Next Mercedes-AMG C63 Will Get A PHEV Six-Cylinder Motor As Rumors About Its Powerplant Continue To Swirl
I know you're tired of hearing what motor is going to be under the hood of the next Mercedes-AMG C63. Hell, I'm getting tired of writing about it. It seems like every couple of weeks, there's a new piece of information or a new rumor about what sort of engine will power Benz's compact sports sedan. Well, the current flavor of the week is a plug-in hybrid straight-six motor.
The change from the current C63's much-maligned PHEV turbo-four to the new turbo-six is expected to come as part of a midcycle refresh of the sedan in 2026, according to Autocar. Mercedes-Benz confirmed to the outlet that it will move on from the four-popper it introduced in 2022. Despite the fact the 2.0-liter engine and rear-mounted electric motor put out 671 horsepower and 752 pound-feet of torque (making it the most powerful C63 ever), it never really won over consumers who missed the big ol' V8 previous C63s had. Now, the German automaker is going to try something new.
When the facelift comes around next year, the C63 will be powered by a new-ish plug-in hybrid drivetrain with a 3.0-liter six-cylinder motor. I say "new-ish" because it's not really a new engine. It's just an updated version of what can already be found in the E53, GLC53 and CLE53. It'll just have even more horsepower than it does in those applications, Autocar reports. Specs aren't exactly pinned down yet, but it's expected the motor will put out well over 650 hp and 650 lb-ft torque.
I wouldn't be shocked if it bested the numbers set by the I4 C63. You can't have a new car that's less powerful than the old one. That's sacrilege. It's also expected to do away with the rear-mounted electric motor in favor of an electric motor placed between the engine and gearbox.
Read more: Nobody Does Land Yachts Like Cadillac, And These Are Five Of The Best Ones
It isn't just the C63 that is doing away with the idea of an F1-inspired four-cylinder PHEV motor, either. The upcoming CLE63 coupe and convertible will get a flat-plane-crank version of AMG's M177 4.0-liter twin-turbocharged V8. It would be sort of confusing — and honestly, a non-starter for most — if the CLE63 made do with a four-popper while the CLE53 got a straight-six. We previously reported on rumors that the V8 would find its way into the C-Class as well, but for now, that doesn't seem to be the case. Here's more on why there's not going to be a V8 under the hood of the C63, from Autocar:
Engineers involved in the C-Class programme say packaging constraints within the model's MRA platform make the adoption of the new AMG V8 unfeasible.
"It requires more space, not just in terms of physical dimensions but also for associated cooling systems and crash protection measures," Autocar has been told.
The current C-Class's engine bay, optimised for four- and six-cylinder engines, would require significant structural changes to accommodate the V8 - changes that would likely necessitate a fresh round of crash testing and regulatory approval, which our sources suggest isn't viable at this stage of the model cycle.
The other big update coming to the C63 is sure to piss off the anti-screen crowd. Get ready for the Superscreen display and the MB:OS operating system to make an appearance in the new AMG. Sorry to let you all down.
Regardless, if this report from Autocar is to be believed (and I've got no reason to doubt it), it finally puts to bed the question of what'll be under the hood of the next C63, and I — for one — am grateful for that.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jay Leno Unveils Ultra-Rare 1956 Mercedes Alloy Gullwing Forgotten Even by Mercedes
⚡️ Read the full article on Motorious In his latest video, automotive icon and comedian Jay Leno unveiled one of the rarest Mercedes-Benz vehicles ever produced—a 1956 Mercedes-Benz Alloy Gullwing, so exclusive that even Mercedes-Benz doesn't know where all of them are today. Leno's discovery highlights a version of the classic 300 SL Gullwing that is rarely seen outside of elite collections. Only 29 examples of the alloy-bodied variant were produced, and this one—once owned by noted collector Rudi Klein in Los Angeles—is among the few known to remain intact. Unlike its more commonly seen steel-bodied sibling, the Alloy Gullwing was a lightweight, high-performance version built entirely out of aluminum. Its 3.0-liter inline-six engine, producing 215 horsepower, was designed for competitive driving and reduced weight. While the standard Gullwing is already a legend, the Alloy version emphasizes performance over refinement, making it highly prized among purists. Despite its value—estimated at $10 million—this Alloy Gullwing is not the most expensive Mercedes ever sold. That distinction belongs to the record-breaking 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupe, which fetched over $140 million in 2022. Still, the Alloy Gullwing remains one of the most valuable privately owned road cars in the world. 'This is the first true supercar,' Leno declared in the episode, challenging the often-cited claim that the Lamborghini Miura holds that title. He emphasized the Alloy Gullwing's blend of performance, rarity, and motorsport heritage, qualities that make it unlike anything else from its era. Now retired from late-night television, Leno continues to spotlight automotive rarities through his YouTube channel, Jay Leno's Garage, where he shares cars from his 300+ vehicle collection, valued north of $50 million. With each new video, Leno not only entertains but also helps preserve the legacies of cars even their manufacturers forgot existed.
