
Donald Trump demands NFL's Washington Commanders change name back to Redskins 'immediately'
Known as the Commanders since 2022, Washington's football team dropped the controversial moniker fiver years ago amid uproar over the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police.
'The Washington "Whatever's" should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' Trump wrote on social media before a scheduled round of golf at Trump National Golf Club in Washington D.C. 'There is a big clamoring for this.'
Daily Mail has reached out to Commanders spokespeople for comment.
While Trump may be slightly off about the team name (they were the 'Washington Redskins' and then the 'Washington Football Team' but never the 'Washington Redskins Football Team'), he is right about uproar over the changes.
Fans and even some Native American groups have voiced support for the team's new ownership group to revert to 'Redskins.' Several public opinion polls of self-identified Native Americans have found most were not offended by the term, while critics have pointed to academic research by the University of Michigan and UC Berkeley that found the opposite was true.
Trump appeared to reference the public polling in favor of a name change on Sunday.
Trump is slightly off about the team names. They were the 'Washington Redskins' and then the 'Washington Football Team' but never the 'Washington Redskins Football Team'
'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' he claimed. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!'
A year ago, the family of the man depicted in the former Redskins logo urged the team to bring his image back to the helmet.
'The fans want him back and we want him back,' Thomas White Calf, a great nephew of late Blackfeet Nation chief John Two Guns White Calf, told Fox News after meeting with Senator Steve Daines (Republican, Montana ).
Thomas' pleas came four years after the team began its rebranding, first becoming the Washington Football Team on a temporary basis before adopting 'Commanders' and dropping the feathered John Two Guns White Calf emblem.
'Our ancestor was the most famous and most photographed native in history,' Thomas told Fox alongside his mother, Delphine White Calf, a niece of the late Blackfeet chief. 'Two Guns was also the face on the Indian head nickel. I'm proud of him. The Blackfeet are proud of him.'
The club began as the Boston Braves in 1932 before changing its name to 'Redskins' a year later and moving to the US Capital in 1937. But it wasn't until 1971 that Blackfeet leader Blackie Wetzel created a portrait of John Two Guns White Calf that ultimately became the team's logo.
The term's origin is disputed, according to a 2016 Washington Post article that claims it was first used as a pejorative as early as 1863 in Minnesota.
'The State reward for dead Indians has been increased to $200 for every red-skin sent to Purgatory,' read an announcement in The Winona Daily Republican. 'This sum is more than the dead bodies of all the Indians east of the Red River are worth.'
By 1898, Webster's Collegiate Dictionary began defining 'redskin' with the phrase 'often contemptuous.'
A 2016 Washington Post poll found that 90 percent of the 504 Native American respondents were 'not bothered' by the team's name. Now-former team owner Daniel Snyder ultimately wrote an open letter, defending his decision to keep the moniker by citing the study.
However, that survey and other similar studies have been slammed by journalists and social scientists as being unreliable.
'The reporters and editors behind this story must have known that it would be used as justification for the continued use of these harmful, racist mascots,' read a statement from the Native American Journalists Association. 'They were either willfully malicious or dangerously naïve in the process and reporting used in this story, and neither is acceptable from any journalistic institution.'
Redskins fan Louis Hilliard, center, has a conversation with Native American protester Jay Winter Nightwolf, left, and Peter Landeros in December of 2017
In March of 2020, UC Berkeley revealed a study that found that more than half of its 1,000 Native American respondents were offended by the team name.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2017 that a trademark law barring disparaging terms infringes on free speech rights. Prior to that, the United States Patent and Trademark office had tried to revoke the Redskins' trademark because it was a racial epithet.
Ultimately it was uproar over Floyd's death in 2020 that led to the change. When the team joined in a social media campaign against racism, many slammed Washington for its continued use of 'Redskins,' leading to the temporary adoption of 'Washington Football Team.'
One twist in the story of the Commanders was their unexpected success with rookie quarterback Jayden Daniels last season. Finishing 12-5, Washington upset the Lions in Detroit en route to the NFC Championship, where they lost to the ultimate Super Bowl winners, the Philadelphia Eagles.
By taking another step in 2025, and potentially winning a Super Bowl as the 'Commanders,' Washington might sideline the debate indefinitely.
Washington D.C. and the NFL's Commanders are set to announce a deal Monday to bring the team back within the city limits after a nearly three-decade run in Landover
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Commanders owner Joshua Harris met Trump at the Oval Office in May to announce plans to bring the league's draft to the National Mall in 2027.
Washington was selected as draft hosts just days after DC mayor Muriel Bowser announced a plan to bring the team back to the city with a new field on the site of the old RFK Stadium, where the team then known as the Redskins played until 1996.
Currently, RFK Stadium stands on the site on the banks of the Anacostia River in the eastern part of the city.
