Jesse Watters' Dig At Simone Biles Hits A New Low — And It's ‘Incredibly Damaging'
Fox News host Jesse Watters recently shared his two cents about a public dispute between Simone Biles and right-wing activist Riley Gaines — and he decided to take a shot at Biles' mental health in the process.
During a segment of 'The Five' on Wednesday night, Watters chided Biles as 'mentally weak' in a conversation about the gymnastics star, who recently criticized Gaines for bullying a teenage softball player, who is transgender. Gaines, a former NCAA swimmer, shared a picture on X, formerly Twitter, of the teenager posing with her team. Gaines misgendered the young athlete and complained that the comments on the photo were turned off.
Biles, the most decorated gymnast of all time, responded on X by calling Gaines 'truly sick' and a 'sore loser' — a reference to Gaines tying for fifth place in a 2022 NCAA Division I national championship race against swimmer Lia Thomas, who is transgender. Gaines was among more than a dozen athletes who sued the NCAA in 2024 for Thomas' inclusion in the national championships.
The Olympic gold medalist said that Gaines should be 'uplifting the trans community' and trying to make sports more inclusive.
'Bully someone your own size, which would ironically be a male,' Biles wrote in another post.
Gaines, for her part, referenced Biles' sexual abuse case against disgraced sports doctor Larry Nassar (who was convicted of sexually abusing female gymnasts) before writing in a post: 'Yet [Biles] believes women should be forced to strip naked in front of men to validate the man's feelings.'
Biles, not Gaines, later apologized for getting personal in the online clash.
On 'The Five,' Watters mocked Biles for the apology, comparing it to Elon Musk's recent change of tune after engaging in an explosive online spat with President Donald Trump last week.
Watters jeered that he would refrain from criticizing the gymnastics icon too much in the event she decides to compete in the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles. 'I just want to lay back and hope she trains for L.A.,' he said.
'If we start messing with her head, she's mentally weak — remember the one time she...' he continued, while moving his finger in a circular motion by his head — a common gesture used to criticize someone's mental state.
Biles has become an advocate for mental health awareness after she withdrew from several competitions at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics, citing concerns for her mental and physical well-being. The gymnastics star shared that she was struggling with a disorientation issue that gymnasts sometimes experience, known as the 'twisties.'
Watters' dismissal of Biles' efforts to focus on her mental health is 'incredibly damaging,' said Monica Cwynar, a licensed clinical social worker with Thriveworks, who specializes in trauma and coping skills.
'It undermines her strength and courage in addressing these issues,' she said. 'Mental health struggles are complex and often invisible, and equating them with weakness perpetuates harmful stereotypes that frankly just aren't true. This is the type of narrative that prevents people from seeking help.'
Cwynar said that Biles faces heightened challenges as a Black female athlete in a predominantly white sport.
'For Black athletes, the pressure to perform can be compounded by societal expectations and biases,' she said. 'Biles' experience with 'twisties' highlights that prioritizing mental well-being is essential for performance, and it should be seen as a strength rather than a flaw.'
Cwynar, a former gymnast herself, also emphasized how dangerous it would have been for Biles to compete while experiencing such disorientation. 'It could have ended with an injury that could have ended her career,' she said.
Comments like what the Fox News host spewed on TV are likely to make people 'less likely to seek help or share their own struggles,' Cwynar said.
And for Biles, these remarks can exacerbate any feelings of 'isolation or shame' that she may have experienced — 'especially considering the added scrutiny she faces as a Black athlete in a field that often overlooks the mental health needs of marginalized individuals,' she said.
Watters' attacks on Biles help to create a 'culture where being vulnerable is seen as a weakness, which can have negative implications for mental health awareness,' Cwynar added.
It's a 'common tactic in debates that rely on personal attacks,' Cwynar said. 'This approach deflects from the actual topic and shifts focus to character criticism.'
Cwynar also said that 'given the racial dynamics at play,' Watters' remarks could reflect an underlying bias, since 'Black individuals often face heightened scrutiny.'
'This tactic aims to delegitimize her struggles and could perpetuate the idea that Black athletes are less competent or resilient, which is another insidious stereotype,' she said.
Cwynar explained that she would encourage anyone who faces scrutiny or mockery for their mental health struggles to 'engage positively with their mental health journey through support networks or professional help can empower them.'
As for Biles, Cwynar commended the gymnastics star for drawing attention to mental health awareness.
'She has helped many people get into treatment,' she said, 'and that's a win for us all.'
