Cuomo financial support in NYC mayoral race features a number of players from Trump world
Since launching his mayoral campaign this month, Andrew Cuomo has largely refrained from the sharp criticism of President Trump that has marked the rhetoric of many of his opponents, and some Trump supporters are opening up their wallets for the former governor.
Cuomo's nascent mayoral campaign has already received nearly $20,000 in contributions from Trump donors and associates, including a prominent conservative social media influencer who recently helped host a fundraiser for the former governor, according to a Daily News review of city and federal filings.
The 'Women for Cuomo' fundraiser on March 7 was co-hosted by Tanya Zuckerbrot, a nutritionist with a large social media following who has been a vocal Trump surrogate and attended the president's inaugural ball in January.
Donation records show Zuckerbrot gave $2,100, the legal max, to Cuomo's mayoral campaign in conjunction with the event in Manhattan.
'I appreciate his strong support of the Jewish community and commitment to making NYC great again. Who's ready for a comeback?' Zuckerbrot captioned a photo she posted on Instagram on March 10 of herself and Cuomo. She capped off the post with the hashtag #makenycgreatagain, a spin on Trump's signature slogan.
In his first two weeks of fundraising, Cuomo also raked in maxed-out $2,100 donations from Randy Levine, president of the New York Yankees who's known to have been on Trump's 'close contacts' list, Jonathan Kushner, cousin of Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, and several others with records of financially backing the Republican president's campaigns, records show.
That includes max donations to Cuomo from Geoffrey Berman, Trump's ex-Manhattan U.S. attorney who pumped $5,400 into the president's 2016 campaign, and four other New Yorkers, including an attorney and an investor, who have between them given more than $40,000 to Trump's campaigns.
Another maxed-out Cuomo mayoral campaign donor is Anthony Scaramucci, a onetime Trump adviser who has since become an outspoken critic of the president. Before turning on Trump, Scaramucci funneled more than $150,000 into Trump's campaign and super PACs, according to disclosures.
In total, Cuomo, who's polling as the favorite to win June's Democratic mayoral primary, raised more than $1.5 million during the first two weeks of his campaign and is, according to most polls, the frontrunner for the Democratic nod.
Cuomo spokesman Rich Azzopardi noted that, like Scaramucci, Berman has since being fired by Trump in 2020 become critical of the president. Azzopardi also noted several of the donors highlighted by The News' review have records of donating to Cuomo and other Democrats before Trump's 2016 election, including Zuckerbrot, who gave $250 to the then-governor's reelection campaign in 2014.
'Past is prologue, only one candidate in this race has a record of standing up for New York when Trump and Washington sought to hurt it and it's Andrew Cuomo,' Azzopardi said, referencing Cuomo's record as an anti-Trump champion during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The ex-gov has since his March 1 campaign launch by and large stayed clear of criticizing the controversial president as pointedly as most elected New York Democrats.
In a March 3 interview on Stephen A. Smith's YouTube show, Cuomo suggested Trump — who has threatened to strip New York of billions of dollars in federal funding for various critical programs — wants to help the city.
'Donald Trump is from New York City and he knows our problems here,' Cuomo said in the appearance. 'He knows we need federal help … He knows our situation, he knows the situation in New York City. It is his hometown. I think that he wants New York City to appreciate him. I think he thinks there's an opportunity for him to do good things.'
Speaking at a Harlem church a few days later, Cuomo again didn't directly criticize Trump, but did say his presidency could result in 'challenges' for the city.
The incumbent, Mayor Adams, has vowed to not publicly criticize the president. Adams, who's trailing Cuomo by double digits in most polls of the mayoral race, has come under fire since the Trump Justice Department moved to drop his federal corruption indictment in a manner that critics and allies say has left the mayor behold to Trump's political agenda. Adams maintains there is no quid pro quo.
Some of Cuomo's opponents in the mayoral race have lambasted his lack of forceful Trump pushback.
One mayoral candidate, state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, held a press conference outside City Hall on Thursday where he questioned whether Cuomo's keeping his powder dry on blasting Trump because House Republicans recently urged the president's Department of Justice to prosecute the ex-governor over matters related to his handling of COVID.
