logo
‘It's something that happens': are we doing enough to save Earth from a devastating asteroid strike?

‘It's something that happens': are we doing enough to save Earth from a devastating asteroid strike?

The Guardian28-06-2025
It is a scenario beloved of Hollywood: a huge asteroid, several miles wide, is on a collision course with Earth. Scientists check and recheck their calculations but there is no mistake – civilisation is facing a cataclysmic end unless the space rock can be deflected.
It may sound like science fiction, but it is a threat that is being taken seriously by scientists.
Earlier this year, researchers estimated that asteroid YR4 2024 had a 3.1% chance of hitting Earth in 2032, before revising that likelihood down to 0.0017%. This week, new data suggested it was more likely to hit the moon, with a probability of 4.3%.
If that happens, the 53- to 67-metre (174ft-220ft) asteroid previously called a 'city killer' will launch hundreds of tonnes of debris towards our planet, posing a risk to satellites, spacecraft and astronauts.
Before that, in April 2029, 99942 Apophis – an asteroid larger than the Eiffel Tower – will be visible to the naked eye when it passes within 32,000km of Earth. This attention-grabbing close encounter has prompted the UN to designate 2029 as the international year of planetary defence.
When it comes to apocalyptic asteroid strikes, there is precedent, of course. Most scientists believe such an event hastened the demise of non-avian dinosaurs 66m years ago.
'This is something that happens,' said Colin Snodgrass, a professor of planetary astronomy at the University of Edinburgh. 'Not very often, but it is something that happens. And it's something that we could potentially do something about.'
As Chris Lintott, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Oxford, told the UK parliament's science, innovation and technology committee this week, the risk posed by an asteroid originating beyond our solar system is minimal. Instead, he said, the greater threat comes from those in our cosmic back yard.
'Most asteroids in the solar system exist in the asteroid belt, which is between Mars and Jupiter, but they become disrupted, usually by encounters with either of those planets, and they can move into orbits that cross the Earth,' said Lintott, who presents the long-running BBC astronomy series The Sky at Night. 'Then it's just a case of whether we're in the wrong place at the wrong time.'
The chances of an enormous asteroid – the type that did for the dinosaurs – hitting Earth is admittedly low. 'We think there's one of these every 10m to 100m years, probably,' Lintott told the Guardian. 'So I think you'd be right to ignore that when you decide whether to get up on a Thursday morning or not.'
Snodgrass said there were 'precisely four' asteroids big enough and close enough to Earth to be considered 'dino-killers', and added: 'We know where they are, and they're not coming anywhere near us.'
But damage can also be done by smaller asteroids. According to Nasa, space rocks measuring about one to 20 metres across collided with Earth's atmosphere resulting in fireballs 556 times over 20 years.
Many collisions have occurred over the oceans, but not all. 'Chelyabinsk is the best example,' Lintott said. In 2013, a house-sized space rock – thought to have been about 20 metres across – exploded in the air above the Russian city with a force of nearly 30 Hiroshima bombs, producing an airburst that caused significant damage and hundreds of injuries, mostly from broken glass.
Less dramatically, in February 2021 a space rock thought to have been just tens of centimetres across broke up in Earth's atmosphere, with fragments landing in the Cotswold town of Winchcombe in the UK. Thankfully, the damage was confined to a splat mark on a driveway.
The types of asteroids we should perhaps be most concerned about are those about 140 metres across. According to Nasa, asteroids around that size are thought to hit Earth about once every 20,000 years and have the potential to cause huge destruction and mass casualties. The space agency has a congressional mandate to detect and track near-Earth objects of this size and larger, and a suite of new technological advances are helping them do just that.
On Monday, the first images from the Vera C Rubin observatory in Chile were released to the public. This telescope is expected to more than triple the number of known near-earth objects, from about 37,000 to 127,000, over a 10-year period. In just 10 hours of observations, it found seven previously unspotted asteroids that will pass close to the Earth – though none are expected to hit.
Also in the offing, though not planned for launch before 2027, is Nasa's near-Earth object (Neo) surveyor. Armed with an array of infrared detectors, this is 'the first space telescope specifically designed to detect asteroids and comets that may be potential hazards to Earth', the agency says.
Lintott said: 'Between those two, we should find everything down to about 140 metres.' He said such observations should give scientists up to 10 years' warning of a potential collision.
The European Space Agency (Esa) is planning a near-Earth object mission in the infrared (Neomir) satellite. Slated for launch in the early 2030s, this will help detect asteroids heading towards Earth that are at least 20 metres in diameter and obscured by the sun.
Assessing the emerging capabilities, Edward Baker, the planetary defence lead at the UK's National Space Operations Centre (NSpOC) at RAF High Wycombe, said: 'I think we're in a good place. I can't see a situation like [the film] Don't Look Up materialising at all – though I wouldn't mind being portrayed by Leonardo DiCaprio.'
As our ability to spot near-Earth asteroids increases, Lintott said, we should get used to hearing about asteroids like YR4 2024, which initially seem more likely to hit Earth before the risk rapidly falls towards zero. He described the shifting probabilities as similar to when a footballer takes a free kick.
'The moment they kick it, [it looks like] it could go anywhere,' he said. 'And then as it moves, you get more information. So you're like: 'Oh, it might go in the goal,' and then it inevitably becomes really clear that it's going to miss.'
Of course, scientists aren't just monitoring the risks to Earth. They are also making plans to protect it. In 2022, Nasa crashed a spacecraft into a small, harmless asteroid called Dimorphos that orbits a larger rock called Didymos to test whether it would be possible to shift its path. The Dart mission was a success, reducing Dimorphos's 12-hour orbit around Didymos by 32 minutes.
In 2024, Esa launched a follow-up to Nasa's Dart mission, called Hera. This will reach Dimorphos in 2026 and carry out a close-up 'crash site investigation'. It will survey the Dart impact crater, probe how effectively momentum was transferred in the collision and record a host of other measurements.
Esa hopes this will provide crucial insights that can be used to make deliberate Dart-style impacts a reliable technique for safeguarding Earth.
'Dart was much more effective than anyone expected it to be,' Lintott said. 'And presumably that's something to do with the structure of the asteroid. I think we need to know whether Dart just got lucky with its target, or whether all near-Earth asteroids are like this.'
For the most part, scientists say the threat of an asteroid strike does not keep them up at night. 'We're safer than we've ever been and we're about to get a lot safer, because the more of these things we find, the more we can spot them on the way in,' Lintott said.
As Esa has quipped on its merchandise: 'Dinosaurs didn't have a space agency.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beam me up, jellyfish: experts unveil spaceships to take us to the stars
Beam me up, jellyfish: experts unveil spaceships to take us to the stars