The building has been in the process of a prolonged demolition that has been delayed multiple times. The building was closed back in September 2019, but structural demolition has only begun this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Texas Democrats flee state in bid to block redrawn congressional map
A group of Democrats has fled Texas as part of an attempt to block a Donald Trump-backed redistricting plan that could reshape the balance of power in Washington. Lawmakers were seen boarding chartered planes on Sunday evening as they sought to deny the Texas House of Representatives the quorum required to vote on a redrawn congressional map that could create an additional five Republican-leaning seats. Gene Wu, who chairs the House Democratic Caucus, said the members were 'walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent'. 'As of today, this corrupt special session is over,' Mr Wu said. Republicans hold 25 of Texas's 38 seats in the US House, and the president has demanded 'a simple redrawing' of congressional lines to create more GOP-friendly districts. 'There could be some other states we're going to get another three, or four or five in addition. Texas would be the biggest one,' Mr Trump said in July. 'Just a simple redrawing, we pick up five seats.' Redistributing typically takes place every 10 years to account for population changes documented in the census, so redrawing the districts mid-decade is considered unusual. The Texas House was due to debate the new map on Monday – but to conduct official business, at least 100 of the 150 members must be present in the chamber. Democrats hold 62 of the seats, which means Republicans would not have the numbers to proceed with redrawing the map while the group of objecting members is out of the state. Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General, threatened to have the fleeing lawmakers arrested. 'Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately,' Mr Paxton wrote on X. Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately. We should use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law. — Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) August 3, 2025 The Democrats face fines of $500 each for every day they break a quorum, and under new state laws they are not allowed to use party funding to pay. Anticipating the walkout, the members have been fundraising to cover costs. On Sunday evening, they posted photographs and videos to social media confirming they were flying interstate. 'We didn't start this fight – Donald Trump started it,' said Democrat Representative Ramon Romero Jr in a video posted to X. 'He asked the Texas legislature to get rid of your voice.' My Democratic colleagues and I just left the state of Texas to break quorum and stop Trump's redistricting power grab. Trump is trying to rig the midterm elections right before our eyes. But first he'll have to come through us. It's time to fight back. — James Talarico (@jamestalarico) August 3, 2025 Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus said 'apathy is complicity, and we will not be complicit in the silencing of hard-working communities who have spent decades fighting for the power that Trump wants to steal.' In a video posted from an airport, Democratic Representative James Talarico accused Republicans of a 'power grab' and claimed the plan would manipulate electoral boundaries to gain political control. 'If you're seeing this video, my Democratic colleagues and I have just left our beloved state to break quorum and stop Trump's redistricting power grab,' Mr Talarico said in the video posted on X on Sunday. 'They're turning our districts into crazy shapes to guarantee the outcome they want in the 2026 elections 'But Texas Democrats are fighting back. [We're] preventing Republicans from silencing our voices and rigging the next election.' Texans deserve better! I won't help pass a racist map drawn by Donald Trump and Washington D.C. to silence the voices of Texans. #txlege #redistricting — Rep Ramón (@RepRamonRomero) August 3, 2025 This is not the first time Texas Democrats have used this tactic. In 2003, they left the state in an attempt to stop a Republican-led redistricting plan. In 2021, they staged a 38-day walkout by fleeing to Washington, DC, in protest against new GOP-backed voting restrictions. Meanwhile, Democrats in Illinois have suggested that they could fight back against Texas Republicans by pushing to have their blue state's congressional maps redrawn. The tit-for-tat tactics may be limited, however, given many Democrat-led states use independent commissions to draw district boundaries. These commissions were designed to make redistricting fairer but they also limit the ability to fight back when Republicans use their legislative power to redraw maps in their favour.


Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Judge makes bombshell ruling after Trump assassination attempt suspect tries to unseal 'classified national security' documents
A federal judge has barred the man accused of trying to kill President Donald Trump at his Florida golf club last year from accessing documents related to his own arrest because they would compromise national security. Ryan Routh, 59, who is representing himself in his upcoming trial for the attempted assassination at Trump's West Palm Beach golf course on September 15, 2024, was shot down in his request for documents related to his case. In her ruling on Friday, Judge Aileen Cannon mysteriously determined that 'the United States has made a sufficient showing that the information at issue was classified' and that its disclosure 'could cause serious damage or exceptionally grave damages to the national security of the United States.' 'The Court finds that the United States properly invoked the provisions of [the] Classified Information Procedures Act and its classified information privilege as to the information referenced by the classified order,' Cannon wrote in her two-page decision. 