logo
- Mapping The Rise Of BRICS: Declarations, Designs And A Future Unfolding

- Mapping The Rise Of BRICS: Declarations, Designs And A Future Unfolding

Barnama6 days ago
Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors.
A systematic review of the BRICS declarations from 2009 to 2025 reveals not fragmentation but thematic coherence and steady institutional growth. The bloc has moved from reactive voice to constructive architect.
With the 17th BRICS summit just concluded in Rio de Janeiro, the BRICS locomotive continues to move, quietly yet unmistakably, through the shifting contours of global power. Beyond headline debates on expansion, currency alternatives, or institutional reform lies a deeper continuity: the deliberate, increasingly coordinated effort of the Global South to shape a post-hegemonic order, one summit at a time.
Over 17 years, several core themes have remained constant (Figure 1). Calls to reform global governance, particularly the UN Security Council and Bretton Woods institutions, have sharpened. So too have affirmations of sovereignty, non-interference, and multilateralism grounded in international law. BRICS has consistently opposed unilateral coercive measures, foreign intervention, and extraterritorial application of law, while emphasising peaceful dispute resolution and sovereign equality.
Yet critics persist. Some dismiss BRICS as little more than a talk shop – long on declarations, short on delivery. But that view no longer holds. A close reading of the declarations reveals growing technical coordination, policy continuity, and formalised structures. The very texts once cited as evidence of vagueness now offer proof of a maturing governance ecosystem.
In the financial domain, BRICS' critique of dollar dominance has moved from posture to practice. The New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement were early steps. Most recently, the bloc's declaration proposed the incubation of a BRICS Multilateral Guarantees (BMG) mechanism within the NDB and technical advances on cross-border payment interoperability. While not yet named, these developments increasingly reflect the logic of Mutual Credit Clearance (MCC) -a decentralised, self-balancing trade system that avoids both hard currency dependency and inflationary credit creation, as EMIR Research proposed in 'BRICS' Currency Dilemma: A Necessary Quality Leap Beyond the Dollar' (2024).
Support for Africa, Latin America, and least developed countries has moved from symbolism to structured frameworks. The introduction of BRICS Partner Country status, along with the refrain 'African solutions to African problems', signals transition from advocacy to architecture.
Peace and security cooperation has also matured. What began as rhetorical condemnation of terrorism is now underpinned by working groups, action plans, and technical coordination platforms. BRICS declarations increasingly address regional conflicts – Palestine, Syria, Sudan, Ukraine – not only in solidarity but as a normative voice for international law and humanitarian principles.
Recent years also mark a decisive shift in BRICS' identity – from platform to prototype. Since 2021, technology governance and AI have become central. The bloc has shifted from addressing digital access to asserting digital sovereignty, with new frameworks on AI governance, cyber norms, and sovereign digital infrastructure.
BRICS is also becoming institutionally dense. No longer just a summit platform, the bloc's operational ecosystem now includes permanent working groups, interbank platforms, think tank networks, and civil society forums. Declarations increasingly reference cross-pillar coordination, 2030 strategies, and detailed technical annexes—hallmarks of real governance capacity.
Another shift is BRICS' growing role in humanitarian diplomacy and legal accountability. Since 2020, declarations have placed stronger emphasis on humanitarian law, unimpeded aid access, and explicit references to the International Court of Justice. The bloc is positioning itself as a normative counterweight in a system long monopolised by Western legal framing.
This institutional maturity is echoed in the block's evolving language. Early BRICS (2009–2014) spoke in terms of voice, representation, and multipolarity. Recent declarations use a more assertive vocabulary: agile, equitable, accountable, inclusive governance. This shift signals BRICS' ambition to offer a values-based alternative, not merely a structural counterweight.
Crucially, BRICS Summit 2025 marks a geopolitical breakthrough. With Indonesia admitted as a full member and eleven additional Partner Countries recognised, including Malaysia, BRICS is operationalising a decentralised, concentric model of expansion. This model preserves consensus while broadening reach.
Even its economic language has shifted. While critique of Western trade asymmetry persists, it now comes wrapped in technical nuance: exchange-rate risk mitigation for public-private partnerships, infrastructure information hubs, ESG-aligned investment platforms, and the integration of digital green finance. 'BRICS exposure' is now entering investment strategy vocabularies – not as political signalling, but as a credible diversification play.
Malaysia's moment: from observer to orchestrator
With Malaysia now chairing ASEAN, the deepening and diversification of BRICS+ offers a strategic opening – not to choose sides, but to help shape the global playing field. Long known for its diplomatic pragmatism, multilateral credibility, and evolving MADANI framework, Malaysia is uniquely placed to serve as both bridge and architect in this era of recalibration.
Already recognised as a BRICS Partner Country, Malaysia could pursue strategic alignment across three domains: monetary innovation, technology governance, and development cooperation.
While BRICS declarations have yet to explicitly adopt Mutual Credit Clearance (MCC), the logic behind it is taking form. In such a system, only countries that produce goods and services of recognised value to others can sustainably issue credit. Malaysia, with its globally demanded exports – from halal goods and palm oil to semiconductors and green components – meets this criterion. Its consistent trade surpluses, diversified production base, and stable monetary governance position it not just as a participant, but as a node of stability and trust in any future BRICS+ MCC-like arrangement.
This alignment of trust and production connects directly to the Multilateral Guarantees (BMG) mechanism now incubating within the NDB. Designed to de-risk infrastructure and sustainable development projects, the BMG reduces reliance on Western risk assessments and credit agencies. Malaysia's institutional credibility and investment-grade governance make it well-placed to act not only as a beneficiary but as a regional anchor. In combination with MCC-like logic, BMG offers the other side of the equation: a collective trust mechanism to ensure productive intent translates into investable outcomes.
Malaysia's strategic value extends further. In the digital and financial domains, it could host an ASEAN–BRICS+ forum on AI governance, data flow standards, and cybersecurity. In the development sphere, Malaysia can lead on Islamic finance, halal regulatory convergence, and biodiversity frameworks – embedding value-based norms in the emerging Global South architecture. With regional neighbours such as Indonesia now full BRICS members, the potential for regulatory coherence and innovation diplomacy is unprecedented.
The BRICS story is no longer about bloc formation – it is about framework evolution. The question is not whether the world is becoming multipolar. It is whether emerging actors like Malaysia will step forward – not merely to adapt to new structures, but to shape them.
In this spirit, Malaysia's path lies not in alignment or opposition, but in co-creation -bringing ASEAN's voice into the core of BRICS+, embedding mutual credit into trade logic, and aligning inclusive governance with pragmatic multilateralism. The moment is open, but the window is narrow. This is not just a chance to observe history. It is an invitation to help design its next chapter.
-- BERNAMA
Dr Rais Hussin is the Founder of EMIR Research, a think tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran accuses Europe of violating 2015 nuclear deal terms
Iran accuses Europe of violating 2015 nuclear deal terms

The Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Sun

Iran accuses Europe of violating 2015 nuclear deal terms

TEHRAN:** Iran has accused Britain, France, and Germany of failing to respect the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal, following threats from the European nations to reimpose sanctions over Tehran's atomic programme. The agreement, signed between Iran and the UN Security Council's permanent members—Britain, China, France, Russia, and the US—plus Germany, imposed restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. The deal collapsed after the US withdrew unilaterally in 2018 under former President Donald Trump, reinstating heavy sanctions. Despite European pledges to uphold the agreement, efforts to counter US sanctions proved ineffective, forcing many Western companies to exit Iran and worsening its economic crisis. 'The European parties have been at fault and negligent in implementing the nuclear agreement,' said Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei. The International Atomic Energy Agency reports that Iran is enriching uranium to 60%, far exceeding the 3.67% limit set by the 2015 deal and nearing the 90% threshold required for nuclear weapons. In recent weeks, France, Britain, and Germany have threatened to trigger the UN snapback mechanism to restore sanctions, accusing Iran of violating its commitments. Baqaei dismissed the move as 'meaningless, unjustifiable, and immoral,' arguing that Iran only scaled back compliance after Western nations failed to uphold their obligations. 'Iran's reduction of its commitments was carried out in accordance with the provisions outlined in the agreement,' he added. - AFP

