
British men are seen as more polite than women - but only because they say ‘mate'
But the surprising reason for men being better-mannered is largely due to them using words like 'mate' more.
This casual greeting expresses 'solidarity', and makes people feel approved of, according to the linguistic analysis, which makes it polite.
Northerners, however, may have to concede that they are no more polite than people living in the south, based on the findings.
Instead, it is people who live and were born in rural areas who are more polite than those in and from urban areas and cities, researchers found.
Because they encounter fewer people in everyday life, people in rural areas may not have picked up the so-called habit of 'urban incivility', where people are more likely to ignore one another.
The results are based on an analysis of 10.8 million words uttered by almost 700 British-speakers, who agreed to record themselves to capture day-to-day conversations at home, work, and in settings like pubs, cafes and hotels, between 2012 and 2016.
Men were calculated to use more expressions of politeness in conversation than women.
However this result was largely due to the word 'mate', which men used almost six times more often than women.
Males were found to say 'mate' around 700 times in every one million words, while females used 'mate' only 120 times in every one million words on average.
Professor Jonathan Culpeper, a co-author of the study from Lancaster University, said: 'Words like "mate" are very important for being polite to others.
'They suggest solidarity - the feeling that if someone calls you "mate", you have things in common, they sympathise with you, and like you.
'Expressions such as "mate" help to strengthen social relationships.
'So while people might instinctively think women are more polite than men - the tendency to use words like 'mate' is one reason why men create a better impression overall.'
The study set out to look at three types of politeness, including the kind expressing solidarity with others, which includes the words 'mate', 'pal', 'love' and 'pet', and the expressions 'take care' and 'night night'.
The researchers also examined politeness which involves being deferential to others, like saying 'excuse me' or 'sorry', thanking people, or addressing them by their titles such as 'Mr', 'Mrs' or 'Doctor'.
Finally they looked at the type of politeness involving 'tentativeness', which avoids imposing on people or being too direct.
This category includes the word 'please', phrases like 'could you' and 'would you mind', and phrases like 'kind of' and 'perhaps' when giving opinions.
People living in, or born in rural areas, more often used deferential and tentative politeness than those living or born in urban areas, although there was no north-south divide for good manners, as has been suggested in the past.
Lead author Dr Isolde van Dorst, from WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, said: 'People in the countryside and predominantly rural areas tend to be polite in a different way, which we call negative politeness.
'They feel they are being polite by giving people space, and not imposing on them, intruding or taking up their time.
'They are also more likely to address people with their titles, such as Mr or Doctor, and use greetings like "hello" and "goodbye".
'People from rural areas perhaps adopt this verbal politeness because they come into contact with fewer people, so it is simpler to maintain a high usage of politeness expressions.'
The study interestingly found women reduce their politeness level at work, while men do not.
Women use less deferential language in an office or workplace than they do at home and in public.
The authors suggest that men and women are often held to different standards when communicating at work, and women may be judged negatively for using a 'powerless' style if they are too deferential and courteous.
Approximately 94 per cent of the recordings analysed captured conversations between family and friends, around three per cent between colleagues, two per cent between acquaintances and the remaining one per cent between strangers.
There were no significant differences in politeness found between different ages, social classes or differently educated people.
