Pick up defence stocks for long term; 2 shipping stocks to buy: Neeraj Dewan
ADVERTISEMENT Would you recommend betting afresh into BEL, HAL, or any other defence stock?
Neeraj Dewan: If someone is a long-term investor, even after the run-up, defence is one space where there are going to be budget allocation expenditure, there can be export opportunities, and so they will continue to be strong even in the longer term.
Shorter term, definitely because in the last couple of months the stocks have run up a lot and some consolidation may happen. But for a long-term play even now one can pick up these stocks and stay invested in them for a longer term.
Even if you take a look at some subsectors inside defence, let us talk about some of these shipping companies. A lot of them have seen a runup once again in the last couple of trading sessions. Given the kind of surge that we have seen in a couple of these names like SCI, Garden Reach, Cochin Shipyard, would you still be advising a buy in all of these stocks?
Neeraj Dewan: I am still positive on companies like Garden Reach or Mazagon Dock. SCI can be a move because of the prices going up because of the Iran-Israel clashes, so they may be impacted. Suppose that is settled and there is a truce there, you may get some reaction on the downside from SCI. So, I am not positive on stocks like SCI or even Cochin Shipyard but something like a Mazagon Dock or Garden Reach are good long-term plays.
What is your analysis on Biocon? I do not know how closely you track this one because there has been a lot of easing in terms of regulatory hurdles. Now, there is a sizable fundraising as well. The next big overhang seems to be succession, but until then, everything seems to be working up.
Neeraj Dewan: Actually, there has been a lot of news flow around the succession issue also and whether there can be some stake sale or not. So, there were a lot of speculations in the stock earlier. And now there is this QIP. There will be interest in seeing who is going to invest in the QIP and that will keep the stock positive. But in the medium-term, what happens is that once you get this kind of a supply in the market, the big investors will invest into the stock for the long term and there would not be any huge follow-up demand coming in. So, over the medium-term, the stock may not give that kind of a move, but this kind of inflow into the company for a longer term will do well and the stock should do well. Performance on the numbers front has not been that great lately, and that also needs to improve going ahead. If that improves with this kind of a capital coming in, over the long term, the stock should do well.
ADVERTISEMENT
What is your take on Asian Paints? Reliance has offloaded its entire stake in Asian Paints. Does this change investor perception about the stock now that Reliance has offloaded? Asian Paints has been in the middle of the competition and the price war in paints. Do you believe it is a good time to see any run-up or is it going to be sluggish going ahead?
Neeraj Dewan: Some more consolidation will stay as far as Asian Paints is concerned. There can be some short-term up move because the stock has been down and stayed at these levels for quite some time. So, someone who is a long-term investor and has seen Asian Paints doing well over the years may take this opportunity to add up some to the portfolio because majority of the portfolios are holding on to the Asian Paints stock because over the longer term they made good money there. So, they may like to add some more.
However, I do not see any meaningful upside happening in Asian Paints over the medium-term. So, a short-term move may happen positively but over the medium term, there can still be a sluggish movement and some more consolidation in Asian Paints.
ADVERTISEMENT
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Modi, Macron discuss efforts to end conflict in Ukraine and Gaza
New Delhi French President Emmanuel Macron dialled Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday to discuss ongoing efforts for the peaceful resolution of the war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas conflict in West Asia. French President Emmanuel Macron is among European leaders playing a leading role in efforts to ensure the security of Ukraine amid a push to organise negotiations with Russia to end the war started by the Russian invasion in February 2022. (HT PHOTO) Macron is among European leaders playing a leading role in efforts to ensure the security of Ukraine amid a push to organise negotiations with Russia to end the war started by the Russian invasion in February 2022. Macron also called Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who offered to host Russia-Ukraine peace talks. 'Had a very good conversation with my friend President Macron. Exchanged views on efforts for peaceful resolution of conflicts in Ukraine and in West Asia. Reaffirmed our commitment to further strengthen the India-France strategic partnership,' Modi said on social media. Macron said in a social media post that he and Modi 'coordinated our positions on the war in Ukraine in order to move towards a just and lasting peace, with strong guarantees for Ukraine and Europe's security'. A readout from the Indian government said Macron shared his assessment of recent meetings between the leaders of Europe, the US and Ukraine in Washington, and his perspectives on the situation in Gaza. Modi reiterated India's 'consistent support for peaceful resolution of the conflicts and early restoration of peace and stability', the readout said. The two leaders reviewed bilateral cooperation in trade, defence, civil nuclear cooperation, technology and energy and pledged to strengthen the bilateral strategic partnership. Macron conveyed his support for the early conclusion of a free trade agreement between India and the European Union. Macron added on social media that the two sides agreed to strengthen economic exchanges and the strategic partnership in all areas as this is the 'key to our sovereignty and independence'. 'Following up on the AI Action Summit held in Paris last February, we are working towards the success of the AI Impact Summit to be held in New Delhi in 2026,' he said. The two sides will also work closely to prepare for the French presidency of the G7 and the Indian presidency of Brics in 2026 for more effective multilateralism, he added.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a day ago
