logo
Beyond the West: Russia and India are building something of their own

Beyond the West: Russia and India are building something of their own

Canada Standard10-07-2025
As the Russian leader prepares to visit New Delhi, experts revisit the foundations of one of the worlds most enduring and underestimated partnerships
As Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to visit India for the two nations' 23rd bilateral summit later this year, experts in both countries are actively formulating proposals ahead of the trip. Mutual trust remains the cornerstone of the Russian-Indian partnership - a quality that has become even more significant in recent years as both countries navigate global turbulence and shifts in the world order.
In the current geopolitical landscape, Moscow-­New Delhi relations go beyond a bilateral framework and contribute an important element of continuity and stability to international relations and the global economy.
A group of Russian and Indian experts has come together to take a fresh look at the India-Russia relationship. Their ideas have been compiled in a new book published earlier this year by Indian publishing house Har-Anand Publications, titled 'India and Russia: Enduring Trust in a Transformational Era'.
The book is edited by renowned expert Dr.Lydia Kulik, head of India Studies at the Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO and senior research fellow at the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The publication also received support from Dipanjan Roy Chaudhury, diplomatic affairs editor at The Economic Times.
"This edition is a selection of opinions from Russia and India providing a fresh look at the relationship that is of utmost importance to the people of our two civilization-states, as well as to the world undergoing profound change," Kulik told RT. She added that the purpose behind the book was to assess the evolution of bilateral ties from the Soviet era to the pivotal year of 2024, when relations experienced an unprecedented boost.
The book addresses the full spectrum of bilateral relations - from traditional pillars of the partnership to emerging areas of cooperation. The contributing authors are renowned scholars and experienced practitioners from both countries, ensuring that the recommendations offered are both research-based and practically applicable. The authors also point out gaps in the relationship, including the absence of a systematic approach to developing science and technology cooperation.
Pankaj Saran, convener of NatStrat and former Indian ambassador to Russia, offers a comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the bilateral relationship. He concludes that India-Russia ties will endure despite current geopolitical challenges, including Russia's confrontation with the West and its deepening ties with China.
Tatyana Shaumyan, head of the Center for Indian Studies at the Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, noted that "Moscow appreciates India's foreign policy based on the pillars of strategic autonomy."
She argues that while India called for Russia to halt its special military operation in Ukraine, it abstained from voting on several UN resolutions condemning Russia's actions - including one at the UN General Assembly on the seizure of Ukrainian territory and a proposal to remove Russia from the Human Rights Council.
"In its strategic orientations, the Indian leadership is increasingly striving to ensure the country's important position not only in the South Asian region, but also at the level of global international relations, aiming to globalize its political thinking and real policy as India's economic, technological, and military power strengthens," she writes.
Shaumyan, a distinguished Russian Indologist and recipient of India's Padma Shri award, also analyzes the prospects and limitations of India-Russia cooperation in multilateral platforms such as the SCO, RIC, and BRICS.
Experts highlight the significance of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's official visit to Moscow in July 2024. It was his first visit to Russia since the start of the Ukraine conflict in 2022 - and his first bilateral trip after being re-elected in June 2024.
Leyla Turayanova, junior research fellow at the Center for the Indo-Pacific Region of the Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO RAS), concludes that India-Russia relations have withstood the stress test imposed by the Ukraine crisis, while their economic ties have significantly expanded. At the same time, New Delhi has demonstrated its commitment to multi-alignment despite growing engagement with the West in recent years.
Practical issues affecting India-Russia relations are also addressed. A team of authors including Julia Melnikova (program manager for Asia and Eurasia at the Russian International Affairs Council), Natalia Viakhireva (head of Canadian Studies at the Georgy Arbatov Institute for US and Canadian Studies), and Gleb Gryzlov (program coordinator at RIAC), explores the issue of connectivity. According to them, the post-2022 expansion of bilateral trade has made India a key stakeholder in Russia's connectivity projects, such as the International North-South Transport Corridor. At the same time, the Arctic and the Northern Sea Route are emerging as new frontiers in the partnership.
Sergey Komyshan, executive director and board member of SIBUR, analyzes trade and investment prospects through the example of Reliance Sibur Elastomers Private Ltd. - a successful joint venture that showcases the potential of India-Russia industrial cooperation. He also highlights new areas for collaboration, including mutual integration of payment systems, cooperation in carbon credits, and water recycling.
Aaryaman Nijhawan, international relations researcher and analyst, discusses the future of military-technical cooperation, drawing lessons from the Ukraine conflict. He identifies untapped opportunities such as joint drone development, anti-drone systems, and semiconductor manufacturing.
Olga Ustyuzhantseva and Ivan Danilin of IMEMO RAS emphasize the rising importance of bilateral science and technology ties, driven in part by India's rapid high-tech growth. However, challenges remain, including vague institutional frameworks, limited investment, and a lack of integration between business and innovation ecosystems. The authors stress the need to shift from state-driven initiatives to private-sector-led partnerships and greater involvement of startups and SMEs.
