logo
UK sanctions Russian intelligence officers behind deadly attack on Mariupol theatre in Ukraine

UK sanctions Russian intelligence officers behind deadly attack on Mariupol theatre in Ukraine

The UK has sanctioned Russian military intelligence units and officers that it said were behind preparations for a 2022 bomb attack on a theatre in southern Ukraine that killed hundreds of civilians.
Britain's foreign ministry said it sanctioned 18 officers working for Russian military intelligence, known as the GRU, along with three units.
It said the officers were also accused of targeting the family of a former Russian spy who was later poisoned in the UK with a nerve agent.
More than 70 different attacks since 2022 have been attributed to Russia by Western officials, who said the goal was to sow chaos across Europe, undermine European societies, and erode support for Ukraine.
The Associated Press has tracked the alleged sabotage and disruption, ranging from cyber attacks and propaganda to arson and attempted assassination.
Britain's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said part of that campaign likely included accessing CCTV cameras near military facilities, ports, train stations, and border crossings in Ukraine, Moldova, and 11 NATO countries — including in the US — to track foreign aid shipments to Ukraine.
"GRU spies are running a campaign to destabilise Europe, undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and threaten the safety of British citizens," UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said.
On March 15, 2022, shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine, Unit 26165 carried out online reconnaissance on civilian bomb shelters in Mariupol, southern Ukraine, and in Kharkiv in eastern Ukraine, the FCDO said.
One of the targets was the Mariupol theatre, where civilians sheltering from Russian bombs had painted the word "children" on the exterior, in the hope of sparing them.
The next day, the theatre was hit by Russian air strikes that killed many people, including children, according to an Associated Press investigation.
Ukrainian officials said as many as 300 people may have been killed in the bombing.
In 2013, officers from the same unit used malware to target email accounts belonging to the daughter of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal, the foreign ministry said.
In 2018, Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with the nerve agent Novichok in the English city of Salisbury, in an attack the British government said was organised by Russian intelligence.
The FCDO said Unit 26165 was a "highly sophisticated, well-established cyber actor which conducts both advanced intelligence gathering and hack-and-leak operations" that target Ukraine, European, and NATO nations.
It said Unit 26165 was likely behind operations to target organisations in the UK, Netherlands, and Switzerland investigating the poisoning of the Skripals in 2018.
Another unit — Unit 74455 — also attempted to disrupt investigations into the attack on the Skripals in 2018 by attempting cyber intrusions on the British foreign ministry and the UK's Defence, Science and Technology laboratory, the ministry said.
Unit 26165 has been conducting cyber operations against the West for at least a decade, and the ministry said it was also likely behind the hack on the Democratic National Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the US in 2016, on French President Emmanuel Macron's election campaign in 2017, and on the 2024 Paris Olympic Games.
The UK's National Cyber Security Center said the GRU was also behind malware specifically designed to enable access to Microsoft user accounts hosted in the cloud.
Friday's sanctions also targeted African Initiative, which the foreign ministry said employed Russian intelligence officers to carry out information operations in Africa, including undermining public health programs and destabilising various countries.
Although targeting GRU officers with sanctions was likely to have limited effect, the foreign ministry said the goal was to raise awareness of Russia's campaign and raise the cost to individuals working for its services, including making it harder for them to travel.
The FCDO gave no details, but its sanctions normally involve asset freezes and travel bans.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge update on 5 year neighbour dispute over untrimmed hedge
Huge update on 5 year neighbour dispute over untrimmed hedge

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Huge update on 5 year neighbour dispute over untrimmed hedge