Nancy Mace Missed 1 Glaring Fact When She Insulted Simone Biles
Simone Biles Apologizes To Riley Gaines, Calls For Inclusion And Respect In Sports
Simone Biles Slams Riley Gaines' 'Truly Sick' Anti-Trans Talk: 'Straight Up Sore Loser!'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement
The NCAA settlement has given rise to worries that schools will cut so-called 'non-revenue' sports, including lacrosse, swimming or gymnastics, to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. The NCAA settlement has given rise to worries that schools will cut so-called 'non-revenue' sports, including lacrosse, swimming or gymnastics, to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Photograph: C Morgan Engel/College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair. Eight female athletes filed an appeal this week, arguing the agreement violates Title IX, the US law banning sex-based discrimination in education. They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men's basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn. Advertisement Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year. However, the NCAA's new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly starting 1 July will still go ahead. So what does this all mean for athletes as well as the future of college sports? Here's what's going on … What is the NCAA settlement about? The NCAA agreed to pay $2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), including things like video game appearances, jersey sales, or social media sponsorships. The settlement covers athletes going back to 2016. Advertisement It also clears the way for a major change: beginning 1 July 2025, colleges will be allowed to directly share revenue with current players, up to $20.5 million per school per year. It's a major shift from the NCAA's traditional amateurism model, which argued that athletes should only be compensated with scholarships, not salaries or endorsement income. Who's appealing the deal and why? Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal. Their names include Kacie Breeding (Vanderbilt) and Kate Johnson (Virginia), along with six athletes from the College of Charleston. Advertisement They argue the deal violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Specifically, they say the settlement gives up to 90% of the money to men in football and basketball, depriving women of $1.1bn in rightful compensation. What is Title IX and how does it apply here? Title IX is a 1972 US law requiring equal access and treatment for men and women in federally funded education programs, including athletics. Colleges must offer comparable resources, scholarships and participation opportunities across men's and women's sports. The female athletes argue that since NIL bans affected both genders equally, compensation for those bans must also be equitable, and that using historical TV revenue (which favors men's sports) ignores systemic barriers women have faced in marketing and media exposure. What did the judge say about the Title IX argument? US district judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week and rejected Title IX-based objections, saying they fell outside the scope of the antitrust case. The female athletes disagree and are now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene. What happens to the money in the meantime? Because of the appeal, no back pay will be distributed until the court rules. That delay could last several months or longer. According to the NCAA's lead attorney, the organization will continue funding the settlement pool, but the money will sit untouched until the case is resolved. Why is most of the money going to men's football and basketball players? The current payout formula is based on historical media revenue and licensing data. Because football and men's basketball generated the majority of money for schools – especially through TV contracts – those athletes stand to receive the most compensation. Advertisement Critics say that approach bakes in decades of inequality, because women were denied the same marketing exposure and investment in the first place. What are the broader concerns about this settlement? Some worry that schools will cut so-called 'non-revenue' sports – like wrestling, swimming or gymnastics – to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Others fear this pushes college sports closer to a professional minor league system, undermining education and competitive balance. Still others say that without clear Title IX guidance, women may continue to be marginalized even in a post-amateurism era. What happens next? The Ninth Circuit will now review the appeal. Briefs are due by 3 October, and while both sides say they'll push for speed, appeals in this court have been known to take 12 to 18 months. Until the case is resolved, no back payments will be made to athletes who played between 2016 and 2021. But the revenue-sharing era is coming, whether or not the NCAA is ready for it.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
NBA star Kevin Durant's custom Oklahoma City townhome hits the market — starting at $35
NBA star Kevin Durant's custom Oklahoma City townhome hits the market — starting at $35 Show Caption Hide Caption Which NBA stars do we expect to see in the 2028 Olympics? LeBron James, Steph Curry and Kevin Durant led Team USA to another gold at the Paris Olympics, and it's a good thing because the team will look VERY different in 2028. But which stars can we expect to see back? An Oklahoma City townhome formerly owned by NBA star Kevin Durant is on the market once more, but the price will surprise you. This three-story, custom townhome in the historic Deep Deuce neighborhood was designed by Durant during his time with the Oklahoma City Thunder has been listed on Redfin with a starting price of only $35. Yes, you read that right. Ieasha Larkpor, managing broker for Thunder Team Realty, said the current homeowners didn't want to put an asking price on the home — instead, they want interested buyers to get with their real estate agent and prepare their own offer for the home. Pre-approved buyers can schedule a tour of the home, and an open house will be held every Sunday each week until it sells, Larkpor said. Here's what to know about the home. Famous real estate: 40 celebrities and athletes who call this Florida county home Former home of Kevin Durant for sale Inside the nearly 4,000 square-foot home, you'll find a basement-level two-car garage with a private elevator that goes to all three floors of the townhome. The home has two kitchens, four bedrooms and three-and-a-half bathrooms. Durant purchased the home in 2013 and converted it and the neighboring townhome into a single home. The homes have since been separated and sold separately, with a kitchen being added back into the 420 townhome along with other modifications required after Durant's renovations.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge approves NCAA House Settlement allowing schools to pay players
The post Judge approves NCAA House Settlement allowing schools to pay players appeared first on ClutchPoints. The landscape of college sports has been in constant change over the last few years, and now a major development has taken place that will ensure it is never the same again. On Friday night, Judge Claudia Wilken approved the House settlement in the House vs. NCAA lawsuit. Advertisement The biggest point in the settlement is that it now allows schools to pay their own athletes, instead of all payment having to go through NIL collectives. This ruling doesn't end the controversy about whether athletes are considered employees of the universities that they play for, but schools being able to pay them is a massive development in the ongoing debate. Schools will be able to pay athletes $20.5 million over the course of the year, with a decided split in which sports get how much money, according to Pete Nakos of On3 Sports. 'Beginning July 1, schools will be able to share $20.5 million with athletes, with football expected to receive 75%, followed by men's basketball (15%), women's basketball (5%) and the remainder of sports (5%),' Nakos wrote. 'The amount shared in revenue will increase annually.' That means that football programs will have about $15 million, give or take, to spend on their rosters. Advertisement The settlement will also introduce roster limits, which was a big sticking point between the two sides over the course of the last few months. Those roster limits will be grandfathered in, a stipulation that Wilkin required in order to go through with the approval of the settlement. On Friday night, NCAA president Charlie Baker released a letter titled 'A new beginning for Division I student-athletes and the NCAA.' 'Approving the agreement reached by the NCAA, the defendant conferences and student-athletes in the settlement opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports,' part of the letter read. 'This new framework that enables schools to provide direct financial benefits to student-athletes and establishes clear and specific rules to regulate third-party NIL agreements marks a huge step forward for college sports.' How this settlement affects the teams on the field and the court in 2025-26 remains to be seen, but there is no question that this massive change will impact the way that college sports work forever. Related: Former NCAA athletes to be paid $2.8 billion for lost NIL earnings Related: Former MLB exec to be new head of College Sports Commission