logo
Huge mistake at petrol station INSTANTLY destroys cars and leaves drivers fuming - as cops are called and motorists told to stay away

Huge mistake at petrol station INSTANTLY destroys cars and leaves drivers fuming - as cops are called and motorists told to stay away

Daily Mail​a day ago
Several drivers have lashed out at a petrol station after accidentally filling their cars with contaminated fuel, causing them to break down on the spot.
A 7-Eleven at Nunawading, in Melbourne 's east, has been accused of unknowingly selling the watered-down petrol on Saturday.
It is understood water from recent rainfall leaked into the underground tanks and contaminated the fuel.
Footage captured motorists opening the bonnets of their cars to assess the damage while one held a plastic bottle with bright green petrol inside.
'All these cars, every single one that is here is ruined because of the water in their fuel,' one driver said in the video.
Motorist Cody Tranquillo told Seven News 'cars were just dying immediately once they started running'.
Pana Kritikos added 'multiple cars have broken down'.
'Some wouldn't even turn over,' she said.
Several pumps have been affected by the contamination, including the Diesel, Unleaded 98 and 91-Octane ones.
Stranded drivers took it upon themselves to warn others pulling into the petrol station to not refuel.
Police were eventually called to the scene as tensions escalated.
7-Eleven said the incident was confined to the one petrol station and that sales had been suspended while investigations continue.
The company promised affected customers would be offered compensation. However, what customers will be offered is not yet clear.
Fuel contamination can cause thousands of dollars in damages to engines.
Water in fuel can cause corrosion, fuel injection issues or microbial growth as it 'dies off'.
Fuel contaminated with water will appear darker than normal and often carry a foul odour.
Consumer Affairs Victoria advises drivers who suspect their cars have been damaged by contaminated fuel to obtain written confirmation from their mechanic and contact their insurer.
Fuel contamination can also be reported to the Federal Government's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water on 1800 803 772.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge mistake at petrol station INSTANTLY destroys cars and leaves drivers fuming - as cops are called and motorists told to stay away
Huge mistake at petrol station INSTANTLY destroys cars and leaves drivers fuming - as cops are called and motorists told to stay away

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

Huge mistake at petrol station INSTANTLY destroys cars and leaves drivers fuming - as cops are called and motorists told to stay away

Several drivers have lashed out at a petrol station after accidentally filling their cars with contaminated fuel, causing them to break down on the spot. A 7-Eleven at Nunawading, in Melbourne 's east, has been accused of unknowingly selling the watered-down petrol on Saturday. It is understood water from recent rainfall leaked into the underground tanks and contaminated the fuel. Footage captured motorists opening the bonnets of their cars to assess the damage while one held a plastic bottle with bright green petrol inside. 'All these cars, every single one that is here is ruined because of the water in their fuel,' one driver said in the video. Motorist Cody Tranquillo told Seven News 'cars were just dying immediately once they started running'. Pana Kritikos added 'multiple cars have broken down'. 'Some wouldn't even turn over,' she said. Several pumps have been affected by the contamination, including the Diesel, Unleaded 98 and 91-Octane ones. Stranded drivers took it upon themselves to warn others pulling into the petrol station to not refuel. Police were eventually called to the scene as tensions escalated. 7-Eleven said the incident was confined to the one petrol station and that sales had been suspended while investigations continue. The company promised affected customers would be offered compensation. However, what customers will be offered is not yet clear. Fuel contamination can cause thousands of dollars in damages to engines. Water in fuel can cause corrosion, fuel injection issues or microbial growth as it 'dies off'. Fuel contaminated with water will appear darker than normal and often carry a foul odour. Consumer Affairs Victoria advises drivers who suspect their cars have been damaged by contaminated fuel to obtain written confirmation from their mechanic and contact their insurer. Fuel contamination can also be reported to the Federal Government's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water on 1800 803 772.

