
This tax policy chaos does not bode well
It is all very reminiscent of the panic we saw last year when the prime minister warned that the budget was going to be 'painful' and then in the run-up his government refused to rule out nearly every tax-grabbing suggestion laid before them. Whether it was stripping widows of their council tax discount or taxing landlords who sold up; it was all left out on the table.
Fretting went into overdrive when it emerged that the Treasury had consulted the pensions industry on what might happen if it stripped savers of their full tax-free lump sum. Inevitably, fearful savers rushed to get their hands on their tax-free retirement cash. The policy never saw the light of day and many were left ruing their decision to withdraw their funds.
Publicly brainstorming tax-grab tactics is no way to prepare for a budget: all it does is spook the public into making damaging decisions.
Yet as we approach the next budget, it seems that the administration has learned nothing. And this year, we have a bigger black hole to fill.
• Treasury accused of punishing homeowners with new property tax
The latest idea said to be under consideration is a capital gains tax raid on properties sold for more than £1.5 million. This would be terrible news for an already lifeless property market. Such a tax grab would grind the market to a halt, because no one would want to sell. It would break sale chains and freeze out new buyers. It shouldn't even be up for discussion.
It has also been suggested that Rachel Reeves could come after inheritances, tightening rules around gifts made to family within your lifetime. It's another unnecessary policy that would simply create more paperwork and resentment than it could ever be worth. It would also drive people to change their behaviour and find ways to shield their money from the taxman.
A shake-up of the regressive stamp duty land tax is long overdue and would be welcome in the budget, but any replacement needs to be an improvement.
These policies may seem like handy revenue raisers for a cash-strapped chancellor, but in practice they would cause people to behave differently so the tax take would reduce in response. They would simply not be worth it. Tax raids on the wealthy, businesses and private schools are already starting to backfire, and it is getting clearer by the day that what is needed instead is heavy cuts to spending.
• Stamp duty's got to go — but be careful what you wish for
But it's worrying that these ideas are still being floated when, if anything, the last 12 months should have taught this government that tax and spend policies will bankrupt the nation sooner rather than later.
Tax rises are the antithesis of growth: the less we are taxed the more money is available to slosh around the economy and the more growth we can generate.
We are all obviously responsible for what we decide to do with our money, but none of the policies that have been trailed this week are inspiring the confidence that we so badly need.
• Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts
Perhaps the tax-raising measures eventually announced in the budget will turn out to be nowhere near as bad as feared and we can all breathe a big sigh of relief. However, the government can no longer neglect its responsibility to provide stability and keep the goalposts firmly in place when it comes to our financial planning strategies.
An economy thrives on movement, and tax is the ultimate enemy. Until this government realises that, we are all within our rights to be worried about what might be about to come.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
South Korea's Lee says plans record $25 bln govt spending on research in 2026
SEOUL, Aug 22 (Reuters) - South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said on Friday the government planned to boost research spending by nearly a fifth to a record 35.3 trillion won ($25.23 billion) in 2026 to help drive the development of artificial intelligence technologies. In televised remarks, Lee said South Korea had managed to transform into an industrial powerhouse through investing in the years since Japanese colonial rule ended in 1945. South Korea is "the only country in the world that was liberated from a colony and succeeded in both industrialisation and democratisation, and that was because we invested in the future," Lee said. The decision to increase the budget for research spending by almost 20% reversed spending cuts made under the previous administration of now-ousted Yoon Suk Yeol, government data shows. ($1 = 1,399.2900 won)


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan to raise assumed bond interest rate for 2026/27 budget, Yomiuri reports
TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuters) - Japan's Ministry of Finance is preparing to raise its assumed interest rate for long-term government bonds at 2.6% for fiscal 2026/27 budget requests, marking the highest level in 17 years, the Yomiuri newspaper reported on Friday. The assumed bond interest rate was previously set at 2.1% during the fiscal 2025 budget request phase before being lowered to 2.0% in the final budget. The increase for the next budget was expected to result in higher debt servicing costs, the report also said without citing sources. Separately, the finance ministry plans to allocate around 30 trillion yen ($202 billion) for debt servicing in its fiscal 2026/27 budget request, the Kyodo news agency reported. The figure represents a record high, driven by rising long-term interest rates, the report said. Annual budget requests for the year starting in April 2026 from Japan's government offices are expected to be submitted to the finance ministry by the end of August. ($1 = 148.4900 yen)


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dick Smith's urgent warning to Australia as Anthony Albanese's renewable energy rollout continues
Australian entrepreneur Dick Smith has launched a fierce attack on the government's renewable energy agenda, accusing Energy Minister Chris Bowen of overstating the reliability of wind farms. In a full-page newspaper ad, Mr Smith singled out Bowen, arguing that once the cost of battery storage is included, wind and solar power become prohibitively expensive, pushing electricity prices beyond the reach of most households. Using the proposed offshore wind farm off the Illawarra in New South Wales as an example, he claimed the necessary battery backup would cost $73 billion and last just 1.5 days during a wind drought. 'This would make electricity totally unaffordable,' he said. While stressing he supports renewable energy, Mr Smith argued it will only be viable if paired with large-scale storage, which he insists is currently unaffordable. As evidence, he pointed to the $400 million Big Canberra Battery project, which he said would power the city for only 40 minutes, and Tesla 's Adelaide 'super battery.' 'It cost $90 million and it can run Adelaide City for seven minutes,' he said. 'The problem is storage is going to be incredibly expensive. 'Batteries have been coming down in price, but they need to come down at least 10 times in price to be to allow us to afford the electricity from solar, wind and batteries.' The controversial offshore wind farm will span 93km south of Sydney, covering some of Australia's most picturesque coastline. Energy Minister Chris Bowen has claimed it will generate up to 2.9 gigawatts of reliable renewable power, enough to supply 1.8 million homes. But Mr Smith rejected that claim. 'When there's no wind blowing, it won't provide power for one home,' he said. The project has faced opposition not only from renewable energy critics but also from environmental groups concerned it could disturb seabirds and migratory whales. However, the 2024–25 GenCost report released last month by CSIRO and AEMO concluded that renewables remain the lowest-cost and most practical option for replacing Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations. Mr Smith rejected the idea that clean energy is cheaper. 'In South Australia, where they've now got to 70 per cent on average over the year, in renewables, their electricity is double what we pay in Sydney,' he said. 'In Sydney, it's about 25 cents a kilowatt hour. 'In South Australia, it's 50 cents a kilowatt hour. So just getting to 70 per cent they've doubled the price for consumers. 'For us to go to high levels of renewables is going to be mind-alteringly expensive. 'Poorer people are going to suffer. Small business will close down. It's just too expensive.' Clean Energy Council general manager of advocacy and investment, Anna Freeman, dismissed Mr Smith's claims as 'misleading.' She argued that, compared to nuclear and other emerging technologies, renewable energy remains more affordable,even when storage and transmission costs are included. 'Wind and solar power are now the cheapest forms of new electricity generation in Australia, even when combined with firming technologies such as batteries, pumped hydro and gas peaking plants,' she said. She added that Mr Smith's argument misunderstands how the energy grid functions. 'The suggestion that a single battery should back up an entire offshore wind farm for multiple days is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the electricity system operates. 'The grid draws on a mix of generation sources and storage spread across the network, ensuring reliability while keeping costs down for consumers.'