Save on the best budget Android tablet of 2025 as it drops down to just $160
As stated above, there are lots of cheap Android tablets on the market. But only some shine through to provide consumers what they want at an affordable price. The Galaxy Tab A9+ is one of those tablets. In fact, it's the one that we think deserves to take the top spot, offering a sleek design, solid build quality, and good performance for everyday use.
When it comes to the internals, you're getting a tablet powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 695 SoC that's paire with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage. Admittedly, the storage isn't really all that much, but Samsung does provide a microSD card slot on the tablet so that it can be expanded up to 1TB.
Furthermore, you also get an 11-inch screen that looks good in most conditions, and also features a 90Hz refresh rate as well. There's a 5MP front-facing camera, along with an 8MP camera on the rear. And with dual speakers, you get clear sound for all your favorite movies and games.
Samsung's OneUI customizations are present, utilizing the impressive power that Android delivers. Not only is the tablet smooth, but you also get years of support thanks to Samsung's recent software commitment for its devices. For the most part, you really can't go wrong if you're on a budget, because at $160, this tablet is an absolute steal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Trump AI Summit Targets Hardware as Key to US Supremacy
Welcome to Tech In Depth, our daily newsletter about the business of tech from Bloomberg's journalists around the world. Today, Ed Ludlow reports on the implications of the Trump administration's new AI Action Plan. Tesla and Samsung: Elon Musk's EV maker agreed a $16.5 billion chipmaking pact with Samsung, which will see the Korean company dedicate its production in an upcoming Texas fab to making the brains of future Tesla self-driving systems.
WIRED
a minute ago
- WIRED
Programmers Aren't So Humble Anymore—Maybe Because Nobody Codes in Perl
Jul 28, 2025 7:00 AM Perl is a messy, maddening programming language, the 'duct tape of the internet.' But at least you can tell it was made by humans. ILLUSTRATION: SAMUEL TOMSON Perl was once everywhere. Or at least it felt that way. Around the turn of the millennium, it seemed that almost every website was built on the back of this scripting language. It processed massive amounts of text—mechanisms for doing this powerfully and easily were part of the language—and it was even used in bioinformatics, munging and churning through genetic data. Based on one list, the companies that used Perl ranged widely: Amazon, Google, Yahoo, Deutsche Bank, Akamai, Citibank, Comcast, Morgan Stanley, Mozilla. A lot of Craigslist was programmed in Perl. Even at its peak use, the popularity of Perl was always a bit surprising. Perl is an undeniably messy language. It's often referred to as the 'duct tape of the internet,' with programmers joking that it's a 'write-only' language: You write in it but seldom read it (at least successfully). There is an amalgamated mashup nature to Perl, all in service of its motto: 'There's More Than One Way to Do It.' Just as there are synonyms in English, Perl has a variety of approaches to writing the same thing. While this is a common feature of programming languages to a certain degree, Perl seems to want to knock you over the head with it. There are multiple ways, for example, of writing conditional statements, from using the traditional 'if' to 'unless'; to writing an if statement backward in a single line; to even a three-part operator that involves a question mark and a colon. I have a distinct memory, in the early 2000s, of writing code in Perl one day, and the next day not understanding what I had written. But this clutter and baroque structure are in fact intentional and part of the broader philosophy that underlies Perl. The language's creator, Larry Wall, was trained in linguistics, and his intention was to become, along with his wife, a missionary involved in rare languages. Wall ended up taking a different path and fully embraced coding. But his deep thoughts around how languages work never left him. Wall's perspective seemed to be that an obsession with linguistic purity was overrated. English has words from French, Greek, German, and even Akkadian, betraying its winding history and multifarious origins. We split our infinitives and dangle our modifiers. We have puns, both intended and not. So what's a little bit of strangeness when it comes to how to write an if statement? Wall viewed evolution as part of the process of language development. There is an organic process going on here, and the final products needn't be orderly. And so, a broad—and nonjudgmental—approach to language construction is vital, whether it's a language designed to write scripts or sonnets. Perl has its 'more than one way' to do things and English has its numerous styles and flexible nature, a nature that can contain everything from cooking recipes to haikus, shopping lists to Faulkner. That is the sign of something that is truly open-ended. As Wall once said: 'I'm a firm believer that a language … ought to be an amoral artistic medium.' If Perl has any overarching vision or dogma, it's merely the fact that, perhaps, there shouldn't be programming dogma at all. To be clear, I was never a deep user of Perl. Its syntax and messiness overwhelmed its power for me, and when I was introduced to the well-ordered structure of Python, I ran to that language and never really looked back. This might in fact be a hint as to why the language lost its luster. Even in 1998, during its heyday, there were suggestions that Perl's bloat might lead to a desire to jump to something 'cleaner.' Whatever the reason, Perl is no longer as popular as it once was. Still, I find myself returning to this strange language, and I think it's because of the humility at its core. We need humility as we recognize that our world is more complicated than we might be able to comprehend, even or especially when it comes to the large technological systems of our own making (AI, cough cough). A single comprehensive theory or model won't cut it in a world of exceptions and edge cases and raging complications. We need slow, stumbling approaches, and Perl's evolved pluralism can show us the way. Perl can even teach us about ourselves. If I had to choose a language that is furthest from Perl, it might be Lisp. Developed around 1960, Lisp is elegant, almost mathematical in its construction. The 'Maxwell's Equations of Software,' as its definition has been described—just to give you a sense of the esotericism. Perl is, of course, not that. It's organic and sometimes maddening. For all its messiness, in other words, it's a language of the people. And that's the thing about programming languages: They are actually for people ; they can't just be parsable by machines. In the classic textbook Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs , the authors make this clear: 'Thus, programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.' Yes, the joke is that Perl is 'write-only'—but you can always tell it was written by human beings. A Perl renaissance is, I admit, unlikely. But perhaps the lesson of Perl is timeless. It asks us to be less precious—and more human—when it comes to programming languages and their design. Only then might we be able to bridge the gap between us and the machines.