Cooperation in the financial sector - which became especially urgent after Western sanctions on Moscow - is examined by Sergey Storchak, senior banker at VEB.RF and former Russian deputy finance minister. He emphasizes that current geopolitical challenges require deeper bilateral financial engagement, including trade in national currencies, secure and fast cross-border payments, and integration of financial messaging systems.
Anna Kireeva, associate professor at MGIMO and senior research fellow at its Institute for International Studies, places the India-Russia partnership within a broader Russia-India-ASEAN context. She proposes new formats for cooperation, such as strategic dialogue on policy and security, joint arms production, maritime security, and the formation of technological alliances.
Aleksei Zakharov, research fellow at the Center for Indian Studies of the Institute of Oriental Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences, agrees that Russia's approach to South Asia is evolving - from a narrow India-centric view to a broader engagement with other regional powers. He notes that while India remains central to Russia's regional strategy, South Asia as a whole is becoming a zone of expanded diplomatic and economic interest for Moscow.
As President Putin prepares to visit India, a new expert volume explores the enduring strength, emerging challenges, and strategic depth of bilateral ties.
(RT.com)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts
What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the beginning of a meeting at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland, July 16, 2018. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File) Bilateral meetings between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his U.S. counterparts were a regular occurrence early in his tenure. But as tensions mounted between Moscow and the West following the illegal annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and allegations of meddling with the 2016 U.S. elections, those became increasingly less frequent, and their tone appeared less friendly. Here's what to know about past meetings between Russian and U.S. presidents: Putin and Joe Biden Putin and Joe Biden met only once while holding the presidency –- in Geneva in June 2021. Russia was amassing troops on the border with Ukraine, where large swaths of land in the east had long been occupied by Moscow-backed forces; Washington repeatedly accused Russia of cyberattacks. The Kremlin was intensifying its domestic crackdown on dissent, jailing opposition leader Alexei Navalny months earlier and harshly suppressing protests demanding his release. Putin and Biden talked for three hours, but no breakthroughs came out of the meeting. The two exchanged expressions of mutual respect, but firmly restated their starkly different views on all of the above. They spoke again via videoconference in December 2021 as tensions heightened over Ukraine. Biden threatened sanctions if Russia invaded Ukraine, and Putin demanded guarantees that Kyiv wouldn't join NATO –- something Washington and its allies said was a nonstarter. Another phone call between the two came in February 2022, less than two weeks before the full-scale invasion. Then the high-level contacts stopped cold, with no publicly disclosed conversations between Putin and Biden since the invasion. Putin and Donald Trump Putin met Trump met six times during the American's first term -– at and on the sidelines of G20 and APEC gatherings — but most famously in Helsinki in July 2018. That's where Trump stood next to Putin and appeared to accept his insistence that Moscow had not interfered with the 2016 U.S. presidential election and openly questioned the firm finding by his own intelligence agencies. His remarks were a stark illustration of Trump's willingness to upend decades of U.S. foreign policy and rattle western allies in service of his political concerns. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said. 'He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' Putin and Barack Obama U.S. President Barack Obama met with Putin nine times, and there were 12 more meetings with Dmitry Medvedev, who served as president in 2008-12. Putin became prime minister in a move that allowed him to reset Russia's presidential term limits and run again in 2012. Obama travelled to Russia twice — once to meet Medvedev in 2009 and again for a G20 summit 2013. Medvedev and Putin also travelled to the U.S. Under Medvedev, Moscow and Washington talked of 'resetting' Russia-U.S. relations post-Cold War and worked on arms control treaties. U.S. State Secretary Hillary Clinton famously presented a big 'reset' button to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at a meeting in 2009. One problem: instead of 'reset' in Russian, they used another word meaning 'overload.' After Putin returned to office in 2012, tensions rose between the two countries. The Kremlin accused the West of interfering with Russian domestic affairs, saying it fomented anti-government protests that rocked Moscow just as Putin sought reelection. The authorities cracked down on dissent and civil society, drawing international condemnation. Obama cancelled his visit to Moscow in 2013 after Russia granted asylum to Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor and whistleblower. In 2014, the Kremlin illegally annexed Crimea and threw its weight behind a separatist insurgency in eastern Ukraine. The U.S. and its allies responded with crippling sanctions. Relations plummeted to the lowest point since the Cold War. The Kremlin's 2015 military intervention in Syria to prop up Bashar Assad further complicated ties. Putin and Obama last met in China in September 2016, on the sidelines of a G20 summit, and held talks focused on Ukraine and Syria. Putin and George W. Bush Putin and George W. Bush met 28 times during Bush's two terms. They hosted each other for talks and informal meetings in Russia and the U.S., met regularly on the sidelines of international summits and forums, and boasted of improving ties between onetime rivals. After the first meeting with Putin in 2001, Bush said he 'looked the man in the eye' and 'found him very straightforward and trustworthy,' getting 'a sense of his soul.' In 2002, they signed the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty -– a nuclear arms pact that significantly reduced both countries' strategic nuclear warhead arsenal. Putin was the first world leader to call Bush after the 9/11 terrorist attack, offering his condolences and support, and welcomed the U.S. military deployment on the territory of Moscow's Central Asian allies for action in Afghanistan. He has called Bush 'a decent person and a good friend,' adding that good relations with him helped find a way out of 'the most acute and conflict situations.' —— Associated Press writer Yuras Karmanau contributed. Dasha Litvinova, The Associated Press