Married couple 'kept lover's corpse at home for a year' as 'dogs chewed on body'
Married couple 'kept lover's corpse at home for a year' as 'dogs chewed on body'

Daily Mirror

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

Married couple 'kept lover's corpse at home for a year' as 'dogs chewed on body'

James Agnew, 55, and Suzanne Agnew, 57, have been charged after allegedly keeping their lover dead in their home for 18 months. The couple pocketed the man's cash, according to police A couple has been charged after allegedly keeping the body of their "intimate" partner in their home for 18 months to pocket his benefits, according to police. James Agnew, 55, and Suzanne Agnew, 57, are accused of stealing more than £13,000 of Jim O'Neil's benefits and using his debit card on numerous occasions since his death in December 2023. The suspects have been charged with one count each of tampering with a deceased human body, and abuse of a corpse, according to an arrest affidavit from the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office. They also face several money-related charges for the alleged theft and usage of the man's financial accounts. It comes as a pregnant woman was allegedly murdered alongside her boyfriend during a heinous rampage. Police said they were confronted with a man at the couple's home who identified himself simply as "James", later confirmed to be James Agnew. He told the officers that he didn't want to see or speak with them despite acknowledging O'Neill's brother's worries about his wellbeing, according to the affidavit. "Agents later were able to identify this male as James Agnew but based on the conversation he appeared to be implying that he was James O'Neill," the affidavit said. Officers returned to the Agnew residence but were denied entry, according to the affidavit. James and Suzanne Agnew are alleged to have given conflicting information about whether the missing O'Neill had ever lived with them, but eventually claimed that he had briefly stayed there before leaving with "some foreign woman online" several years ago. The police then added O'Neill to a missing persons list. Days later, according to the affidavit, O'Neill's brother got in touch with the Agnews about an alleged inheritance payment that needed to be deposited into his bank account. The couple claimed that O'Neill had actually returned home, but was refusing to speak to his brother. Despite this, the Agnews gave O'Neill's brother his banking details and Social Security number. However, when they found out that O'Neill would need to be present for the deposit, they "immediately stopped talking to him," the affidavit said. Becoming suspicious, O'Neill's brother checked his brother's bank statements. He discovered "regular" transactions, including monthly Social Security deposits of £867 and an overdraft of around £150. He also spotted "numerous ATM withdrawals," according to the police. O'Neill's brother took the evidence he had collected to the authorities, who looked at CCTV footage from a 7-Eleven store where O'Neill's debit card had been used multiple times. The video appeared to show James Agnew using the card to make purchases, the affidavit stated. James Agnew was "cooperatively" arrested in early July on an outstanding warrant, with Suzanne Agnew being called in shortly after. The police informed Suzanne that they wished to have a chat and that they had a search warrant, according to the affidavit. "She said she understood and immediately told me we would find James O'Neill's body in the residence, indicating he was deceased," a copper penned in the affidavit. "I let other detectives know and then came back out to Suzanne to provide her with a Miranda Advisement. Suzanne indicated she understood the advisement and agreed to continue speaking with me at the station. Detectives searching the residence did find the body of a deceased male, presumed to be James O'Neill." During a police interview, Suzanne Agnew confessed that she, her husband and O'Neill had been involved in a "three way relationship" for several years. Investigators concluded that O'Neill passed away in December 2023, likely due to a medical condition or drug use. James and Suzanne Agnew were not suspected of causing O'Neill's death, the affidavit stated. "I asked Suzanne about when they decided to cover up his body and she said after about a week the chihuahuas began 'chewing' on him so she covered him with a deflated air mattress to try to keep them away," the affidavit read. She told officers that she had initially decided to keep O'Neill's body at the property, but admitted what she had done "was wrong," according to the affidavit. "James had less to say about [O'Neill's] passing but provided a similar account," the affidavit said. "He didn't remember exactly when Jim died but said he recalled it and could tell he was deceased. He didn't initially provide reasoning as to why the police were not contacted but later told me he was aware of the SSI income that went into Jim's account and said that was definitely a consideration in deciding whether or not to report his death." Suzanne Agnew is scheduled for a court appearance on August 27, while James Agnew is due in court on September 2.

