Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge accuses PM Modi of ‘murdering' Constitution
He was addressing a mega convention organised by the Karnataka government, where development works worth over Rs 2,500 crore for Mysuru were inaugurated and foundation stones laid.
'BJP and RSS are talking about amending or rewriting the Constitution. You may try how much ever you want, the people of this country will not allow you to change the Constitution. If you (people) allow them to change the Constitution, you will not have any rights,' Kharge warned the gathering.
'Modi, you became the Chief Minister and Prime Minister because of the Constitution, you bowed to the Constitution before entering the Parliament, but Modi is today murdering the same Constitution.' 'BJP and RSS are every day making attempts to remove this Constitution,' he added.
During his address, Kharge also hit out at the PM for visiting 42 countries, but not conflict-hit Manipur.
Chief Minister Siddaramiah, Deputy CM D K Shivakumar and several ministers of the state government were present at the event.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Jagdeep Dhankar's shock resignation prompts search for reasons, Opposition says 'deeper reasons' than health
The gazette notification of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar's resignation, ostensibly on health grounds, was issued by the Union Home Ministry on Tuesday (July 22, 2025), less than 24 hours after he tendered it, formally marking his exit from the post. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a brief message posted on social media platform X, acknowledged the resignation without elaboration. 'Shri Jagdeep Dhankharji has got many opportunities to serve our country in various capacities, including as the Vice President of India. Wishing him good health,' Mr. Modi said. Also read | What does the Constitution say about the vice-presidential elections when a V-P resigns Though there is no official word on what prompted the resignation, sources indicated it may have been linked to Mr. Dhankhar's decision to accept a notice submitted by 63 Opposition MPs seeking the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma. According to sources, the government was taken by surprise as it had intended the motion for removal to be a bipartisan initiative, and that too originating in the Lok Sabha. By the time Mr. Dhankhar accepted the Opposition's notice, a joint delegation of senior leaders from both the ruling alliance and the Opposition had already submitted a similar motion to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, indicating rare political consensus. Further, Mr. Dhankhar not only accepted the notice but also informed the Rajya Sabha that if similar notices were presented in both Houses, a joint committee would be constituted to examine the allegations against Justice Varma. During this period, government managers were reportedly mobilising signatures from NDA MPs in the Rajya Sabha in support of the motion, to preserve its bipartisan character. Sources added that the matter led to an exchange of heated words between officials in the Rajya Sabha Chairperson's office and government functionaries. While this may have acted as the immediate trigger, sources suggest there were underlying differences between Mr. Dhankhar and the government. Sources say it has been a while since Mr. Dhankar and the government have been simpatico, with the former not feeling supported enough by the Centre when an Opposition sponsored impeachment motion was moved against him last December, and the government objecting to his frequent statements taking up cudgels against the judiciary. Dhankhar's remarks on judiciary didn't sit well with Govt Differences also surfaced over Mr. Dhankhar's remarks critical of the judiciary, which reportedly did not sit well with the government. He had, on one occasion, publicly admonished Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan at a function, urging him to initiate dialogue with protesting farmers. On Tuesday, the Opposition raised questions over the circumstances of Mr. Dhankhar's departure. Congress chief whip Jairam Ramesh, in a detailed post on X, described events on Mr. Dhankhar's final day in office, pointing to the absence of Leader of the House in Rajya Sabha J.P. Nadda and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju from a meeting of the Rajya Sabha's Business Advisory Committee (BAC), which Mr. Dhankhar reportedly took umbrage at. Mr. Dhankhar had subsequently rescheduled the BAC meeting to 1 p.m. on Tuesday. 'So something very serious happened yesterday between 1 PM and 4:30 PM to account for the deliberate absence of Shri Nadda and Shri Rijiju from the second BAC yesterday,' Mr. Ramesh wrote. Mr. Nadda, however, denied any procedural lapse, saying that the Vice-President's office had been informed in advance. 'The Vice President's office was intimated about our inability to attend the meeting,' he said. Mr. Ramesh maintained that there were 'deeper reasons' behind the resignation. 'To the extent possible under the current G2 ruling regime, he tried to accommodate the Opposition. He was a stickler for norms, proprieties, and protocol, which he believed were being consistently disregarded in both his capacities,' Mr. Ramesh said — a pointed remark, given the Opposition's earlier move to impeach Mr. Dhankhar for alleged partisanship. Mr. Dhankhar resigned on Monday evening, citing medical reasons in his letter to President Droupadi Murmu. He said he was stepping down with immediate effect.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Explained: What the India-UK free trade deal means for both economies
Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's two-day visit to the United Kingdom on July 23-24 will mark a milestone in India-UK ties, with the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) likely to be signed during his stop in London on July 24. This would be PM Modi's fourth visit to the UK as Prime Minister and the first under the new British leadership of Prime Minister Keir Starmer. PM Modi would also call on King Charles, and will be accompanied by Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal for the formal signing of the agreement. Following this, Modi will visit the Maldives on July 25–26, becoming the first foreign leader to do so under President Mohamed Muizzu's administration. What is the India-UK Free Trade Agreement? The FTA aims to boost bilateral trade, eliminate or reduce tariffs on goods and services, and facilitate investment and collaboration between the two nations. The pact has been three years in the making, with negotiations beginning in 2022 and officially concluding on May 6. According to Britain, the deal is its 'biggest and most economically significant' bilateral agreement since exiting the European Union. Bilateral trade between India and the UK stood at £42.6 billion in 2024, and the agreement is expected to increase this by £25.5 billion annually by 2040. Which sectors will benefit the most? The agreement is expected to boost labour-intensive Indian exports such as: -Leather -Apparel and footwear -Toys -Marine products -Gems and jewellery India, in return, will reduce tariffs on a range of British goods, including: -Whisky and gin: Tariffs will fall from 150 per cent to 75 per cent immediately, and to 40 per cent by the 10th year -Automobiles: Duties will be lowered from over 100 per cent to 10 per cent, under a quota regime -Medical devices, cosmetics, soft drinks, chocolates and biscuits -Machinery and aerospace equipment British textile tariffs will also be removed, supporting India's large apparel industry, which employs millions. What does the FTA mean for India? The deal will give Indian exporters zero-duty access for 99 per cent of their products into the UK market. It is significant for sectors like engineering goods, auto components, electric vehicles, and sports goods. The agreement includes a double contribution convention, which will exempt Indian professionals and companies from social security contributions in the UK for three years — a move described by the Indian government as a 'huge win'. The FTA also opens up opportunities for Indian businesses under Britain's public procurement market, including in healthcare, transport, and energy sectors. Additionally, British firms investing in India could receive preferential treatment under the 'Make in India' policy. India-UK trade deal: What are the exclusions? India has excluded some agricultural goods from the agreement. This includes products like apples, dairy, and cheese, to protect local farmers and producers. The deal also comes with phased timelines. While whisky duties will drop in stages, automotive tariff reductions will happen under a managed quota regime over time. Why was the UK-India FTA deal stalled for so long? The most prominent reason for the stalling of the UK-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations was that both countries entered their general election cycles around the same time. This led to the 14th round of talks being paused as political focus in both countries shifted towards campaigns. The proposed FTA is highly comprehensive, including 26 chapters that include goods, services, investment, and intellectual property rights. This prolonged the time required for consensus and finalising the draft. Both countries are also negotiating a separate Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), which may have further delayed the process. What happens after the deal is signed? If signed on July 24, the FTA will need to be ratified by the British Parliament and approved by India's Union Cabinet. The implementation is expected to take up to a year from the date of signing. Both sides are betting on this deal to double bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030. With India's import demand projected to rise significantly and its middle class expected to reach 60 million by 2030, the agreement could reshape the economic relationship between the two nations.
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
BIG setback to Congress: Tribunal dismisses appeal challenging ₹199 Crore tax demand for FY18-19
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed an appeal by the Congress party seeking income tax exemption for the income of ₹ 199.15 crore during the assessment year 2018-19. The Tribunal rejected the party's claim for exemption on the ground that there was a violation of the conditions in Section 13A of the Income Tax Act, legal news website LiveLaw reported. (This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