- First Post
How Trump's tariff politics threaten America's global standing
America's liberal hegemony is unsustainable today and apparently beyond repair. Donald Trump ensures the end of that order faster than expected. It is too predictable and requires no special expertise to decode. His tariff drama, as a form of soft coercion to bend a trade partner into accepting the US's terms and conditions, is an ill-advised move and ultimately fatal for its interests in the long run. It is political suicide and diplomatic myopia. It exposes the US's weakness and shaky political psychology. The dividends will be negative. Trump is holding onto something that will ensure quick disrepute and erosion of American leadership. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US's liberal hegemony, promoted by liberal democracy, a free-market economy, globalisation, and political and military influence, has declined over the years. Its crisis has created a multiplex world order, competition, and diversification. Trump lives in an ivory tower, indulging in imaginary pomposity, power, and hubris. The US economy is badly affected, and recovery is too remote. It must have domestic prosperity and international heft to wield authority. Trump has exacerbated the matter further by showing off a false sense of superiority. His hubris has exposed his duplicity. The European Union (EU) is not under its control. West Asia has become more fragile after the Iran-Israel war and the Gaza fiasco. Despite the Alaska meet, the Russia-Ukraine war is not likely to end soon. War fatigue is obvious, but hubris keeps the war going. Trump's verbosity about bringing instant peace has failed deplorably. The China-Taiwan conflict boils the waters of the Indo-Pacific. Can Trump manage to address multiple pressure points? This is the time for tactical diplomatic cooperation to ease global problems and strengthen the domestic economy. Paradoxically, transactional Trump prefers conflict to negotiation. Tariffs are weaponized to secure concessions. His tariff model is a conflict model. Partnership is not built through impositions, imperatives, coercion, or bullying. Every country protects its interests. Mutual interest is the foundation of a secure partnership. These are elementary in international relations. To coerce a country through tariff threats, vetoes, sanctions, and social media comments does not make a country a responsible global power. The US has imposed a total of 50 per cent tariff on Indian exports. Reportedly, exemptions are applied to a host of products that the US needs most. These include pharmaceuticals, energy products, electronics, and semiconductors. The reason behind imposing this tariff is to restrict India from buying energy and weapons from Russia. Russia is India's time-tested traditional partner. India has significantly reduced its singular dependencies on Russia by diversifying its export-import partnerships to secure its interests. India's purchase of Russian oil has significantly reduced the global energy crisis and inflation. Trump's failure to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine pushes the policy of economic blockade to force the Kremlin to come to the negotiating table. This policy will engender a severe energy crisis and uncontrollable inflation, and the Global South will bear the brunt. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India is an energy-dependent country. Its infrastructures require energy. Its dense demography will suffer in the event of a hike in energy prices and soaring inflation. It has a political price attached to it. These consequences are not featured in Trump's critical calculation and can be called a miscalculation. Trump's tariff framework has two sides to it: one is economic, and the other is geopolitical. Here, geopolitics is more important than the economic dimension. The geopolitical game through tariffs creates an atmosphere of extreme discomfort. The US cannot impose tariffs, interfere in India's neighbourhood, pass frivolous and unnecessary statements on India's Operation Sindoor in Pakistan to fight terrorism, and still ask for partnership. These contradictions hardly coexist. The US interferes in Bangladesh and Myanmar and irks India with irresponsible and unstatesmanlike statements concerning India's ceasefire with Pakistan. Its preferential treatment of Pakistan, a country that carries out cross-border terrorism in India, does not make the US a friend or a trusted partner. However, despite a chequered history, India has built a significant partnership with the US for over a decade. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India can antagonise neither Russia, a traditional strategic partner, nor China, a neighbour. It has to take a balanced line. It has shown great statesmanship, restraint, and composure despite Trump's provocations through social media. The US needs India to cool the waters of the Indo-Pacific—not through coercion but through cooperation. China is America's archenemy. The latter cannot control the former without a formidable alliance. Therefore, India is a Quad member, delivering its responsibility through strategic cooperation and partnership. The US intends to develop contrary camps: either one is its friend or a rival. This kind of rigid determinism is counterproductive in international relations. The era of binary choices is over in the age of a multipolar world order. Either/or binary thinking is untenable—interests matter. Interest-based cooperation will be more profitable and attractive. The US's moralising on partnership ethics and high-tariff trade architecture does not hold any merit in an increasingly competitive world order. When the US was at the helm of the global order, it never referred to morality while pushing its interests unilaterally. India has mainly been more considerate and has preferred a balanced approach to international relations. It has diversified immensely. It is not entirely dependent on the US's adversaries, Russia and Iran. Its dependencies on them have minimised over the years. It has developed an incredible partnership with the US. But the US wants India to toe its line as and when the former requires and become its puppet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Can the US follow India as and when the latter requires it? On the issue of Pakistan, the US has no trouble switching sides. Why would India do anything counterintuitive? India is an aspirational country and has a bright future. It is gradually diversifying its scope of expression, connection, and cooperation with special attention to the Global South. It follows its own pace and works in the direction that leads it toward a future of progress. Moreover, China will seemingly be the primary beneficiary of Trump's tariff exercise. The US cannot build a firewall against China without trusted partners. India's indispensability is irrefutable because it is a key player in the Indo-Pacific. Tariff pressure may force countries to come closer to China. Though China is an equally coercive power and its debt-trap diplomacy is globally infamous, it has manufacturing strength, supply chain support, critical technology, and rare earth resources to attract partners for collaboration and trade. Therefore, Trump's policy miscalculations and misplaced priorities will eventually empower China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If good sense prevails and he retracts the tariff diplomacy from his policy itinerary, it may ease the tension. The US must get down from the ivory tower and understand the geopolitical and geostrategic complexities. Its self-insulated sense of unquestioned grandeur and brandishing of unending power will become a hamartia ensuring its downfall. Howdy Modi and Namaste Trump in 2019 and 2020, respectively, gave an impression of a bromance. It was cosmetic and short-lived. Trump's transactionalism has ruined everything. Recent incidents of unnecessary meddling in Indian affairs and tariff coercion proved Henry Kissinger's statement: 'It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.' The tariff shock is not Trump's miscalculation—it speaks of his political madness and policy myopia. Dr. Jajati K. Pattnaik teaches at the Centre for West Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Dr. Chandan K. Panda teaches at Rajiv Gandhi University (A Central University), Itanagar. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 days ago
- First Post
US praises Lebanon for backing plan to disarm Hezbollah, envoy to discuss ceasefire with Israel
The US envoy to Lebanon said Washington will negotiate a ceasefire with Israel after Beirut backed a US plan for Hezbollah's disarmament. Hezbollah vowed defiance, raising fears of renewed instability amid Lebanon's ongoing crisis. US Ambassador to Turkey and Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack, speaks during a press conference after his meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun at the presidential palace, in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon. AP The US special envoy to Lebanon said Monday that his team will negotiate a long-term cease-fire with Israel after Beirut approved a US-backed proposal for the Hezbollah militant organisation to disarm. Following a meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Tom Barrack announced that Washington will seek an economic plan for the country's post-war rebuilding, following months of shuttle diplomacy between the two countries. Barrack is also scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Speaker Nabih Berri, who frequently negotiates on behalf of Hezbollah with Washington. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I think the Lebanese government has done their part. They've taken the first step,' said Barrack, who is also the US ambassador to Turkey. 'Now what we need is for Israel to comply with that equal handshake.' Lebanon's decision last week to support a plan to disarm Hezbollah enraged the Iran-backed group and its allies, who believe Israel's military should first withdraw from the five hilltops it has occupied in southern Lebanon since the end of its 14-month war with Hezbollah last November and cease launching almost daily airstrikes in the country. Hezbollah's secretary-general, Naim Kassem, has pledged to defy efforts to disarm the group, raising worries of civil instability in the nation. Barrack told Hezbollah that it would have 'missed an opportunity' if it would not support calls for disarmament. Both Aoun and Salam want to disarm Hezbollah and other non-state armed organisations, and they have asked that Israel cease its attacks and leave from the nation. Aoun said he wants to increase funding for Lebanon's cash-strapped military to bolster its capacity. He also wants to raise money from international donors to help rebuild the country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The World Bank estimates that Hezbollah and Israel's monthslong war in late 2024 cost $11.1 billion in damages and economic losses as larges swaths of southern and eastern Lebanon were battered. The country has also faced a crippling economic crisis since 2019.
