I'm clinging to my dual-monitor setup for dear life, but ultrawides are tempting
But lately, my resolve has been melting, and with good reason, too. Here's why I'm hanging on to my dual monitors by a thread, and why I might ultimately make the switch to a single ultrawide in the near future.
Am I getting old?
Right, so, just to reiterate — I love dual monitor setups. If I ever have to work on my laptop, I'm suffering due to the lack of a second screen.
Recommended Videos
Whether I'm working or gaming, I always, always, always want to have a second monitor to throw all kinds of things onto. When I work, it's my notes or a million tabs with research; when I game, it's Netflix, Discord, or Chrome. In any case, there's almost never a time when I don't actively use both of my monitors.
And yet, I feel like I might have to change my mind soon.
Over a year after I finally decided to stop neglecting my second monitor and bought two of the same screens, I can feel my resolve to stick to a dual-monitor setup melting away, and I can't help but wonder …
…am I just getting old?
Having to constantly crane my neck left and right never used to bother me before. I also never used to care much that my two monitors don't have the exact same colors, despite hours of meticulous calibration. The viewing angles being different were alright, too, as my second monitor was never the one I actively stared at while sitting at my desk.
But, I have to say, it's starting to bug me a little bit now. Perhaps my biggest problem are the bezels — while my monitors have super-thin bezels, they're still there, and it's hard to push them together perfectly when one is at an angle.
I also wear glasses, and I use progressive lenses, which have different strengths across the lens. This means that at the sides and near the top, the prescription is weaker, which makes looking at my second monitor a little tiring at times.
Put together, it's fair to say that I see the problem with dual monitor setups — and unfortunately, ultrawides are starting to look tempting.
Ultrawides are better and cheaper than ever
We've reviewed a bunch of excellent ultrawides, including some of the best ultrawides on the market. Some were expensive, and some were rather affordable. Many were tempting to me even when my dual-monitor resolve was stronger than it is now.
However, ultrawides are getting harder to resist because they've become much more commonplace. You don't need to drop $1,000 to get a decent ultrawide; there are plenty of options that are more affordable than my dual setup ever was — and they don't suffer from the same problems that my setup is plagued by.
Take the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9, which blew us away in a slightly different iteration. It's not cheap, but this is a 49-inch ultrawide monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate; it looks like a dream, and it now costs $879. That's more than I spent on my two monitors, but only just, and it's a whole new category of display. Check it out — it's gorgeous.
Still, you don't need to spend a fortune to buy a solid ultrawide. Samsung's ViewFinity costs $269 right now (I found it on sale), and it's still superb. It's 34 inches, which is a lot more manageable if you sit by the desk, and it's still optimized for gaming thanks to the 100Hz refresh rate.
The cheapest ultrawide I'd reasonably buy is this Sceptre model at $199. It actually costs less than one of my monitors in my dual setup, and it has everything most gamers could possibly ask for.
Yeah, these prices aren't helping, and I've had more than one friend try to convince me to just go for it. But, there are things I'd miss if I switched to an ultrawide.
I'm tempted, but I'm staying strong for now
There are many good reasons why I stayed true to my dual setup over the years, and despite the neck pain and the lens-induced frustration, I'm not ready to jump ship just yet.
For starters, I still believe (and yes, I've used ultrawides too for testing purposes) that dual (or multi) monitor setups are second to none for productivity. I love having two entirely independent screens where I don't risk using the wrong app at the wrong time, and can have everything organized the way I like it.
Next, gaming. Ultrawides make many games look outstanding, but the downside is that many games aren't optimized for them. If you play indies or older titles, you'll be left with ugly black bars on the sides of your game, or, at best, suboptimal pixel distribution if you brute-force the title into fitting the 21:9 or 32:9 aspect ratio.
Lastly, proximity to the screen. I sit by my desk, which is stupidly small (the joys of having a tiny apartment), so those 34-inch or 49-inch ultrawides wouldn't work for me. I'm already pushing it with two 27-inch monitors.
