
Interest rates, dollar sales boost RBI income by 27%
A surge in global interest rates and gains from dollar sales to stem the rupee's fall boosted the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI's) FY25 net income by 27%, enabling it to transfer a record surplus to the central government and help bridge the fiscal gap. North Block's money manager also demonstrated the prudence it expects from mainstream lenders, boosting gold holdings in its overall asset mix to mitigate quality slippage risks.
The central bank's net income rose to ₹2.69 lakh crore last fiscal, up from ₹2.11 lakh crore a year earlier, as its investments in overseas assets yielded decade-high returns, its annual report shows.
'Income from foreign sources increased 38% to ₹2.58 lakh crore,'' the annual report said. 'The rate of earnings on foreign currency assets was 5.31% during the year compared with 4.21%'' in the year before that.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dukung Orang Terkasih Menghadapi Limfoma: Mulai Di Sini
Limfoma
Klik Di Sini
Undo
Income from Forex Transactions Up 33%
A sharp increase in the returns from foreign currency assets (FCA) of the central bank helped it last week pay a dividend of ₹2.69 lakh crore to the government, up from ₹2.1 lakh crore a year ago, giving the Centre a fiscal space of 0.12% of GDP.
The payout was higher despite an increase in the contingency risk buffer (CRB) to a maximum 7.5% of the RBI's balance sheet under a revised economic capital framework (ECF).
Live Events
'Earnings on FCA improved significantly on account of better returns on the dollar,'' said Dipanwita Mazumdar, economist at
Bank of Baroda
. 'This becomes critical given that our forex reserves held by the RBI have been increasing and are being invested in various avenues.''
Interest income from investments in foreign securities was up 48% to ₹97,007 crore against ₹65,328 crore in FY24. The report also says that RBI's income from foreign exchange transactions rose 33% to ₹1.11 lakh crore in FY25, against ₹83,616 crore a year ago.
'This ensures that the Centre meets its fiscal deficit target of 4.4% of GDP—if not exceed,' said Gaura Sengupta, chief economist, IDFC Bank.
In FY19, the RBI adopted the ECF that required the central bank to maintain a contingency risk buffer of 5.5–6.5%.
'The dividend would have been even higher if the provisioning wasn't increased to 7.5% of total assets from 6.5% earlier,' said Sengupta. 'Indeed, if the provisioning was maintained according to the old framework, the dividend would have been ₹3.5 lakh crore.'
Under the revised ECF, the CRB is 4.5–7.5% of the central bank's balance sheet.
'The dividend announcement, though lower than market expectation, was still larger than the budgeted estimate by 0.15% of GDP,'' said Anubhuti Sahay, Head of India Economics Research, Standard Chartered Bank.
Price Stability, Liquidity
Going forward, domestic economic activity is expected to strengthen from the lows of the first half of FY25, said the annual report. The economic outlook is an important deciding factor in arriving at the CRB levels.
Headline inflation is expected to ease and move further toward the legally mandated target in 2025–26, said the annual report. Monetary policy is committed toward achieving durable price stability, which is a necessary prerequisite for high growth on a sustained basis, said the report.
The Reserve Bank will undertake liquidity management operations in sync with the monetary policy stance and keep system liquidity adequate to meet the needs of the productive sectors of the economy, said the annual report.
In FY25, the RBI's total expenditure rose 7.76% to ₹69,714 crore, due to higher interest spends, printing of notes and employee costs.
The expenditure also includes provisions toward the contingency fund and asset development fund (ADF). However, no provision was made toward ADF.
An amount of ₹44,861.70 crore was provided toward the contingency fund to maintain the Available Realised Equity at the level of 7.5% of the balance sheet. Accordingly, the balance in CF as on March 31, 2025, was ₹5.42 lakh crore, compared with ₹4.29 lakh crore as on March 31, 2024.
The size of the balance sheet increased by ₹5.78 lakh crore, or 8.2%, to ₹76.25 lakh crore. The increase on the assets side was due to a rise in gold holdings, domestic investments and foreign investments by 52%, 14.3% and 1.7%, respectively.
On the liabilities side, expansion was due to an increase in notes issued, revaluation accounts, and other liabilities by 6.03%, 17.32% and 23.31%, respectively.
Domestic assets constituted 25.73% while foreign currency assets, gold (including gold deposit and gold held in India) and loans and advances to financial institutions outside India constituted 74.27% of total assets as on March 31, 2025, against 23.31% and 76.69%, respectively, as on March 31, 2024.
The share of gold in net foreign assets increased to 12% as at end-March 2025 from 8.3% as at end-March 2024, mainly due to revaluation gains from gold prices.