I was told my electric car had a driving range of 800km... I had barely made it out of Brisbane when the real trouble began
I was told my electric car had a driving range of 800km... I had barely made it out of Brisbane when the real trouble began

Daily Mail​

time6 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

I was told my electric car had a driving range of 800km... I had barely made it out of Brisbane when the real trouble began

An Aussie four-wheel driver has slammed hybrid EVs as a 'false economy' after putting a hybrid vehicle to the test in a cross-country road trip. Gold Coast man Shaun Whale was only 100km into a 2,000km drive from Brisbane to the Simpson Desert last month when the BYD Shark hybrid vehicle he tasked with the journey already needed a charge. 'I've apparently got a range of 800km, I'm 100km-ish out of Brisbane, I've got a quarter of a tank of fuel and I'm out of battery,' he said in a video posted to the popular YouTube account, 4WD 24/7. 'So, something's not quite right at the moment.' He interrupted the journey to stop in at a designated charging station, where the first outlet he tried turned out to be out of order. Lacking the cable required to use a separate outlet within the same station, he drove on to a second charging station where the only vacant outlet was again out of order. Only at the third station - after two failed attempts and already hours into the drive - was he able to begin the charging process. While he agreed the vehicles were desirable for those driving short distances in urban areas, Mr Whale concluded the technology was 'not quite there'. 'Overall, what I'm seeing with these vehicles is it's a little bit of a false economy... in the sense that all the great things you want out of a ute are not quite there,' he said. 'My whole point is these PHEVs (plug-in hybrid electric vehicles) might suit people in the inner city with short commutes, but don't cut it if you drive long distances,' he told the Daily Mail. 'They are terrible when it comes to fuel consumption compared to a standard diesel ute if you plan on driving any real distance.' The unreliability of public EV chargers is a major concern among road users, with 13 per cent of registered chargers in Australia being unavailable when reviewed in May. Of Australia's nearly 6,000 registered public charger sites with 15,290 connectors, nine per cent were under repair and four per cent were listed as 'coming soon'. Arcadis national asset management lead Clara Owen, who extracted the data from PlugShare, said the issue stressed the need for better monitoring and maintenance. 'We need predictive maintenance, we need real-time monitoring and networks that perform like critical infrastructure,' Ms Owen told The Drive. 'If I turned up at a petrol station and they said "sorry we're out of petrol," you can imagine the furore. Chargers should be the same.' Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) president Chris Jones has called for financial penalties for operators who fail to maintain their chargers. 'There absolutely needs to be some kind of financial penalty for neglecting service licence agreements,' Mr Jones said. 'The thing that's grinding our gears is the fact that charge point operators are often in receipt of public funds to expand their footprint, but they never seem to prioritise the maintenance of their hardware.' The complaints are widespread on EV user social media pages, with many sharing similar stories of abandoned road trips and emergency tow operations. When Tanya Turner-Jones took her BYD SUV on its first road trip in March, she made sure to plan ahead, mapping out a charging destination along the way. Only upon arriving at the charging station did she find out the charger was out of order, and the second charger required a cable she didn't possess. 'There were no other chargers in this town,' she wrote on the popular Facebook group, EV Owners Australia. 'The distance to our destination was less than the available kms/charge so we pushed on but we didn't get there. 'I pulled over on a side road at about 2 per cent charge and got towed to our destination. I felt so stupid and learned a lot of lessons.' The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) tested five EVs in its Real-World Testing Program and found some models drove up to 111km less on the road than they did in laboratory testing. The 2023 BYD Atto 3 was the worst performer, with a driving range of 369km on a single charge — 23 per cent less than the 480km recorded in its lab testing. The 2024 Tesla Model 3 had a real-world range of 441km, which was 14 per cent less than the 513km it achieved in the lab. The 2022 Kia EV6 and the 2024 Tesla Model Y both had driving ranges eight per cent shorter than their lab tests. The best performer was the 2024 Smart #3, which logged a real-world driving range of 432km, five per cent below its compulsory lab test.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store