The study is published in the Journal of Pragmatics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Increase in vapes found on Britain's coastline by beach clean volunteers
Volunteer beach cleaners are finding more vapes than ever before as plastic pollution chokes Britain's coastline. The Marine Conservation Society (MCS) on Wednesday launches its annual beach clean, which last year involved more than 15,000 volunteers who completed more than 1,200 litter surveys. The charity is calling for swift and strong action at the UN's global plastics conference in Geneva this week, where countries are deciding on their pollution policies. Some forms of plastic are on the rise, according to MCS litter volunteers. Of those surveyed, 41% mentioned finding more plastic items (including plastic cups, bottle caps/lids, microplastics), including 19% more vapes, 26% more fishing litter (including lines/nets), 11% more dog poo bags and 11% more wet wipes. But there were some positive findings that demonstrated how good policy can make a difference. Volunteers on the beach cleans log every piece of litter they find so that a comprehensive dataset of rubbish on beaches can be built up and trends observed. Their research found that the number plastic bags littered on beaches reduced by 80% between 2015 and 2024, after a charge on carrier bags was introduced. The MCS says this shows that policy changes can quickly make a positive difference to the amount of pollution in the environment. Summer is a bad time for litter on UK beaches. Seventy-four per cent of MCS volunteers said they found an increase in beach litter during the summer, compared with winter months, due to increased visitor numbers plus a gap in public awareness around environmental impacts. Volunteers who take part in the litter pick have asked local authorities and governments in the UK to build better infrastructure including more accessible bins on beaches. Litter pickers said the problem was widespread and harming wildlife. Violet Fraser, who has been cleaning beaches on the Western Isles in Scotland, said she had found birds' nests with plastic in, while Colette Edwards in Norfolk reported regularly finding seals caught in discarded nets on her local beach. Plastic is a particular scourge on beaches as it does not biodegrade, instead breaking down into microplastics that stay in the environment indefinitely, and these are easily ingested by marine animals and can cause illness and even death. A spokesperson for the MCS said: 'The amount of plastic found on beaches increased by 9.5% between 2023 and 2024. The continued presence of plastics on our coastline highlights the need for a circular economy in which consumers have more options and access to use refillable and reusable products. 'Beachwatch data has already been used by governments across the UK as evidence to introduce litter reducing policy – such as the carrier bag charges and bans on certain single-use plastics, such as straws, cutlery, plates and bowls, and the recent UK-wide commitment to ban plastic wet wipes.' Isaac Kenyon, a volunteer, said: 'There's something deeply grounding about standing on a shoreline and knowing that your small actions are part of something much bigger. Every piece of litter picked up is one less hazard for wildlife, one less piece of plastic in the ocean, and one small step toward a healthier planet.' The Great British Beach Clean runs from 19-28 September.


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Study reveals what most people think of as a high amount of sexual partners
Britons think 20 or more sexual partners is a lot a new YouGov survey has revealed. The stats come as part of a wider poll looking at modern society's sexual histories and habits and it has revealed the UK as being a surprisingly chaste nation. The average Briton claims to have only had sex with four people in their lifetime. Researchers at YouGov asked the respondents what they considered to be a 'small and large lifetime numbers of sexual partners'. Sharing the findings on X, they revealed that the majority of people see 20 or more sexual partners as a 'large' amount. Similarly, 15 or more people was seen as large by 41 per cent. People who had slept with 0-4 or 5 people were seen as having a 'small' number by the majority of those polled, and 6 to fourteen sexual partners were seen as having neither a 'small' or 'large' number. The researchers added that, unsurprisingly, people's idea of large or small is skewed by their own sexual history. The study explained: 'Whether Britons regard a number of sexual partners as large or small depends on how many people they themselves have slept with. 'At an overall level, the attitudes of men and women are effectively the same across the range. 'However, the generations do take differing views, with young people being the quickest to start saying that a number of sexual partners is "high". 'This is not necessarily surprising – the older someone is, the more chances to have sexual encounters they have had, and it is probably fair to assume that respondents are basing their answers on the tally of a person about the same age as them.' For instance, 44 per cent of people who have had one sexual partner in their life sees 10 or more partners as a 'large' number, with 27 per cent of people with four sexual partners saying the same. Meanwhile, eight per cent of people who have slept with ten to 14 people, and three per cent of people with 25 or more partners deem ten partners to be a 'large' number. Interestingly, the study found that young men and old women were notably more likely than their counterparts to consider a given number to represent a 'large number' of lifetime sexual partners. In June, a study found that women who have sex at least once a week are the 'happiest' in their relationship. While Bonnie Blue is famous for having sex with 1,000 men in a day, the average Briton has only slept with 4 people in their life So what do Britons consider to be small and large lifetime numbers of sexual partners? 0-4 people - majority see as small 5 people - 48% small / 40%… — YouGov (@YouGov) August 4, 2025 Scientists found 85 per cent of women who had sex once a week described themselves as 'sexually satisfied', according to a study of nearly 500 heterosexual women. In contrast, only 66 per cent of wives and girlfriends who had sex once a month reported the same level of relationship bliss. And the figure fell to 17 per cent among those women who had intercourse less than this. Author of the new study Alexandra Janssen, a researcher at the University Of Manchester, said the findings show the importance of regular intimate relations. She told the Daily Mail: 'While the study shows an association between frequency of sex and sexual relationship satisfaction, this is only a correlation. 'We don't know whether women are happier because they are having more sex, if they are having more sex because they are happier, or if they are happier and having more sex because of other factors-perhaps they don't have kids. 'Also, the fact that women who have less sex are also less satisfied in their relationship isn't particularly surprising.'


Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ministers told to ‘get a grip' on Asian hornets
Ministers have been urged to 'get a grip' on the threat of Asian hornets in Britain as the number of sightings has surged by at least 150 per cent in a year. The population of Asian hornets, also known as yellow-legged hornets, in the UK has soared since they first arrived in 2016. One nest of the apex predators can kill 11 kilograms' worth of insects in a single year, and they pose a particular threat to Britain's bee populations as well as to food production. Experts have warned that this year could be the worst ever for Asian hornets in the UK, and authorities must take advantage of the 'window of opportunity' before they become fully established. The National Bee Unit, part of the Government's Animal & Plant Health Agency, has said that there had been 73 credible sightings in the UK to the end of July. This is up from 28 over the same period last year, an increase of more than 160 per cent. The organisation has also found 28 nests so far this year. One nest can be home to up to 3,000 Asian hornets. Ian Campell, of the British Beekeepers Association, told The Telegraph that this year appeared to be a 'surge year' for yellow-legged hornets, in part because of the weather. 'There is significant worry that this year is going to be ahead of 2023, which is the worst year we've had so far,' he warned. He said that the authorities must act as Britain was 'in a window of opportunity' to eradicate the species before it became fully established. 'The only way we're going to beat this and eradicate it is if every nest gets reported and every nest gets eradicated,' he said. 'They're not getting every nest each year at the moment'. The invasive species is mostly found in Kent and East Sussex. Experts say that they mostly come into the country via trucks and other vehicles. But they are also known to be able to fly across the Channel if backed by strong winds. Each nest can produce over 350 queens, which can go on to start new colonies the following year if they survive the winter. It has emerged that the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has only one staff member on call at any one time to destroy hornet nests, on a rota system. The department said that it can pool additional resources when required. Demands for task force The Liberal Democrats have accused the Government of not taking the issue sufficiently seriously and demanded Defra set up a task force to deal with the problem. Martin Wrigley, the MP for Newton Abbot, said: 'The previous Conservative government was asleep at the wheel in their response to Asian hornets so the government has got to wake up to the risks and get a grip on this invasive species now – especially ahead of August and September, when new females are born. 'We urgently need a fully fleshed task force dedicated to this invasive insect to reduce delays between reporting nests and their destruction. It's time this Government took our biodiversity and the safety of our communities seriously.' The insects were first discovered in Britain in 2016, having crossed over from Europe. It is thought they entered Europe after an Asian hornet queen was accidentally imported from China. Between 2016 and 2022 there were 23 confirmed sightings in the UK, including 13 nests, a number dwarfed by figures in recent years. Mr Campbell said that the surge represented significant risks to biodiversity, domestic food production and public health. He pointed to a case last month where a 67-year-old man in France died after being stung while mowing the lawn and a nest fell from a tree and onto the ground beside him. While a single hornet is unlikely to cause injury if left alone, they can become very aggressive if their nests are disturbed. The insects can also cause significant damage to certain crops, with Mr Campbell warning this could have a knock-on impact on food production. 'In Kent and surrounding counties there is a huge amount of fruit production and vineyards. The hornets will damage the fruit and that will have an impact on those businesses.' Laboratory-confirmed sightings of Asian hornets in 2025 are up to 37 so far, compared to 21 the previous year. The number of individual Asian hornets or nests officially spotted this year is only three fewer than the overall number in 2024. A spokesman for the Animal and Plant Health Agency said: 'Our highly skilled staff work 24/7 to tackle the threat of invasive non-native species, which cost the economy nearly £2bn a year. 'The yellow-legged hornet response, as with other outbreaks, is managed through a roster of trained nest destructors and inspectors that is scaled up as required based on reports and seasonal fluctuations.' They added that it was not 'unexpected to see more reports of sightings' due to increasing public awareness of the insects.