Here are hottest jobs in tech, and the roles you should avoid
The decline began post-pandemic and continued after ChatGPT's release in late 2022.
AI and machine learning roles are in demand, while junior positions require more experience.
New tech hiring data from Indeed shows overall postings have plunged 35% from early 2020.
Roughly half this decline happened during the post-pandemic sell-off, when tech companies realized they'd overhired. The other half happened after ChatGPT came out in late 2022.
"While there isn't a smoking gun linking AI to the plunge, automation trends could be a reason the weakness persists," said Brendon Bernard, a senior economist at Indeed. "We're also seeing potential AI effects show up in the types of tech jobs still in demand, and rising experience requirements among the opportunities that remain."
Demand for AI and machine learning roles is up, while listings for junior tech positions have dropped significantly. More job postings now require 5+ years of experience.
Here's what hot, and what's not, in tech jobs over the past five years or so:
I often think that the most boring technology ends up being the most profitable. So it may not be surprising to see an SAP job at the top of the table on the right here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI is at a classic strategy crossroads involving its ‘moat'—which Warren Buffett believes can make or break a business
It's an epochal moment as history's latest general-purpose technology, AI, forms itself into an industry. Much depends on these early days, especially the fate of the industry's leader by a mile, Open AI. In terms of the last general-purpose technology, the internet, will it become a colossus like Google or be forgotten like AltaVista? No one can know, but here's how to think about it. OpenAI's domination of the industry is striking. As the creator of ChatGPT, it recently attracted 78% of daily unique visitors to core model websites, with six competitors splitting up the rest, according to a recent 40-page report from J.P. Morgan. Even with that vast lead, the report shows, OpenAI is expanding its margin over its much smaller competitors, including even Gemini, which is part of Google and its giant parent, Alphabet (2024 revenue: $350 billion). The great question now is whether OpenAI can possibly maintain its wide lead (history would say no) or at least continue as the industry leader. The answer depends heavily on OpenAI's moat, a Warren Buffett term for any factor that protects the company and cannot be easily breached–think of Coca-Cola's brand or BNSF Railroad's economies of scale, to mention two of Buffett's successful investments. On that count the J.P. Morgan analysts are not optimistic. Specifically, they acknowledge that while OpenAI has led the industry in innovating its models, that strategy is 'an increasingly fragile moat.' Example: The company's most recent model, GPT-5, included multiple advances yet underwhelmed many users. As competitors inevitably catch up, the analysts conclude, 'Model commoditization is an increasingly likely outcome.' With innovations suffering short lives, OpenAI must now become 'a more product-focused, diversified organization that can operate at scale while retaining its position' at the top of the industry–skills the company has yet to demonstrate. Bottom line, OpenAI can maintain its leading rank in the industry, but it won't be easy, and betting on it could be risky. Yet a different view suggests OpenAI is much closer to creating a sustainable moat. It comes from Robert Siegel, a management lecturer at Stanford's Graduate School of Business who is also a venture capitalist and former executive at various companies, many in technology. He argues that OpenAI is already well along the road to achieving a valuable attribute, stickiness: The longer customers use something, the less likely they are to switch to a competitor. In OpenAI's case, 'people will only move to Perplexity or Gemini or other solutions if they get a better result,' he says. Yet that becomes unlikely because AI learns; the more you use a particular AI engine, the more it learns about you and what you want. 'If you keep putting questions into ChatGPT, which learns your behaviors better, and you like it, there's no reason to leave as long as it's competitive.' Now combine that logic with OpenAI's behavior. 'It seems like their strategy is to be ubiquitous,' Siegel says, putting ChatGPT in front of as many people as possible so the software can start learning about them before any competitor can get there first. Most famously, OpenAI released ChatGPT 3.5 to the public in 2022 for free, attracting a million users in five days and 100 million in two months. In addition, the company raised much investment early in the game, having been founded in 2015. Thus, Siegel says, OpenAI can 'continue to run hard and use capital as a moat so they can do all the things they need to do to be everywhere.' But Siegel, the J.P. Morgan analysts, and everyone else knows plenty can always go wrong. An obvious threat to OpenAI and most of its competitors is an open-source model such as China's DeepSeek, which appears to perform well at significantly lower costs. The venture capital that has poured into OpenAI could dry up as hundreds of other AI startups compete for financing. J.P. Morgan and Siegel agree that OpenAI's complex unconventional governance structure must be reformed; though a recently proposed structure has not been officially disclosed, it is reportedly topped by a nonprofit, which might worry profit-seeking investors. As for moats, OpenAI is obviously in the best position to build or strengthen one. But looking into the era of AI, the whole concept of the corporate moat may become meaningless. How long will it be, if it hasn't been done already, before a competitor asks its own AI engine, 'How do we defeat OpenAI's moat?' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
