
Donald Trump demands NFL's Washington Commanders change name back to Redskins 'immediately'
Known as the Commanders since 2022, Washington's football team dropped the controversial moniker fiver years ago amid uproar over the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police.
'The Washington "Whatever's" should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' Trump wrote on social media before a scheduled round of golf at Trump National Golf Club in Washington D.C. 'There is a big clamoring for this.'
Daily Mail has reached out to Commanders spokespeople for comment.
While Trump may be slightly off about the team name (they were the 'Washington Redskins' and then the 'Washington Football Team' but never the 'Washington Redskins Football Team'), he is right about uproar over the changes.
Fans and even some Native American groups have voiced support for the team's new ownership group to revert to 'Redskins.' Several public opinion polls of self-identified Native Americans have found most were not offended by the term, while critics have pointed to academic research by the University of Michigan and UC Berkeley that found the opposite was true.
Trump appeared to reference the public polling in favor of a name change on Sunday.
Trump is slightly off about the team names. They were the 'Washington Redskins' and then the 'Washington Football Team' but never the 'Washington Redskins Football Team'
'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' he claimed. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!'
A year ago, the family of the man depicted in the former Redskins logo urged the team to bring his image back to the helmet.
'The fans want him back and we want him back,' Thomas White Calf, a great nephew of late Blackfeet Nation chief John Two Guns White Calf, told Fox News after meeting with Senator Steve Daines (Republican, Montana ).
Thomas' pleas came four years after the team began its rebranding, first becoming the Washington Football Team on a temporary basis before adopting 'Commanders' and dropping the feathered John Two Guns White Calf emblem.
'Our ancestor was the most famous and most photographed native in history,' Thomas told Fox alongside his mother, Delphine White Calf, a niece of the late Blackfeet chief. 'Two Guns was also the face on the Indian head nickel. I'm proud of him. The Blackfeet are proud of him.'
The club began as the Boston Braves in 1932 before changing its name to 'Redskins' a year later and moving to the US Capital in 1937. But it wasn't until 1971 that Blackfeet leader Blackie Wetzel created a portrait of John Two Guns White Calf that ultimately became the team's logo.
The term's origin is disputed, according to a 2016 Washington Post article that claims it was first used as a pejorative as early as 1863 in Minnesota.
'The State reward for dead Indians has been increased to $200 for every red-skin sent to Purgatory,' read an announcement in The Winona Daily Republican. 'This sum is more than the dead bodies of all the Indians east of the Red River are worth.'
By 1898, Webster's Collegiate Dictionary began defining 'redskin' with the phrase 'often contemptuous.'
A 2016 Washington Post poll found that 90 percent of the 504 Native American respondents were 'not bothered' by the team's name. Now-former team owner Daniel Snyder ultimately wrote an open letter, defending his decision to keep the moniker by citing the study.
However, that survey and other similar studies have been slammed by journalists and social scientists as being unreliable.
'The reporters and editors behind this story must have known that it would be used as justification for the continued use of these harmful, racist mascots,' read a statement from the Native American Journalists Association. 'They were either willfully malicious or dangerously naïve in the process and reporting used in this story, and neither is acceptable from any journalistic institution.'
Redskins fan Louis Hilliard, center, has a conversation with Native American protester Jay Winter Nightwolf, left, and Peter Landeros in December of 2017
In March of 2020, UC Berkeley revealed a study that found that more than half of its 1,000 Native American respondents were offended by the team name.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2017 that a trademark law barring disparaging terms infringes on free speech rights. Prior to that, the United States Patent and Trademark office had tried to revoke the Redskins' trademark because it was a racial epithet.
Ultimately it was uproar over Floyd's death in 2020 that led to the change. When the team joined in a social media campaign against racism, many slammed Washington for its continued use of 'Redskins,' leading to the temporary adoption of 'Washington Football Team.'
One twist in the story of the Commanders was their unexpected success with rookie quarterback Jayden Daniels last season. Finishing 12-5, Washington upset the Lions in Detroit en route to the NFC Championship, where they lost to the ultimate Super Bowl winners, the Philadelphia Eagles.