The Drive
9 hours ago
- The Drive
Another Mercedes-AMG One Has Burned to the Ground
The latest car news, reviews, and features. The world is short yet another Mercedes-AMG One this week after what appeared to be a very public conflagration somewhere in Germany. As is typical with a situation like this, information is thin on the ground, but unless there's big money to be made in faking videos of obscure supercars catching fire, we're inclined to believe everything is on the up-and-up. @chrimbu AMG ONE ein heisser Sportwagen 🤣, wäre besser ohne Lithium Ion Akku🤔🤷♂️ ♬ The Sound of Silence (CYRIL Remix) – Disturbed It's hard to tell much from this low-res video, but the Exclusive Car Registry has several photos of the car prior to the mishap, along with some basic production data about the car itself. It's all crowdsourced, so take it with a grain of salt, but we'd buy that the exterior was Emerald Green Metallic before it was blackened by all that smoke. It's listed as a 2023 model, and the current description is as succinct, but exhaustive: 'Burnt down.' That site's listing, plus the Mercedes' German license plate and Feuerwehr markings on the vehicle in the background (German for 'Fire Department') indicate that the incident took place in Germany. Indeed. As we noted off the top, this isn't the first AMG One that has apparently self-immolated. Back in May of 2023, another example caught fire inside a car transporter, leaving nothing but a carbon-glazed pile of rubble: Um Mercedes-AMG ONE pegou fogo. A unidade estava no guincho, sendo rebocada no M6, em Staffordshire, quando explodiu em chamas.A Mercedes está investigando o incêndio no motor híbrido, que aconteceu quando seu motor estava desligado. 🗞️ | The Sun — Mercedes-AMG F1 Brasil 🇧🇷 (@MercedesAMGF1BR) May 22, 2023 Development of the electrified hypercar was a headache for AMG. Essentially, Mercedes-Benz asked its performance car division to wrap a street car body around a Formula 1 drivetrain. The company's engineers were well aware of the challenges it faced, but the unprecedented adaptation nonetheless ended up taking nearly a year longer than planned to develop. If the early productions numbers are to be believed, Mercedes only built 275 of these for the general public. As an owner, that means the odds of your car catching fire are still less than 1 in 100—a risk most of us would be willing to take to say we own a 1,000-horsepower, 11,000-RPM monster that is essentially an F1 car for the street. Got a tip? Send us a note at tips@
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Max Verstappen must control his road rage to cement his legacy as a great
There was no justification for Max Verstappen's rash and futile act of retribution at the Spanish Grand Prix, when he deliberately drove into the side of George Russell's car. The world champion knows it and on Monday admitted as much with something of a mea culpa on social media. Yet it also must be considered that it is part and parcel of what makes Verstappen so competitive, albeit in this case in an entirely unedifying and self-defeating fashion. Angry and frustrated at a sequence of events in Barcelona, including having to cede a place to Russell, Verstappen surrendered to his baser instincts. Having pulled over to give the place to Russell, he clearly then felt a point had to be made and accelerated back up the inside to collide with the Mercedes. Advertisement Related: 'Not right': Verstappen issues veiled apology for Russell crash at F1 Spanish GP He took a 10-second penalty, dropping him to 10th putting him 49 points behind title leader Oscar Piastri and had three points added to his licence. One more penalty and he will receive a one-race ban. He conceded on Monday that he was 'frustrated', his emotions were running high and that the move was 'not right and shouldn't have happened'. Clearly he had had time to cool down and put some perspective on what was a moment of madness, but even given the chain of events – which were still hardly rage-inducing stuff – this was still shocking from an F1 veteran at 27-years-old and a four-time world champion. Advertisement It was the purposeless anger that really caught the eye, rather than the severity of the action itself. The Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff described it as 'incomprehensible' and his interpretation of it in the immediate aftermath bears repeating. 'The great ones, whether it's in motor racing or in other sports, you just need to have the world against you and perform at the highest possible level,' he said. 'That's why sometimes these greats don't recognise that actually the world is not against you, it's just you who has made a mistake or you've screwed up.' Verstappen has displayed this attitude in the past, while his Red Bull team have at times positively cultivated the 'us-against-the-world' stance, with their contention they have never been quite taken seriously because they are backed by an energy drink manufacturer. Advertisement Verstappen has also been clear in the past that he believes the rules around overtaking are over-prescriptive and this too doubtless fed into his frustration. He was similarly aggrieved in Mexico last season when he was penalised twice for two rash manoeuvres on the same lap against Lando Norris. 'What is allowed, what isn't, is not very natural,' he said on Sunday, in reference to the regulations. However, even given that antipathy, it is hard not to sense that the driver who can be as controlled and composed as they come, who will grind out a result from nowhere, who has been dragging his recalcitrant car by scruff of the neck to the front of the grid this season, can sometimes simply succumb to a base, emotive response that is really beneath him but which he cannot seem to quite always suppress. Which is disappointing, because Wolff is also correct in identifying Verstappen as one of the greats. He may be flawed but he is without doubt an exceptional driver, a generational talent. His uncompromising attitude, drive and competitive spirit inform part of what makes him so good and so hard to beat but on Sunday those attributes went unrestrained to his cost. He shares those ultra-competitive traits with others, perhaps notably Michael Schumacher and Ayrton Senna but there is also a fundamental difference. When Schumacher ruthlessly and deliberately clashed with Damon Hill at Adelaide in 1994 and then Jacques Villeneuve at Jerez in 1997, he had a specific purpose in mind – the moves were with the intent of winning the world championship. Similarly, Senna taking out Alain Prost at Suzuka in 1990. Cynical, ruthless, ugly and unsportsmanlike without doubt but notably with purpose. Advertisement Nigel Mansell recalls that Senna's uncompromising attitude was aimed expressly at intimidating other drivers. Verstappen's wild lunge at Russell in Spain was none of these things. It served no end other than to vent his own anger and has left his title hopes hanging by the slenderest of threads. Worse still it coloured what has otherwise been an enormously impressive season in which he has stayed with the McLarens with immense determination and consistency, taking every opportunity and returning the maximum when he had none. This moment of madness was a pointless flailing that rendered those efforts all but futile and while he maintains he was never really in the title fight, his fearsome efforts thus far this season belie that claim because for all the rightful opprobrium from Sunday, Verstappen is better and more than the driver who gave in to his emotions. His legacy as a potentially great champion depends on him proving that.
