of NIH breach starting in fourth paragraph.) Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Trump's AI Action Plan Means For U.S. Tech Leadership
Washington, DC - January 23: AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks speaks with President Donald J Trump as ... More he signs executive orders in the Oval Office. On July 23, the Trump administration released its 'Winning the Race – America's AI Action Plan.' The administration's new AI action plan comes after months of policy shifts, industry dealmaking and public input. Here is a breakdown of what it contains and how we got to this point. In the plan's preamble, President Trump states: 'Today, a new frontier of scientific discovery lies before us, defined by transformative technologies such as artificial intelligence… Breakthroughs in these fields have the potential to reshape the global balance of power, spark entirely new industries, and revolutionize the way we live and work. As our global competitors race to exploit these technologies, it is a national security imperative for the United States to achieve and maintain unquestioned and unchallenged global technological dominance.' This sets the stage for a plan that acts as a blueprint for an acceleration strategy prioritizing infrastructure investment and innovation over regulation. The Journey of AI And American Leadership The administration's focus on AI dates from Trump's first term, when he became the first president to issue an executive order on the topic. Since 2019, maintaining and extending American leadership has been the priority. During the first week of his second presidential term, he issued a new directive to remove barriers to American leadership in AI, setting the tone for deregulation and positioning AI at the center of the U.S. geopolitical, trade and economic strategy. The plan announcement followed a flurry of activity during the first 180 days of Trump's second term. It started with the revocation, on inauguration day, of Biden's AI executive order viewed as an inhibitor to innovation with regulatory overtones, emphasis on equity, civil rights, enforcement of consumer protection laws and safeguards against bias, discrimination, infringements on privacy and other harms from AI. The January 23 executive order set the stage for 'innovation, driven by the strength of our free markets, world-class research institutions, and entrepreneurial spirit,' and asked for the creation of an action plan to 'sustain and enhance America's global AI dominance.' The National Science Foundation followed with a request for information to support the development of the plan. This resulted in more than 10,000 responses and exposed a divide between the industry and civil society. The industry supported the push for global leadership and resisted regulation. Civil society yearned for accountability and expressed concerns about job loss, copyright infringement, disinformation and privacy. Two major announcements signaled the private sector's central role in AI infrastructure buildout. In January, OpenAI, SoftBank, Oracle, and MGX launched Stargate, a $500 billion initiative to expand U.S. AI capacity. In July, companies pledged over $90 billion at the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit to fund data centers and power infrastructure. Both efforts underscore a market-led push to scale AI while advancing U.S. technological dominance. On the government side, the White House moved to harness federal purchasing power to steer AI development. In April, the Office of Management and Budget directed agencies to appoint chief AI officers, publish AI strategies, and set rules for using powerful systems like generative AI. Their 'AI Use Memo' encouraged agency AI adoption and the removal of risk-averse barriers to innovation. A companion 'AI Procurement Memo' focused on buying American-made AI tools and simplifying procurement. Together, the policies use public-sector demand to influence industry behavior. Export controls on advanced AI chips also shifted sharply this year. In April, the administration imposed a ban on Nvidia's and AMD's processors, citing national security and limiting China's access. But by July, as part of a rare earths trade deal, restrictions were eased to allow sales with export licenses. Supporters said the move balanced security with economic interests; critics warned it could erode America's competitive edge. This policy reversal marked a notable departure from the Biden-era AI Diffusion framework. On the legislative front, Congress rejected a House-passed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulations when the Senate voted 99–1 to strip it from H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Instead, H.R. 1 was enacted, allocating funds for AI in defense, transformational AI models at the Department of Energy, and tech solutions for rural hospitals. With states able to legislate freely, the move increased pressure on the White House and Congress to work on federal legislation or preemption to avoid a patchwork of state laws. The AI Action Plan Unveiled at the 'Winning the AI Race' summit on July 23, the plan crystallizes a vision to ensure U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence. Introduced by President Trump and top officials, the plan rests on three pillars: accelerating innovation, building AI infrastructure, and leading international AI diplomacy and security. The 28-page document identifies over 90 federal policy actions across these three areas. During an interview with CNBC, Greg Barbaccia, U.S. Federal Chief Information Officer, called the plan a 'whole of government strategy.' It emphasizes removing regulatory barriers, expanding domestic chip manufacturing, and enabling large-scale adoption of AI across government and industry. Key policies in the plan include expedited and modernized permitting for data centers and semiconductor fabs, along with national initiatives to expand the skilled workforce, particularly electricians and HVAC technicians, to meet rising infrastructure demands. The plan also emphasizes exporting American AI leadership through full-stack partnerships with allied nations, combining chips, software, models and standards. It directs the Commerce and State Departments to coordinate with industry to deliver secure AI packages abroad. The plan outlines an ambitious international strategy to shape global AI norms and secure supply chains. It calls for engaging with like-minded allies while promoting interoperability and adoption of U.S.