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Beam me up, jellyfish: experts unveil spaceships to take us to the stars

Spaceships modelled on jellyfish, 3D-printed homes, polyamorous relationships and vegetarian diets are among the ways in which experts have envisaged making interstellar travel feasible. The ideas from scientists, engineers, architects and social theorists came in response to a global competition to develop plans for 'generation ships', self-sustaining crafts capable of supporting up to 1,500 people on a 250-year journey to a habitable planet. Entrants to the Project Hyperion design competition, launched last year, could only incorporate current technologies or those expected to emerge in the near future, such as nuclear fusion, into their proposals. An expert panel, including Nasa scientists, judged the viability of almost 100 submissions, assessing how their habitats, architecture and social structures would allow the crew to not only survive but flourish as a society across multiple generations of space flight. The winner was Chrysalis, a 58km cigar-shaped craft, designed around a series of concentric cylinders, each dedicated to a different function: 3D-printed living quarters; communal spaces, including parks, libraries and galleries; and farms and biomes of different Earth environments, such as tropical forests. As animals would be brought onboard only to maintain biodiversity, a vegetarian diet would be necessary. The design won praise for its detailed plans, particularly how the psychological resilience of the crew would be vetted by living in isolated Antarctic bases. The proposal also explained how family structures would change, with individuals' sense of belonging based more on being part of the starship community. Inhabitants would be allowed to have children but not necessarily with the same partners. The second place design was Hyperion, a spacecraft which resembles the space station from 2001: A Space Odyssey. The twin rings of this design are engineered to generate an Earth-like magnetic field, which would be essential for a successful pregnancy in deep space, without which the mission would be doomed. The proposal also includes designs for loose-fitting clothes with large sealable pockets to prevent items from falling out in low gravity. The mission would include three pairs of turtles, chosen for their longevity, relatively inactive, and resistance to disease. The third place design, Systema Stellare Proximum, is modelled after the shape of a jellyfish and uses a hollowed-out asteroid as a shield against impacts. It envisages a society guided by a non-human collective intelligence and human council, as well as the potential emergence of new religions, such as neopaganism that deifies 'nature and man, in all his forms'. Other notable entires included Endless Beyond the Stars, which includes floating light created from biogas, generated from the bodies of the dead. Dr Andreas Hein, the executive director of the Initiative for Interstellar Studies, which ran the competition, said it was 'part of a larger exercise to explore if humanity can travel to the stars' and how 'a civilisation might live, learn and evolve in a highly resource-constrained environment'. He added: 'We asked participants to integrate architecture, technology and social systems to conceptualise a functional society spanning centuries – and the outcome was beyond expectations.'

