WA House and Senate reach deal on unemployment benefits for striking workers
Lawmakers in the Washington House and Senate have struck an agreement to provide up to six weeks of unemployment insurance for striking workers.
Both chambers approved Senate Bill 5041 this year to open the safety net program to striking workers, but they set different limits for the amount of time people could receive benefits. The Senate approved a 12-week limit, the House four weeks.
Sen. Marcus Riccelli, D-Spokane, said the six-week compromise hits a 'sweet spot,' addressing concerns from businesses while leveling the playing field for low-wage workers.
Labor unions and Democratic lawmakers have pressed for the bill, arguing the benefits will help striking workers afford necessities such as food and rent when negotiating for better wages and working conditions.
When the bill passed the Senate last month, an amendment that would have restricted unemployment benefits to four weeks failed by one vote. Then, in mid-April, the House amended the bill ahead of a floor vote to add the four-week limit.
Gov. Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, has not publicly taken a position on the bill.
Under the bill, workers would become eligible for unemployment benefits on the second Sunday after a strike begins, plus a one-week waiting period. Typically, unemployment insurance is offered for up to 26 weeks a year.
If a strike is determined to be prohibited by state or federal law, benefits would have to be repaid.
Workers affected by employer-initiated lockouts would also be eligible for the benefits. Labor advocates point to lockouts as a tactic businesses can use to put pressure on workers during contract negotiations.
New Jersey and New York are the only states that provide unemployment insurance for striking workers.
Republicans opposed the bill.
They, along with business groups, argue it could incentivize workers to strike and result in higher costs for businesses that could spill over onto employers not involved in labor disputes.
'If employers aren't healthy, you don't have workers and when we don't have healthy employers, we're not going to have a healthy economy,' said Rep. Suzanne Schmidt, R-Spokane Valley.
The bill would also require the state's Employment Security Department to submit annual reports to the Legislature with data on the prevalence of strikes in the state and the cost of benefits for striking workers for Washington's unemployment insurance trust fund.
If passed, the bill would take effect on Jan. 1, 2026, and is set to expire Dec. 31, 2035.
Both chambers have to wait 24 hours before putting the bill up for a vote, which means it could gain final approval from the Legislature as early as Friday. The session ends Sunday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
29 minutes ago
- NBC News
Natural disaster victims would get six months of mortgage relief under Senate bill
LOS ANGELES — Natural disaster survivors would be eligible for six months of mortgage relief under a bill introduced Thursday by two senators whose states have been ravaged by wildfires and floods. The Mortgage Relief for Disaster Survivors Act would apply to homeowners with federally backed loans in areas declared disasters since Jan. 1 without accumulating interest or penalties during the six-month period. Borrowers could apply for additional six-month extensions. 'Earlier this year, we watched as families in Los Angeles were devastated by wildfires, and to date, many homeowners are still struggling to rebuild from this disaster,' said Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who is co-sponsoring the bill. 'As natural disasters become more frequent due to climate change, it is critical that we pave a path to stability for homeowners in times of crisis,' he added. Parts of Schiff's former congressional district in Southern California were devoured in January when the Eaton Fire tore through Altadena, destroying nearly 6,000 homes and killing at least 19 people. His co-sponsor is Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., whose state was ravaged by the 2021 Marshall Fire, which damaged or destroyed some 1,200 homes in Boulder County. 'Coloradans know all too well how difficult it is to pick up the pieces and move forward after catastrophic wildfires,' Bennet said. 'When mounting financial and emotional costs of recovery weigh on families, they should be able to take time to put their lives back together and rebuild their homes.' House members who represent Altadena, Pacific Palisades and Malibu in California introduced a companion bill this year that would provide 180 days of mortgage relief without penalties or late fees. The pause would apply only to federally backed loans. Nonfederal lenders are not required to offer payment reprieves to homeowners in disaster zones. But after the Palisades and Eaton fires, more than 400 lenders agreed to a 90-day pause without reporting the missed payments to credit agencies. Eaton Fire survivor Freddy Sayegh said he took advantage of the program after heavy smoke damage prevented him from returning to his Altadena home. He has since moved his family seven times and incurred thousands of dollars of unforeseen costs for food, clothing and other immediate needs. Some of the costs were covered by insurance, but much of the money came out of his pocket while he awaits compensation. He dipped into his savings when the 90 days were over and paid his delinquent mortgage in a lump sum, fearing he would incur fees or be forced to refinance. 'It actually placed a lot of pressure to come up with three months all at once,' he said. 'There's a lot of people who don't have three months of savings.' In Texas, where cataclysmic flooding that began July 2 caused an estimated $240 million in damage, officials announced a 90-day foreclosure moratorium that prohibits mortgage companies from initiating or completing foreclosures in Kerr County, the area hardest hit by the disaster. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, delinquencies nearly doubled nationally in March compared with the same time last year, up 21% from 12%. In California, wildfire-related delinquencies peaked in March at 4,100 and fell to 2,240 in June, according to the data tracking company ICE Mortgage Technology. The trend follows a pattern seen after other natural disasters, in which delinquencies spike in the months immediately following catastrophes and gradually level out over the next 18 to 24 months, said Andy Walden, head of mortgage and housing market research at Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of ICE Mortgage Technology. 'It takes time for many homeowners to untangle finances while dealing with the emotional and logistical aftermath of losing their homes,' he said. 'From navigating insurance claims to working with FEMA, borrowers often need time to stabilize. Foreclosure moratoriums introduced after major disasters often give families the breathing room they need to recover.' Former Altadena resident Keni 'Arts' Davis stared down at a 10-year mortgage when his home of nearly four decades was destroyed. He has moved six times since then, finally landing close to the neighborhood he loved so much. Much of his recovery journey included negotiating with his insurance company to pay off his mortgage, rather than borrowing or seeking an extension. 'It might have meant financial ruin,' he said. He intends to rebuild by cobbling together the money through savings and microloans that are sometimes just $500. He said that the mortgage relief bills sound good on paper but that their timing leaves something to be desired. 'My grandmother would have said it's a day late and a dollar short,' he said. 'We're all just depending on any help we can get to make it one day to the next.'


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
US support for Israel's actions in Gaza drops, as Democratic opposition grows and MAGA movement splits
Americans' support for Israel's military actions in Gaza is dropping rapidly, prompting pro-Israel Democrats and some of President Donald Trump's long-time allies to warn that the country could permanently damage its standing in the United States. A Gallup poll released this week found that just 32% of US adults support Israel's military actions in Gaza — a record low since the war was launched in response to Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack. The poll also found the strongest partisan split yet: Support among those who identify themselves as Republicans remained strong, at 71%. But just 8% of Democrats and 25% of independents say they back Israel's military actions. In perhaps the most ominous long-term sign for backers of Israel, the poll found just 9% support for its actions among those age 18-34 of all political parties. The shift in public opinion has crucial implications for both parties: Some key members of Trump's MAGA movement are vocally questioning whether the United States should keep supporting Israel, while plummeting backing for the country among Democrats will likely impact the party's primaries in key races in 2026 and 2028. The collapse in American support for Israel is part of a global trend. The United Kingdom said this week it would recognize a Palestinian state before the United Nations General Assembly unless Israel takes major steps to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The announcement followed France's decision to do so. United Nations agencies are warning that 'time is running out to mount a full-scale humanitarian response' in the besieged Gaza Strip. Data show that more than one in three people (39%) are now going days at a time without eating, the UN's World Food Programme said in a statement Wednesday, adding that over 500,000 people — almost a quarter of Gaza's population — 'are enduring famine-like conditions.' Rep. Brad Sherman, a California Democrat who co-chairs the bipartisan Congressional Israel Allies Caucus, told CNN that Israel is losing the battle for worldwide public opinion. He said Israel's military faces serious challenges in Gaza, where Hamas is willing to incur massive civilian casualties 'to undermine Israel's position in the world,' but said its objectives 'have to be balanced against each other.' 'Israel has to determine, what are its military objectives, and what casualties is it willing to incur to realize that national security includes your image around the world,' Sherman said. 'You can't get everything you want, and your worldwide image is important.' Within the GOP, fissures over Israel's actions came into public view after Trump on Monday disputed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's weekend assertion that there is 'no starvation in Gaza.' 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, and you can't fake that. So, we're going to be even more involved.' Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent figure in Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement, appeared to become the first Republican in Congress to describe the crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide' with a Monday night social media post. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene said. Her comment came in a longer post criticizing Florida GOP Rep. Randy Fine, a staunch supporter of Israel. Fine told CNN that 'those who claim that Israel is engaged in genocide are either antisemites or idiots or both.' 'If Israel had wanted to commit a genocide in Gaza, they had the ability to do it. And it would have been done 18 months ago, and it would have been over in two days,' he said. 