-led AI standards. To safeguard national interests, the plan includes policies to restrict outbound investment in adversarial nations, defend against intellectual property theft, and ensure AI infrastructure is free from foreign adversary technology, notably from China. This combination of infrastructure buildout and AI diplomacy aims to position the U.S. as a leader not only through innovation, but through standard setting, global commerce and adoption and diffusion of American technology. The plan calls for updates to federal procurement rules to ensure that frontier models used by the government are free from top-down ideological bias and aligned with principles of free expression. It offers no details on how this will be implemented. The document does not define how objectivity will be measured, which agencies will oversee compliance, or what enforcement mechanisms will apply, leaving execution to future regulatory or agency-specific action. A central pillar of the action plan is a sweeping deregulatory agenda aimed at removing federal and state barriers to AI innovation. The plan directs the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to launch a public Request for Information to identify federal rules that hinder AI adoption. Simultaneously, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under Executive Order 14192 'Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation,' is tasked with working across all federal agencies to identify, revise or repeal regulations and guidance that unnecessarily constrain AI development or deployment. The plan also calls for integrating deregulatory criteria into funding decisions. Agencies are instructed to assess a state's AI regulatory climate and potentially limit discretionary funding to states with regimes that may impair program effectiveness. This can be seen as a direct reaction to the failed attempt at a moratorium for state-level AI legislation. Additionally, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is directed to examine whether state AI laws interfere with its federal mandates, while the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is instructed to review prior investigations and consent decrees to ensure they do not impose undue burdens on AI innovation. While framed as a strategy to streamline innovation, the plan's approach draws scrutiny about the politicization of regulatory agencies. The recommendation to use agencies like the FCC and FTC to roll back enforcement or pressure states on funding decisions has raised concerns among critics about potential federal overreach. However, aligning agency policy with national economic goals is both lawful and can be characterized as necessary to maintain U.S. competitiveness in a fast-moving global race. Importantly, the plan frames AI as both an economic and national security imperative. Frontier models must reflect American values and free speech, and infrastructure must be free of foreign adversary technology. The approach is explicitly deregulatory and pro-industry, with global ambitions. The action plan's release marks a major milestone in the administration's strategy to align public and private efforts around a unified AI agenda—and signals that Congress will now face pressure to translate these principles into national legislation. What This Means For The Future Of AI The plan marks a significant moment in U.S. tech policy. The document outlines a clear national direction that embraces acceleration, private-sector leadership, and deregulation as drivers of AI growth. It offers a coherent industrial policy that links AI development to economic competitiveness, infrastructure expansion, and national security. It will shape federal priorities, influence international AI diplomacy, and accelerate domestic capacity building in the months ahead. Yet the plan's deregulatory stance also reveals its limits. It largely disregards the concerns raised by civil society during the public consultation process, which emphasized transparency, accountability, and protections against disinformation, bias and surveillance. Instead, the plan places regulatory rollback and centralized control of agency behavior at the core of its strategy, raising questions about whether innovation is being pursued at the expense of democratic safeguards. The real test now shifts to Congress. With no comprehensive federal law in place, lawmakers will face growing pressure to translate this accelerationist vision into legislation that balances innovation with oversight, fosters growth without fragmentation, and builds public trust in the transformative technologies reshaping American life. Whether Congress can keep pace with this vision remains to be seen.
Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Video Shows Moment GOP Senator Josh Hawley Leaves Stage Over Heckling
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, was temporarily escorted from the stage amid heckling from pro-Palestinian demonstrations during a panel discussion about the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on American workers with Axios Wednesday morning. Newsweek reached out to Hawley's office for comment via email. Why It Matters Politicians from both sides of the aisle have faced protests from pro-Palestinian protesters during public appearances over the past few years, as the U.S. has remained a closer ally to Israel despite humanitarian concerns about its actions in Gaza. On October 7, 2023, Hamas led an attack against Israel, killing 1,200 and abducting 251 people. Israel has said 50 hostages remain in Gaza and that only 21 of them are believed to still be alive. Israel has since launched an offensive on Gaza, killing more than 59,000 people, according to The Associated Press, citing Gaza's Health Ministry. Critics have raised concerns about the number of civilians killed or displaced, as well as conditions such as the threat of starvation in the Gaza Strip. Others, however, have said Israel has a right to respond to the October 7 attack and have blamed Hamas for putting these civilians in harm's way. What to Know Hawley, who has been supportive of Israel, faced heckling during Axios' News Shapers conference in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday morning with journalist Stef Kight. The interruption came during a discussion about AI. Hawley warned about a his concerns on "a huge loss of jobs for working people," and that lawmakers need to "put people at the center of our technology policy." "If we don't do that, I'm worried about what that's going to mean for ordinary working Americans," Hawley said. Kight continued to ask if he feels like is "alone in that kind of approach," when one protester began shouting at the senator. Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on April 09, 2025 in Washington, DC. Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on April 09, 2025 in Washington, DC."Josh Hawley cannot possibly care about people in this country because he is supporting a war of starvation," the protester said. Kight asked the protester to allow her to continue with the interview, noting that it was the first instance of a protester during Wednesday's event. She then escorted Hawley from the stage, though Hawley asked, "aAre you sure?" when she got up. Kight and Hawley quickly returned to the stage after about one minute. Kight asked attendees to "be respectful and allow us to continue our conversation." Hawley quipped that it was "just another day in the Senate" before continuing on with the conversation. The two protesters with the group Code Pink were removed from the event after the disruption, according to video footage that has circulated across social media. What People Are Saying Hawley wrote on X: "Hahahah - pro-Hamas CRAZIES tried to disrupt another event this morning. What a bunch of nutcases. I'm proud as ever to stand for America and our ally Israel." Code Pink, the group that led the protest, on X: "We shut down Josh Hawley because his career is built on suffering from Gaza to the U.S. As 2.2 million Palestinians face forced starvation, he doubles down on genocide. We won't let him speak freely while children starve." What Happens Next The conflict between Israel and Hamas continues as President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff prepares to head to the Middle East to try to broker a ceasefire deal.