'Either Cuomo should vocally condemn the president, or explain his refusal to do so — New Yorkers deserve to know where he stands,' Myrie said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump is flirting with strikes in Iran. That could be a tough sell at home.
For years now, Americans have been trending in a more isolationist, anti-war direction. Particularly on the right, the ascendant view is that the world's problems are not necessarily ours. Iran could be about to test that. President Donald Trump has in recent hours employed increasingly bold rhetoric about involving the United States in Israel's attacks on Iran. On Tuesday afternoon, he wrote on Truth Social that 'we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' He added that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is an 'easy target,' and said, 'We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' He called for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' These comments came as CNN reported he's indeed quickly warming to using the US military to strike Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump has saber-rattled for effect before, so it's possible this is him employing the 'madman theory' of foreign policy again. But it's also evident that we're closer to a major new military confrontation than we've been in two decades. So how might Americans view it if Trump did involve the US military offensively? It's complicated. Americans have in recent years expressed plenty of worry about Iran and even support for hypothetical military strikes. But there is reason to believe military action today could be a bridge too far – for the same reasons Americans have been drifting away from foreign interventions. Much of the polling here is dated, and views are of course subject to change based on fresh circumstances. A 2019 Fox News poll is the most recent high-quality survey to ask directly about a situation like the one Trump is contemplating. And it found a significant level of support for using action to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. American voters favored that 53% to 30% – a 23-point margin. The question from there is whether Americans would view that as indeed the purpose here. This is how Trump has billed potential strikes, saying Iran is on the verge of a nuclear weapon. But as recently as March of this year, his own director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified quite the opposite. She said that the intel community had assessed that 'Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' Trump disputed Gabbard's account on Tuesday, but it's not difficult to see her words – and US intelligence assessments about the lack of imminence of an Iranian nuclear weapon – becoming a problem. That's particularly because America's last major military foray, into neighboring Iraq, became so unpopular due how the Bush administration exaggerated the threat it posed. Americans have appeared open to military action in theory. The question from there is how immediate they view that threat as being. Some surveys indicate Americans do tend to view Iran as a major threat – and on a bipartisan basis: The same Fox poll showed 57% of Democrats and 65% of Republicans called Iran a 'real national security threat.' A 2023 Fox poll showed more than 6 in 10 Democrats and about 8 in 10 Republicans were at least 'very' concerned about Iran getting a nuke. And Gallup polling last year showed 93% of Republicans and 70% of Democrats described Iran developing nuclear weapons as a 'critical threat' to the vital interests of the United States. But other surveys suggest that perceived problem might not rank particularly high. Pew Research Center polling last year showed many more Americans felt China (64%) and Russia (59%) were major military threats than Iran (42%). Pew data last year also found only 37% of Americans said limiting Iran's power and influence should be a 'top priority.' It ranked lower than limiting Russia and China's power and about the same as North Korea's – while also falling below limiting climate change. And back in 2020, just 14% of Americans thought Iran was such a threat that it required immediate military action, according to a CBS News poll conducted by SSRS. A huge majority felt it was a threat that could be contained (64%), while 17% said it wasn't a threat. All of these numbers could change if Trump goes down the path toward the US hitting Iran. He has shown an ability to get Republicans, in particular, to buy into pretty much whatever he says. (Though some prominent conservative voices like Tucker Carlson have strongly rejected the idea of strikes, meaning there could even be some resistance there). Anyway, it's likely we'd see these numbers polarize. But US intelligence assessments had concluded that not only was Iran not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon — in contrast to Israeli warnings — but that it was also up to three years from being able to produce and deliver one to a target, CNN reported Tuesday. Trump's history with Iran also looms here. In 2020, he launched a controversial strike that killed a top Iranian commander, Qasem Soleimani. And polling often showed people leaned in favor of the strike. But polling also showed Americans said by double digits that the strike made us less safe domestically. And a CNN poll at the time showed Americans disapproved of Trump's handling of the situation with Iran also by double digits, 53-42%. All of which indicates Americans are concerned about blowback and don't have a particularly high degree of faith in Trump's Iran policies. The sum total of the data suggest that, while Americans are concerned about the prospect of Iran getting a nuclear weapon, they don't necessarily view it as an immediate problem necessitating the use of the US military. If someone asks you if you are worried about a nuclear foreign country, of course that sounds scary. You might even sign off on a hypothetical in which US military might be needed to combat that threat you fear. But it doesn't mean you think that's imminent enough to warrant putting US servicemembers in harm's way and setting off a major Middle Eastern war, today. And there's plenty of reason to believe Trump could – or at least should – approach this idea cautiously.