CNN
a minute ago
- CNN
Elon Musk says Tesla and Samsung have signed a $16.5 billion chip deal
Tesla CEO Elon Musk said the U.S. automaker had signed a $16.5 billion deal to source chips from Samsung Electronics, a move expected to bolster the South Korean tech giant's loss-making contract manufacturing business. Samsung's shares jumped as much as 6.8% to their highest since September last year after news of the deal. Tesla shares were up 1.9% in U.S. premarket trading. Musk said Samsung's new chip factory in Taylor, Texas will make Tesla's next-generation AI6 chip, potentially re-energizing the project that has faced long delays amid Samsung's difficulties in retaining and attracting major clients. 'Samsung agreed to allow Tesla to assist in maximizing manufacturing efficiency. This is a critical point, as I will walk the line personally to accelerate the pace of progress. And the fab is conveniently located not far from my house,' Musk said in a post on X on Monday. 'The $16.5B number is just the bare minimum. Actual output is likely to be several times higher,' he said in another post. According to a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities, Ryu Young-ho, Samsung's Taylor fab 'so far had virtually no customers, so this order is quite meaningful.' In October, Reuters reported that Samsung had postponed taking deliveries of ASML chipmaking equipment for its Texas factory as it had not yet won any major customers for the project. It has already delayed the plant's operational start to 2026. While no timeline was provided for AI6 chip production, Musk has previously said that next-generation AI5 chips will be produced at the end of 2026, suggesting AI6 would follow. Lee Dong-ju, an analyst at SK Securities, expects production in 2027 or 2028, but Tesla has a history of missing its targets. Samsung currently makes Tesla's AI4 chips, which power its Full Self-Driving driver assistant system, while TSMC is slated to make the AI5, initially in Taiwan and then Arizona, Musk has said. Samsung, the world's top memory chip maker, also produces logic chips designed by customers through its foundry business. The Texas project is central to Samsung Chairman Jay Y. Lee's strategy to expand beyond its bread-and-butter memory chips into contract chip manufacturing. It holds just 8% of the global foundry market, far behind industry leader TSMC, which has a 67% share, data from market researcher Trendforce show. Samsung had earlier announced the $16.5 billion chip supply deal without naming the client, saying the customer had requested confidentiality about the details of the deal, which will run through the end of 2033. Three sources briefed about the matter told Reuters that Tesla was the customer for the deal. The deal with Tesla comes as Samsung, which is due to report its earnings on Thursday, faces mounting pressure in the race to produce artificial intelligence chips, where it trails rivals such as TSMC and SK Hynix. This lag has weighed heavily on its profit and share price. Earlier this month, Samsung projected a 56% drop in second-quarter operating profit, partly due to widening losses of its foundry business. Pak Yuak, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said the deal would help reduce losses at Samsung's foundry business, which he estimates exceeded 5 trillion won ($3.6 billion) in the first half of the year. Analysts say Samsung has struggled to retain key clients, with many defecting to TSMC for advanced chips, underscoring technological challenges the firm faces in the race to stay relevant in the capital intensive business. TSMC counts Apple, Nvidia and Qualcomm among its customers. It is not clear whether the Samsung-Tesla deal is related to ongoing trade talks between South Korea and the United States. Seoul is seeking U.S. partnerships in chips and shipbuilding amid last-ditch efforts to reach a trade deal to eliminate or reduce potential 25% U.S. tariffs.