Vitesse Arnhem ‘deeply disappointed' as court upholds license withdrawal
Vitesse Arnhem ‘deeply disappointed' as court upholds license withdrawal

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Vitesse Arnhem ‘deeply disappointed' as court upholds license withdrawal

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Vitesse Arnhem lost a last-ditch bid Friday to get back its license to play in the Dutch professional leagues, possibly signalling an end to one of the oldest soccer clubs in the Netherlands. A Dutch court rejected an injunction request by Vitesse Arnhem that sought to halt a decision by the Netherlands' soccer association in July to withdraw its professional license. In a statement on its website, the club said it was 'deeply disappointed and distressed' by the decision. 'We have done everything we can in the past period to meet the set conditions, in collaboration with the investors and other stakeholders,' said Michel Schaay, chairman of De Sterkhouders, a group of investors that sought to save the club. 'The fact that this has been deemed insufficient is painful for us. Above all, for our supporters, employees, and the city of Arnhem.' Vitesse was established in 1892, initially as a cricket club. A soccer team was added later that year. Its only major Dutch title came when it won the KNVB Beker knockout cup competition in 2017. The Central Netherlands District Court said in a statement that a judge ruled that the Dutch soccer association KNVB 'did not violate the licensing regulations and could reasonably have reached this decision.' The judge who made the decision also said the ruling by the association's licensing commission was 'sufficiently reasoned.' Vitesse has been wrangling with the association for years over its status. Last year, it was docked 18 points and relegated from the top-flight Eredivisie while under investigation for ties to sanctioned Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich, the former owner of Chelsea. The KNVB said in a written reaction that 'it has become painfully clear how significant the impact can be if a club structurally fails to comply with the licensing system.' 'Losing a professional football club's license is a devastating blow, not only for the club itself, but also for the fans, sponsors, partners, employees, and everyone else directly or indirectly involved with Vitesse,' the KNVB added. 'We fully understand that this is painful and a very difficult time for them.' The club said Friday that it's future is now unclear. Vitesse had been scheduled to play its first match of the new season in the second tier of the Dutch professional league on Saturday against Almere City. 'The club is investigating the possibilities,' it said. 'In the meantime, the leadership remains in talks with stakeholders to secure the continuation of soccer in Arnhem.' ___ AP soccer:

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump's deadline for Russia arrives
Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump's deadline for Russia arrives

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump's deadline for Russia arrives

Ukrainian servicemen of the 148th artillery brigade load ammunition into a M777 howitzer before firing towards Russian positions at the frontline in Zaporizhzhia region, Ukraine, on Thursday, Aug. 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka) DNIPROPETROVSK, Ukraine — Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as U.S. President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing arrived and he eyed a possible summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the conflict. Trump, exasperated that Putin didn't heed his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, almost two weeks ago moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia, as well as introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil, if no Kremlin moves towards a settlement were forthcoming. It was unclear what steps Trump intended to take Friday. Trump's efforts to pressure Putin into stopping the fighting have so far delivered no progress. Russia's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armor while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace. Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometre (620-mile) front line that snakes from northeast to southeast Ukraine. The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out from there into the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages. Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine's northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk. In the Pokrovsk area, a commander said he believes Moscow isn't interested in peace. 'It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,' Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told The Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military. 'I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that; it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,' he said. In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia's invasion. 'We are on our land, we have no way out,' he said. 'So we stand our ground, we have no choice.' Trump said Thursday that he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader will not meet with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent's biggest conflict since World War II. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in an assessment Thursday that 'Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process.' 'Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia's side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West,' it said. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to end the conflict. Orbán said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow 'to negotiate on behalf of Europe.' Otherwise, 'we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent,' Orbán told Hungary's state broadcaster. Orbán, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe's concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent's interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative. 'This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,' he said. 'This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.' ___ Vasilisa Stepanenko, The Associated Press Samya Kullab in Kyiv, Ukraine, contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store