Tariff shock: 11.3% power increase announced
• Also read: Mogale City's draft budget Part 12: Mogale vows to curb wasteful spending
Mayoral spokesperson Palesa Molefe stated that this R5.6b budget is to translate their priorities of the integrated development plan (IDP) into practical and community-driven plans.
'This budget aligns firmly with our strategic objective of positioning MCLM as a competitive urban city centre within the Gauteng City Region.
It reinforces the continuity of our long-term spatial vision, while introducing pragmatic steps to strengthen financial governance, reduce service delivery risks, and channel investment towards areas of greatest developmental particularly in our townships and peri-urban communities,' said Sele.
Molefe added that the 2025/ 26 MTREF reflects a balanced and Batho-Pele (people first) governance approach to resource allocation and notable investments, which include:
• A capital expenditure budget of R501m, comprising R289m from national and provincial grants and R212m from municipal own revenue
• An allocation of R98m towards road resurfacing, sewer spillage repairs, and electricity streetlight maintenance
• An initial R24m investment (R48m over MTREF) to phase out the use of chemical toilets, in favour of environmentally sustainable and dignified Enviro Loo facilities. Another R16.5m has been allocated to the Brickvale Housing Initiative, while R15m has been set aside for the development of the Swaneville Industrial Park
'Provision has also been made to strengthen youth development initiatives, local procurement programmes, and digital transformation within municipal service departments aimed at building institutional agility and enhancing citizen access to services,' she said.
She revealed there will be a 0% increase in property rates for the next three financial years.
'In addition, extended rebates for pensioners and residential property owners have been approved,' she continued.
She added, other tariff adjustments for the 2025/26 financial year include:
• A 4.3% increase in refuse removal and sundry tariffs
• A 15.3% increase in water and sanitation tariffs, as determined by the Rand Water Board
• An 11.3% increase in electricity tariffs, under the National Energy Regulator of South Africa directive
Molefe stated the budget is fully funded, with a projected operating surplus of R37m. The municipality has set a targeted collection rate of 90% to be achieved through strengthened credit control measures, implementation of smart metering to reduce technical losses, and the continued rollout of the Mogale Ya Tima disconnection campaign for non-payment.
'Cost containment remains a priority. The municipality will be reducing reliance on contracted services and optimising internal capacity to ensure value for money. The mayor will continue to champion engagements with various stakeholders, particularly on tariffs, thus mayoral imbizos will be rolled out. Council's resounding support for the 2025/ 26 Budget demonstrates a collective commitment to accelerated service delivery, fiscal discipline, and improved accountability.
The municipality remains unwavering in its pursuit to build a capable, responsive, and developmental local government, one that puts people first and ensures that no resident is left behind,' she concluded.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App
Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App here
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
3 days ago
- TimesLIVE
SIU ready to recover R21m in lottery grant funding
The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) says it has already started the process of executing an order of the Special Tribunal which set aside grant funding of R21m made by the National Lotteries Commission (NLC). The tribunal reviewed and set aside two NLC grant funding applications and ordered a former board member, advocate William Huma, to pay back the amount in full. The SIU said on Monday this was the first judgment that set aside grant funding in its NLC investigation. 'The SIU has now filed 18 NLC review applications to set aside grants. The total value of the funds involved in these review and preservation applications amounts to R320m. More review applications can be expected.' In the judgment in June, the Special Tribunal reviewed and set aside the 2019 NLC decision to award R16.5m to the Samaritan Initiative NPO, a hijacked entity allegedly controlled by Huma's relatives. The funds were allocated for community upliftment projects, including a chicken farming initiative for the residents of Marikana, North West. 'The SIU investigation found that the funds were misappropriated by Silverlite Trading (Pty) Ltd, which Huma later took control as the sole director. The farm is now in a dilapidated state and has never benefited the community of Marikana,' the SIU said. The tribunal also set aside a 2020 grant of R4.6m to Reagile NPC, directed by Huma's wife and nephew. The SIU said no tangible community benefits were delivered. It said the tribunal found that Huma abused his position to funnel funds to entities linked to his family. 'His conduct was deemed 'egregious, negligent, and dishonest', causing the NLC to suffer losses of R21,158,118.' The tribunal said Huma failed to disclose conflicts of interest, contravening the Lotteries Act and his fiduciary duties. 'To ensure there is cash available to recover the full amount lost by the NLC, the SIU, through the tribunal, preserved R10m, which are the proceeds of a sale of Huma's Waterkloof property, which amount is now executable.' As part of the ongoing NLC investigations, the SIU preserved a number of assets belonging to Huma and linked to NLC funds. These include a farm and a boutique hotel, both in North West. This preservation is linked to another NLC investigation. 'As part of implementing the order, the SIU will conduct auctions for the properties in question. The proceeds generated from these auctions will be directed back to the NLC to support projects aimed at uplifting communities, rather than benefiting individuals or their close associates.' The SIU was authorised in terms of a proclamation issued by President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2020 to investigate allegations of corruption and maladministration in the affairs of the NLC and recover any financial losses suffered by the state.
