Donald Trump threatens to arrest NYC mayoral Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani
President Donald Trump has escalated his attacks on New York City's Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, and now Mamdani and New York Democrats are responding.
Trump threatened to arrest Mamdani if as mayor he follows through on pledges not to assist federal officials enforcing immigration laws.
'Well then, we'll have to arrest him,' Trump told reporters on July 1 while visiting a detention center in Florida. Trump that he would 'be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation.'
Trump also said "a lot of people are saying he's here illegally," which is false. Mamdani is a naturalized U.S. citizen born in Uganda, who immigrated to the United States with his parents − film director Mira Nair and Columbia University professor Mahmood Mamdani − at the age of seven.
Mamdani, a state Assembly member who won the nomination for mayor on a progressive platform, responded on social media that Trump is threatening him despite the fact that not cooperating with ICE doesn't violate any law. (The Immigrant Legal Resource Center notes "There is no federal legal obligation for state and local jurisdictions to use their resources to help with immigration enforcement.")
'His statements don't just represent an attack on our democracy but an attempt to send a message to every New Yorker who refuses to hide in the shadows: if you speak up, they will come for you,' Mamdani said. 'We will not accept this intimidation.'
The clash represents an escalation of tensions over immigration enforcement, as well as an outpouring of xenophobic reactions to Mamdani's victory from Republicans and conservatives. Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tennessee, called for Mamdani to be stripped of his citizenship and deported and offensively referred to Mamdani as "little muhammad" in reference to his Muslim religion.
Trump made border security a priority in his administration. He deployed the National Guard to help ICE conduct raids in Los Angeles after sometimes violent protests there. The Justice Department sued Los Angeles to halt its 'sanctuary' policies refusing to help federal agents.
But California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Karen Bass said the raids and National Guard troops exacerbated tensions that led to the protests where rocks were thrown at federal authorities and cars were burned.
The arrest threat is just the latest clash between Trump and Mamdani.
Trump wrongly called Mamdani a communist and a "radical left lunatic" on Maria Bartiromo's "Sunday Morning Futures" on Fox News.
Mamdani, 33, beat former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary, is not a communist. He is a democratic socialist. A communist believes in collective ownership of all property and the end of capitalism. A democratic socialist aims to reform capitalism through democracy.
Mamdani faces New York Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent on the November ballot.
Trump's comments drew swift pushback from some New York elected officials, including those that distanced themselves from Mamdani after his June 24 upset against Cuomo, the three-term governor who resigned amid a sexual harassment scandal.
'I don't care if you're the President of the United States,' Gov. Kathy Hochul tweeted, 'if you threaten to unlawfully go after one of our neighbors, you're picking a fight with 20 million New Yorkers — starting with me.'
Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine, who recently won the nomination for city comptroller, said, 'This is not normal. This is not acceptable. These are the words of an unhinged would-be dictator.'
In attacking Mamdani, Trump backs Mayor Eric Adams
Trump also gave support to Adams, the embattled mayor who opted not to run in the Democratic primary amid a corruption scandal. Adams is now running in the Nov. 4 general election as an independent.
'I helped him out a little bit,' Trump said. 'He had a problem.'
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan indicted Adams on corruption charges before Trump's Justice Department intervened to drop the charges. Officials said the case interfered with Adams' ability to conduct the administration's priorities on immigration enforcement, and that he was running for reelection. Several prosecutors resigned in protest of senior officials' actions to drop the case.
Adams has denied wrongdoing or that he negotiated with the administration.
Trump falsely said prosecutors indicted Adams 'the following day' he made comments about the influx of migrants to New York City.
Adams' office didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
"That was a Biden indictment," Trump said. "I said, 'Don't feel bad, I got indicted five times.'"
