logo
UK sanctions Russian intelligence officers behind deadly attack on Mariupol theatre in Ukraine

UK sanctions Russian intelligence officers behind deadly attack on Mariupol theatre in Ukraine

The UK has sanctioned Russian military intelligence units and officers that it said were behind preparations for a 2022 bomb attack on a theatre in southern Ukraine that killed hundreds of civilians.
Britain's foreign ministry said it sanctioned 18 officers working for Russian military intelligence, known as the GRU, along with three units.
It said the officers were also accused of targeting the family of a former Russian spy who was later poisoned in the UK with a nerve agent.
More than 70 different attacks since 2022 have been attributed to Russia by Western officials, who said the goal was to sow chaos across Europe, undermine European societies, and erode support for Ukraine.
The Associated Press has tracked the alleged sabotage and disruption, ranging from cyber attacks and propaganda to arson and attempted assassination.
Britain's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said part of that campaign likely included accessing CCTV cameras near military facilities, ports, train stations, and border crossings in Ukraine, Moldova, and 11 NATO countries — including in the US — to track foreign aid shipments to Ukraine.
"GRU spies are running a campaign to destabilise Europe, undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and threaten the safety of British citizens," UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said.
On March 15, 2022, shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine, Unit 26165 carried out online reconnaissance on civilian bomb shelters in Mariupol, southern Ukraine, and in Kharkiv in eastern Ukraine, the FCDO said.
One of the targets was the Mariupol theatre, where civilians sheltering from Russian bombs had painted the word "children" on the exterior, in the hope of sparing them.
The next day, the theatre was hit by Russian air strikes that killed many people, including children, according to an Associated Press investigation.
Ukrainian officials said as many as 300 people may have been killed in the bombing.
In 2013, officers from the same unit used malware to target email accounts belonging to the daughter of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal, the foreign ministry said.
In 2018, Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with the nerve agent Novichok in the English city of Salisbury, in an attack the British government said was organised by Russian intelligence.
The FCDO said Unit 26165 was a "highly sophisticated, well-established cyber actor which conducts both advanced intelligence gathering and hack-and-leak operations" that target Ukraine, European, and NATO nations.
It said Unit 26165 was likely behind operations to target organisations in the UK, Netherlands, and Switzerland investigating the poisoning of the Skripals in 2018.
Another unit — Unit 74455 — also attempted to disrupt investigations into the attack on the Skripals in 2018 by attempting cyber intrusions on the British foreign ministry and the UK's Defence, Science and Technology laboratory, the ministry said.
Unit 26165 has been conducting cyber operations against the West for at least a decade, and the ministry said it was also likely behind the hack on the Democratic National Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the US in 2016, on French President Emmanuel Macron's election campaign in 2017, and on the 2024 Paris Olympic Games.
The UK's National Cyber Security Center said the GRU was also behind malware specifically designed to enable access to Microsoft user accounts hosted in the cloud.
Friday's sanctions also targeted African Initiative, which the foreign ministry said employed Russian intelligence officers to carry out information operations in Africa, including undermining public health programs and destabilising various countries.
Although targeting GRU officers with sanctions was likely to have limited effect, the foreign ministry said the goal was to raise awareness of Russia's campaign and raise the cost to individuals working for its services, including making it harder for them to travel.
The FCDO gave no details, but its sanctions normally involve asset freezes and travel bans.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Families sent wrong bodies after Air India disaster
Families sent wrong bodies after Air India disaster

News.com.au

time5 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Families sent wrong bodies after Air India disaster