The Citizen
14-08-2025
- The Citizen
Municipality warns of new job scam
Mogale City Local Municipality (MCLM) is warning residents about a new job scam targeting vulnerable job seekers. 'In this latest scam, fraudsters are falsely advertising a 12-month fixed-term contract for the position of Senior Practitioner in Acquisition Management,' said MCLM communications officer, Refilwe Mahlangu. She added that the scammer instructs applicants to send CVs to [email protected]. Mahlangu reiterated that the municipality only advertises vacancies in selected national newspapers, on their official website, and on their LinkedIn page. If a job listing is not on these platforms, it is not legitimate. 'Anyone posing as a recruiter, consultant, or using unofficial channels is committing fraud. Do not respond, share personal information, or make any payments,' she concluded.
IOL News
13-08-2025
- IOL News
Brian Molefe's legal troubles deepen as AIG sues for R4. 4m over defence costs
Insurance company AIG South Africa is gunning for former Eskom chief executive Brian Molefe in a multimillion-rand lawsuit. Image: Simphiwe Mbokazi / Independent Newspapers uMkhonto weSizwe Party MP and former Eskom chief executive Brian Molefe is facing more legal woes after an insurance company slapped the erstwhile Transnet boss with a R4.4 million lawsuit. AIG South Africa signed a written management liability insurance policy with Eskom in April 2017. In terms of the policy, AIG agreed to provide liability cover to the power utility's directors, officers, and employees, including those in its subsidiaries. Each insured person was insured independently and separately for their respective interests, according to the policy. Molefe, in his capacity as chief executive of Eskom, qualified as an insured person under the policy and was eligible, subject to its terms and conditions, to indemnification during his time at the state-owned entity. The policy made provision that AIG will advance cover for liability insurance, being the obligation to pay to or on behalf of an insured person any loss incurred by the insured person. In Molefe's case, AIG agreed to pay for his defence costs on condition that if it was found by a court that he had gained a profit or an advantage to which he was not legally entitled or that there was a commission of a dishonesty or deliberate fraudulent act, then he would have to repay the costs that had been disbursed or that would be disbursed to him or on his behalf. The insurance company disbursed the sum of approximately R4,398,849 (about R4.4m) for his defence costs. However, various judgments were delivered against Molefe by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) and the Constitutional Court, which determined that his conduct was unlawful. The matter relates to Molefe unsuccessfully applying for leave to appeal to both the SCA and the apex court, an earlier Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, judgment finding that his reinstatement as Eskom chief executive was at variance with the principle of legality and reviewing and setting aside the board's decision to accept his early retirement proposal in November 2016. The high court also reviewed and set aside the decision by then Public Enterprises minister Lynne Brown to appoint and reinstate Molefe to the position of Eskom chief executive and declared that any payment or sum of money received by Molefe under any purported pension agreement between him and Eskom is invalid and ordered him to repay such amounts within 10 days. AIG informed Molefe of its intention to institute legal proceedings and claim the provision of his defence costs, and that he accepted the benefits conferred on him by the policy and agreed to be bound by its terms. The company told Molefe in October 2017 that it would advance defence costs to him on a without prejudice basis, and, on the basis that should it eventuate in due course that he was not entitled to an indemnity under the policy, he would refund such costs in full and on demand. Molefe maintained that he did not agree to the provisions of the policy and is not bound by it, as well as that he did not agree to repay the defence costs He also insisted that an arbitration clause in the policy compelled AIG to refer disputes on the recovery of the defence costs to arbitration and raised a special plea in the pending action by the company that its case be dismissed or stayed pending resolution of the arbitration. On August 1, Judge Allyson Crutchfield ordered that the disputes in respect of the claim instituted by AIG shall not be referred to arbitration. The judge found that Molefe's stance that he is not bound by the policy while simultaneously relying upon and claiming the enforcement of the arbitration clause in respect of AIG's claims was untenable and not sustainable in law.