By taking another step in 2025, and potentially winning a Super Bowl as the 'Commanders,' Washington might sideline the debate indefinitely.
Washington D.C. and the NFL's Commanders are set to announce a deal Monday to bring the team back within the city limits after a nearly three-decade run in Landover
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Commanders owner Joshua Harris met Trump at the Oval Office in May to announce plans to bring the league's draft to the National Mall in 2027.
Washington was selected as draft hosts just days after DC mayor Muriel Bowser announced a plan to bring the team back to the city with a new field on the site of the old RFK Stadium, where the team then known as the Redskins played until 1996.
Currently, RFK Stadium stands on the site on the banks of the Anacostia River in the eastern part of the city.
The building has been in the process of a prolonged demolition that has been delayed multiple times. The building was closed back in September 2019, but structural demolition has only begun this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Harsh reality behind Colbert's 'cancellation' as DNC spokesperson
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission served a brutal dose of reality to Stephen Colbert (pictured) fans 'wailing' over the loss of the liberal comedian's show. Brendan Carr explained how the drama over Colbert's Late Show cancellation was nothing more than political theater - and the actual motive was just dollars and cents. On Thursday, CBS announced that the comedian's decade-long run as the host of CBS' late night flagship will end next May. The sudden move s parked immediate backlash from left-wing celebrities and politicians, who claim the decision was strictly politically-motivated. The cancellation was revealed two days after Colbert used the term 'big fat bribe' to describe Paramount's $16million settlement with President Trump. Paramount, which owns CBS, decided to settle on the lawsuit over deceptive editing of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. The entire affair came amid a pending merger between CBS parent company Paramount and Skydance - a deal still awaiting regulatory approval under the oversight of the Trump administration. CBS - long known as the 'Tiffany Network' - insisted that canceling Colbert's show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night.' 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,' it added. Though the program regularly topped its timeslot on network TV, it reportedly hemorrhaged $40 million a year in revenue - a staggering loss that ultimately proved unsustainable. However, the network instantly faced widespread accusations, including from US senators, of cancelling Colbert for political reasons, particularly given the timing following his vocal criticism of Trump. 'Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal, days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO,' Bernie Sanders wrote to X. Actress Jamie Lee Curtis added her voice to the backlash, telling the Associated Press : 'They just cut NPR and, you know, public broadcasting. Yes, they're trying to silence people, but that won't work. It won't work. We will just get louder.' Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to X : 'CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons,' she added. 'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better,' California Senator Adam Schiff (pictured) wrote to X. Jon Stewart, Colbert's former Comedy Central colleague, also weighed in on the controversy during Monday's episode of The Daily Show, questioning the network's decision to cancel the program. 'Watching Stephen exceed all expectations in the role and become the number one late-night show on network television has been an undeniable great pleasure for me as a viewer and as his friend, and now Stephen has been canceled for "purely financial reasons," Stewart said. Colbert ultimately gained a reputation as one of Trump's fiercest critics, departing from the traditional late-night in favor of a more overtly partisan approach. Following the announcement of The Late Show's cancellation, President Trump took to Truth Social on Friday to gloat over the news in a celebratory post. 'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings,' he wrote. Colbert, who briefly addressed the move Friday, devoted much of his Monday show to the controversy, eventually uniting with almost every other liberal late-night talk show host in a show of support, as well as Adam Sandler and even Lin-Manuel Miranda. The 61-year-old comic opened after a standing ovation and a lengthy applause from the New York City crowd by saying 'cancel culture has gone too far' and then joked now that the show is ending, he can say whatever he feels. Colbert said sarcastically of Paramount: 'They made one mistake, they left me alive! For the next ten months, the gloves are off!' The Late Show host then referenced Trump's comments, turning to an 'Eloquence Cam' and said: 'How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go [expletive] yourself.' He then referenced Trump stating in the same Truth Social post: 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.' Colbert replied: 'Nope, no, no. Absolutely not. Kimmel, I am the martyr. There's only room for one on this cross. And the view is fantastic from up here. I can see your house!' He also said that cancellation meant he could finally admit what he felt about the president. In contrast to his often over-the-top anti-Trump monologues, he dryly, quietly said: 'I don't care for him. Doesn't seem to have the skill set to be president. Just not a good fit, that's all.' Colbert also referenced a story from The New York Post saying the show lost $40-$50million last year, though some have suggested its as high as $100million. 'I could see us losing $24 million but where would Paramount have possibly spent the other $16 million, oh...' he quipped, naming the amount the company settled with Trump for over his 60 Minutes lawsuit. He then went back to bashing Trump and the recent news accusing him of writing a 'bawdy' letter to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday. 'I'll have more to say about all this after the commercial break. The only other story is a small one... the president is buddies with a [expletive],' he said. In a follow-up post on X, Carr chimed in again, taking aim at the comedian and slamming him for his reaction to the cancellation. 'I'm surprised to learn that CBS didn't find this stuff profitable,' he wrote.