Ultimately, the satisfaction from using two fantastic monitors still outweighs the annoyances that plague me on a daily basis. If you're curious which ones I own, they're the LG 27GP850-B, and I couldn't recommend them enough if I tried — so I'm sticking to them, through thick and thin. Please don't try to tempt me otherwise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
a minute ago
- CNET
ChatGPT-5 Gives You Real Choices After All. Here's a Quick Breakdown
The biggest pushback after OpenAI announced its new GPT-5 model for ChatGPT came from devotees of older models who felt the new generative AI chatbot lacked the panache of its predecessors. Now you have more choices of pre-GPT-5 models (although you'll have to hunt for some of them) and better control over which components of GPT-5 handle your questions. OpenAI is still sorting through a somewhat rocky launch of GPT-5, led by complaints about the lack of model choices. The model has been anticipated for more than two years and comes as competitors like Anthropic and Google have released powerful new versions of their AI models this year. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) OpenAI planned for one model that could handle everything: GPT-5 includes two different modes, one fast and lean for simple tasks and one aimed at reasoning for complicated ones. A routing program would decide which model handled a given prompt. That's still the default in ChatGPT, but it's not your only option. Here's a look at the menu: Watch this: ChatGPT Users Want the Old Models Back, Intel CEO Goes to the White House & More | Tech Today 03:03 Choices of GPT-5 models There are a few different modes of GPT-5 you can select between if you want to use OpenAI's newest technology. Here's a quick rundown: Enlarge Image This is what your choices will look like if you don't enable legacy models in settings. Screenshot by Jon Reed/CNET Auto: This mode allows the switching program built into GPT-5 to decide whether your query is handled by a lighter, faster large language model or a bigger, slower reasoning model. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X that this will be the best fit for most people. This mode allows the switching program built into GPT-5 to decide whether your query is handled by a lighter, faster large language model or a bigger, slower reasoning model. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X that this will be the best fit for most people. Fast: Your query will go straight to the fastest, lightest model. Expect quick, basic answers, but not the in-depth research you'd get from a reasoning model. Your query will go straight to the fastest, lightest model. Expect quick, basic answers, but not the in-depth research you'd get from a reasoning model. Thinking: This is a reasoning model, meaning it'll try to answer your question over several steps. It might use web searches and other tools, or it might go back and redo its past steps to try to get the right answer. There are some limits on how much you can use this model (3,000 messages per week right now). This is a reasoning model, meaning it'll try to answer your question over several steps. It might use web searches and other tools, or it might go back and redo its past steps to try to get the right answer. There are some limits on how much you can use this model (3,000 messages per week right now). Thinking mini: This is a lighter, faster version of the Thinking model. If you hit the usage limit on Thinking, you'll be stuck with Thinking mini. You can access it on your own if you enable more model options (more on that below). This is a lighter, faster version of the Thinking model. If you hit the usage limit on Thinking, you'll be stuck with Thinking mini. You can access it on your own if you enable more model options (more on that below). Pro: The most powerful reasoning model in the fleet, this is only available at the moment for Pro users, who pay $200 per month. (Although Altman did tease giving Plus users, who pay $20 a month, a very limited number of queries as a taste.) Again, sticking with Auto is probably easiest for most users. Think of it like driving a car with an automatic transmission instead of having to change gears manually. Sure, people who are really into cars might prefer the stick shift, but most people should probably just let the machine handle it. How to get the older OpenAI models Everyone with a paid ChatGPT subscription can access the older GPT-4o model directly in the same menu where you can choose your flavor of GPT-5. This model received the most clamor from users after it was removed, and Altman said if OpenAI ever decides to take it away permanently, "we will give plenty of notice." But 4o isn't your only choice (if you're a paid user). You just have to know where to look. To access GPT-4.1, 4o-mini and 3o, along with GPT-5 Thinking mini, you'll have to go into your Settings and toggle on "Show additional models."
