Judge orders CVS' Omnicare unit to pay $949 million over invalid prescriptions
In a Monday evening order, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon in Manhattan imposed a $542-million penalty for filing 3,342,032 false claims between 2010 and 2018.
McMahon also awarded $406.8 million of damages, representing three times the $135.6 million that a jury awarded on April 29.
The tripling was required under the federal False Claims Act, which lets whistleblowers sue on behalf of the federal government and share in recoveries.
CVS plans to appeal the judgment. The Woonsocket, Rhode Island-based drugstore chain and pharmacy benefits manager bought Omnicare in 2015. Omnicare has asked McMahon to throw out the case or grant a new trial.
"This lawsuit centered on a highly technical prescription dispensing recordkeeping issue that was allowed by law in many states," CVS said in a statement on Tuesday. "There was no claim in this case that any patient paid for a medication they shouldn't have or that any patient was harmed."
The lawsuit was filed in 2015 by Uri Bassan, a former Omnicare pharmacist in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and joined by the federal government in 2019.
They said Omnicare improperly billed Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare, which serves military personnel, for prescriptions for tens of thousands of patients in assisted-living facilities, group homes for people with special needs, and other long-term care facilities.
Omnicare allegedly assigned new prescription numbers without necessary paperwork and pharmacist approvals, after the original prescriptions expired or ran out of refills.
McMahon rejected CVS' argument that a $948.8-million award violated the U.S. Constitution's prohibition against excessive fines under the Eighth Amendment.
"This was a very big fraud on the government, one that lasted over almost a decade, and one that Omnicare was aware of but avoided taking steps to correct," the judge wrote.
McMahon found CVS jointly liable with Omnicare for $164.8 million of the penalties, after jurors found it failed to stop Omnicare from submitting 30% of the false claims after buying that company. CVS itself did not submit any claims.
The case is U.S. ex rel Bassan v. Omnicare Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 15-04179.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's Medicaid cuts to Planned Parenthood blocked
That provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed by the Republican-led Congress denied certain tax-exempt organizations and their affiliates from receiving Medicaid funds if they continue to provide abortions. More: Donald Trump's megabill could mean closure for a third of Planned Parenthood clinics The U.S. Department of Justice argued that "the bill stops federal subsidies for Big Abortion" and urged Talwani not to let Planned Parenthood and its members "supplant duly enacted legislation with their own policy preferences." Talwani, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said the law's text and structure made clear that it was crafted to cover every member of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the parent organization, even if they were not named. That specificity likely transformed the provision at issue into an unconstitutional "bill of attainder," an act of Congress that wrongly seeks to inflict punishment without a trial, the judge said. More: Supreme Court sides with South Carolina in effort to cut Planned Parenthood funding "Plaintiffs are likely to establish that Congress singled them out with punitive intent," Talwani wrote. She said the law also violated Planned Parenthood members' equal protection rights under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment and burdened the right of some who do not provide abortions to associate with their parent organization in likely violation of the First Amendment. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The judge last week had issued a partial injunction that only covered some Planned Parenthood members. Because an earlier temporary restraining order was expiring, Planned Parenthood said many health centers were forced to stop billing for Medicaid services ahead of Monday's ruling. Planned Parenthood has said the law would have "catastrophic" consequences for its nearly 600 health centers, putting nearly 200 of them in 24 states at risk of closure. "We will keep fighting this cruel law so that everyone can get birth control, STI testing and treatment, cancer screenings, and other critical health care, no matter their insurance," Alexis McGill Johnson, Planned Parenthood Federation of America's president, said in a statement.
Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
US FDA recommends removal of hold on Sarepta's Elevidys in some patients
July 28 (Reuters) - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Monday it is recommending the removal of the hold placed on Sarepta Therapeutics' (SRPT.O), opens new tab gene therapy Elevidys for patients with a rare muscular disorder who can walk. The FDA's recommendation followed a probe that showed the death of an 8 year old boy was unrelated to the gene therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, the agency said.
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Judge orders Trump administration to continue Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood
A federal judge on Monday ruled that Donald Trump's administration must continue to reimburse Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide for Medicaid-funded services, as the reproductive health giant heads to war with the administration over its efforts to 'defund' the organization through Trump's sweeping tax bill. The new order replaces and expands a previous edict handed down by US district judge Indira Talwani in Boston last week. The judge initially granted a preliminary injunction specifically blocking the government from cutting Medicaid payments only to Planned Parenthood affiliates that did not provide abortions or did not receive at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in a given year. 'Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable,' Talwani wrote in her Monday order. 'In particular, restricting members' ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs.' More than 80 million people rely on Medicaid, the US government's insurance program for low-income people. Trump's tax bill instructed the federal government to end Medicaid payments for one year to abortion providers that received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023, such as Planned Parenthood. It is already illegal to use Medicaid to pay for most abortions, but Planned Parenthood clinics – who treat a disproportionate number of people who use Medicaid – rely on the program to reimburse them for services such as birth control, STI tests and cancer screenings. In its lawsuit, Planned Parenthood had argued that they would be at risk of closing nearly 200 clinics in 24 states if they are cut off from Medicaid funds. These closures would probably be felt most strongly in blue states, since they are home to larger numbers of people who use Medicaid. A Planned Parenthood affiliate in California has already been forced to close five clinics as a result of the 'defunding' provision. Planned Parenthood estimated that, in all, more than 1 million patients could lose care. 'We will keep fighting this cruel law so that everyone can get birth control, STI testing and treatment, cancer screenings, and other critical health care, no matter their insurance,' Planned Parenthood Federation of America's president and CEO, Alexis McGill Johnson, said in a statement after the Monday ruling. Planned Parenthood is battling overwhelming political and economic headwinds. Even if it prevails against the Trump administration, its affiliates could still be removed from Medicaid in red states, thanks to a June decision by the US supreme court in favor of South Carolina in a case involving the state's attempt to kick Planned Parenthood out of its Medicaid program. On Monday, the state of Missouri also sued Planned Parenthood Federation of America – the mothership organization that knits together Planned Parenthood's network of regional affiliates – over accusations that the organization downplayed the medical risks of a common abortion pill, mifepristone, 'to cut costs and boost revenue'. The lawsuit, which asks for more than $1m in damages, is part of an ongoing campaign by anti-abortion activists to cut off access to mifepristone. More than 100 studies, conducted across dozens of countries and more than three decades, have concluded that mifepristone is a safe way to end a pregnancy. The Associated Press contributed reporting