'The United States' motion and all accompanying material are hereby sealed.' It is unclear what classified documents Routh may have been seeking or how it relates to national security threats. But some have speculated online about what the ruling could mean, with conservative influencer Nick Sortor asking, 'Was this guy a Ukrainian asset or something.' Libertarian Ken Silva also wondered, 'What are they trying to hide?!' Routh has been charged with attempting to assassinate Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course last year before the presidential election, as well as charges of assaulting a federal officer and multiple firearm violations related to the September 15, 2024 assassination attempt. He is also charged with owning a handgun despite being a convicted felon and with possessing a firearm with a removed serial number. Prosecutors have said Routh aimed a rifle at Trump from behind a bush on his golf course, but his plot was quickly foiled by a sharp-eyed Secret Service agent. The would-be assassin then allegedly aimed his rifle at the agent, who opened fire while Trump was raced away to safety. The action took place just a few hundred yards away from where Trump was golfing on September 15, 2024, just weeks before the November elections. Routh has denied the charges against him, pleading not guilty in the weeks after the incident. Last month, he was granted the ability to represent himself in his upcoming trial, with his court-appointed attorneys serving as standby counsel as Cannon warned him that the lawyers 'will defend you better than you can defend yourself' and urged him not to make the decision, Fox News reports. He has filed a number of motions ever since, and at his first opportunity to speak in court, Routh went of topic - bringing up what he thought were the ambitions of Cannon and the federal prosecutors, according to WPBF. Libertarian Ken Silva also asked what the federal government is trying to hide He also reportedly wrote Cannon - who previously oversaw Trump's classified documents case - an unusual letter asking why the death penalty was not on the table in his case. Routh even went as far as proposing he be included in a prisoner swap with enemies of the United States. 'Why is the death penalty not allowed? At nearly 60, a life of nothingness without love - what is the point? Why is it all or nothing?' he wrote, according to Fox. 'I had wished for a prisoner swap with Hamas, Iran ... or China for [businessman] Jimmy Lai or one of the 40 others, or to freeze to death in Siberia in exchange for a Ukrainian soldier... so I could die being of some use and save all this court mess.' He then suggested that Cannon send him away - joking that it would give Trump a symbolic win. 'Perhaps you [Judge Cannon] have the power to trade me away... An easy diplomatic victory for Trump to give an American he hates to China, Iran or North Korea... everyone wins.' Meanwhile, Routh tried to flex his legal muscles when he filed a motion asking Cannon to exclude 'irrelevant and prejudicial evidence' including messages from his former employer, Tina Cooper, who pleaded guilty to conspiring with Routh to help get weapons illegally. The Department of Justice blasted Routh in its response, claiming he was 'mistaken' on a number of things he alleged, including an 'odd claim' that the government has not identified specific pieces of evidence against him. 'Other arguments are more persuasive in light of the defendant's decision to represent himself,' federal prosecutors argued, Law & Crime reports. 'This court has a responsibility to ensure that trial does not become a circus and that the jury is not burdened and distracted by plainly inadmissible evidence,' they added. Routh did not seem to help his case in his response, when he rambled about the 'new DOJ, Trump [and United States Attorney General Pam] Bondi,' and argued that one can't 'besmirch the president's morals when he has none. 'The defendant respectfully moves this court to recognize that the prosecution is making every attempt in this motion to silence the defense in every fashion.' Federal prosecutors now say they expect Routh to present statements from self-published 'books' and other writings of his as well as hearsay statements in his defense. 'It is the defendant's evidence that is most likely to upend this trial by injecting irrelevant and prejudicial facts unrelated to the actual charges,' the federal prosecutors argued. 'None of the substantive legal arguments raised... has merit.' The Daily Mail has reached out to the Department of Justice for comment.


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump says he 'loves Sydney Sweeney' as president responds to the actress's 'great jeans' advert controversy
President Donald Trump was elated to find out that actress Sydney Sweeney was registered as a Republican after her controversial American Eagle jeans ad caused a political firestorm. Daily Mail asked Trump his reaction to Sweeney's surprise voter registration after he landed in Allentown, Pennsylvania, and the president didn't shy away from his excitement. 'Oh, now I love her ad,' Trump responded. 'You'd be surprised at how many people are Republican. That's one I wouldn't have known but I'm glad you told me that,' he continued. 'If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' Daily Mail previously revealed that Sweeney registered with the Republican Party of Florida in Monroe County last June, according to public voter records. The reveal comes as Sweeney's controversial advertising campaign with American Eagle sparked intense backlash among liberals who accused it of subtly promoting white supremacy and eugenics. But the controversy led many to leap to Sweeney's defense, pointing out that the reference to 'great genes/ jeans ' was simply a play on words about Sweeney's good looks and its denim line. In the promo, a camera pans on Sweeney putting on her jeans as she explains how genes are passed down 'from parents to offspring.' She tells the audience that genes determine 'traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color.' As the camera pans up her body, Sweeney then seductively concludes, 'my genes are blue.' She continues: 'My body's composition is determined by my genes...' before exclaiming: 'Hey, eyes up here' as the camera cuts back to her face. The ad generated intense backlash with critics claiming that the reference to 'great genes' is a subtle comment on her whiteness. A report in Salon argued that praising someone's genes has a historical connection to celebrating thinness, and conventional attractiveness. American Eagle denied accusations that the ad had any nods to racism in a statement that read: '"Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans" is and always was about the jeans'. 'Her jeans. her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone'. Prominent figures on the right have also defended the ad, criticizing accusers of jealousy for Sweeney's attractiveness or extracting unnecessary meanings from the pun. Republican Senator Ted Cruz weighed in on the debate, writing on X: 'Wow. Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I'm sure that will poll well….'