Digital Trends
a minute ago
- Digital Trends
Are 1080p monitors still worth buying for gaming? You'd be surprised
These days, many of the best gaming monitors fall in the 1440p to 4K category — but does that make 1080p displays obsolete? Many users and manufacturers alike might want you to believe that, but fortunately, there's still a lot to be said about the humble (or not-so-humble, as expensive options exist) 1080p monitor. While 1080p monitors have their charms, gamers tend to go for top-shelf hardware instead, which is why their popularity in those circles is slowly waning. Personally, I think there's a lot to love about 1080p, but it's not all sunshine and rainbows. I'll walk you through whether 1080p is still worth buying in 2025, and how to pick the right monitor for your needs. Why 1080p refuses to die Check any tech outlet or electronics store, and it's all jaw-dropping 4K OLEDs as far as the eye can see. But, for many gamers and casual users alike, the reality is quite different. 1080p monitors are still far from being buried in the tech graveyard alongside CRTs and VGA cables, and with good reason. Recommended Videos For a lot of gamers, 1080p still does exactly what they need it to do, and it does so without setting their bank accounts on fire. You can play just about every game in 1080p and make the most of it, and while many will tell you 1440p looks and feels better, it's not going to make or break your whole setup. It's true that higher resolutions tend to offer better immersion, and more importantly, more screen real estate. But, speaking as someone who only made the 1080p to 1440p switch in the last couple of years, I didn't suddenly become a better player just by switching my monitor. However, I can't deny that I enjoy the extra pixels. However, those extra pixels come at a staggering cost: a hit to raw performance. Rendering fewer pixels means your graphics card doesn't have to work as hard, freeing up frames for smoother gameplay. That's why competitive esports pros still swear by 1080p — you're more likely to get those ultra-high refresh rates on a 1080p monitor. Take this 500Hz Alienware monitor, for example. In our review, we were impressed by how fast it was, and that kind of refresh rate would be infinitely harder to achieve on a 1440p display. And because the technology is so mature, you can get those blistering refresh rates, solid color accuracy, and low input lag for a fraction of the price of a high-refresh 1440p or 4K display. Scaling up to 1440p or 4K is really taxing on the GPU, so you'll often need one of the best graphics cards to comfortably hit 60 frames per second (fps) and more in every title at 1440p and more. That explains why a whopping 54% of all Steam Hardware Survey participants are still using 1080p, although 1440p is at 20% and rising every month. Some trade-offs are hard to ignore It's impossible to fully ignore the benefits of 1440p, though. I currently run a dual-monitor setup consisting of two identical 1440p screens (although I'm considering switching to an ultrawide). The extra screen real estate is nothing to turn your nose up at. Switching to 1440p gives you roughly 78% more pixels on your screen. This feels great, both when you just look at your desktop and when you play games, and having used 1440p and 4K, scaling back to 1080p feels jarring. However, that's also 78% more pixels that your GPU needs to render, making it work extra hard. The benefit of 1440p also lies in the fact that you can easily upgrade to a bigger display while keeping the image perfectly sharp. 1080p monitors do just fine at 24 inches or less, but if you want a display that's 27 inches or bigger, you might notice jagged edges or softer text. Textures don't look anywhere near as nice as they do on a higher resolution display. If you've ever gone from playing a visually rich single-player game on a 4K panel to the same title at 1080p, the downgrade is immediately obvious: less fine detail, more aliasing, and a general sense that the world you're looking at is just a bit blurrier. There's also the question of future-proofing. You might want to buy a budget GPU right now (and who can blame you, considering the current GPU prices), and for that, a 1080p monitor will do just fine. But if you one day upgrade to a high-end model, all that extra firepower will be slightly wasted on a worse display. Conversely, if your GPU can't handle it, buying a 1440p monitor will just result in lower frame rates and a lot of frustration. It's certainly a balancing act, but the fact remains that 1440p and 4K have their benefits — but so do 1080p displays. When 1080p makes perfect sense While there are some downsides, if you're still using 1080p, don't let the FOMO (fear of missing out) get to you. There are still a lot of situations in which 1080p makes perfect sense. As things stand now, pretty much every GPU under $300 is made for 1080p gameplay — meaning that a lot of budget-oriented gamers are better off with a 1080p monitor. There are GPUs like the Intel Arc B580 that are cheap but also equipped