
Telangana HC suspends man's sentence over child's rape-murder; points out lapses in identification, prolonged incarceration
The order, delivered on July 24 by a bench of Justices Moushumi Bhattacharya and B R Madhusudhan Rao, stated, '…the inordinate and unexplained delay of 150 days in conducting the Test Identification Parade, coupled with the circumstances in which the material witnesses…saw a person running away from the scene of offence without seeing his face, read with the conclusion of the Trial Court that it was not possible to identify the petitioner/accused from the video footage, nullifies the value of the Test Identification Parade.'
The case stemmed from a complaint lodged on May 9, 2019, by the father of a 7-year-old boy, who was found dead with head injuries after being sent to a shop near their home the day before. The investigation led to the apprehension of the appellant on May 13 that year, based on CCTV footage and suspicion raised by a witness.
The prosecution alleged that the appellant lured the deceased, committed unnatural sexual acts, and then fatally hit the child's head on the ground. The appellant was convicted on July 20, 2021, for offences under sections 363 (kidnapping), 377 (unnatural offences), and 302 (murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and Section 5(m) read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. He was awarded multiple sentences for the offences, including rigorous imprisonment of five years, life imprisonment, and two sentences of 10 years each, all of which were directed to run concurrently.
The division bench, however, noted several critical issues with the prosecution's case, one of them being that there were no eyewitnesses to the alleged unnatural sex, kidnapping, or murder. The court also highlighted the 'inordinate and unexplained delay' of 150 days in conducting the Test Identification Parade (TIP) after the accused's arrest.
The court felt the identification of the appellant by the witnesses was unreliable due to the long delay, noting that the witnesses had only seen a person running away from the scene in the dark and provided a vague description.
'It is settled law that the Test Identification Parade should be held without any unreasonable delay after the arrest of the accused, which is necessary for eliminating the possibility of the accused being shown to the witnesses before the Test Identification Parade,' the order read. The court also found that the Investigating Officer was unable to determine the blood group of the deceased or the accused, nor confirm if the bloodstains on seized items belonged to the accused.
The court referred to the precedent set in Batchu Ranga Rao and others v State of Andhra Pradesh, which provides guidelines for releasing accused persons who have been in custody for more than five years.
As the appellant had been in jail for over six years as of the order date, the court found it to be sufficient grounds for granting bail. The bail was granted subject to several conditions, including furnishing of a personal bond of Rs 25,000 with two sureties.
Rahul V Pisharody is an Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting from Telangana on various issues since 2019. Besides a focused approach to big news developments, Rahul has a keen interest in stories about Hyderabad and its inhabitants and looks out for interesting features on the city's heritage, environment, history culture etc. His articles are straightforward and simple reads in sync with the context.
Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of district correspondents, centres and internet desk for over three years.
A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. Long motorcycle rides and travel photography are among his other interests. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Man sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for the rape of 16-year-old girl
The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Sessions Court-2., K.S. Maanu, has sentenced Mansoor alias Mohammed Mansoor, 30, of Sajipa Nadu village, to twenty years imprisonment and imposed fine of ₹55,000 on finding him guilty of raping a 16-year-old girl. Mansoor was accused of raping the 16-year-old girl on May 30, 2023, and recording the act on his mobile phone after threatening her. The victim's complaint got registered on December 23, 2023, for offences under Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and under sections 363, 376 (2)(N), 376 (3), 506 of Indian Penal Code in the Mangaluru Women Police Station. The police arrested Mansoor on July 2, 2024. The case was investigated by police inspectors Gururaj and B. Rajendra, and chargesheet was filed. The judge on July 30, sentenced Mansoor to 20 years imprisonment and imposed fine of ₹20,000 for the offence of rape of 16-year-old girl. He was sentenced to one year imprisonment and fined ₹5,000 for the offence of criminal intimidation of the victim.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Ok, Leave Rs 150, But At Least Return My Rs 750': Malegaon Blast Accused To Court
During the court hearing, Kulkarni stated that Rs 900 was confiscated from him at the time of his arrest, but only Rs 750 was officially recorded Sameer Kulkarni, one of the seven individuals acquitted in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, made an unusual request in court, he asked for his Rs 750, confiscated during his arrest, to be returned. During the court hearing, Kulkarni stated that Rs 900 was confiscated from him at the time of his arrest, but only Rs 750 was officially recorded. 'During the arrest, Rs 900 was confiscated from me, but only Rs 750 was shown on paper. Ok, leave Rs 150, but at least return my Rs 750," he told the court. The presiding judge noted the request but reminded him that court directives forbid the return of any case property until further orders. Though Kulkarni is now free, he must wait for the official clearance to retrieve the amount, NDTV reported. Kulkarni also asked for permission to raise nationalist slogans such as 'Bharat Mata Ki Jai" for three seconds, but the court declined, citing the need to maintain discipline in court proceedings. About Malegaon Blast Case Seventeen years after the Malegaon blast killed six people and injured more than 100, a special court in Mumbai on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, declaring a lack of 'reliable and cogent evidence." The court sated, 'Terrorism has no religion" and warned against convictions based on perception alone. Additionally, the court awarded compensation under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act: Rs 2 lakh each to the six victims' families and Rs 50,000 to each of the injured 101 individuals. The father of the youngest victim, 10-year-old Farheen, decried the verdict as unacceptable and vowed to take the matter to the Supreme Court. The trial, initiated by the Maharashtra ATS in 2018 and later overseen by the NIA, involved testimony from 323 witnesses. Thirty-seven turned hostile during proceedings. Special Judge AK Lahoti flagged serious shortcomings in the prosecution's case, noting that suspicion alone could not serve as proof. With these findings, the accused were granted the benefit of the doubt and released. (With inputs from PTI) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Coimbatore man gets double life term for murdering lover in 2017
The Fifth Additional District Court in Coimbatore on Thursday sentenced a man to double life imprisonment for murdering his lover aged 21 in 2017. Judge P.K. Sivakumar awarded the punishment to M. Prashanth, 35, a resident of Vijaya Lakshmi Nagar at Vinayagapuram near Saravanampatti in Coimbatore. As per the prosecution case, Prashanth had been in love with H. Rukshana, 21, a resident of Ponnu Nalli Konar Street at Kovilmedu in Coimbatore. Meanwhile, the girl's family started looking for marriage alliances for her, which annoyed Prashanth. According to the prosecution, Prashanth took Rukshana to Kallar near Mettupalayam for a leisure trip on October 16, 2017. Family members launched a search for the girl after she did not return home on the day. The family lodged a complaint with the Saibaba Colony police station on October 19 and a woman missing case was registered. The police found that Rukshana had contacted Prashanth, who had been working in a software company at Tidel Park in the city, on multiple occasions and on the day of her disappearance. The police questioned Prashanth, who confessed to have murdered Rukdhana by pushing her down from a steep terrain at Kallar following a quarrel and attacking her with a rock on her head. The woman's body was recovered a week after the murder and Prashanth was arrested for the crime. The court found him guilty and sentenced him to double life imprisonment for offences under Sections 302 (punishment for murder) and 364 (kidnapping or abducting in order to murder) and one year jail term for Section 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender) of the Indian Penal Code. The then Saibaba Colony police station inspector K.S. Saravanan investigated the case and Public Prosecutor S. Mohan Prabhu appeared for the prosecution during the trial.