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fossil fuels are ‘flailing and failing' as world enters new energy era, says UN chief
The age of fossil fuels is nearing its end and a clean energy revolution is well underway, UN secretary-general António Guterres said on Tuesday, urging governments to accelerate the shift before it is too late. 'We are on the cusp of a new era. Fossil fuels are running out of road. The sun is rising on a clean energy age,' Mr Guterres said in a speech in New York. 'I have never been more confident that they will fail – because we have passed the point of no return.' Backed by the latest figures from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Mr Guterres said that renewables made up 92.5 per cent of new electricity capacity last year. Investment in clean energy reached $2 trillion in 2024 – nearly $800bn more than what flowed into fossil fuels. 'The clean energy future is no longer a promise. It's a fact,' he said. 'No government. No industry. No special interest can stop it.' Despite his optimistic tone, the UN chief warned that the transition is still too slow and uneven, particularly in developing nations that lack access to finance and technology. He called on wealthy countries and major tech firms to lead the charge by committing to 100% renewable-powered operations by 2030. 'The energy transition is unstoppable,' he said. 'But the transition is not yet fast enough or fair enough.' The remarks marked a notable shift in tone from previous UN warnings that focused on the escalating dangers of global heating. This time, Mr Guterres framed the energy transition as an economic and security imperative. 'Countries that cling to fossil fuels are not protecting their economies – they are sabotaging them,' he said. 'Driving up costs. Undermining competitiveness. Locking-in stranded assets. And missing the greatest economic opportunity of the 21st century.' 'There are no price spikes for sunlight. No embargoes on wind. Renewables mean real energy security. Real energy sovereignty. And real freedom from fossil-fuel volatility.' More than 90 per cent of renewable energy projects today are cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives, according to IRENA. Solar power is now 41 per cent cheaper than the lowest-cost fossil fuel option, while onshore wind is less than half the price. Still, major gaps remain. A UN report released alongside IRENA's data warned that grid investment is failing to keep pace with the boom in renewables. For every dollar spent on clean generation, only 60 cents is going into infrastructure – when parity is needed to support the transition. Critical mineral supplies also remain a concern, as do geopolitical tensions and trade disputes that could raise costs or slow momentum. Yet Mr Guterres insisted the shift is already transforming lives – and holds vast potential for regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia where energy access remains limited. 'You can't build a coal plant in someone's backyard,' he said. 'But you can deliver solar panels to the most remote village on earth.' Environmental groups welcomed the speech. Bill Hare, CEO of Climate Analytics, said: 'Any investment in new fossil fuels now is a fool's gamble, while joining the race to renewables can only bring benefits – not just jobs and cheaper energy at stable prices, but energy independence and access where it's needed most.' Shady Khalil, senior global policy strategist at Oil Change International, said the speech sent a clear signal that 'the fossil fuel era is ending and the renewable energy transition is now unstoppable.' But he warned that 'Global North countries like the US, Canada, Norway, and Australia are still gearing up for massive oil and gas expansion,' calling it 'reckless and gluttonous short-termism' that would backfire on their economies. Jacobo Ocharan, head of political strategies at Climate Action Network International, said Guterres was 'on the money' in calling for a transition that delivers 'equity, dignity and opportunity for all.' He said COP30 must produce a roadmap 'grounded in human rights, justice and equity' rather than remaining stuck in 'the polluting and unfair past, which is where the fossil fuel industry wants us trapped.' Mr Guterres called on countries to use their updated national climate plans – due in September – to slash fossil fuel subsidies and invest in clean energy. The message, he said, was not about sacrifice but smart economics. 'This is not just a shift in power,' he said. 'This is a shift in possibility. This is our moment of opportunity.'


