‘Soft resistance' involves using false statements to create misunderstanding about authorities, justice sec. says
Speaking to local media outlets in interviews published on Monday, the fifth anniversary of the Beijing-imposed national security law, Lam said methods of soft resistance may not always be illegal – but that did not mean they would not harm society.
He said there were three main elements of soft resistance – making false or misleading statements; expressing them irrationally and with emotional bias; and with the intention of creating misunderstanding about the Chinese and Hong Kong governments and their policies.
Lam's interview marks the first time authorities have explained what soft resistance is. Since 2021, Chinese and Hong Kong officials have cited the phrase as a threat to national security, but have not been specific about what it means.
The justice secretary said soft resistance was difficult to define, and the government would not use the label arbitrarily.
Ahead of the fifth anniversary of the Beijing-imposed national security law, high-ranking officials have given media interviews addressing 'soft resistance' in areas ranging from arts and culture to development and medicine.
The term was first used in 2021 by the then-director of China's Liaison Office in Hong Kong Luo Huining, who warned that Hong Kong must regulate 'soft resistance' in addition to cracking down on 'hard resistance.'
Last week, Chief Executive John Lee said in a press conference that soft resistance is 'real' and is 'lurking across different areas and different sectors.'
'Different views' still allowed
Speaking to HK01, Lam said citizens can have 'different views' about the government, including negative views, but such opinions must be based on 'objective facts.'
Soft resistance cannot be condoned, he told the media outlet.
'If it creates a negative impact, it would affect society's overall stability, hinder the building of consensus in society, and stand in the way of Hong Kong's collective effort of driving development,' he said in Chinese.
Just because not all soft resistance methods may be illegal, this did not mean that society could ignore them, he said.
'Not all issues in society should be addressed by legal means. [Legal means] are also not always the most effective way of handling [matters],' Lam said.
Beijing imposed a national security law in Hong Kong on June 30, 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest over a controversial extradition bill.
It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts, which were broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure.
The move gave police sweeping new powers, alarming democrats, civil society groups and trade partners, as such laws have been used broadly to silence and punish dissidents in China.
However, authorities say it has restored stability and peace to the city.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Armageddon scenario': UK made plan for mass Hong Kong exodus in handover run-up
The UK government prepared a secret contingency plan dubbed 'the Armageddon scenario' in the lead-up to the 1997 handover for the evacuation of millions of Hong Kong residents who might have wanted to flee the city, according to newly unsealed documents. The British national archive documents date back to 1989 in the period immediately preceding and following the Tiananmen Square crackdown. A number of scenarios and recommendations for UK authorities were outlined in the event Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule triggered an exodus of people from the city. The documents, which were made public on Tuesday UK time, stated that the United Kingdom could 'not handle a mass evacuation alone' and that other countries would need to help, highlighting the United States as 'particularly important'. Repeated references were made to the 'Official Group on Contingency Planning for Hong Kong', which was said to have been formed following then prime minister Margaret Thatcher's meeting with the governor of Hong Kong on June 8, 1989. The governor at the time was David Wilson. The internal communications, labelled 'secret', categorised the plan into three scenarios – green, amber and red.
HKFP
4 hours ago
- HKFP
Transgender people have right to use public toilets in line with their affirmed genders, Hong Kong court rules
Transgender people are entitled to use public toilets according to their affirmed genders, a Hong Kong court has ruled in a landmark legal challenge filed by a trans man. High Court Judge Russell Coleman said in a judgment delivered on Wednesday that the Public Conveniences (Conduct and Behaviour) Regulation (PCCBR), which makes it illegal for transgender people to enter public toilets in line with their gender identity, is unconstitutional. Coleman ruled that two relevant provisions of the law should be struck down but suspended the judgment for one year to allow the government to 'consider and implement the appropriate way to resolve the contravention.' According to provisions 7 and 9 of the PCCBR, no male person, other than a child under five who is accompanied by a female relative or nurse, can enter a public toilet allocated for women, and vice versa. Under the current law, authorities have the power to order any person violating the law to leave public toilets. Those who violate the law may be committing a criminal offence and will be fined up to HK$2,000. Judge Coleman ruled that those provisions contradicted Article 25 of the Basic Law, which states that all Hong Kong residents are equal before the law. The PCCBR only applies to public toilets managed by the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD). The High Court judgment did not touch upon the regulations of privately managed toilets accessible to the general public. K, the applicant in the judicial review, said in a Chinese-language statement released by his legal representatives on Wednesday afternoon that he began preparing the legal challenge six years ago. 'Today, my transgender friends who are still undergoing gender transitions and I can openly use public restrooms without fear of being denied,' he said. 'This is a progressive step towards a more gender-friendly environment in Hong Kong, and we hope that the judicial system in Hong Kong will gradually become more inclusive in the future.' K, who was assigned female at birth, has been receiving medical treatment, including hormonal treatment, since he was 19. When he filed the judicial review, he was waitlisted for sex reassignment surgery and still identified as 'female' in his Hong Kong Identity Card, according to the judgment. Daly & Associates, K's solicitors, called the ruling a 'victory' and 'another step forward on the long road towards equality for the LGBTQ+ community in Hong Kong.' 'We welcome this judgment as a significant milestone in the advancement of transgender rights in Hong Kong,' the solicitors said. 'We urge the Government not to continue perpetuating these injustices, but to take timely, proactive actions to protect fundamental human rights, including the right to protection from discrimination on the grounds of gender identity.' Transgender concern group Quarks urged the government to 'immediately strike down' the provisions, as well as to push legislation of gender recognition and to comprehensively review gender-related laws and policies. Definition of male and female During the judicial review, K also asked the government to revise the definitions of 'male' and 'female' in the PCCBR to include transgender people like himself. According to Wednesday's judgement, Coleman said it should be the legislature, not the court, that gives the definition. The Court of Final Appeal ruled in February 2023 that it was unconstitutional for the government to require transgender people to complete full sex reassignment surgery (SRS) before they could change the gender marker on their identity cards. In 2021, the Equality Opportunities Commission (EOC), Hong Kong's equality watchdog, called for legislation to provide for protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status. However, the government or the EOC has yet to introduce any proposals.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Rebalancing' needed in China-Europe relationship, chamber president says
This year marks half a century of formal diplomatic relations between China and the European Union, as well as the 25th anniversary of the founding of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China. In this entry of our series examining ties between the two powers, Ji Siqi speaks to the chamber's president about business sentiment in a tense period for global trade. Advertisement The president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China – the chief non-profit organisation advocating on behalf of the continent's businesses – has said the relationship between Beijing and Brussels has reached a tipping point, encouraging the two to realign their collaborative model and distribute benefits in a more equitable manner. Jens Eskelund said there is a strong perception among the European population that China is taking most of the spoils from bilateral trade, as the EU's manufacturing sector struggles to compete with a glut of cheaper goods. 'When we look back at the past 50 years of the bilateral relationship, it has created enormous value for both sides,' Eskelund told the Post on the eve of the chamber's 25th anniversary. 'Chinese exports have created jobs and wealth in China, and given the average European higher purchasing power. 'Now the question is, if we are in a situation where very intense pressure from China leads to losses for European companies … then, of course it becomes, 'Hang on, why are we doing this?'' Advertisement The relationship between China and the EU has been fraught in recent years, despite continuous dialogue as both sides seek to avoid the sort of full-blown trade war being waged by US President Donald Trump.