Families of UK residents killed in last month's Air India disaster have been sent the wrong bodies in repatriation blunders. The Daily Mail reports that at least two cases of mistaken identity had come to light, with one family having to abandon a funeral after being informed their coffin contained an unknown body. In another case, a coffin contained 'co-mingled' remains of more than one person killed in the flight 171 crash at Ahmedabad in western India on June 12. The scandal has sparked top-level inquiries in both the UK and India, the Mail reports, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to raise concerns with counterpart Narendra Modi this week. There were 52 British citizens killed among the 261 people who died after the plane lost power and crashed into a residential area soon after it lifted off to fly to London. All but one of the 242 people on board died as well as 19 people on the ground. Aviation lawyer James Healy-Pratt has been engaged to represent UK-based people impacted by the tragedy, with the remains of 12 people repatriated so far. 'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back,' he told the Mail. 'But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this. 'It has been going on for a couple of weeks (and) I think these families deserve an explanation.' Mr Healy-Pratt said the family which had received the wrong body had been left 'in limbo' since the devastating discovery was made. '(They) have no one to bury because it was the wrong person in their casket. 'And if isn't their relative, the question is, who is it in that coffin? Presumably it's another passenger and their relatives have been given the wrong remains. 'The coroner also has a problem because she has an unidentified person in her jurisdiction.' Investigations continue into how the disaster unfolded, with mounting attention on the actions of lead pilot Captain Sumeet Sabharwal. Some experts who have reviewed the initial report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) believe a pilot on turned off two switches controlling fuel flow to the plane's engines. The first was moved three seconds after lift off and the other one second later, the AAIB report found, before being turned back on a further 10 seconds later. Fingers have been pointed at Captain Sabharwal because his younger co-pilot, Clive Kunder, would have had his 'hands full' while flying the plane. Air India's inspection of the locking feature on the fuel control switches of its existing Boeing 787 aircraft found no issues, an internal communication circulated within the airline said on July 17. India's aviation regulator ordered the country's airlines this week to investigate the locking feature on the switches of several Boeing models. The order came after Boeing notified operators that the fuel switch locks on its jets were safe. However, it was in line with a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2018, which recommended inspection of the locks to ensure they could not be moved accidentally. Air India's probe found no problems with the locking mechanism. 'Over the weekend, our Engineering team initiated precautionary inspections on the locking mechanism of Fuel Control Switch (FCS) on all our Boeing 787 aircraft,' the airline's flight operations department said in a communication to its pilots. 'The inspections have been completed and no issues were found.' A spokesperson for the UK government told the Mail formal identification of the bodies was a 'matter for the Indian authorities'. 'We understand that this is an extremely distressing time for the families, and our thoughts remain with them,' they said. – with AFP.

Thousands protest legislation that weakens anti-corruption agencies in Ukraine
Thousands protest legislation that weakens anti-corruption agencies in Ukraine

ABC News

time5 hours ago

  • ABC News

Thousands protest legislation that weakens anti-corruption agencies in Ukraine

Thousands of people gathered in Kyiv and other cities across Ukraine to urge President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to veto a controversial bill that threatens anti-corruption infrastructure. It marked the largest public protests against the government in more than three years of war. Many protesters carried signs reading "Veto the law", "Protect the anti-corruption system, protect Ukraine's future", or simply "We are against it". On Tuesday, Ukraine's parliament passed legislation that will tighten oversight of two key anti-corruption agencies, which critics say could significantly weaken their independence and autonomy and give Mr Zelenskyy's circle more control over investigations. The changes would grant the prosecutor general new authority over investigations and cases handled by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO). "In effect, if this bill becomes law, the head of SAPO will become a nominal figure, while NABU will lose its independence and turn into a subdivision of the prosecutor general's office," the agencies said in a joint statement on Telegram. The legislation's passage triggered public outrage in Ukraine, with some saying it appeared to be a greater moral blow than the routine Russian drone and missile attacks. Some protesters accused Ukraine's leadership of prioritising loyalty and personal connections over the fight against corruption. "Those who swore to protect the laws and the Constitution have instead chosen to shield their inner circle, even at the expense of Ukrainian democracy," said veteran Oleh Symoroz, sitting in a wheelchair because both his legs were amputated after he was wounded in 2022. "Instead of setting an example of zero tolerance for corruption, the president is using his power to take control of criminal cases involving his allies," he said. The legislation has also drawn sharp criticism from the heads of both agencies and a top EU official. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's bid to join the European Union and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid. In a post on X, the EU's Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern over the vote in the parliament, called the Rada, calling it "a serious step back". "Independent bodies like NABU & SAPO are essential for Ukraine's EU path. Rule of Law remains in the very center of EU accession negotiations," Ms Kos added. The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticised parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners. The group urged Mr Zelenskyy to veto the law, warning that otherwise he would share responsibility with the Rada for "dismantling Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure". On Monday, Ukraine's domestic security agency detained two NABU officials on suspicion of links to Russia and searched other agency employees on unrelated allegations. Last week, Mr Zelenskyy reshuffled his wartime cabinet in a move widely seen as centralising power within his inner circle. AP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store