Adams, a centrist Democrat, is one of a number of candidates in the November election for mayor. Curtis Sliwa, the GOP nominee, has said he won't drop out of the race and Cuomo is mulling an independent bid as well.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
About 70 National Guard troops activated to protect Alligator Alcatraz
Just fewer than 70 Florida National Guard troops have been sent to guard the remote migrant detention center in the state's Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' the Pentagon's top spokesperson announced Wednesday. 'Nearly 70 Florida National Guard are on state active duty … conducting base camp security at Alligator Alcatraz,' chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told reporters. The activation comes after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said he would send 100 Guard troops there, with people arriving at the facility as early as Wednesday. President Trump on Tuesday toured the site in southern Florida at the Miami-Dade Collier Training and Transition Airport, afterwards saying the complex is 'surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is really deportation.' The facility, estimated to cost $450 million annually, will hold migrants awaiting deportation and could house around 5,000 people, officials have claimed. But Democrats have denounced the complex, with Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) describing the site as an 'internment camp,' and 24 House Democrats on Wednesday began lobbying for the site's closure. 'They target migrants, rip families apart, and subject people to conditions that amount to physical and psychological torture in facilities that can only be described as hell on Earth,' Frost said in a statement last week. 'Now, they want to erect tents in the blazing Everglades sun and call it immigration enforcement. They don't care if people live or die; they only care about cruelty and spectacle.' Trump has increasingly used the military in his immigration crackdown, placing 8,500 service members at the U.S.-Mexico border and 5,000 in Los Angeles to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents that have received pushback due to their sweeping immigration raids. Deportations are expected to ramp up after Senate Republicans overnight advanced a major spending package that injects tens of billions of dollars into immigration enforcement spending.
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Musk Threatens to Primary Republicans Over Trump Bill, Analysts React
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk are embroiled in a new public spat over the much-debated financial package dubbed the "big, beautiful bill," which led to the Tesla CEO threatening to support primary challengers against Republicans who vote in favor of the sprawling federal budget proposal. Several analysts talked with Newsweek about repercussions the GOP could face if Musk follows through on his threat. Why It Matters Musk's intervention comes at a volatile moment: The attempted passage of Trump's fiscal initiative—the centerpiece of his legislative efforts—agonized party traditionalists and grassroots activists who have long campaigned on promises of fiscal restraint. Clashes over the bill also underscore significant fractures within the Republican Party as it aims to hold control of Congress amid mounting pressure from both establishment leaders and populist outsiders. Musk's threat to back the unseating of officeholders deviating from fiscal conservatism raises questions about grassroots accountability, donor influence and the enduring sway of Trump within GOP ranks. On Tuesday after a marathon "vote-a-rama," the Senate narrowly passed the bill, with a tiebreaking vote from Vice President JD Vance, sending it back to the House for final deliberations. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva What To Know Political science professor at Columbia University, Robert Y. Shapiro, told Newsweek via email Tuesday night that Trump's political clout "is still strong" despite the fervent attacks from Musk. "His has been strengthened by the big win he can claim in the attack on Iran's nuclear sites. This did not improve his approval rating but that rating has held up thanks to the strong support from his MAGA base and other Republicans. Trump's party has minimal control of the Senate and the House, and Vance having to cast the deciding vote was not a sign of weakness but showed Trump's strength with Thune in holding majority support together in the Senate," Shapiro said. The political science professor added, "Do not be surprised to see the same in the House," while saying the Musk's political power is "limited." "His behavior is all theatrics," Shapiro said about Musk. "As is Trump's but Trump also still has the cards here. The biggest threat to Trump is if he can't get the bill passed in the House now after plowing it through the Senate, and if his tariffs and other erratic economic rhetoric and actions destabilize the economy. These could have repercussions as we move toward 2026 and the midterm elections -- but these are still far off." Musk has not shied away from blasting the piece of legislation backed by the president. In a Monday post to X, formerly Twitter, Musk said, "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." D. Stephen Voss, political science professor at the University of Kentucky, told Newsweek via email Tuesday night, "Musk speaks for a small but influential faction within the Republican electorate, to a degree the same faction responsible for the rise of Liberty Republicans like Sen. Rand Paul and Rep. Thomas Massie. An endorsement from Musk could help such candidates in GOP primaries, especially if the support comes with sufficient financial backing to mount a serious campaign. Hard to say whether that would be a problem for Trump or the Republicans, though." Voss added that "robust" primaries don't necessarily "hurt" Republicans or Democrats but could "drain resources and sometimes cause bad blood." He did, however, highlight that they do get voters "engaged" by registering to vote, and in the practice of participating. Musk-backed candidates who win would have to "operate effectively within Congress," Voss says, while adding that it usually means compromise. "In terms of Trump losing clout: Trump is riding high within the Republican Party right now, so anyone who challenges him - from inside or outside the government - is running into the wind," Voss said. "Should Trump's job approval persist at rock-bottom levels, though, then breaking from him early could pay off, especially if Republicans suffer in the 2026 midterm elections. Eventually we'll see various Republicans fighting to define the future of the Republican Party, and who rises in that contest will be shaped by Trump's record over the next couple of years." Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks on as President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks on as President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Grant Davis Reeher, professor of political science at Syracuse University, told Newsweek on Wednesday, "My sense—just a sense, no data to bolster it—is that with his absence from the administration, Musk is beginning to fade in political influence." Reeher added: "He and Trump have patched up some of the worst aspects of their earlier falling out. The notion of a 'feud' is back in the news, but I don't see this dragging on as a running drama. Musk in particular doesn't have much to gain from that, but he does have much to lose. He wants to see government much smaller than it is, and if he wants to pursue that goal through political involvement, fighting with Democrats makes much more sense than fighting with Republicans." After Musk left his post heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in May, he denounced the piece of legislation and also hurled public accusations at the president, including, "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Trump on Tuesday also floated the idea of Musk heading back to his native South Africa if the president halted government subsidies for his companies, adding later that his administration may even "have to take a look" at deporting the billionaire. Musk reacted to Trump's comment on Wednesday, calling it "so disappointing." What People Are Saying Musk posted to X on Tuesday: "What's the point of a debt ceiling if we keep raising it?" Trump, on Truth Social early Tuesday morning: "Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one. Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!" What Happens Next The aftermath of Musk's threat will likely unfold over time, as candidate filings approach for next year's midterms. Primary challengers backed by well-resourced figures remain a wild card for Republican leadership and could prompt incumbents to recalibrate fiscal messaging.