A UK couple has won a bitter neighbour dispute over an untrimmed hedge after five years of furious feuding. Keith Smith, 71, and his wife Julie, 68, were locked in a feud with their neighbours in Prestonfield, Edinburgh, over the height of a hedge, The Sun reports. The Smiths claimed the untrimmed cypress trees, belonging to David Hunter and Niena Hunter Mistry, made their lives a misery. The row of trees sparked a five-year battle between the two couples. The neighbour war grew so bitter that it involved the Edinburgh City Council, the Scottish Government and even the police. The Smiths claim the trees cast a shadow across their garden, forcing the pensioners to live out their retirement in darkness. Demanding the trees be chopped down, the Smiths turned to the local authority but were left frustrated when they were refused. The couple paid a massive £350 ($A712) fee for a High Hedge Notice application which was denied after a visit from a city council officer. Appealing the decision, the Smiths won and managed to successfully have the trees trimmed back to 8.5ft in 2023. After the bush was trimmed the Smiths claim that gaps where the tree once stood were suddenly replaced by gardening tools, including ladders, pipes and concrete. The pair went on to claim the trim was inadequate and called for the council to come back, which they did and agreed that the remaining trees should be further cut back. Mr Hunter left a single tree standing untrimmed however which he claimed was not part of the 'boundary hedge' and therefore not subject to the High Hedge Notice. The Smiths then insisted the remaining tree be cut back too with the dispute turning ugly again. The couple, who have lived in their home for 44 years, continued their brutal battle to have the foliage lopped back. Things got so bad that in June of last year the police were called to the quiet suburb where they issued 'two men' with 'recorded police warnings'. Mr Smith previously claimed to Edinburgh Live his neighbours' behaviour had been 'atrocious' and branded the couple's actions 'absolutely appalling'. The hedge owners refused to chop down their bush and claimed they felt harassed and intimidated by the Smiths. The Smiths previously said: 'We, the Smiths, have suffered hugely financially, emotionally and physically by this process and sincerely hope, this will now lead to resolution.' An appeal launched by Mr Hunter in a bid to save his tree was rejected and the last remaining part of the hedge will now have to be cut back to 8.5ft. Mr Hunter insisted the remaining tree was not part of the hedge and begged that it be allowed to stand. He said in a document seen by the Mail Online: 'The individual tree identified in the varied notice cannot reasonably be said to be part of the boundary hedge. 'It appears as a separate individual tree and has never been trimmed. 'We would be very grateful if you would take all our points and concerns into account and request that you quash the revised high hedge notice.' Despite his pleas Mr Hunter was ordered to cut back the remaining piece of his hedge to 8.5ft in line with the previous High Hedge Notice. The Smiths were delighted after a government official stated the tree did in fact cast a shadow over a 'significant' portion of their garden. The official also stated the previous High Hedge Notice applied to the whole hedge, including the remaining tree. Despite the best efforts of Mr Hunter the government official ruled the hedge damaged the Smith's enjoyment of their home. The government ruled the remaining part of the hedge is now subject to the High Hedge Notice and should be trimmed to 8.5ft.

Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals
Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals

After keeping Donald Trump happy with a pledge to up defence spending at NATO's summit, Europe is now bracing for a key decision from the US president on the future of American forces on the continent. Washington is currently conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide -- set to be unveiled in coming months -- and the expectation is it will lead to drawdowns in Europe. That prospect is fraying the nerves of US allies, especially as fears swirl that Russia could look to attack a NATO country within the next few years if the war in Ukraine dies down. However, the alliance is basking in Trump's newfound goodwill following its June summit in The Hague, and his officials are making encouraging noises that Europe will not be left in the lurch. "We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe," said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, adding he expected the review to come out in "late summer, early fall". "I have daily conversations with our allies about the process," he said. While successive US governments have mulled scaling back in Europe to focus more on China, Trump has insisted more forcefully than his predecessors that the continent should handle its own defence. "There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe," said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. "The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast." When Trump returned to office in January many felt he was about to blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. But the vibe in NATO circles is now far more upbeat than those desperate days. "There's a sanguine mood, a lot of guesswork, but the early signals are quite positive," one senior European diplomat told AFP, talking as others on condition of anonymity. "Certainly no panic or doom and gloom." - 'Inevitable' - The Pentagon says there are nearly 85,000 US military personnel in Europe -- a number that has fluctuated between 75,000 and 105,000 since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. "I think it is inevitable that they pull out some of their forces," a second European diplomat told AFP. "But I don't expect this to be like a dramatic overhaul. I think it's going to be gradual. I think it's going to be based on consultations." Trump's first target is likely to be the troops left over from a surge ordered by his predecessor Joe Biden after Moscow's tanks rolled into Ukraine. Officials say relocating the rump of that 20,000-strong deployment would not hurt NATO's deterrence too much -- but alarm bells would ring if Trump looked to cut too deep into personnel numbers or close key bases. The issue is not just troop numbers -- the US has capabilities such as air defences, long-range missiles and satellite surveillance that allies would struggle to replace in the short-term. "The kinds of defence investments by Europe that are being made coming out of The Hague summit may only be felt in real capability terms over many years," said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund think tank. "So the question of timing really does matter." - 'Inopportune moment' - Washington's desire to pull back from Europe may be tempered by Trump now taking a tougher line with Russia -- and Moscow's reluctance to bow to his demands to end the Ukraine war. "It seems an inopportune moment to send signals of weakness and reductions in the American security presence in Europe," Lesser said. He also pointed to Trump's struggles during his first term to pull troops out of Germany -- the potential bill for relocating them along with political resistance in Washington scuppering the plan. While European diplomats are feeling more confident than before about the troop review, they admit nothing can be certain with the mercurial US president. Other issues such as Washington's trade negotiations with the EU could rock transatlantic ties in the meantime and upend the good vibes. "It seems positive for now," said a third European diplomat. "But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease will start in 2026. To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage." del/ec/jxb/tc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store