with plenty of VRAM, giving them more merit at higher resolutions. Even then, you'll enjoy smoother gameplay at 1080p than if you brute-force your GPU to go up to 1440p or 4K. No one's stopping you from upgrading, of course. A friend of mine uses a 4K 34-inch monitor with an Nvidia GTX 1060 GPU. It works, and he claims he's happy with it even in games like Red Dead Redemption 2, but this is achieved through dialing it back as far as settings go. If you like to play at max settings, you'll need a GPU that can handle higher resolutions and modern AAA gaming. Then, there are the times when you might have the hardware, but may not actually need a bigger display. Gamers who like esports titles are often better off with a snappy 1080p monitor than with a bigger display. After all, you need your monitor to be fast, and pixel density plays a smaller role in winning matches. At 1080p, even a modest GPU can push 200 fps in games like League of Legends. And then there's the price-to-performance sweet spot. High-refresh 1080p monitors are significantly cheaper than their 1440p or 4K counterparts, which means you can invest more of your budget into other parts of your setup. You can get a 240Hz 1080p monitor for $150 or less — this AOC model is a good one. Standard 60 to 75Hz displays can be bought for well under $80. 1440p and 4K monitors are cheaper now than ever before, but you'll still spend extra, especially if you want to invest in a good IPS (or OLED) panel. The bottom line is: Yes, 1080p monitors are still relevant for gamers, and they're still worth buying. If you're a mainstream gamer on a budget and your hardware might struggle with higher resolutions, stick to 1080p. If there's one thing that might force you to upgrade, it's trying out a higher resolution and then going back down. Personally, I know that I'm forever stuck with 1440p or more, because once you try it out, it's hard to go back.
Android Authority
a minute ago
- Android Authority
Save $250 on the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Ryan Haines / Android Authority Smaller phones are dying, but many of us still look for more manageable phones that don't add too much bulk in the pocket. Your next best bet might be to go for something like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, known for being especially thin. Right now, you can take one home at a $250 discount, bringing the price down to $849.99 Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge for $849.99 ($250 off) This offer is available from Amazon. The discount applies to all color versions available, including Titanium Jetblack, Titanium Silver, and Titanium Icyblue. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Ultra-thin. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is the thinnest Galaxy S device ever but still packs a 6.7-inch AMOLED display, a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, and a 200MP main camera. See price at Amazon Save $250.00 Limited Time Deal! The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge came to the market with very contrasting opinions. Some people think it is totally not worth it, and would rather get one of the main Galaxy S25 models. But while technically this point is valid, there are intangibles that some of us really value. I happen to like small phones, and my options are getting very slim, especially if I want a premium experience. With that in mind, a super-thin phone like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is looking pretty enticing, even if I must make some sacrifices. Now, keep in mind this is a pretty expensive phone with a retail price of $1,099.99. You don't have to pay full price, though. Deals are getting pretty good already, and the current $250 discount makes the purchase much more palatable. You're getting a pretty nice phone for a price that gets really close to mid-tier territory. Of course, the main highlight is the design, especially its 5.8mm thickness. The rest of the phone is pretty nice, though. In terms of general specs, we often compare it to the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus. And it's actually better in some ways, as it has a titanium frame. Ryan Haines / Android Authority Specs include a powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor and 12GB of RAM. It is plenty powerful and will handle anything you throw at it. You'll also enjoy a nice 6.7-inch LTPO AMOLED 2X display with a sharp QHD+ resolution and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. And while it is super thin, it still has an IP68 rating. That said, making such a thin phone obviously has its sacrifices, as mentioned earlier. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge has a 3,900mAh battery, which is on the smaller side of the spectrum. Also, the camera system isn't as good as the ones in the main Galaxy S25 series. If you're looking for the hottest thin phone around, it's the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, at least right now. If you're interested, go catch this deal while it is still available! Follow