Time Magazine
19 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What to Know About the Trump Administration's Reversal on ICE Raids Guidance
U.S. immigration officials will continue conducting immigration raids at farms, hotels, and restaurants, marking an apparently rapid reversal of guidance issued last week to exempt those worksites from the Trump Administration's mass deportations. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials told staff in a call on Monday that agents must conduct raids at farms, hotels, and restaurants, two people with knowledge of the call told The Washington Post. Multiple news outlets, including CNN and Reuters, have since confirmed the news. 'There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts,' Tricia McLaughlin, an assistant secretary for the Department of Homeland Security, told the Post. 'Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safeguard public safety, national security and economic stability.' Trump's pledge to 'protect our Farmers' President Donald Trump has launched a mass-deportation operation since he took office for a second time in January, sparking outrage from Democratic lawmakers and prompting thousands of demonstrators to take to the streets to protest ICE raids targeting undocumented immigrants. Trump has recently faced backlash from agriculture and hospitality executives over his hardline immigration agenda, the Post reported. On Thursday, he posted on Truth Social that 'changes are coming.' 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump said in his post. 'In many cases the Criminals allowed into our Country by the VERY Stupid Biden Open Borders Policy are applying for those jobs. This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' What changed—or didn't Despite the public pledge, a White House official told the Post at the time that the White House hadn't proposed any real policy changes. But three U.S. officials familiar with the situation told The New York Times that the Administration had instructed ICE officials to mostly halt raids and arrests at those worksites. 'Effective today, please hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and operating hotels,' Tatum King, a senior ICE official, said in an email that was sent out as guidance to regional leaders of the branch of ICE that typically works on criminal investigations, as reported by the Times. Monday's reversal of that guidance comes after Trump posted on Truth Social over the weekend that he wants to 'expand efforts to detain and deport illegal Aliens in America's largest cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside.'
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"He's So Disgusting": Eric Trump Is Being Dragged For Using A Slur When Describing LA Protesters
Eric Trump on Monday was slammed for his use of a highly offensive term during an interview. President Donald Trump's son ― talking with conservative influencer Benny Johnson — was criticizing people who are protesting the immigration crackdowns by his father's administration in Los Angeles when he described those who had attacked police cars as 'mongoloids.' Eric Trump describes LA protesters as "mongoloids" — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 16, 2025 @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via Merriam-Webster defines the word 'mongoloid' as a dated and 'now offensive' term to describe 'a person affected with Down syndrome.' Critics on social media slammed Trump as 'disgusting' for making the 'dehumanizing' comment. But "deplorables" led to weeks of tantrums. — Sally VW (@actorgrrrl) June 16, 2025 @actorgrrrl / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via Related: Well, Well, Well, For The Second Time In 2 Weeks, People Are Letting JD Vance Know EXACTLY How They Feel About Him In Public Trump calls protesters 'mongoloids' — straight-up slur on national Trump brand isn't just toxic. It's proudly cruel. When do we say enough? — AnatolijUkraine (@AnatoliUkraine) June 16, 2025 @AnatoliUkraine / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via nazi talk... — Lawrence Fitzgerald (@lwfitzgerald) June 16, 2025 @lwfitzgerald / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via Related: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem He's so disgusting. — Berngirl (@BGminimom) June 16, 2025 @BGminimom / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via They are all so disgusting. Such a totally disgusting family. — Mary Ann Lissau (@nose4rose) June 16, 2025 @nose4rose / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via Dehumanizing people is essential to carrying out the next phases. — AC Tatum (@actatumonline) June 16, 2025 @actatumonline / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via This is the term they used 50 years ago about people who have down syndrome. The whole family are just atrocious human beings. — Bekah Freitas (@rebekahkfreitas) June 16, 2025 @rebekahkfreitas / @atrupar / The Benny Show / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason Also in In the News: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them