Net credit to the government expanded during the year owing to the liquidity injection through purchase of G-secs via open market operations during January–March 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
39 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trade Setup for June 6: Nifty eyes RBI cue to breakout towards 25,000+
Indian equities saw a volatile but rangebound session on June 5, with the Nifty 50 closing at 24,751, up 131 points. Despite midday gains of nearly 200 points, the index gave up most of them before ending higher. Support at 24,500 remains strong, keeping the bullish bias intact. 🔑 Key Technical Levels Support: 24,500 Immediate Resistance: 24,900 Breakout Trigger: Sustained close above 24,900 could open doors to 25,000+ 🏦 Eyes on RBI Markets are pricing in a 25 bps repo rate cut by the RBI on June 6 — the third cut this year. A deeper cut could spark bullish sentiment and push Nifty past its current ceiling. 💹 Sector & Stock Highlights Outperformers: Realty, Pharma, Healthcare Underperformers: PSU Banks, Auto, Media Top Gainers: Eicher Motors, Trent, Dr Reddy's Top Laggards: IndusInd Bank, Tata Consumer, Axis Bank Buzzing Stocks: Reliance Industries (+1%) on JPMorgan upgrade DLF, Godrej Properties on continued realty rally Hindustan Zinc (+6%) amid record silver prices 📊 Broader Market Trends Nifty Midcap 100: +0.53% Nifty Smallcap 100: +0.96% (4-month high) 📉 Analyst Views Golden crossover on Nifty's daily chart hints at short-term uptrend (Rupak De) Base formation near 24,500 supports bullish continuation (Devarsh Vakil) Watch for a decisive break above 24,900 for momentum to pick up (Om Mehra) Strategy for Traders: Long bias if Nifty holds above 24,500 and breaks past 24,900 Cautious near resistance if RBI outcome disappoints Watch rate-sensitive sectors (Realty, Banks, Auto) closely post-policy


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Is IBC an effective resolution tool?
The story so far: More than eight years have passed since the enactment of India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). According to data from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), creditors have realised ₹3.89 lakh crore under the framework, with a recovery rate of over 32.8% against admitted claims. Why was the IBC enacted? India enacted the IBC, its first comprehensive bankruptcy law, in 2016 to improve the overall corporate insolvency resolution process. Shifting control from debtors to creditors, the IBC introduced a time-bound resolution mechanism to streamline bankruptcy proceedings, reduce judicial delays, and improve creditor recoveries. According to current provisions, a maximum timeline of 330 days is allowed to find a resolution for a company admitted into the insolvency resolution process. Otherwise, the company goes into liquidation. So far, the Code has rescued 1,194 companies through resolution plans. Is IBC a preferred route for debt recovery? As per the Reserve Bank of India report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India released in December 2024, the IBC emerged as the dominant recovery route, accounting for 48% of all recoveries made by banks followed by the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act (32%), Debt Recovery Tribunals (17%), and Lok Adalats (3%) in the Financial Year 2023-24. The realisation under IBC is more than 170.1% as against the liquidation value. Resolution plans, on average, are yielding 93.41% of the fair value of the Corporate Debtors (CDs), IBBI said. Further, 1,276 cases have been settled through appeal, review, or settlement, and 1,154 cases have been withdrawn under section 12A. The Code has referred 2,758 companies for liquidation, as per IBBI data. Nearly 10 companies are being resolved against five going into liquidation. Has IBC been an effective recovery mechanism? Akshat Khetan, Founder, AU Corporate Advisory and Legal Services, pointed out that IBC has changed the underlying credit culture. As the Supreme Court once observed, 'the defaulter's paradise is lost' and the Code has created a credible threat that ensures timely repayment. On the recovery rate of 32.8%, Mr. Khetan pointed out that it must be interpreted in light of the distressed nature of the assets that come into the IBC process, often after years of erosion. As the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has rightly remarked in one of its rulings, 'IBC is not a recovery mechanism; it is a resolution framework.' Compared to legacy systems, where recovery rates were often below 20% with timelines extending into decades, a 32.8% realisation is a leap forward, he said. Mr. Khetan also stated that the statistic does not capture qualitative gains, such as job preservation, improved enterprise value, and restored investor confidence. In a framework designed to balance resolution over liquidation, the broader economic impact of IBC far outweighs numerical recovery alone, he said. The provisions of the IBC have prompted debtors to take early action in distress situations, marking a shift in their behaviour. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) data show that 30,310 cases were settled prior to admission, covering underlying defaults worth ₹13.78 lakh crore till December 2024. A study by the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, submitted to IBBI, said IBC has injected discipline in the credit allocation process and has prompted borrowers to adhere to stipulated payment schedules. The gross non-performing assets of the scheduled commercial banks have declined from a peak of 11.2% in March 2018 to 2.8% in March 2024. A part of that reduction is attributable to resolution processes enabled under IBC, it said. The study also indicated a 3% reduction in the cost of debt for distressed firms post-IBC, compared to non-distressed firms , indicating an improved credit environment for distressed firms. The IBC has had a positive impact on corporate governance, reflected in the increased proportion of independent directors on the boards of companies resolved under the Code. What are the major challenges? In a recent report, India Ratings and Research said that judicial delays and post-resolution uncertainties continue to affect confidence in the IBC framework. Even when resolution applicants are ready and the Committee of Creditors has granted approval, delays at the NCLT continue to push recovery timelines. In several cases, such delays result in extended litigation or failed implementation, increasing the risk of liquidation for a viable asset that requires timely execution, it said. The future insolvencies also raise questions about the Code's readiness to handle non-traditional enterprise defaults. While the IBC is legally broad enough to accommodate various resolution strategies, key commercial elements such as intellectual property valuation, treatment of employee dues, and tech continuity require a clearer treatment under the framework to make it future-ready, India Ratings said. To enhance its effectiveness, India must invest in strengthening tribunal infrastructure, allow for pre-packaged insolvency, and establish jurisprudential guardrails to protect bona fide commercial decisions from post-resolution uncertainty, Mr. Khetan said. While challenges persist, including process delays and recovery rates below expectations, the Code's foundational structure remains sound. As implementation matures and jurisprudence evolves, the IBC is well-positioned to overcome these hurdles and fully realise its transformative potential in India's financial ecosystem, IBBI Chairman Ravi Mital said in the recent quarterly newsletter. Does the SC verdict on Bhushan Steel pose a challenge to IBC? The recent developments in the Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. case have reignited concerns around the finality of resolution outcomes and the predictability of the framework. While the decision upholds compliance standards, its timing and implications highlight the need for judicial clarity and faster adjudication to sustain investor confidence in the process in the long term, India Ratings said. By questioning a transaction that had been closed and operational for years, it risks unsettling the core principle of commercial certainty. If resolution applicants fear judicial reversals even after significant investment, they may hesitate to bid, undermining the IBC's very purpose. The Bhushan verdict thus underscores the need for legal sanctity once a resolution plan is approved and implemented, Mr. Khetan said. The IBC is not merely a piece of economic legislation, it is the backbone of India's credit ecosystem. Its future lies in striking a fine balance between judicial oversight and economic pragmatism. As India aspires to become a $5 trillion economy, robust and predictable insolvency mechanisms are indispensable. The Code must remain nimble, continually evolving to meet emerging realities while ensuring that commercial wisdom is not second-guessed endlessly, he said. Almost 78% of the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) cases have exceeded 270 days, post-admission by the NCLT, as on March 31, 2025, ratings agency ICRA said. A sustained momentum would be needed to minimise haircuts for lenders, which remain high at 67%, it said. Nevertheless, some of the recent judgments reinforce the need for timely and transparent resolution, thereby putting greater onus on the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and NCLT. However, such rulings may also impact investor confidence in stressed assets setting precedents that the decision made by the CoC and the NCLT may be challenged and overturned by the judicial system, thus impacting the effectiveness of the resolution process, ICRA said.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Fintech entry cleared: Flipkart gets RBI nod for lending licence; plans for NBFC rollout still under wraps
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now has received a lending licence from the Reserve Bank of India, paving the way for direct financing to customers, though the ecommerce firm is yet to disclose operational details. The Walmart-backed company confirmed on Thursday that it had secured a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) licence from the RBI, with sources indicating the approval came in March, PTI reported. While Flipkart acknowledged the development, it did not offer details on how or when the NBFC arm would be operationalised. According to sources, the licence could enable the company to offer credit services such as EMIs or instalment-based financing directly to consumers on its platform. However, specifics of product rollout remain unconfirmed. Walmart currently owns over 80% of Flipkart, having acquired a majority stake in the company in 2018. The development comes shortly after Flipkart, which is preparing for a public listing, announced in April that it plans to shift its holding company from Singapore to India. The move, Flipkart said, aligns its structure with core Indian operations and reflects long-term commitment to the domestic market. "We are inspired by the Government of India's strong vision and proactive initiatives in fostering a thriving business environment and ease of doing business, which have significantly shaped our journey," a Flipkart spokesperson said in April. "This move represents a natural evolution, aligning our holding structure with our core operations, the vast potential of the Indian economy and our technology and innovation-driven capabilities to foster digital transformation in India. "