Los Angeles Times
26 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Republican holdouts bristle at Trump pressure over megabill
WASHINGTON — Confident that passage of President Trump's signature legislation is all but assured, West Wing aides summoned holdouts in the House Republican caucus on Wednesday to deliver a blunt message: Follow the president's orders and get it done by Friday. It was a call to action after House Speaker Mike Johnson directed his caucus to converge back on Washington from home districts around the country, braving flight delays due to storms in the capital to rush back in time for a vote before Independence Day. But the vote is in doubt, and signs have emerged of cracks in a coalition otherwise firmly under Trump's control. 'The president of the United States didn't give us an assignment,' Rep. Derrick Van Orden, a Republican from Wisconsin, told reporters, using an expletive to suggest Trump was treating lawmakers like his minions. 'I'm a member of Congress. I represent almost 800,000 Wisconsinites. Is that clear?' Frustration within the Republican Party is coming from two disparate camps of a broad-tent coalition that have their own sets of grievances: fiscal hawks who believe the bill adds too much to the national debt, and GOP lawmakers representing districts that heavily rely on Medicaid. One GOP lawmaker who attended the White House meeting on Wednesday, Rep. David Valadao of California, represents a Central Valley district with one of the highest percentages of Medicaid enrollment in the nation. The president's megabill, which he calls the 'big beautiful bill,' levies historic cuts to the healthcare program that could result in up to 12 million Americans losing health coverage, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, gutting $1 trillion in funding and introducing a work requirement for enrollees of 80 hours per month until they turn 65 years old. The proposed legislation also restricts state taxes on healthcare providers, known as the 'provider tax,' an essential tool for many states in their efforts to supplement Medicaid funding. Several Republican lawmakers fear that provision could have devastating effects on rural hospitals. A handful of Republican lawmakers from North Carolina have bristled at the president's pressure campaign, with Rep. Chuck Edwards telling Punchbowl News that the White House meeting 'didn't sway my opinion.' North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican, was one of three senators who voted against the bill on Tuesday, warning it would devastate his state. It still passed with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance. The vote is shaping up to be narrow in the House, as well, where Johnson can only afford to lose three votes in order to pass the omnibus legislation. Earlier Wednesday, after taking meetings at the White House, members of the House Freedom Caucus, a bloc founded to promote fiscal responsibility, also met with Johnson. The speaker emerged with a message of tempered optimism. 'I feel very positive about the progress, we've had lots of great conversations,' Johnson told reporters Wednesday, 'but we can't make everyone 100% happy. It's impossible.' 'This is a deliberative body. It's a legislative process by definition — all of us have to give up on personal preferences,' he continued. 'I'm never going to ask anyone to compromise core principles, but preferences must be yielded for the greater good. And that's what I think people are recognizing and coming to grips with.' Trump says the legislation encompasses his entire domestic agenda, extending tax cuts passed during his first term in 2017 and beefing up funding for border security, mass deportations, and the Defense Department. Cuts to Medicaid, as well as to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, better known as SNAP, are intended to offset a fraction of the costs. But the CBO still estimates the legislation will add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, and hundreds of billions to the deficit, with other nonprofit budget trackers forecasting even higher figures.
