Keezhadi excavation report under review, time bracket not justified: Minister
Culture Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat said the time bracket of 8th-5th century BCE given for Period 1 in the report was 'not justified at all'. 'For the earliest period in the present state of our knowledge we can, at the maximum, suggest it originates somewhere in pre-300 BC,' he said in an annexure attached with the response to a question by DMK MP T Sumathy.
Keezhadi is an ancient site in Tamil Nadu's Sivaganga district, about 12 km from Madurai. Over a decade ago, Amarnath Ramakrishna, ASI's then Superintending Archaeologist, led excavations at the site that unearthed evidence of a sophisticated urban society.
According to the Keezhadi report, carbon dating had revealed the objects to be over 2,160 years old, corresponding to the Sangam era in Tamil history. It classified the site's history into three periods — Pre-Early Historic (8th-5th century BCE), Mature Early Historic (5th-1st century BCE) and Early Historic (1st century BCE-3rd century CE).
The report triggered a controversy between the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government and the NDA-ruled Centre, after the ASI, which comes under the Union Ministry of Culture, asked Ramakrishna to review his report. The DMK saw this as an attempt by the Centre to pressure Ramakrishna to 'change' his findings.
DMK MP Sumathy had asked the Ministry if the Keezhadi report prepared was officially reviewed by the Government after submission in June 2025, seeking details of the specific deficiencies cited by the Government or ASI leading to its rejection.
In his reply, Shekhawat said: 'Keezhadi excavation has been conducted under the aegis of ASI and a report of lead archaeologist is under review. The comments of experts have been shared with the lead archaeologist, which are still to be finalised.' However, the minister added, 'there is no practice of rejecting a report'.
In the annexure, which details excerpts from experts' observations, on the basis of which Ramakrishna has been asked to review the report, Shekhawat said the 'missing details' require the village map to be redrawn and the cultural period to be reoriented as specified, among other things.
'As per experts suggestion: a) the nomenclatures of the three periods require change; b) the time bracket of 8th century BC to 5th century BCE given for Period 1 is not justified at all; c) The other two periods should also be determined on the basis of scientific AMS dates and the material recovered in view of stratigraphical details. For the earliest period in the present state of our knowledge we can, at the maximum, suggest that it originates somewhere in pre-300 BCE…' the annexure said.
On June 10, Shekhawat had said further studies were needed to validate the ASI findings on an ancient civilisation at Keezhadi.
In response to another question by DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran, the Ministry informed Parliament Monday that ASI has not requested any 'revised report' on the site from the Tamil Nadu State Department of Archaeology.
Maran also asked details of the 'additional excavation phases and funding support' by ASI for the tenth phase of Keezhadi excavation that began on June 18, 2024, which has already 'identified six terracotta pipelines and various urban settlement structures'. To this, Shekhawat replied: 'Question does not arise.'
Divya A reports on travel, tourism, culture and social issues - not necessarily in that order - for The Indian Express. She's been a journalist for over a decade now, working with Khaleej Times and The Times of India, before settling down at Express. Besides writing/ editing news reports, she indulges her pen to write short stories. As Sanskriti Prabha Dutt Fellow for Excellence in Journalism, she is researching on the lives of the children of sex workers in India. ... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
DMK updates app after Madras HC order, OTP not needed now
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court on Monday passed the interim order, directing DMK not to carry out OTP-based verification to enrol members. The order was based on a PIL that raised concerns over data protection and privacy. 'The nervousness of AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami to block our party's membership drive shows just how far the campaign has reached among the people,' he said. However, Bharathi said the court refused to ban the membership drive but allowed it to carry it out without OTP. He said people are coming forward to enrol as members themselves due to the welfare schemes and good governance of the Dravidian Model government. 'OTP was just a procedure for confirmation. However, respecting the court's direction, the party cadre have been asked to go ahead with the membership drive through alternative procedure.' In revised guidelines to the party cadre, he said although OTP verification is not needed in the mobile application used for the campaign, collecting of mobile numbers and ensuring them that they are not wrong are important.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Ideology permanent, alliances poll-driven: AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami
THANJAVUR: AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami said his party's ideology is different from that of its allies. 'Alliance is formed during elections to consolidate votes for the victory of the candidates, whereas ideology is permanent. We would not compromise our ideology,' he said. Campaigning at Papanasam, an Assembly constituency with a considerable population of minority community on Tuesday, Palaniswami said AIADMK is a party beyond caste and religious considerations, and its cadre are from all castes and religions. They are also united, he added. Addressing weavers at a hotel in Kumbakonam, the opposition leader assured that if AIADMK comes to power, a handloom silk saree will be given under the 'gold for thaali' scheme. Meanwhile at Tiruvaiyaru, he said if the party forms the government, a saree will be given to women on the occasion of Deepavali from 2026 onwards. Speaking at Thanjavur, the opposition leader said Chief Minister M K Stalin, his ministers, DMK office-bearers and its allies are creating a narrative as if parliamentary election will be held next year. 'They are criticising BJP as there is nothing for them to point out against AIADMK', he added. Justifying AIADMK's alliance with BJP, EPS asked what's wrong with aligning with BJP. 'We can form alliance with any party of our choice,' he said, adding their aim is to dislodge the DMK government.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
TN ordered to maintain status quo on removal of flagpoles of parties
Senior counsel N G R Prasad, who represented Shanmugam, told the bench that the issue involves the rights of political parties, communal bodies or associations etc. To ensure that an opportunity of hearing is provided to all political parties, communal and religious associations etc., before taking a final decision on the matter, the full bench therefore directed the chief secretary of TN to issue a public notification enabling the political parties, communal parties or associations etc., to file impleading petitions to get impleaded in the appeal. The notification should be published in two English and two Tamil dailies that have wide circulation across the state, on or before July 25, the judges added. The impleading petitions should be filed on or before August 5, they further said, and adjourned the matter to August 6. After Prasad expressed fear that existing flagpoles may be removed in the meantime to implement the single judge's order, the judges ordered the government to maintain status quo until further orders.