AI Datacenters Are Raising Nearby Residents' Electric Bills
If you're looking for someone to blame for your ballooning energy bills, we have an increasingly familiar culprit: AI data centers. A new analysis of one the US's largest power grids, PJM, found that a rise in customer energy rates is directly attributable to the tremendous power demands of these data facilities that undergird services like OpenAI's ChatGPT, the Washington Post reports. Serving 67 million customers, the PJM region covers just over a dozen states, including Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, as well as DC. Some of these states will see their energy bills surge by more than 20 percent this summer, Reuters reported; in Philadelphia, according to WaPo, the typical bill rose by about $17. And in Columbus, Ohio, prices spiked by $27. "We are seeing every region of the country experience really significant data center load growth," Abe Silverman, a researcher of energy markets at Johns Hopkins University, told WaPo. "It's putting enormous upward pressure on prices, both for transmission and for generation." Using Columbus as an example again, customers are paying an extra $240 per year due to the power demand of AI data centers, WaPo calculated based on figures from local utility company AEP Ohio. One of the reasons for the soaring costs is that utility companies — which maintain the infrastructure that delivers your power, rather than generating it — are paying more for "capacity," or the total power that's made available to them. Utility companies bid for capacity at an annual auction, and last year, per WaPo, these auction prices soared by an eye-watering 833 percent. They rose again this year by another 22 percent. According to an independent monitor's report, about three-quarters of the surge in capacity prices are because of planned or existing data centers. "There has been a paradigm shift in the market," Joseph Bowring, the author of the independent monitor's report, told WaPo. "These data centers could overwhelm the grid. The system cannot go on this way." Generative AI's energy appetite is so voracious that companies like Microsoft and Google are firing up entire nuclear power plants to supply their data centers. Even heavily polluting coal plants are being kept online as a stopgap until these new facilities come online. And the Trump administration wants to build even more coal plants. It's not just the prices you should worry about, though, or the harrowing environmental toll, ranging from titanic carbon emissions to vaporizing entire lakes' worth of water. The huge spike in power demands are also putting immense stress on the aging power grids themselves, which are failing during brutal heatwaves and frigid winters. Some states are pushing back. Ohio regulators recently ruled that data center companies must pay more for their energy to help make upgrades to the power grid, WaPo noted. But the story's different in Virginia, which has more data centers than any other state — 596, according to the website Data Center Map, with the overwhelming majority up North near DC. To keep its numero uno status, Virginia is offering huge tax breaks to data center companies — meaning they get a free ride, and the state's taxpayers, if the latest trends keep up, get bigger energy bills. "The Big Tech companies suck up the electricity, and we end up paying higher prices," an Ohio resident told WaPo. "I'm not comfortable with average customers subsidizing billion-dollar companies." More on AI: Scientists Just Found Something Unbelievably Grim About Pollution Generated by AI Solve the daily Crossword
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI Employees Plan $6 Billion Share Sale at $500 Billion Valuation
OpenAI is in talks to let current and former staff sell about $6 billion worth of shares. The group of buyers includes SoftBank Group (SFTBY), Thrive Capital, and Dragoneer Investment Group. If the deal goes through, it would place the company at a $500 billion value, which is up from $300 billion earlier this year. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. At the same time, OpenAI is also running a separate $40 billion funding round led by SoftBank. The firm has already secured $8.3 billion from investors and expects SoftBank to add $22.5 billion by the end of the year. By setting up both a primary raise and a secondary sale, the company is seeking to raise funds while also letting staff cash out a part of their equity. Revenue has been climbing at a fast pace. OpenAI doubled its revenue in the first seven months of 2025, which put it on an annual run rate of $12 billion. By the end of the year, the number is projected to hit $20 billion. This growth has been closely linked to strong use of ChatGPT, which has seen weekly active users rise to about 700 million. In fact, this move is like hitting two birds with one stone; the secondary sale gives staff a chance to gain from the rise in value without the firm going public, but also helps the company keep workers in place while rivals such as Meta (META) try to draw talent away. With staff able to sell at a high mark, the company can ease some of the pressure of talent competition. If completed, the deal would make OpenAI one of the most valuable private firms in the world. For context, the figure would even put it above SpaceX, which is valued at around $400 billion. Investors see the company's rapid climb in revenue and users as a sign of continued demand in the field of artificial intelligence. With TipRanks' Comparison Tool, we looked at several well-known companies that employ chatbots similar to OpenAI's ChatGPT.