Scotsman
14 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Everything you need to know about Donald Trump's four-day Scotland visit
Donald Trump will be meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Preparations are underway as Donald Trump is set to arrive in Scotland later this week. This will be the first time the US president has returned to the country of his mother's birth since 2023. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Trump is set to visit his golf resorts at Turnberry on the Ayrshire coast and Menie in Aberdeenshire. He will return to the UK for an official state visit in September. Donald Trump will visit his golf resorts during his Scotland visit. | Bloomberg via Getty Images When is Trump visiting? White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the visit would take place between July 25 and July 29. She said: 'President Trump will travel to Scotland, where he will visit both Turnberry and Aberdeen from July 25 to July 29. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "During the visit, President Trump will meet again with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the great trade deal that was brokered between the United States and the United Kingdom." Make sure you keep up to date with news from across Scotland by signing up to our free newsletter here. His schedule has not been made public but he is expected to split his time between his two Scottish bases at Turnberry and Menie. What is he doing in Scotland? Mr Trump's press secretary confirmed that he will be meeting Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Aberdeen. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad First Minister John Swinney has also confirmed he will have a meeting with Mr Trump during the visit, although no details have been released. PA Mr Trump said: 'We're going to be meeting with the British Prime Minister, very respectful, and we are going to have a meeting with him, probably in Aberdeen, and we're going to do a lot of different things. 'We're going to also refine the trade deal that we've made. So we'll be meeting mostly […] at probably one of my properties, or maybe not, depending on what happens, but we'll be in Aberdeen, in Scotland, meeting with the Prime Minister.' He will also visit both of his golf courses in Scotland - Turnberry in Ayrshire and Menie in Aberdeenshire. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is also expected Mr Trump will pay a visit to the 18-hole links New Course ahead of its expected opening in August. What will security be like? The chair of the Scottish Police Federation, David Threadgold, told Scotland on Sunday that all officers in Scotland could be affected for the duration of the trip, with some officers potentially being asked to work 12-hour shifts. He said: 'This is a huge policing event for Scotland and we will require mutual aid because of the huge demand on my colleagues. 'Very few if any cops will not be impacted by next week's visit and beyond.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added that ensuring officers can eat, drink and rest will be a 'challenge'. Police Scotland have also made a request to the Police Service of Northern Ireland seeking officers to provide additional support during the visit. Flying restrictions over the Trump International Golf Links site in Aberdeenshire are already in force and will remain in place until August 10. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Will there be protests? Coordinated anti-Trump protests are being held in Edinburgh and Aberdeen this weekend, marking the arrival of the US President in Scotland. Since the dates of the President's visit have been confirmed, a group of campaigners from across the UK have joined forces under a banner called the 'Stop Trump Coalition'. It has organised two protests in Scotland on Saturday, at Union Terrace Gardens in Aberdeen and outside the US consulate in Edinburgh, which are expected to kick off at noon. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Protesters gathered in Edinburgh when Donald Trump visited Scotland in 2018. | PA Organisers said activists, made up of trade unionists, climate campaigners and pro-Palestine groups, will respond to the President's agenda and follow him 'wherever he goes' during his trip.