Iran accuses Europeans of not respecting 2015 nuclear deal
Iran accuses Europeans of not respecting 2015 nuclear deal

Free Malaysia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Iran accuses Europeans of not respecting 2015 nuclear deal

Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60%. (Atomic Energy Organization of Iran/AP pic) TEHRAN : Tehran today accused Britain, France and Germany of failing to respect the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, after they threatened to re-impose sanctions over its atomic programme. The 2015 deal, reached between Iran and the UN Security Council's permanent members – Britain, China, France, Russia and the US – plus Germany imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. But it unravelled when the US in 2018, during Donald Trump's first term as president, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and re-imposed sweeping sanctions. The Europeans had pledged continued support for the deal, but the mechanism intended to offset US sanctions never materialised effectively and many western firms were forced to exit Iran, which has since faced a deepening economic crisis. 'The European parties have been at fault and negligent in implementing' the nuclear agreement, said Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei. The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60% – far beyond the 3.67% cap set by the 2015 accord. That is a short step from the 90% required for a nuclear weapon. In recent weeks, France, Britain and Germany have threatened to trigger the UN snapback mechanism to re-impose sanctions on Tehran, accusing Iran of breaching its nuclear commitments. Using this clause 'is meaningless, unjustifiable and immoral', Baqaei told a news conference, arguing that Iran only began distancing itself from the agreement in response to western non-compliance. 'Iran's reduction of its commitments was carried out in accordance with the provisions outlined in the agreement,' the foreign ministry spokesman added.

Anwar: Malaysia will not bow to external pressure that undermines national policy
Anwar: Malaysia will not bow to external pressure that undermines national policy

Malaysian Reserve

time12 hours ago

  • Malaysian Reserve

Anwar: Malaysia will not bow to external pressure that undermines national policy

PUTRAJAYA — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (picture) has stressed that Malaysia will not bow to pressure that could undermine national policies, including negotiations with the s. He said that although investment and trade with the US are significant, Malaysia has a 'red line' in negotiations — namely the Bumiputera policy — which must not be compromised, even if it is perceived as 'discriminatory' by external parties. In addition, Anwar, who is also the finance minister, stated that procurement and opportunities for local companies must also be protected in negotiations with the US. He added that Malaysia's approach is more thorough and firm in order to safeguard national interests, while continuing to strengthen trade relations with other countries, including China and ASEAN, as a step to expand market access. 'That is our red line in negotiations (on tariffs), which is why our approach is more careful and firm. 'We must continue to trade and engage well with all countries, but no country should be allowed to impose conditions that pressure us,' he said during a monthly meeting with staff of the Prime Minister's Department (JPM) here today. Anwar said that his close ties with world leaders, particularly in Brazil and Egypt, have opened up strategic economic opportunities for Malaysia to strengthen its economic resilience. He stated that as a result of his good relationship with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Petronas was invited to participate in oil exploration and production in the country, while Yinson Holdings is involved in the construction of oil and gas vessels for the Brazilian and Peruvian markets. 'The involvement of Malaysian companies was made easier due to our strong friendship. In addition to increased trade with BRICS countries (the economic bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), Malaysia is opening new networks for the country's survival, (as we) cannot rely on just one country,' he said. In Egypt, Anwar said his relationship with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi also yielded positive results, with the Egyptian government granting Proton the opportunity to make the country a production hub for the north African market. This has also contributed to a 34 per cent increase in trade with Egypt within a year. — BERNAMA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store