logo
U.S. eyes 'back to basics' revamp of G20 when it assumes presidency next year: Reuters

U.S. eyes 'back to basics' revamp of G20 when it assumes presidency next year: Reuters

CNBCa day ago
The United States aims to pare the Group of 20 major economies back to its financial roots next year when it takes over the rotating presidency from South Africa, sources familiar with the Trump administration's plans said.
Washington has scaled back its participation this year, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent skipping a G20 finance chiefs' meeting that started in Durban, South Africa, on Thursday, his second absence from an event this year.
Experts and administration sources say the absence of top U.S. officials reflects the Trump administration's skepticism about multilateral institutions such as the G20, which the U.S. helped found in 1999.
U.S. President Donald Trump has upended the global economy with a wide-ranging trade war that has targeted many developing countries, including G20 members, while slashing foreign development funds to pursue an "America First" agenda.
Three U.S. sources familiar with the matter say Washington still plans to assume the G20 presidency at the end of the year, which coincides with the 250th anniversary of the United States.
But it will focus on two "tracks" — the leaders' summit and the financial track — eliminating other working groups and ministerial-level meetings, including those on energy, health, commerce and the environment, two of the sources said.
A more streamlined G20 process would be in-line with Bessent's call in April for the International Monetary Fund and World Bank to focus on their core missions of financial stability and development instead of climate finance and gender issues. The White House and Treasury had no immediate comment.
Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council in Washington, said Bessent and other senior U.S. officials want to get "back to basics," an approach being embraced by other G20 members.
The U.S. has already withdrawn from co-chairing a working group on sustainable finance with China and it remains unclear whether Trump will join this year's leaders' summit in South Africa.
Many members agreed the G20's portfolio had grown too large, triggering a review, said two sources familiar with the issue.
In 2024, G20 host Brazil sought the group's endorsement of a global minimum tax on the ultra wealthy, a step that the Biden administration rejected as an overreach.
"There seems to be consensus at the G20 that it has expanded a lot. G20 South Africa is conducting a review of the G20 process and will provide recommendations to streamline it. That is in line with what the U.S. is looking at," one of the sources said.
Activists and developing countries say they will watch U.S. actions, but that paring back could help the G20 survive.
"Our hope is that development continues to be linked," said Eric LeCompte, executive director of the non-profit Jubilee USA Network. "Financial stability, debt issues and economic issues cannot be separated from development and global growth."
The G20 was founded after the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998, before expanding to include state leaders during the global financial crisis in 2008. It has been tested by U.S.-China tensions, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and divergent views on the Middle East conflicts.
Brad Setser, a former U.S. official now at the Council on Foreign Relations, said the G20 still offered a platform for high-level bilateral meetings.
He said Trump could welcome to the U.S. next year foreign leaders such as Chinese President Xi Jinping and even Russian President Vladimir Putin if the Ukraine war ended, without the fanfare of a bilateral summit or state visit.
Ben Harris, a former senior Treasury official now at the Brookings Institution, said Washington's decision to pull back offered China and others a chance to show leadership, which might not serve U.S. interests.
"It obviously creates a vacuum, and that vacuum will be filled."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Colbert Addresses ‘The Late Show's Financial Losses With Another Dig At Paramount's $16M Trump Settlement
Stephen Colbert Addresses ‘The Late Show's Financial Losses With Another Dig At Paramount's $16M Trump Settlement

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stephen Colbert Addresses ‘The Late Show's Financial Losses With Another Dig At Paramount's $16M Trump Settlement

Stephen Colbert is not shying away from the fact that The Late Show was canceled. Kicking off Monday's show with a joke about Trump wanting to change the name of the Washington Commanders NFL team (the 'Washington Epsteins', Colbert suggested), he walked into the Ed Sullivan theater to loud cheers and said 'This is going to be fun'. It certainly was. More from Deadline 'The Daily Show's Jon Stewart Torches Paramount Over Colbert Axing: "Go F*ck Yourself" Stephen Colbert Tells Donald Trump To "Go F*ck Yourself" After 'The Late Show' Axing 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' Attracts Protesters; More Planned This Week 'Cancel culture has gone too far,' he joked. 'Last week we learned that The Late Show will be ending in May. I want to thank everybody who reached out to me over the weekend, including one text from an unknown number, offering a high paying IT work-from-home job for only two to three hours a day. Yes, I am very interested and I will be sending you my routing number in May. Daddy needs a job.' He added that the news sunk in over the weekend that CBS was 'killing' his show. 'But they made one mistake. They left me alive. Now for the next 10 months, the gloves are off. I can finally speak unvarnished truth to power and say what I really think about Donald Trump. I don't care for him. Doesn't have the skillset to be President,' he joked. Colbert noted that people have been 'speculating' about the timing of the decision, coming days after he called CBS' settlement of its lawsuit with President Trump a 'big fat bribe'. 'People have been speculating about the timing of this decision from Paramount, and they're pointing out the last Monday, just two days before my cancelation, I delivered a blistering monologue in which I showed the courage to have a mustache. When obviously CBS saw my upper lip and boom, canceled. Coincidence? Oh, I think not. This is worse than fascism. This is stashism.' He kidded that CBS may turn the Ed Sullivan Theater into a self-storage facility ('Put your old records where the Beatles performed'). He reiterated that CBS have 'always been great partners' and thanked them for the 'very nice things' it said in the press release announcing the axing. 'They clarified that the cancelation was purely a financial decision. But how could it purely be a financial decision if the Late Show is number one in ratings. A lot of folks are asking that question, mainly my staff's parents and spouses,' he added. But he had a few stern words by suggesting that CBS leaked the fact that The Late Show loses between $40M-$50M a year. 'Over the weekend, somebody at CBS followed up their gracious press release with a gracious anonymous leak saying they pulled the plug on our show because of losses pegged between $40M and $50M a year. $40M is a big number. I could see us losing $24 million but where would Paramount have possibly spent the other 16 million? Oh, yeah,' he added, alluding to the settlement. Best of Deadline Everything We Know About 'The Devil Wears Prada 2' 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery

Here's why Target is ending its long-running ‘price matching' policy this month
Here's why Target is ending its long-running ‘price matching' policy this month

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Here's why Target is ending its long-running ‘price matching' policy this month

Target stores won't match the prices of competitors including Amazon and Walmart after July 28 the retail chain has announced. "We've found our guests overwhelmingly price match Target and not other retailers, which reflects the great value and trust in pricing consumers see across our assortment and deals," a Target spokesperson told ABC News. The policy, introduced in 2013, allowed customers to buy items in Target stores at reduced prices if they were being sold for less on or at Amazon or Walmart. Under the new policy, the price match will only apply to lower-priced items on according to the company. Target's policy was an industry first as brick-and-mortar chains faced increasing low-price competition from online retailers. Target, which is ending its price match policy this month, has faced rising inflation, consumer boycotts, disappointing earnings, and uncertainty around Trump's tariffs (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved) Neil Saunders, a retail analyst at the research and analytics firm GlobalData, said the change was a sign of Target's continued financial challenges. "Target's profitability and margins have weakened over recent years, and if it wants to invest more in stores, then it needs to be more financially disciplined," he told USA TODAY. "Ending price matching helps to achieve this, especially at a time when costs are rising because of tariffs. That said, this is only one part of the puzzle and there is a lot more Target needs to do to bolster its bottom line." In May, the company missed Wall Street expectations and announced sales were down 2.8 percent in the first quarter, and had declined compared with the same period in 2024. Target, along with some of its competitors, have faced financial headwinds including uncertainty over the Trump administration's on-again, off-again tariff regime, rising inflation, as well as multiple consumer boycotts in the wake of the company's decision to align with the priorities of the new administration and end some of its diversity initiatives. Target competitors such as Best Buy retain a price match offer while Amazon and Walmart do not.

Trump and Philippine leader plan to talk tariffs and China at the White House
Trump and Philippine leader plan to talk tariffs and China at the White House

Boston Globe

time22 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump and Philippine leader plan to talk tariffs and China at the White House

Washington sees Beijing, the world's No. 2 economy, as its biggest competitor, and consecutive presidential administrations have sought to shift U.S. military and economic focus to the Asia-Pacific in a bid to counter China. Trump, like others before him, has been distracted by efforts to broker peace in a range of conflicts, from Ukraine to Gaza. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Tariffs also are expected to be on the agenda. Trump has threatened to impose 20% tariffs on Filipino goods on Aug. 1 unless the two sides can strike a deal. Advertisement 'I intend to convey to President Trump and his Cabinet officials that the Philippines is ready to negotiate a bilateral trade deal that will ensure strong, mutually beneficial and future-oriented collaborations that only the United States and the Philippines will be able to take advantage of,' Marcos said Sunday when he was departing for Washington, according to his office. Manila is open to offering zero tariffs on some U.S. goods to strike a deal with Trump, finance chief Ralph Recto told local journalists. Advertisement White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt hinted that a trade agreement with the Philippines was in the works. 'Perhaps this will be a topic of discussion,' she told reporters Monday when asked about tariff negotiations. The White House said Trump will discuss with Marcos the shared commitment to upholding a free, open, prosperous and secure Indo-Pacific. Before a meeting with Marcos at the Pentagon, Hegseth reiterated America's commitment to 'achieving peace through strength' in the region. 'Our storied alliance has never been stronger or more essential than it is today, and together we remain committed to the mutual defense treaty,' Hegseth said Monday. 'And this pact extends to armed attacks on our armed forces, aircraft or public vessels, including our Coast Guard anywhere in the Pacific, including the South China Sea.' Marcos, whose country is one of the oldest U.S. treaty allies in the Pacific region, told Hegseth that the assurance to come to each other's mutual defense 'continues to be the cornerstone of that relationship, especially when it comes to defense and security cooperation.' He said the cooperation has deepened since Hegseth's March visit to Manila, including joint exercises and U.S. support in modernizing the Philippines' armed forces. Marcos thanked the U.S. for support 'that we need in the face of the threats that we, our country, is facing.' China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan have been involved in long-unresolved territorial conflicts in the South China Sea, a busy shipping passage for global trade. The Chinese coast guard has repeatedly used water cannon to hit Filipino boats in the South China Sea. China accused those vessels of entering the waters illegally or encroaching on its territory. Advertisement Hegseth told a security forum in Singapore in May that China poses a threat and the U.S. is 'reorienting toward deterring aggression by Communist China.' During Marcos' meeting Monday with Rubio, the two reaffirmed the alliance 'to maintain peace and stability' in the region and discussed closer economic ties, including boosting supply chains, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said. The U.S. has endeavored to keep communication open with Beijing. Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met this month on the sidelines of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. They agreed to explore 'areas of potential cooperation' and stressed the importance of managing differences. Associated Press writer Chris Megerian contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store