People with ME have key genetic differences to other people, study finds
People with ME have key genetic differences to other people, study finds

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

People with ME have key genetic differences to other people, study finds

People diagnosed with ME/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have significant differences in their DNA compared to those without the condition, according to a 'groundbreaking' new study. Scientists said the findings offer the first robust evidence that genes contribute to a person's chance of developing the disease. The DecodeME study, said to be the largest of its kind in the world, uncovered eight areas of genetic code in people with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) that are markedly different to the DNA of people without the condition. Researchers hope the findings will boost 'validity and credibility' for patients, and help rebuff some of the stigma and lack of belief that exists around the condition. There is currently no diagnostic test or cure for ME/CFS, which is believed to affect around 67 million people worldwide, and very little is known about what causes it. A key feature of the condition is a disproportionate worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental activity, which is known as post-exertional malaise (PEM,) while other symptoms include pain, brain fog and extreme energy limitations that do not improve with rest. For the new study, researchers analysed 15,579 DNA samples from the 27,000 people with ME/CFS participating in DecodeME, described as the world's largest data set of people with the disease. The eight regions of DNA where scientists found genetic differences involve genes linked to the immune and nervous systems. At least two of the genetic signals relate to how the body responds to infection, which researchers said aligns with long-standing patient reports that the onset of symptoms often followed an infectious illness. Professor Chris Ponting, DecodeME investigator from the University of Edinburgh, said: 'This is a wake-up call. These extraordinary DNA results speak the language of ME/CFS, often recounting people's ME/CFS symptoms. 'DecodeME's eight genetic signals reveal much about why infection triggers ME/CFS and why pain is a common symptom. 'ME/CFS is a serious illness and we now know that someone's genetics can tip the balance on whether they are diagnosed with it.' As a person's DNA does not change over time, experts say the genetic signals identified would not have developed because of ME/CFS and are therefore likely to reflect the causes of the disease. Populations used in the initial study were limited to those from European ancestries. DecodeME research studying DNA data from all ancestries is ongoing. ME/CFS, thought to affect around 404,000 people in the UK, affects more females than males, although researchers found nothing to explain why this is the case. The DecodeME team is now calling on researchers from around the world to access its 'rich' dataset and help drive forward targeted studies into ME/CFS. Sonya Chowdhury, chief executive of Action for ME and a DecodeME co-investigator, said: 'These results are groundbreaking. 'With DecodeME, we have gone from knowing next to nothing about the causes of ME/CFS, to giving researchers clear targets.' She also hopes the discoveries will help change the way the condition is viewed. Ms Chowdhury said: 'This really adds validity and credibility for people with ME. 'We know that many people have experienced comments like ME is not real, or they've been to doctors and been disbelieved or told that it's not a real illness. 'Whilst things have changed and continue to change, that is still the case for some people and we hear that repeatedly as a charity. 'Being able to take this study into the treatment room and say there are genetic causes that play a part in ME is going to be really significant for individuals. 'It will rebuff that lack of belief and the stigma that exists.' The findings have been reported in a pre-print publication, or unpublished study. During a media briefing about the study, researchers were asked about similarities between the symptoms of long Covid and ME/CFS. Prof Ponting said: 'It's very clear that the symptomology between long Covid and ME is highly similar. 'Not for everyone but there are substantial similarities but as a geneticist the key question for me is are there overlapping genetic factors, and we haven't found that in DECode ME with the methods that we've employed. ' One of the key things that we're doing is enabling others to use their different approaches to ask and answer the same question.' DecodeME is a collaboration between the University of Edinburgh, the charity Action for ME, the Forward ME alliance of charities, and people with ME/CFS. It is funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health and Care Research.

How robot rabbits are tackling invasive pythons
How robot rabbits are tackling invasive pythons

The Independent

time5 hours ago

  • The Independent

How robot rabbits are tackling invasive pythons

Remote-controlled robot rabbits are being deployed in Florida to help tackle the invasive Burmese python problem in the Everglades. These solar-powered robots mimic marsh rabbits, designed to emit a heat signature and smell to lure pythons out of hiding. Equipped with cameras, the robots monitor for pythons and notify officials, allowing snake wranglers to be dispatched for removal and euthanasia. The initiative is a collaboration between scientists from the South Florida Water Management District and the University of Florida. Burmese pythons, introduced to the Everglades in the 1970s through the pet trade, threaten the ecosystem by preying on native wildlife.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store