'Israel has the capability to kill everyone in Gaza, but they haven't. … Hundreds and hundreds of Israeli soldiers have died in order to minimize the deaths of Gaza Arabs.' He argued that Israel should stop putting its own soldiers at risk 'to minimize the deaths of the enemy.' Fine added: 'Israel needs to stop worrying about what the rest of the world thinks and take care of business. Political opinion does not win wars.' While many Republicans still agree with Fine, Steve Bannon, the former Trump chief strategist, said Tuesday on his podcast that there is 'very little support for Israel' within Trump's MAGA movement among those under age 30. 'And now, even people who support Israel are sitting there going, what in the hell's going on here?' Bannon said. Inside the Democratic Party, the issue of support for Israel proved to be a difficult one in 2024 for President Joe Biden and then his replacement atop the ballot, Vice President Kamala Harris, particularly in the battleground state of Michigan. That state, with its large Arab-American population, will host a competitive Senate contest in 2026. And Democrats who hope to run for president in 2028 will surely be pushed on their Israel policies in primaries across the country. Progressive Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee, who was one of six members of Congress to support a recent Greene amendment to strip $500 million in funding for Israel's missile defense systems from a defense appropriations bill, said in a statement that, 'The United States has a responsibility to demand a permanent ceasefire, stop funding and supplying the bombs being dropped, and call for unconditional humanitarian aid to enter Gaza immediately. It is good policy, good politics, and the right thing to do.' More establishment figures in liberal media have also sharpened their criticism of Israel in recent days — offering a preview of what could become a significant long-term shift in the party. The former aides to President Barack Obama who host the 'Pod Save America' podcast argued this week that Democratic candidates should stop supporting military aid for Israel. 'There has to be a total mindset change in the Democratic Party,' co-host Tommy Vietor, a former Obama National Security Council staffer, said. 'When the war ends, we are not going back to the pre-October 7 status quo. It's not where the party is. It's not where the world is.' Eric Fingerhut, the president and chief executive officer of the Jewish Federations of North America and a former Ohio Democratic congressman, said the Gallup findings numbers reflect 'overwhelmingly negative media coverage of the war.' 'There's no question that we are in a very partisan moment in America, and that that is an overlay on how people react to the situation in Israel and in the war in Gaza,' Fingerhut said. CNN's Nadeen Ebrahim and Ibrahim Dahman contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Minister rejects claim that recognition of Palestine state could breach international law
A minister has denied claims that Sir Keir Starmer could risk breaching international law with his pledge to recognise Palestine as a state. Nearly 40 members of the House of Lords, including prominent UK lawyers, made the claims in a letter to Attorney General Lord Hermer letter, first reported by The Times, argues that Sir Keir's promise to recognise Palestine in September - unless Israel takes "substantive steps" to end the situation in Gaza - may breach international law as the territory may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. But speaking to Wilfred Frost on Sky News Breakfast, small business minister Gareth Thomas said he did not believe the move, which has been condemned by Israel, would breach international law because the UK has not signed the Montevideo Convention. He pointed out that 140 countries have already recognised Palestine as a state. Mr Thomas said: "I respect the views of those lawyers, but in the end, recognition of a state is a political judgement. "And we've been very clear that our judgement is that the Palestinians have an inalienable right to statehood; that now is the right time to say publicly that we will recognise the state of [Palestine] unless Israel agrees to end the appalling violence that we're seeing in Gaza at the moment, and commits to a two state solution." He added: "And the ceasefire that can enable the huge amounts of aid we need to get aid and to feed the people of Gaza and commits to no annexation of land in the West Bank. Otherwise, we will recognise, at the UN General Assembly in September." Read more: Canadian Prime Minister saying his country would also recognise Palestine as a state pending certain conditions - including that the Palestinian Authority commits to fundamentally reforming its governance, and holds general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part. But in their letter to Lord Hermer, 38 peers said Palestine "does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states". They said there was no certainty over the borders of Palestine and no single government, while also pointing out that Hamas and Fatah are enemies. Lord Hermer has previously insisted that a commitment to international law "goes absolutely to the heart" of the government's approach to foreign policy. Read more from Sky News:Airlines furious after another technical glitch cancels flights Among the respected lawyers who have signed the letter are Lord Pannick - who represented the previous government at the Supreme Court over its Rwanda scheme - as well as KCs Lord Verdirame and Lord Faulks. Some of Parliament's most prominent Jewish voices, including crossbench peer Baroness Deech, Labour's Lord Winston and the Conservatives' Baroness Altmann, have also put their name to the letter. Israel has condemned the UK's decision, with the foreign ministry arguing it "constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of hostages".